-
1.
Effect of a Hop Extract Standardized in 8-Prenylnaringenin on Bone Health and Gut Microbiome in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia: A One-Year Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Lecomte, M, Tomassi, D, Rizzoli, R, Tenon, M, Berton, T, Harney, S, Fança-Berthon, P
Nutrients. 2023;15(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is a bone condition characterized by weakened and brittle bones, leading to an increased risk of fractures. Oestrogens play a vital role in maintaining bone health, whereby oestrogen deficiency elevates the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, particularly in menopausal women due to the decline in oestrogen levels. Phytoestrogens, plant-derived compounds capable of interacting with human oestrogen receptors, have presented an intriguing non-pharmaceutical avenue for preventing bone loss. Other phytoestrogens have received some attention in the field, however, limited human research exists on prenylflavonoids, a phytoestrogens found in hops (Humulus lupulus). This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of a year-long supplementation of standardised hop extract (8-PN) Lifenol® on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Additionally, the study explored potential mechanisms, particularly focusing on changes in gut bacteria. Notably, gut bacteria play a role in bone metabolism and the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. They are also, along with the liver, responsible for converting hops phenols into active phytoestrogenic compounds. The trial was completed by 95 postmenopausal, women with Osteopenia aged 50 to 85. They all received calcium and vitamin D3 tablets in addition either a hop extract (100mcg) or a placebo for 48 weeks. Changes were monitored using DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism, blood samples for markers for bone health, a quality of life questionnaire, gut microbiome testing, and tests for short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels. In conclusion, the intake of hop extract confirmed a previously observed trend of a slight increase in total bone mineral density (BMD), in addition to the benefits linked to calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Although there were no significant changes in the composition of gut bacteria and SCFA levels, the hop extract candidates had a higher abundance of specific genera associated with total body BMD, suggesting a potential positive impact. Larger studies are required to validate these findings.
Abstract
Estrogen deficiency increases the risk of osteoporosis and fracture. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a hop extract standardized in 8-prenylnaringenin (8-PN), a potent phytoestrogen, could improve bone status of osteopenic women and to explore the gut microbiome roles in this effect. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 100 postmenopausal, osteopenic women were supplemented with calcium and vitamin D3 (CaD) tablets and either a hop extract (HE) standardized in 8-PN (n = 50) or a placebo (n = 50) for 48 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism were assessed by DXA measurements and plasma bone biomarkers, respectively. Participant's quality of life (SF-36), gut microbiome composition, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels were also investigated. In addition to the CaD supplements, 48 weeks of HE supplementation increased total body BMD (1.8 ± 0.4% vs. baseline, p < 0.0001; 1.0 ± 0.6% vs. placebo, p = 0.08), with a higher proportion of women experiencing an increase ≥1% compared to placebo (odds ratio: 2.41 ± 1.07, p < 0.05). An increase in the SF-36 physical functioning score was observed with HE versus placebo (p = 0.05). Gut microbiome α-diversity and SCFA levels did not differ between groups. However, a higher abundance of genera Turicibacter and Shigella was observed in the HE group; both genera have been previously identified as associated with total body BMD. These results suggest that an 8-PN standardized hop extract could beneficially impact bone health of postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
-
2.
Consumption of Extruded Sorghum SC319 Improved Gut Microbiota at Genus Level and Reduced Anthropometric Markers in Men with Overweight: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Lúcio, H, Anunciação, P, da Silva, B, da Silva, A, Queiroz, V, de Carvalho, C, Pinheiro-Sant'Ana, H, Martino, H
Nutrients. 2023;15(17)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is frequently associated with the dysregulation of lipid, glucose, and cholesterol metabolism, in addition to increased oxidative stress and the establishment of low-grade chronic inflammation, which are risk factors for developing non-communicable chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the consumption of extruded SC319 whole sorghum or extruded whole wheat associated with an 8-week daily 500 kcal energy restriction diet on the modulation of intestinal health with a focus on gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acid production, faecal pH, and weight loss and inflammation markers. This study was an 8-week, single-blind, controlled, randomised nutritional intervention study conducted in 21 men with overweight. The participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive extruded SC319 whole sorghum or extruded whole wheat. Results showed that consuming SC319 extruded sorghum along with an energy restricted diet achieved greater weight loss and reduced body fat percentage in Brazilian men with overweight compared to the wheat group, with no differences in SCFA synthesis, faecal pH, alpha and beta-diversity, and inflammatory markers. Sorghum consumption promoted alternations in intestinal microbiome composition at the genus level, probably due to the presence of resistant starch and polyphenolic compounds. Authors conclude that sorghum consumption improved weight loss, decreased anthropometric measures, and acted as a prebiotic, thereby changing intestinal microbiome composition.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sorghum is a cereal source of energy, carbohydrates, resistant starch, proanthocyanidins, and 3-deoxyanthocyanins; it promotes satiety by slowing digestion and benefits intestinal health. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the effects of extruded sorghum SC319 consumption on intestinal health, weight loss, and inflammatory markers in men with overweight. METHODS This was a randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Twenty-one men were randomly allocated into one of two groups: the sorghum group (test), which received 40 g of extruded SC319 whole sorghum (n = 10), or the wheat group (control), which received 38 g of extruded whole wheat (n = 11) for eight weeks. RESULTS The sorghum consumption increased the weight loss intragroup, decreased the body fat percentage intergroup, and did not change inflammatory markers, while the wheat group had increased IL-6 levels compared to baseline. Short-chain fatty acid production, fecal pH, and α and β diversity indexes did not differ intra- and intergroup after interventions. However, sorghum consumption decreased genus levels of Clostridium_sensu_stricto 1, Dorea, and Odoribacter and increased CAG-873 and Turicibacter compared to baseline. Further, sorghum showed a tendency (p = 0.07) to decrease the proteobacteria phyla compared to wheat. CONCLUSION Extruded sorghum SC319 improved intestinal microbiota and body composition and promoted weight loss, demonstrating its prebiotic potential.
-
3.
Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial.
Corbin, KD, Carnero, EA, Dirks, B, Igudesman, D, Yi, F, Marcus, A, Davis, TL, Pratley, RE, Rittmann, BE, Krajmalnik-Brown, R, et al
Nature communications. 2023;14(1):3161
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Composition of the human gut microbiome has been shown to be associated with chronic diseases such as obesity, however whether they have a causal effect in disease development or whether microbiota composition is a direct result of the disease is unclear. This randomised control trial of 17 individuals aimed to determine the effects of a diet designed to modulate the gut microbiome (MBD) on human energy balance compared to a typical Western style diet (WD). The MBD diet maximised fibre, resistant starch, and limited processed foods and resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of energy produced by individuals compared to the WD. It was also shown that the MBD increased the microbial composition and decreased nutrient breakdown. It was concluded that the MBD increased the amount of gut bacteria and altered the amount of energy produced by individuals on this diet. This study could be used by healthcare practitioners to understand that composition of the gut microbiome can affect the amount of energy gained from food. Diets high in fibre, starch and low in processed foods, which promote microbial diversity may help individuals to lose weight.
Abstract
The gut microbiome is emerging as a key modulator of human energy balance. Prior studies in humans lacked the environmental and dietary controls and precision required to quantitatively evaluate the contributions of the gut microbiome. Using a Microbiome Enhancer Diet (MBD) designed to deliver more dietary substrates to the colon and therefore modulate the gut microbiome, we quantified microbial and host contributions to human energy balance in a controlled feeding study with a randomized crossover design in young, healthy, weight stable males and females (NCT02939703). In a metabolic ward where the environment was strictly controlled, we measured energy intake, energy expenditure, and energy output (fecal and urinary). The primary endpoint was the within-participant difference in host metabolizable energy between experimental conditions [Control, Western Diet (WD) vs. MBD]. The secondary endpoints were enteroendocrine hormones, hunger/satiety, and food intake. Here we show that, compared to the WD, the MBD leads to an additional 116 ± 56 kcals (P < 0.0001) lost in feces daily and thus, lower metabolizable energy for the host (89.5 ± 0.73%; range 84.2-96.1% on the MBD vs. 95.4 ± 0.21%; range 94.1-97.0% on the WD; P < 0.0001) without changes in energy expenditure, hunger/satiety or food intake (P > 0.05). Microbial 16S rRNA gene copy number (a surrogate of biomass) increases (P < 0.0001), beta-diversity changes (whole genome shotgun sequencing; P = 0.02), and fermentation products increase (P < 0.01) on an MBD as compared to a WD along with significant changes in the host enteroendocrine system (P < 0.0001). The substantial interindividual variability in metabolizable energy on the MBD is explained in part by fecal SCFAs and biomass. Our results reveal the complex host-diet-microbiome interplay that modulates energy balance.
-
4.
Effect of an Immune-Boosting, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Food Supplement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
Reino-Gelardo, S, Palop-Cervera, M, Aparisi-Valero, N, Espinosa-San Miguel, I, Lozano-Rodríguez, N, Llop-Furquet, G, Sanchis-Artero, L, Cortés-Castell, E, Rizo-Baeza, M, Cortés-Rizo, X
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide, reaching pandemic proportions. The symptoms caused by COVID-19 disease are nonspecific and may range from asymptomatic to severe pneumonia and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. This study was a prospective, randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. A total of 162 patients were enrolled at Sagunto Hospital, 42.0% of whom were women. Participants were assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic or control group. Results showed that higher mortality was found in men, older patients and those with severe radiological involvement. Furthermore, administration of the food supplement product Gasteel Plus®, as an adjuvant to the treatment established in the hospital for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated pneumonia, reduced the duration of digestive symptoms and hospital stay in patients with mild–moderate pulmonary involvement. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate the importance of considering the use of the food supplement under review in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2, including severe cases, which showed no side effects.
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 disease is a serious global health problem. Few treatments have been shown to reduce mortality and accelerate time to recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. METHODS A prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a sample of 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 recruited over eight months. All patients received standard treatment, but the intervention group (n = 67) was given one food supplement stick daily during their admission. After collecting the study variables, a statistical analysis was performed comparing the intervention and control groups and a multivariate analysis controlling for variables that could act as confounding factors. RESULTS ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability. Moreover, the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001); patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus®) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in patients with a normal-mild-moderate chest X-ray at admission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04666116).
-
5.
Targeting the gut-lung axis by synbiotic feeding to infants in a randomized controlled trial.
Sjödin, KS, Sjödin, A, Ruszczyński, M, Kristensen, MB, Hernell, O, Szajewska, H, West, CE
BMC biology. 2023;21(1):38
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Infants are at increased risk of infections, and respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Although the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts are separate, they share a mucosal immune system called the “gut-lung axis.” The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of feeding prebiotic infant formula with the same prebiotic infant formula supplemented with probiotic Lactobacillus F19 (synbiotics) until 6 months of age on infant gut microbiota development in the first year of life. This study was a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled study. Infants were randomised to control group - prebiotic formula or experimental group - synbiotic formula. Results showed additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. In fact, synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella [bacteria], enrichment of bifidobacteria, and slight increases in microbial degradation metabolites. Authors concluded that their findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Formula-fed infants are at increased risk of infections. Due to the cross-talk between the mucosal systems of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, adding synbiotics (prebiotics and probiotics) to infant formula may prevent infections even at distant sites. Infants that were born full term and weaned from breast milk were randomized to prebiotic formula (fructo- and galactooligosaccharides) or the same prebiotic formula with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19 (synbiotics) from 1 to 6 months of age. The objective was to examine the synbiotic effects on gut microbiota development. RESULTS Fecal samples collected at ages 1, 4, 6, and 12 months were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a combination of untargeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These analyses revealed that the synbiotic group had a lower abundance of Klebsiella, a higher abundance of Bifidobacterium breve compared to the prebiotic group, and increases in the anti-microbial metabolite d-3-phenyllactic acid. We also analyzed the fecal metagenome and antibiotic resistome in the 11 infants that had been diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infection (cases) and 11 matched controls using deep metagenomic sequencing. Cases with lower respiratory tract infection had a higher abundance of Klebsiella species and antimicrobial resistance genes related to Klebsiella pneumoniae, compared to controls. The results obtained using 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic sequencing were confirmed in silico by successful recovery of the metagenome-assembled genomes of the bacteria of interest. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. Synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella, enrichment of bifidobacteria, and increases in microbial degradation metabolites implicated in immune signaling and in the gut-lung and gut-skin axes. Our findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01625273 . Retrospectively registered on 21 June 2012.
-
6.
Effect of a Probiotic and a Synbiotic on Body Fat Mass, Body Weight and Traits of Metabolic Syndrome in Individuals with Abdominal Overweight: A Human, Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Clinical Study.
Laue, C, Papazova, E, Pannenbeckers, A, Schrezenmeir, J
Nutrients. 2023;15(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Numerous studies have provided evidence that the intestinal microbiota has a key role in the interface between dietary factors and host biology and that overweight, diabetes and liver steatosis, which are known to depend on dietary factors, are associated with alterations in the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a probiotic and synbiotic strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. This study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled design with three parallel arms. A total of 180 female and male overweight individuals aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Results showed that: - the probiotic resulted in significant improvements in the primary parameter, body fat mass; body weight; body mass index; waist circumference; waist-to-height ratio; visceral adipose tissue and in liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography. - the synbiotic resulted in better outcomes in visceral adipose tissue and liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography, and in reduction in constipation. - the count of viable lactobacilli was lower in the synbiotic test product than in the probiotic test product Authors concluded that the probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
Abstract
L. fermentum strains K7-Lb1, K8-Lb1 and K11-Lb3 were found to suppress Th1 and Th2 response and to enhance defensin release by enterocytes, respectively. Based on these anti-inflammatory actions, we investigated the effect of these strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with three parallel arms, 180 individuals with abdominal overweight were administered for 3 months with (1) placebo; (2) probiotic, comprising L. fermentum strains; or (3) synbiotic, comprising the strains + acacia gum (10 g daily). The effects were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks and post hoc tests (Holm-Sidak and Dunn's tests). The alteration (∆) in body fat mass (kg) (primary parameter) during intervention was significantly (p = 0.039) more pronounced in the Probiotic group (-0.61 ± 1.94; mean ± SD) compared with the Placebo group (+0.13 ± 1.64). Accordingly, differences were found in ∆ body weight (p = 0.012), BMI (p = 0.011), waist circumference (p = 0.03), waist-to-height ratio (p = 0.033), visceral adipose tissue (SAD) (p < 0.001) and liver steatosis grade (LSG) (p < 0.001), as assessed using sonography. In the Synbiotic group, ∆SAD (p = 0.002), ∆LSG (p < 0.001) and ∆constipation score (p = 0.009) were improved compared with Placebo. The probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
-
7.
A double-blinded, randomized, parallel intervention to evaluate biomarker-based nutrition plans for weight loss: The PREVENTOMICS study.
Aldubayan, MA, Pigsborg, K, Gormsen, SMO, Serra, F, Palou, M, Galmés, S, Palou-March, A, Favari, C, Wetzels, M, Calleja, A, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(8):1834-1844
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity, and particularly abdominal adiposity, is associated with various metabolic abnormalities. Diet has a vital role in preventing and managing obesity, but evidence from clinical studies demonstrates there is a great interindividual variability in response to the same dietary intervention, which likely indicates that no one diet is superior to another. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the PREVENTOMICS (empowering consumers to PREVENT diet-related diseases through OMICS sciences) platform, incorporated in an e-commerce digital tool, for producing more favourable health outcomes over dietary plans based on general diet recommendations, in subjects with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. This study is a 10-week randomised single-centre, parallel-group, double-blinded intervention study. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by cluster to either the intervention group (personalised plan) or the control group (generic recommendations). Results show that there isn’t any additional benefit of personalising dietary plans, over a generic approach, on the change in fat mass and body weight in individuals with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. Accordingly, personalisation of the diet did not significantly improve health parameters beyond the changes induced by the control diet. Participants in both groups lost approximately 3 kg of body weight. Authors conclude that based on their findings evidence to translate personalised nutrition approaches into clinical practice is insufficient.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Growing evidence suggests that biomarker-guided dietary interventions can optimize response to treatment. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the PREVENTOMCIS platform-which uses metabolomic and genetic information to classify individuals into different 'metabolic clusters' and create personalized dietary plans-for improving health outcomes in subjects with overweight or obesity. METHODS A 10-week parallel, double-blinded, randomized intervention was conducted in 100 adults (82 completers) aged 18-65 years, with body mass index ≥27 but <40 kg/m2, who were allocated into either a personalized diet group (n = 49) or a control diet group (n = 51). About 60% of all food was provided free-of-charge. No specific instruction to restrict energy intake was given. The primary outcome was change in fat mass from baseline, evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Other endpoints included body weight, waist circumference, lipid profile, glucose homeostasis markers, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, physical activity, stress and eating behavior. RESULTS There were significant main effects of time (P < 0.01), but no group main effects, or time-by-group interactions, for the change in fat mass (personalized: -2.1 [95% CI -2.9, -1.4] kg; control: -2.0 [95% CI -2.7, -1.3] kg) and body weight (personalized: -3.1 [95% CI -4.1, -2.1] kg; control: -3.3 [95% CI -4.2, -2.4] kg). The difference between groups in fat mass change was -0.1 kg (95% CI -1.2, 0.9 kg, P = 0.77). Both diets resulted in significant improvements in insulin resistance and lipid profile, but there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION Personalized dietary plans did not result in greater benefits over a generic, but generally healthy diet, in this 10-week clinical trial. Further studies are required to establish the soundness of different precision nutrition approaches, and translate this science into clinically relevant dietary advice to reduce the burden of obesity and its comorbidities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04590989).
-
8.
Oral lactase for infantile colic: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Narang, M, Shah, D
BMC pediatrics. 2022;22(1):468
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Infantile colic – unexplained and inconsolable crying episodes without any identifiable cause in otherwise healthy infants - is a common problem. It has been postulated to be caused due to painful intestinal contractions, lactose intolerance, altered gut microbiota, aerophagy, food hypersensitivity and behavioural factors. Currently, there is no well-established treatment of infantile colic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lactase enzyme supplements in management of infantile colic. The primary objectives were to compare crying or fussing duration and number of colic days, and the secondary objectives were to compare the parent satisfaction and adverse effects in children receiving lactase or placebo. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The enrolled infants (n = 162 children - 99 boys and 63 girls) were randomly assigned to receive five drops (0.2 mL) of the lactase enzyme preparation or placebo. Results show a significant reduction in crying and fussing duration in children receiving lactase drops prior to feeding in comparison to those receiving placebo during the entire 4-week treatment period. Furthermore, results show lesser number of days with colic, and better parental satisfaction in terms of positive change in child’s mood, alertness, activity and oral intake. Additionally, the treatment with lactase was well tolerated by all the infants as no serious adverse event was reported during the treatment. Authors conclude that oral lactase drops may result in significant symptomatic relief in infantile colic in terms of reducing the crying or fussing duration and number of colic days, resulting in better parental satisfaction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infantile colic is a common problem during the first three months of life. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in an urban hospital in Delhi, India evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral lactase in management of infantile colic. METHODS One hundred sixty-two clinically healthy infants aged < 5 months age [mean (SD) = 63.5 (30.5) days] fulfilling the Rome-IV diagnostic criteria for infantile colic were enrolled. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive 5 drops of lactase (600 FCC units/mL) (n = 80) or placebo (n = 82) mixed with breast milk or formula feed four times a day for a duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were duration of crying or fussing (min/d), and number of days with colic lasting > 3 h/d; secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS At the end of four weeks, mean (SD) crying or fussing time (min/d) was significantly shorter in infants receiving lactase in comparison to placebo [89.9 (115.2) vs.178.5 (153.2); P = 0.001]. The mean (SD) number of days with colic was also significantly less in the lactase group as compared to placebo group at the end of the treatment [12.1 (7.8) vs 17.6 (8.4); P < 0.001]. By the end of 4th week, parental satisfaction in terms of infant's mood, activity, alertness, comfort and oral intake was better in intervention group. The adverse event profile was comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Oral lactase treatment in infantile colic results in symptomatic relief in terms of shortening of duration of crying or fussing, and better parental satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2017/12/010930) registered on 20/12/2017.
-
9.
Probiotics-Supplemented Low-Protein Diet for Microbiota Modulation in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (ProLowCKD): Results from a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.
De Mauri, A, Carrera, D, Bagnati, M, Rolla, R, Vidali, M, Chiarinotti, D, Pane, M, Amoruso, A, Del Piano, M
Nutrients. 2022;14(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by the accumulation of a number of metabolites—referred to as uremic toxins—that cannot be excreted by failing kidneys. Dysbiotic microbiota is a feature of patients affected by CKD. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the association of selected probiotics on top of a low protein diet (LPD) are able to reduce the burden of uremic, microbiota-derived, and proatherogenic toxins in patients with advanced renal failure who were not on dialysis. This study was a single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Participants were prescribed LPD in addition to their ongoing pharmacological therapy; after 2 months (T2), they were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive, in addition to the LPD, either probiotics (probiotics group) or a placebo (placebo group). Results showed that a probiotics-supplemented LPD reduced traditional uremic, microbiota-derived and atherogenic uremic toxins, delayed the progression to end stage renal disease, allowed the reduction of loop diuretics and antihypertensive agent use, and improved quality of life. Authors conclude that a probiotics-supplemented LPD represents not only a holistic kidney-friendly approach but allows for ecological and planet-friendly management of renal disease.
Abstract
The probiotics-supplemented low-protein diet in chronic kidney disease (ProLowCKD) was a single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial that was conducted to investigate whether the association between a low protein diet (LPD) and a new formulation of probiotics (Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus reuteri) was effective at reducing traditional uremic, microbiota-derived, and proatherogenic toxins in sixty patients affected by advanced CKD. After 2 months of a LPD-a reduction in blood urea nitrogen (52 ± 17 vs. 46 ± 15 mg/dL, p = 0.003), total cholesterol (185 ± 41 vs. 171 ± 34 mg/dL, p = 0.001), and triglycerides (194 ± 148 vs. 161 ± 70 mg/dL, p = 0.03) was observed; 57 subjects were then randomized to receive probiotics or a placebo for the subsequent 3 months. A total of 27 patients in the placebo group showed increased serum values of total cholesterol (169 ± 36 vs. 185 ± 40 mg/dL, p = 0.01), LDL cholesterol (169 ± 36 vs. 185 ± 40 mg/dL, p = 0.02), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (155.4 ± 39.3 vs. 167.5 ± 51.4 nmol/mL/min, p = 0.006), and indoxyl-sulphate (30.1 ± 17.6 vs. 34.5 ± 20.2 μM, p = 0.026), while the 24 subjects in the probiotics group showed a trend in the reduction of microbiota toxins. A reduction of antihypertensive and diuretic medications was possible in the probiotics group. This study shows that associating probiotics to LPD may have an additional beneficial effect on the control and modulation of microbiota-derived and proatherogenic toxins in CKD patients.
-
10.
Probiotic Mixture Containing Lactobacillus helveticus, Bifidobacterium longum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Affects Brain Responses to an Arithmetic Stress Task in Healthy Subjects: A Randomised Clinical Trial and Proof-of-Concept Study.
Edebol Carlman, HMT, Rode, J, König, J, Repsilber, D, Hutchinson, AN, Thunberg, P, Persson, J, Kiselev, A, Pruessner, JC, Brummer, RJ
Nutrients. 2022;14(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Physiological and psychological stress can affect gut function and its interaction with the brain (gut-brain axis). Different types of stress and different phases of stress regulation can affect the brain in different ways. Manipulation of the gut microbiota using probiotic bacteria has been shown to improve cognition and stress response. However, probiotic interventions are likely to have different effects depending on the strains used. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a probiotic intervention on brain activity and stress response. This study is a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover study with 22 healthy subjects. Subjects were randomised to two study groups receiving the intervention in different orders (probiotics or placebo first). Results demonstrate that the probiotic intervention: - altered activity in specific brain regions known to regulate emotion and stress response. - significantly altered functional connectivity between the upper limbic and medioventral regions. - did not affect the activation of other limbic or subcortical areas. Authors conclude that their findings could further lead to possible clinical implications for improving stress resilience and potential roles in the treatment of affective and gut-brain axis disorders.
Abstract
Probiotics are suggested to impact physiological and psychological stress responses by acting on the gut-brain axis. We investigated if a probiotic product containing Bifidobacterium longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum R1012 affected stress processing in a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover proof-of-concept study (NCT03615651). Twenty-two healthy subjects (24.2 ± 3.4 years, 6 men/16 women) underwent a probiotic and placebo intervention for 4 weeks each, separated by a 4-week washout period. Subjects were examined by functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) as well as an autonomic nervous system function assessment during the Stroop task. Reduced activation in regions of the lateral orbital and ventral cingulate gyri was observed after probiotic intervention compared to placebo. Significantly increased functional connectivity was found between the upper limbic region and medioventral area. Interestingly, probiotic intervention seemed to predominantly affect the initial stress response. Salivary cortisol secretion during the task was not altered. Probiotic intervention did not affect cognitive performance and autonomic nervous system function during Stroop. The probiotic intervention was able to subtly alter brain activity and functional connectivity in regions known to regulate emotion and stress responses. These findings support the potential of probiotics as a non-pharmaceutical treatment modality for stress-related disorders.