1.
Gut microbiome modulates the effects of a personalised postprandial-targeting (PPT) diet on cardiometabolic markers: a diet intervention in pre-diabetes.
Ben-Yacov, O, Godneva, A, Rein, M, Shilo, S, Lotan-Pompan, M, Weinberger, A, Segal, E
Gut. 2023;72(8):1486-1496
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet is a major contributor to cardiometabolic health and plays a fundamental role in the prevention, management and even reversal of many chronic diseases. The gut microbiota has a central role in human health and disease. Specifically, its role in cardiometabolic health has been studied extensively in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interplay between dietary modifications, microbiome composition and cardiometabolic health outcomes. This study was a randomised controlled trial of a 6-month dietary intervention comparing a personalised postprandial-targeting (PPT) diet versus Mediterranean (MED) diet in 200 adults with pre-diabetes. Results showed that: - PPT intervention induced greater changes in multiple dietary features compared with MED intervention. - PPT intervention increased microbiome diversity and richness and exerted specific microbiome species changes that associate with clinical outcomes. - Changes in specific gut microbiome species partially mediated the effects of dietary modifications on clinical outcomes. Authors conclude that the PPT diet prompted greater changes in gut microbiota composition, consistent with overall greater dietary modifications, as compared with the MED intervention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the interplay between dietary modifications, microbiome composition and host metabolic responses in a dietary intervention setting of a personalised postprandial-targeting (PPT) diet versus a Mediterranean (MED) diet in pre-diabetes. DESIGN In a 6-month dietary intervention, adults with pre-diabetes were randomly assigned to follow an MED or PPT diet (based on a machine-learning algorithm for predicting postprandial glucose responses). Data collected at baseline and 6 months from 200 participants who completed the intervention included: dietary data from self-recorded logging using a smartphone application, gut microbiome data from shotgun metagenomics sequencing of faecal samples, and clinical data from continuous glucose monitoring, blood biomarkers and anthropometrics. RESULTS PPT diet induced more prominent changes to the gut microbiome composition, compared with MED diet, consistent with overall greater dietary modifications observed. Particularly, microbiome alpha-diversity increased significantly in PPT (p=0.007) but not in MED arm (p=0.18). Post hoc analysis of changes in multiple dietary features, including food-categories, nutrients and PPT-adherence score across the cohort, demonstrated significant associations between specific dietary changes and species-level changes in microbiome composition. Furthermore, using causal mediation analysis we detect nine microbial species that partially mediate the association between specific dietary changes and clinical outcomes, including three species (from Bacteroidales, Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospirales orders) that mediate the association between PPT-adherence score and clinical outcomes of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides. Finally, using machine-learning models trained on dietary changes and baseline clinical data, we predict personalised metabolic responses to dietary modifications and assess features importance for clinical improvement in cardiometabolic markers of blood lipids, glycaemic control and body weight. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the role of gut microbiome in modulating the effects of dietary modifications on cardiometabolic outcomes, and advance the concept of precision nutrition strategies for reducing comorbidities in pre-diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03222791.
2.
A Plant-Based Meal Increases Gastrointestinal Hormones and Satiety More Than an Energy- and Macronutrient-Matched Processed-Meat Meal in T2D, Obese, and Healthy Men: A Three-Group Randomized Crossover Study.
Klementova, M, Thieme, L, Haluzik, M, Pavlovicova, R, Hill, M, Pelikanova, T, Kahleova, H
Nutrients. 2019;11(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity substantially increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain types of cancer. Lifestyle change, including improved dietary choices, represents a primary prevention tool. The study’s hypothesis is that plant-based meal produces higher levels of gastrointestinal hormones and increased satiety in men with type 2 diabetes or obesity while having a negligible effect on healthy men. The study is randomised crossover study which enrolled 60 men aged between 30 – 65 years: 20 men diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, 20 obese and 20 healthy controls with two interventions (vegan or processed meat meal). Results indicate that greater satiety was reported by all men following the vegan meal. The difference between the meals was noticeable also in healthy volunteers. Authors conclude that plant-based meals with tofu may be an effective tool to increase postprandial (after a meal) secretion of gastrointestinal hormones, as wells as promote satiety, compared to processed meat and cheese in healthy, obese and diabetic men.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal hormones are involved in regulation of glucose metabolism and satiety. We tested the acute effect of meal composition on these hormones in three population groups. A randomized crossover design was used to examine the effects of two energy- and macronutrient-matched meals: a processed-meat and cheese (M-meal) and a vegan meal with tofu (V-meal) on gastrointestinal hormones, and satiety in men with type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 20), obese men (O, n = 20), and healthy men (H, n = 20). Plasma concentrations of glucagon-like peptide -1 (GLP-1), amylin, and peptide YY (PYY) were determined at 0, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min. Visual analogue scale was used to assess satiety. We used repeated-measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for statistical analysis. Postprandial secretion of GLP-1 increased after the V-meal in T2D (by 30.5%; 95%CI 21.2 to 40.7%; p < 0.001) and H (by 15.8%; 95%CI 8.6 to 23.5%; p = 0.01). Postprandial plasma concentrations of amylin increased in in all groups after the V-meal: by 15.7% in T2D (95%CI 11.8 to 19.6%; p < 0.001); by 11.5% in O (95%CI 7.8 to 15.3%; p = 0.03); and by 13.8% in H (95%CI 8.4 to 19.5%; p < 0.001). An increase in postprandial values of PYY after the V-meal was significant only in H (by 18.9%; 95%CI 7.5 to 31.3%; p = 0.03). Satiety was greater in all participants after the V-meal: by 9% in T2D (95%CI 4.4 to 13.6%; p = 0.004); by 18.7% in O (95%CI 12.8 to 24.6%; p < 0.001); and by 25% in H (95%CI 18.2 to 31.7%; p < 0.001). Our results indicate there is an increase in gut hormones and satiety, following consumption of a single plant-based meal with tofu when compared with an energy- and macronutrient-matched processed-meat meat and cheese meal, in healthy, obese and diabetic men.
3.
The Effect of Probiotic Yogurt on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials.
Barengolts, E, Smith, ED, Reutrakul, S, Tonucci, L, Anothaisintawee, T
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The metabolic disorders type 2 diabetes and obesity are highly prevalent worldwide. There are multiple merging treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity, but the management of both conditions remains challenging. The aim of the study was to review the effects of probiotics on glycaemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes or obesity. The study is a meta-analysis of RCTs that utilized probiotic yoghurt as a main intervention in participants with type 2 diabetes or obesity. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, seven of which were conducted in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the rest were conducted in subjects with obesity. Results indicate that probiotic yoghurt provides no significant improvement compared with the control in glycaemic markers. Authors conclude that their study did not demonstrate the benefits of consuming probiotic yoghurt compared with conventional yoghurt for improving glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity.
Abstract
Probiotic yogurt is suggested as a nutritional approach in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of probiotic yogurt on glycemic outcomes in T2D or obesity. The databases used to search for RCTs included Medline and Scopus. The RCTs were eligible if outcomes included selected glycemic markers. In nine eligible trials, 237 and 235 subjects were in treatment (probiotic yogurt) and control (mostly conventional yogurt) groups, respectively. There was no significant difference for pooled unstandardized mean difference (USMD) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by probiotic yogurt compared with the control in T2D (USMD: -0.366; 95% CI: -0.755, 0.024, p = 0.066) and obesity (USMD: 0.116, 95% CI: -0.007, 0.238, p = 0.065). Similarly, there were no effects of probiotic yogurt on fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, or insulin resistance (estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) in either T2D or obesity. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis has not demonstrated the benefits of consuming probiotic compared with conventional yogurt for improving glucose control in patients with diabetes or obesity. Larger trials are needed to verify the benefits of probiotic and/or conventional yogurt or other probiotic fermented milk (e.g., kefir) on glycemic markers in patients with diabetes and obesity.
4.
Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.
Mozaffarian, D
Circulation. 2016;133(2):187-225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet-related cardiometabolic conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, pose a significant health and economic burden across the world. In recent years, scientific advances and research have generated enormous insights, yet there remain many controversies and unanswered questions. This extensive review summarizes recent evidence of key-dietary components and their impact on cardiometabolic health. Amongst the topics covered are dietary patterns, food quality and processing, genetics, personalized nutrition, supplements, functional foods and the existing knowledge on selected food groups such as carbohydrates, meat and fats alongside relevant vitamins, minerals and plant compounds. The author highlights how an oversimplified concept of nutrition from previous decades, has led to an array of conflicting advice and undermined the nuanced and complex impact that diet and nutrition can have on the body. Thus in light of the evidence, food-based interventions and dietary patterns are suggested as favourable, with less focus on dietary components in isolation. Throughout the paper, the need for adjunct support to facilitate sustainable health-promoting behaviour changes is recognized. Calling for additional measures to address behaviour change, health systems reforms, targeting socioeconomic inequalities, employing novel technologies, and adequate policymaking. This overview of recent evidence yields a comprehensive source of information, worthwhile reviewing when designing personalised diet plans in support of cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of poor health. Nutrition and policy science have advanced rapidly, creating confusion yet also providing powerful opportunities to reduce the adverse health and economic impacts of poor diets. This review considers the history, new evidence, controversies, and corresponding lessons for modern dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Major identified themes include the importance of evaluating the full diversity of diet-related risk pathways, not only blood lipids or obesity; focusing on foods and overall diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients; recognizing the complex influences of different foods on long-term weight regulation, rather than simply counting calories; and characterizing and implementing evidence-based strategies, including policy approaches, for lifestyle change. Evidence-informed dietary priorities include increased fruits, nonstarchy vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, vegetable oils, yogurt, and minimally processed whole grains; and fewer red meats, processed (eg, sodium-preserved) meats, and foods rich in refined grains, starch, added sugars, salt, and trans fat. More investigation is needed on the cardiometabolic effects of phenolics, dairy fat, probiotics, fermentation, coffee, tea, cocoa, eggs, specific vegetable and tropical oils, vitamin D, individual fatty acids, and diet-microbiome interactions. Little evidence to date supports the cardiometabolic relevance of other popular priorities: eg, local, organic, grass-fed, farmed/wild, or non-genetically modified. Evidence-based personalized nutrition appears to depend more on nongenetic characteristics (eg, physical activity, abdominal adiposity, gender, socioeconomic status, culture) than genetic factors. Food choices must be strongly supported by clinical behavior change efforts, health systems reforms, novel technologies, and robust policy strategies targeting economic incentives, schools and workplaces, neighborhood environments, and the food system. Scientific advances provide crucial new insights on optimal targets and best practices to reduce the burdens of diet-related cardiometabolic diseases.