1.
Effects of dietary composition on energy expenditure during weight-loss maintenance.
Ebbeling, CB, Swain, JF, Feldman, HA, Wong, WW, Hachey, DL, Garcia-Lago, E, Ludwig, DS
JAMA. 2012;307(24):2627-34
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Many diets can produce weight loss over the short term, but most people struggle to maintain this loss over the long term. One explanation is that weight loss results in biological effects, such as a decline in energy expenditure and an increase in hunger, that promote weight regain. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of three different diets on energy expenditure, hormones (including leptin, insulin, cortisol and thyroid hormones) and metabolic indicators following a 10-15% weight loss. The three diets differed widely in macronutrient composition and were: low-fat/high glycaemic load (60% energy from carbohydrates, 20%, 20% protein) LF; low glycaemic index (40%-40%-20%) LGI; and very low carbohydrate/low glycaemic load (10%-60%-30%) VLC. Participants were assigned to one of the three diets for four weeks. Participants on the VLC diet had a resting energy expenditure (REE) of 67kcal/day greater than the LF diet, as well as a total energy expenditure (TEE) of 300kcal/day greater. The physiological basis for these differences is unclear. Although the VLC diet produced the greatest improvements in most metabolic syndrome markers, it also resulted in increased cortisol and inflammation markers. These could be deleterious to health in the long term.
Abstract
CONTEXT Reduced energy expenditure following weight loss is thought to contribute to weight gain. However, the effect of dietary composition on energy expenditure during weight-loss maintenance has not been studied. OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of 3 diets differing widely in macronutrient composition and glycemic load on energy expenditure following weight loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A controlled 3-way crossover design involving 21 overweight and obese young adults conducted at Children's Hospital Boston and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, between June 16, 2006, and June 21, 2010, with recruitment by newspaper advertisements and postings. INTERVENTION After achieving 10% to 15% weight loss while consuming a run-in diet, participants consumed an isocaloric low-fat diet (60% of energy from carbohydrate, 20% from fat, 20% from protein; high glycemic load), low-glycemic index diet (40% from carbohydrate, 40% from fat, and 20% from protein; moderate glycemic load), and very low-carbohydrate diet (10% from carbohydrate, 60% from fat, and 30% from protein; low glycemic load) in random order, each for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was resting energy expenditure (REE), with secondary outcomes of total energy expenditure (TEE), hormone levels, and metabolic syndrome components. RESULTS Compared with the pre-weight-loss baseline, the decrease in REE was greatest with the low-fat diet (mean [95% CI], -205 [-265 to -144] kcal/d), intermediate with the low-glycemic index diet (-166 [-227 to -106] kcal/d), and least with the very low-carbohydrate diet (-138 [-198 to -77] kcal/d; overall P = .03; P for trend by glycemic load = .009). The decrease in TEE showed a similar pattern (mean [95% CI], -423 [-606 to -239] kcal/d; -297 [-479 to -115] kcal/d; and -97 [-281 to 86] kcal/d, respectively; overall P = .003; P for trend by glycemic load < .001). Hormone levels and metabolic syndrome components also varied during weight maintenance by diet (leptin, P < .001; 24-hour urinary cortisol, P = .005; indexes of peripheral [P = .02] and hepatic [P = .03] insulin sensitivity; high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, P < .001; non-HDL cholesterol, P < .001; triglycerides, P < .001; plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, P for trend = .04; and C-reactive protein, P for trend = .05), but no consistent favorable pattern emerged. CONCLUSION Among overweight and obese young adults compared with pre-weight-loss energy expenditure, isocaloric feeding following 10% to 15% weight loss resulted in decreases in REE and TEE that were greatest with the low-fat diet, intermediate with the low-glycemic index diet, and least with the very low-carbohydrate diet. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00315354.
2.
Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance.
Larsen, TM, Dalskov, SM, van Baak, M, Jebb, SA, Papadaki, A, Pfeiffer, AF, Martinez, JA, Handjieva-Darlenska, T, Kunešová, M, Pihlsgård, M, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363(22):2102-13
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The recommended diet composition for best preventing and managing obesity has remained inconclusive. The aim of this trial is to test the efficacy of moderate fat diets that vary in protein content and glycaemic index for preventing weight regain after weight loss. After completing an 8-week low calorie diet, participants were assigned to a low protein and low-glycaemic-index diet, a low-protein and high-glycaemic-index diet, a high-protein and low-glycaemic index diet, a high-protein and high-glycaemic-index diet or a control diet. A total of 548 participants adhered to and completed the 26-week intervention following the 8-week intensive weight loss programme. This study found that participants assigned to the high-protein and low-glycaemic index diet maintained the initial weight loss and had a higher rate of completion compared with the other diets. The authors conclude that this diet composition appears to be ideal for prevention of weight regain in obese patients following successful weight loss.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of weight-control diets that are high in protein or low in glycemic index have reached varied conclusions, probably owing to the fact that the studies had insufficient power. METHODS We enrolled overweight adults from eight European countries who had lost at least 8% of their initial body weight with a 3.3-MJ (800-kcal) low-calorie diet. Participants were randomly assigned, in a two-by-two factorial design, to one of five ad libitum diets to prevent weight regain over a 26-week period: a low-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a low-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, or a control diet. RESULTS A total of 1209 adults were screened (mean age, 41 years; body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 34), of whom 938 entered the low-calorie-diet phase of the study. A total of 773 participants who completed that phase were randomly assigned to one of the five maintenance diets; 548 completed the intervention (71%). Fewer participants in the high-protein and the low-glycemic-index groups than in the low-protein-high-glycemic-index group dropped out of the study (26.4% and 25.6%, respectively, vs. 37.4%; P=0.02 and P=0.01 for the respective comparisons). The mean initial weight loss with the low-calorie diet was 11.0 kg. In the analysis of participants who completed the study, only the low-protein-high-glycemic-index diet was associated with subsequent significant weight regain (1.67 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 2.87). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the weight regain was 0.93 kg less (95% CI, 0.31 to 1.55) in the groups assigned to a high-protein diet than in those assigned to a low-protein diet (P=0.003) and 0.95 kg less (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.57) in the groups assigned to a low-glycemic-index diet than in those assigned to a high-glycemic-index diet (P=0.003). The analysis involving participants who completed the intervention produced similar results. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to diet-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In this large European study, a modest increase in protein content and a modest reduction in the glycemic index led to an improvement in study completion and maintenance of weight loss. (Funded by the European Commission; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00390637.).