-
1.
Efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lou, J, Cui, S, Huang, N, Jin, G, Chen, C, Fan, Y, Zhang, C, Li, J
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2024;59:48-62
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The intestinal microbiota is a complex microbial community that plays an irreplaceable role in human life. Intestinal dysbiosis is very common in patients with critical illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics or synbiotics in preventing ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty-three trials (n=4 retrospective studies and n=29 randomised controlled studies). A total of 7886 patients were grouped into the probiotics or synbiotics group (n= 4065) and control group (n= 3821). Results showed that probiotics or synbiotics significantly reduced the incidence of VAP and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical support, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU morality. Authors concluded that probiotics or synbiotics supplementation plays a beneficial role in critically ill patients and presents a novel approach to the management of critical diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation in critically ill patients. METHODS Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and the Web of Science. The primary output measure was the incident of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the secondary outputs were diarrhea, Clostridium diffusion infection (CDI), incident of sepsis, incident of hospital acquired pneumonia, duration of mechanical exploitation, ICU mortality rate, length of ICU stay, in hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay. Data were pooled and expressed as Relative Risk(RR) and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS 33 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 4065 patients who received probiotics or synbiotics (treatment group) and 3821 patients who received standard care or placebo (control group). The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the treatment group has significantly reduced incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR = 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.67-0.96; p = 0.021, I2 = 52.5 %) and sepsis (RR = 0.97; 95 % CI: 0.66-1.42; p = 0.032, I2 = 54.4 %), As well as significantly increased duration of mechanical exploitation (SMD = -0.47; 95 % CI: -0.74-0.20, p = 0.012, I2 = 63.4 %), ICU mobility (RR = 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.71-1.27; p = 0.004, I2 = 62.8 %), length of ICU stay (SMD = -0.29; 95 % CI: -0.58-0.01; p = 0.000, I2 = 82.3 %) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.33; 95 % CI: -0.57-0.08, p = 0.000, I2 = 74.2 %) than the control group. There were no significant differences in diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis showed that probiotic and synbiotic supplements are beneficial for critically ill patients as they significantly reduce the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical exploitation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality. However, this intervention has minimal impact on diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality in critically ill patients.
-
2.
Effect of probiotics or prebiotics on thyroid function: A meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials.
Shu, Q, Kang, C, Li, J, Hou, Z, Xiong, M, Wang, X, Peng, H
PloS one. 2024;19(1):e0296733
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome is thought to play a role in thyroid disorders, mediated by regulating iodine uptake, degradation and enterohepatic cycling of thyroid hormones, and differences in microbiome composition between patients with thyroid disorders and healthy individuals have been observed. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of pro-, pre- and synbiotics on thyroid function (thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb)) in patients with and without thyroid disorders. 8 randomised controlled trials including 367 participants were included in the review and meta-analysis. Neither pro-, pre- nor synbiotics had a significant effect on TSH, fT4 or fT3 but pre- and probiotics lead to a significant reduction in TRAb in patients with Graves’ disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbiome-directed therapies are increasingly utilized to optimize thyroid function in both healthy individuals and those with thyroid disorders. However, recent doubts have been raised regarding the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in improving thyroid function. This systematic review aimed to investigate the potential relationship between probiotics/prebiotics and thyroid function by analyzing the impact on thyroid hormone levels. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) levels. We searched for articles from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up until April 1st, 2023, without any language restriction. Quantitative data analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval as summary statistics. The methods and results were reported according to the PRISMA2020 statement. RESULTS A total of eight articles were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed no significant alterations in TSH (SMD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.21, 0.20, P = 0.93; I2: 0.00%), fT4 (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.29, 0.21, P = 0.73; I2: 0.00%) or fT3 (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: -0.14, 1.03, P = 0.43; I2: 78.00%), while a significant reduction in TRAb levels was observed (SMD: -0.85, 95% CI: -1.54, -0.15, P = 0.02; I2: 18.00%) following probiotics/prebiotics supplementation. No indication of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics/prebiotics supplementation does not influence thyroid hormone levels, but may modestly reduce TRAb levels in patients with Graves' disease.
-
3.
The synergistic effect of herbal medicine and probiotics in pediatric functional constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim, E, Chang, S, Nam, J, Park, N, Min, SY
Medicine. 2024;103(7):e36899
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Paediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder in children. The initial approach to managing PFC involves demystification, education, toilet training, and the use of laxatives. Using laxatives can lead to various adverse effects therefore, patients with functional constipation typically adopt a self-management approach and explore complementary and alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to analyse the synergistic effect of herbal medicine (HM) combined with probiotics in the treatment of PFC, by comparing it to the use of probiotics alone. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-two randomised controlled trials. Results showed that the combination of HM with probiotics may yield significantly greater benefits for total effective rate when compared to probiotics alone. Furthermore, HM combined with probiotics could potentially reduce the recurrence rate by 70% compared to probiotics alone. Authors concluded that HM could potentially offer advantages in enhancing the efficacy rate and Bristol faecal score, influencing gastrointestinal peptide hormones, decreasing inflammation indicators and lowering the recurrence rate among children with functional constipation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a prevalent and persistent gastrointestinal disorder, that requires various treatments, including alternative approaches. This review assessed the synergistic efficacy of herbal medicine (HM) and probiotics for PFC. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of 11 databases, including English, Chinese, and Korean databases, until June 29, 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the intervention of HM with probiotics to that of the same probiotics. Statistical analyses included calculation of the mean difference (MD), standardized MD, risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and assessment of risk of bias using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system was used to evaluate evidence quality. Potential publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Egger test, the fail-safe N test, and Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method. RESULTS A total of 22 RCTs involving 2228 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The HM and probiotics group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the probiotics alone group in various parameters: total effective rate (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.19-1.29, P < .001), Bristol fecal Score (MD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, P < .001), gastrointestinal peptide hormone (motilin) (MD: 35.37, 95% CI: 24.64-64.10, P < .001), inflammation indicator (nitrous oxide) (MD: -12.45, 95% CI: -15.12 to -9.77, P < .001), minimal sensitive volume of the rectum (MD: -8.7, 95% CI: -10.91 to -6.49, P < .001), and recurrence rate (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21-0.43, P < .001). CONCLUSION The combination of HM and probiotics may exhibit a synergistic effect on PFC. Nevertheless, it is imperative to undertake rigorously planned RCTs to comprehensively evaluate the synergistic efficacy of HM and probiotics.
-
4.
Efficacy of probiotic treatment as post-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19: A double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized trial.
Wischmeyer, PE, Tang, H, Ren, Y, Bohannon, L, Jiang, D, Bergens, M, Ramirez, ZE, Andermann, TM, Messina, JA, Sung, JA, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2024;43(1):259-267
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection, continues to pose a unique and novel challenge to global health. Ongoing research is showing a potentially significant role of the microbiome and dysbiosis in COVID-19 disease severity and development of Long-Covid. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as post-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomised to receive LGG or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that the participants randomised to LGG had fewer symptoms and prolonged time to development of COVID-19 compared to those receiving placebo. Additionally, probiotic supplementation also reduced symptomatic disease, and changed the gut microbiome structure. Authors conclude that their findings lend credence to the notion that symbiotic microbes may be valuable partners in the fight against COVID-19 and potentially other future pandemic diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose unprecedented challenges to worldwide health. While vaccines are effective, additional strategies to mitigate the spread/severity of COVID-19 continue to be needed. Emerging evidence suggests susceptibility to respiratory tract infections in healthy subjects can be reduced by probiotic interventions; thus, probiotics may be a low-risk, low-cost, and easily implementable modality to reduce risk of COVID-19. METHODS In this initial study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States testing probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as postexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in 182 participants who had household exposure to someone with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed within ≤7 days. Participants were randomized to receive oral LGG or placebo for 28 days. The primary outcome was development of illness symptoms within 28 days of COVID-19 exposure. Stool was collected to evaluate microbiome changes. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis showed LGG treatment led to a lower likelihood of developing illness symptoms versus placebo (26.4 % vs. 42.9 %, p = 0.02). Further, LGG was associated with a statistically significant reduction in COVID-19 diagnosis (log rank, p = 0.049) via time-to-event analysis. Overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis did not significantly differ between LGG and placebo groups (8.8 % vs. 15.4 %, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS This data suggests LGG is associated with prolonged time to COVID-19 infection, reduced incidence of illness symptoms, and gut microbiome changes when used as prophylaxis ≤7 days post-COVID-19 exposure, but not overall incidence. This initial work may inform future COVID-19 prevention studies worldwide, particularly in developing nations where Lacticaseibacillus probiotics have previously been utilized to reduce other non-COVID infectious-morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04399252, Date: 22/05/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399252.
-
5.
Synbiotic as an ameliorating factor in the health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Hariri, Z, Yari, Z, Hoseini, S, Abhari, K, Sohrab, G
BMC women's health. 2024;24(1):19
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as a chronic endocrine disorder, can affect many aspects of young women’s lives. Apart from physical complications, women with polycystic ovary syndrome are more likely to suffer from mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study was to examine whether synbiotic supplementation could improve the health quality of life of women with PCOS. This study was a triple-blind, randomised clinical trial which recruited women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Participants were randomly divided into synbiotic or placebo groups for 12 weeks. Results showed that synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional, body hair, weight and infertility domains of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. Authors concluded that 12-week supplementation with synbiotics could noticeably improve the emotional, body hair, weight, infertility and general physical health status of women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are complicated mechanisms that link the disruption of the gut microbiome to the symptoms and complications of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this study, an attempt was made to assess the effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with PCOS . METHODS Fifty-six women with PCOS were enrolled in a triple-blind controlled trial for 12 weeks. They were randomly assigned to receive a daily 2-gram synbiotic sachets (containing Bacillus coagulans (GBI-30), Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus helveticus, and fructooligosaccharide) (n = 28) or placebo (n = 28). To evaluate the impact on the HRQoL, participants were required to fill 26-Item Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PCOSQ-26), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) pre and post the intervention. RESULTS Finally, statistical analyses were performed on 52 participants who finished the trial. Synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional (P = 0.044), body hair (P = 0.016), weight (P = 0.033) and infertility domains (P = 0.027) of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. The physical score within SF-12 also had a significant enhancement (P = 0.035). No significant improvement was seen in the PSS-10 score at the end of the trial. CONCLUSION This study illustrated the advantageous effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life in women with PCOS. Further studies are required to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.irct.ir : IRCT20211108053007N1; date of registration: 14/02/2023.
-
6.
Oral compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life for patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy: A randomized placebo-controlled study.
Wei, H, Yue, Z, Han, J, Chen, P, Xie, K, Sun, Y, Zhu, J
Thoracic cancer. 2024;15(2):182-191
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy occupies an important role in the management of lung cancer; however, there are treatment-associated side effects. These symptoms may deteriorate the quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy, and even necessitate dose reduction or discontinuation. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral compound probiotic supplements can reduce chemotherapy-related adverse effects and improve lung cancer patients' quality of life during chemotherapy. This study was a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study. A total of 100 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy where enrolled for the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intervention (probiotics) vs placebo. Results showed that the participants receiving probiotic supplements were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhoea relative to the placebo group. Authors concluded that compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve platinum-based doublet chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal adverse reactions for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is an important approach for lung cancer patients. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the compound probiotic supplements in improving the quality of life for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients with lung cancer who were scheduled to receive platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. All eligible patients were randomly administered (1:1) compound probiotic supplements (group BP-1) or placebo (group C) for two chemotherapy cycles. The EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire scores were evaluated before the first, second, and third cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in the EROTC QLQ C30 questionnaire score between the two groups after two cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 110 patients were recruited from March 2021 to January 2022. After undergoing two cycles of chemotherapy, group BP-1 were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea relative to group C (76.90 ± 18.31 vs. 58.89 ± 17.17; 93.33 ± 11.58 vs. 85.93 ± 15.06; 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 27.04 ± 29.15; 6.67 ± 13.53 vs. 22.22 ± 18.80; 0.95 ± 5.63 vs. 28.15 ± 22.42; 2.86 ± 9.47 vs. 15.56 ± 16.82; p < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea in group BP-1 was significantly lower than in group C (0% vs. 71.43%, 16.67% vs. 57.14%, 2.38% vs. 63.27%, and 7.14% vs. 42.86%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal side effects for lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800019269).
-
7.
Collinsella aerofaciens as a predictive marker of response to probiotic treatment in non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome.
Gargari, G, Mantegazza, G, Cremon, C, Taverniti, V, Valenza, A, Barbaro, MR, Marasco, G, Duncan, R, Fiore, W, Ferrari, R, et al
Gut microbes. 2024;16(1):2298246
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction in which recurrent abdominal pain is associated with defecation or a change in bowel habits. Various therapeutic options for IBS target the underlying pathophysiological aspects of the condition. Unfortunately, no single approach can effectively address this disorder’s diverse manifestations simultaneously. The aim of this study was to identify markers for recognising non-constipated (NC) IBS patients that may show significant clinical improvements upon treatment with the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DG (LDG). This study is based on a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 63 patients were included in this study who were randomised to receive a probiotic treatment or placebo capsules for 12 weeks. Results showed that the probiotic bacterium LDG can be clinically effective in a subgroup of non-constipated IBS patients characterised by an altered faecal microbiota which resembles that observed in metabolic syndrome-associated pathologic or pre-pathologic conditions. Furthermore, a bacterium reported to contribute to pro-inflammatory immune states, was positively associated with markers of increased endothelial permeability and liver functionality Authors concluded that an analysis of the faecal microbiota focused on particular bacteria could permit the identification of NC-IBS patients who can obtain a significant clinical benefit from the probiotic treatment.
Abstract
Probiotics are exploited for adjuvant treatment in IBS, but reliable guidance for selecting the appropriate probiotic to adopt for different forms of IBS is lacking. We aimed to identify markers for recognizing non-constipated (NC) IBS patients that may show significant clinical improvements upon treatment with the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DG (LDG). To this purpose, we performed a post-hoc analysis of samples collected during a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial in which NC-IBS patients were randomized to receive at least 24 billion CFU LDG or placebo capsules b.i.d. for 12 weeks. The primary clinical endpoint was the composite response based on improved abdominal pain and fecal type. The fecal microbiome and serum markers of intestinal (PV1 and zonulin), liver, and kidney functions were investigated. We found that responders (R) in the probiotic arm (25%) differed from non-responders (NR) based on the abundance of 18 bacterial taxa, including the families Coriobacteriaceae, Dorea spp. and Collinsella aerofaciens, which were overrepresented in R patients. These taxa also distinguished R (but not NR) patients from healthy controls. Probiotic intervention significantly reduced the abundance of these bacteria in R, but not in NR. Analogous results emerged for C. aerofaciens from the analysis of data from a previous trial on IBS with the same probiotic. Finally, C. aerofaciens was positively correlated with the plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 (PV-1) and the markers of liver function. In conclusion, LDG is effective on NC-IBS patients with NC-IBS with a greater abundance of potential pathobionts. Among these, C. aerofaciens has emerged as a potential predictor of probiotic efficacy.
-
8.
Daily skin-to-skin contact alters microbiota development in healthy full-term infants.
Eckermann, HA, Meijer, J, Cooijmans, K, Lahti, L, de Weerth, C
Gut microbes. 2024;16(1):2295403
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome develops in early life and is influenced by several different factors. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC), whereby an infant and mother have bare skin contact, has been shown to be associated with improved brain and heart development, decreased anxiety and stress, and longer breast-feeding duration. In animals, SSC has also been shown to alter the infants gut microbiota, but this has not been investigated in humans. This study of 116 infant-mother pairs aimed to determine the effect of SSC compared to normal care on the infant gut microbiome and the gut-brain connection. The results showed that there was an overall difference in microbiota diversity between SSC and normal care infants in early but not late infancy. The development of the gut microbiota was also affected in early and late infancy. In SSC infants there was a lower abundance of Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium hallii, and Rothia and higher abundance of Flavonifractor, Lacticaseibacillus, Bacteroides and Megasphaera compared to the normal care infants. Some gut-brain communication pathways differed between the two groups including those associated with anxiety and stress. It was concluded that SSC may influence gut microbiota development. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that SSC can alter the infants gut microbiome, however further studies are required to determine the significance of this.
Abstract
The gut microbiota is vital for human body development and function. Its development in early life is influenced by various environmental factors. In this randomized controlled trial, the gut microbiota was obtained as a secondary outcome measure in a study on the effects of one hour of daily skin-to-skin contact (SSC) for five weeks in healthy full-term infants. Specifically, we studied the effects on alpha/beta diversity, volatility, microbiota maturation, and bacterial and gut-brain-axis-related functional abundances in microbiota assessed thrice in the first year. Pregnant Dutch women (n = 116) were randomly assigned to the SSC or care-as-usual groups. The SSC group participants engaged in one hour of daily SSC from birth to five weeks of age. Stool samples were collected at two, five, and 52 weeks and the V4 region was sequenced. We observed significant differences in the microbiota composition, bacterial abundances, and predicted functional pathways between the groups. The SSC group exhibited lower microbiota volatility during early infancy. Microbiota maturation was slower in the SSC group during the first year and our results suggested that breastfeeding duration may have partially mediated this relation. Our findings provide evidence that postpartum SSC may influence microbiota development. Replication is necessary to validate and generalize these results. Future studies should include direct stress measurements and extend microbiota sampling beyond the first year to investigate stress as a mechanism and research SSC's impact on long-term microbiota maturation trajectories.
-
9.
Efficacy and Safety of the Adjuvant Use of Probiotic Bacillus clausii Strains in Pediatric Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Vázquez-Frias, R, Consuelo-Sánchez, A, Acosta-Rodríguez-Bueno, CP, Blanco-Montero, A, Robles, DC, Cohen, V, Márquez, D, Perez, M
Paediatric drugs. 2023;25(1):115-126
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is considered both a health and a socioeconomic burden. Curative treatment for IBS is currently not available and current management strategies vary. Gut microbiota dysbiosis is increasingly considered as a vital factor in the etiopathogenetic of IBS; thus, gut microbiota are a potential therapeutic target. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Bacillus clausii plus conventional treatment, compared with placebo plus conventional treatment, in children with IBS in Mexico. This study is a phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical trial. Patients (n=259) were centrally randomised 1:1 to treatment with either B. clausii or placebo. Results show that IBS symptom relief in children was very high in both groups (B. clausii and placebo). In fact, there weren’t any significant differences between groups for proportion of patients with clinical improvements at Week 8 or any of the key secondary endpoints. Furthermore, the adverse event profile was similar between groups. Authors conclude that their study was not able to demonstrate the efficacy of B. clausii as an adjuvant to conventional treatment of patients with IBS.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) treatments have limited efficacy and probiotics like Bacillus clausii (B. clausii) were found to be effective in the management of several gastrointestinal disorders. This phase III trial assessed the efficacy and safety of adding B. clausii (four strains: O/C, N/R, SIN, T), versus placebo, to conventional treatment of pediatric IBS in Mexico. METHODS Patients aged 6-17 years 11 months with IBS (Rome IV) for at least 2 months were randomized to receive either B. clausii (oral suspension, total dose 4 billion spores/day) or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. All patients also received conventional treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of patients with clinical improvements at Week 8 (Global Assessment Questions [GAQ]). Secondary endpoints included responders by Subject's Global Assessment of Relief for Children with IBS (SGARC); number/consistency of stools; abdominal distention/bloating; abdominal pain/intensity; and IBS behavior. RESULTS 73.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.3-80.0; B. clausii n = 129) and 78.5% (95% CI 72.5-84.4; placebo n = 130) of patients had symptom improvement (p = 0.8182). For Week 8 SGARC, 19.2% (B. clausii) and 20.9% (placebo) reported complete symptom relief. Stool evaluations, bloating, abdominal pain/intensity, and IBS behavior were similar between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION No significant differences in efficacy between B. clausii and placebo were demonstrated in addition to conventional treatment. The sample size calculation was based on an expected placebo/conventional treatment response of 30-40%. However, the actual treatment response observed was 80% and, thus, a study with larger population would be warranted. In addition, this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when such controlled social conditions may have resulted in better diet, greater family stability, less psychological stress, and lower risk of infections exacerbating IBS, thereby improving symptoms in both groups. EUDRACT NUMBER 2018-004519-31.
-
10.
A randomized controlled trial of an oral probiotic to reduce antepartum group B Streptococcus colonization and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Forgie, M, Malloy, E, Singh, M, Scherer, M, Kleber, D, Dixon, J, Hryckowian, AJ, Safdar, N
American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023;5(1):100748
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Streptococcus agalactiae (or group B Streptococcus [GBS]) is an encapsulated, gram-positive, beta-haemolytic anaerobe that asymptomatically colonizes the genitourinary tract. Vertical transmission of GBS during normal vaginal birth can lead to neonatal colonization and risk for early-onset GBS disease. The aim of this study was to present the findings of a phase II, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of an antenatal probiotic intervention to reduce GBS colonization. A secondary aim was to determine if the probiotic intervention reduces gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of pregnancy. Participants (n=107) were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic intervention (n=55) or placebo group (n=54). Results show that: - there weren’t any significant differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, perinatal or neonatal outcomes, or intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis doses. - there wasn’t any significant difference between groups in the presence of the probiotic bacteria on the rectal swabs, whereas the vaginal swabs showed a trend toward greater presence in probiotic group participants. - more probiotic participants took antenatal antibiotics (5/39) compared with controls (1/44). Authors conclude that probiotic bacteria colonisation of the genitourinary tract occurred more in the intervention group than in the control group and significantly reduced GI symptoms of pregnancy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have been suggested as a strategy to reduce antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization. Although probiotics are known to improve gastrointestinal symptoms, this has not been studied during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic to reduce: (1) standard-of-care antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization and colony counts and (2) gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN In a double-blind fashion, 109 healthy adult pregnant people were randomized to Florajen3 probiotic or placebo capsules once daily from 28 weeks' gestation until labor onset. Baseline vaginal and rectal study swabs for group B Streptococcus colony-forming units and microbiome analysis were collected at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Standard-of-care vaginal to rectal group B Streptococcus swabs were collected from all participants at 36 weeks' gestation and determined the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Data collection included solicitation of adverse events, demographic information, Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment score, yogurt ingestion, sexual activity, and vaginal cleaning practices. RESULTS A total of 83 participants completed the study to 36 weeks' gestation with no adverse events. Standard-of-care group B Streptococcus colonization was 20.4% in the control group and 15.4% in probiotic group participants (-5%; P=.73). The relative risk for positive standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.40) times higher in the control group than in the probiotic group (P=.55). There were no differences in median vaginal (P=.16) or rectal (P=.20) group B streptococcus colony-forming units at baseline or at 36 weeks (vaginal P>.999; rectal P=.56). Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment scores were similar at baseline (P=.19), but significantly decreased in probiotic group participants at 36 weeks (P=.02). No covariates significantly altered group B Streptococcus colonization. Significantly more Florajen3 bacteria components were recovered from the vaginal-rectal samples of probiotic group participants (32%; P=.04) compared with controls. CONCLUSION The findings of this study provided insufficient evidence for the clinical application of the Florajen3 probiotic intervention to reduce standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization. The prevalence of group B Streptococcus was lower than expected in the study population, and intervention adherence was poor. Probiotic bacteria colonization of the genitourinary tract occurred more in intervention group participants than in controls and significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy.