-
1.
Alpha-Linolenic and Linoleic Fatty Acids in the Vegan Diet: Do They Require Dietary Reference Intake/Adequate Intake Special Consideration?
Burns-Whitmore, B, Froyen, E, Heskey, C, Parker, T, San Pablo, G
Nutrients. 2019;11(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fish and seafood are good sources of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, like eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). A vegan diet does not include animal-sourced foods and is therefore void of EPA and DHA, unless algae-derived omega-3 supplements are consumed. Thus, vegans rely on the body's own production of long-chain fatty acids from plant-derived alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). However, adequate conversion can have several limitations. Vegan diets are generally rich in linoleic acid (LA), an omega-6 fatty acid, which in high levels can impede the conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA. Furthermore, the efficiency of conversion is influenced by gender, age or health conditions like obesity. This review sought to discuss whether vegans require special dietary recommendations for fatty acids and what these suggestions could be. Most studies assessing biological indicators of fatty acid status showed that vegans had lower levels of EPA and DHA compared to omnivores. Thus, the authors concluded that special consideration should be given to ALA and LA intake in vegan diets. In the absence of a set recommendation for a fatty acid ratio, a ratio of 4:1 (omega-6:omega-3) was proposed for vegans and omnivores. A reduction in LA and an increased intake of ALA of 2.2–4.4 g/day (or 1.1 g/day/1000 Kcals) was suggested to achieve such. This article is a useful guide when considering adequate fatty acid balance and omega-3 conversion for individuals following a vegan diet.
Abstract
Good sources of the long-chain n-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) include cold-water fish and seafood; however, vegan diets (VGNs) do not include animal-origin foods. Typically, US omnivores obtain enough dietary EPA and DHA, but unless VGNs consume algal n-3 supplements, they rely on endogenous production of long-chain fatty acids. VGN diets have several possible concerns: (1) VGNs have high intakes of linoleic acid (LA) as compared to omnivore/non-vegetarian diets. (2) High intakes of LA competitively interfere with the endogenous conversion of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) to EPA and DHA. (3) High somatic levels of LA/low ALA indicate a decreased ALA conversion to EPA and DHA. (4) Some, not all VGNs meet the Dietary Reference Intake Adequate Intake (DRI-AI) for dietary ALA and (5) VGN diets are high in fiber, which possibly interferes with fat absorption. Consequently, health professionals and Registered Dietitians/Registered Dietitian Nutritionists working with VGNs need specific essential fatty acid diet guidelines. The purpose of this review was: (1) to suggest that VGNs have a DRI-AI Special Consideration requirement for ALA and LA based on VGN dietary and biochemical indicators of status and (2) to provide suggestions to ensure that VGNs receive adequate intakes of LA and ALA.
-
2.
Nutrition Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Potential Use of Plant-Based Diets. A Review.
Alwarith, J, Kahleova, H, Rembert, E, Yonas, W, Dort, S, Calcagno, M, Burgess, N, Crosby, L, Barnard, ND
Frontiers in nutrition. 2019;6:141
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by joint pain and inflammation with both genetic and modifiable risk factors. Research suggests a plant-based diet may play a role in management and remission. The aim of this review was to summarize the associations between plant-based diet patterns and RA symptoms. Current studies indicate an association between improvements in RA symptoms with weight loss and with plant-based diets. Based on these findings, the authors conclude excess weight and diets that include animal products may exacerbate symptoms associated with RA, whereas plant-based diets may help reduce pain and inflammation in these patients. The authors suggest further research is needed to test the effectiveness of plant-based diets on patients with RA.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, affects roughly 1% of the world's population. RA pathogenesis remains unclear, but genetic factors account for 50-60% of the risk while the remainder might be linked to modifiable factors, such as infectious diseases, tobacco smoking, gut bacteria, and nutrition. Dietary triggers may play an inciting role in the autoimmune process, and a compromised intestinal barrier may allow food components or microorganisms to enter the blood stream, triggering inflammation. In addition, excessive body weight may affect pharmacotherapy response and the likelihood of disease remission, as well as the risk of disease mortality. Evidence suggests that changes in diet might play an important role in RA management and remission. Several studies have shown improvements in RA symptoms with diets excluding animal products. Studies have also shown that dietary fiber found in these plant-based foods can improve gut bacteria composition and increase bacterial diversity in RA patients, thus reducing their inflammation and joint pain. Although some of the trigger foods in RA patients are individualized, a vegan diet helps improve symptoms by eliminating many of these foods. This review examines the potential role of a plant-based diet in mediating RA symptoms. Further research is needed to test the effectiveness of plant-based diets on joint pain, inflammation, and quality of life in patients with RA.
-
3.
Associations between Dietary Patterns and Bile Acids-Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Vegans and Omnivores.
Trefflich, I, Marschall, HU, Giuseppe, RD, Ståhlman, M, Michalsen, A, Lampen, A, Abraham, K, Weikert, C
Nutrients. 2019;12(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Colorectal cancer is associated with higher intakes of meat and lower consumption of fibre. Fibre may alter cholesterol and bile acid production and high bile acids may cause changes in the cells of the colon. Vegan diets high in fibre and low in fat may affect bile acid production and this observational study of 72 people aimed to compare bile acids in the faeces and blood of vegans and omnivores. The results showed that vegans had higher fibre and lower fat intakes, compared to omnivores, and although bile acids in the faeces were lower in vegans, blood levels were higher. Fat intake was associated with increased bile acids in the faeces whereas fibre intake was associated with lower levels. Coffee, fish, margarine, fried potatoes, bread, and processed meat were all associated with increased bile acids in the faeces and muesli was associated with lower levels. It was concluded that high fibre, low-fat intakes characteristic of vegan diets, are associated with lower bile acids in the faeces and this could impact colorectal cancer incidence. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a vegan diet high in fibre and low in saturated fat to individuals with colorectal cancer or those who are at an increased risk.
Abstract
Bile acids play an active role in fat metabolism and, in high-fat diets, elevated concentrations of fecal bile acids may be related to an increased risk of colorectal cancer. This study investigated concentrations of fecal and serum bile acids in 36 vegans and 36 omnivores. The reduced rank regression was used to identify dietary patterns associated with fecal bile acids. Dietary patterns were derived with secondary and conjugated fecal bile acids as response variables and 53 food groups as predictors. Vegans had higher fiber (p < 0.01) and lower fat (p = 0.0024) intake than omnivores. In serum, primary and glycine-conjugated bile acids were higher in vegans than in omnivores (p ≤ 0.01). All fecal bile acids were significantly lower in vegans compared to omnivores (p < 0.01). Processed meat, fried potatoes, fish, margarine, and coffee contributed most positively, whereas muesli most negatively to a dietary pattern that was directly associated with all fecal bile acids. According to the pattern, fat intake was positively and fiber intake was inversely correlated with bile acids. The findings contribute to the evidence that, in particular, animal products and fat may play a part in higher levels of fecal bile acids.
-
4.
The Effects of Vegetarian and Vegan Diets on Gut Microbiota.
Tomova, A, Bukovsky, I, Rembert, E, Yonas, W, Alwarith, J, Barnard, ND, Kahleova, H
Frontiers in nutrition. 2019;6:47
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The difference in gut microbiota composition between individuals following vegan or vegetarian diets and those following omnivorous diets is well documented. A plant-based diet appears to be beneficial for human health by promoting the development of more diverse and stable microbial systems. This diversity appears to have an important association with BMI, obesity, and arterial compliance. This review highlights the effects of different diets, particularly plant-based diets, on the gut microbiota composition and production of microbial metabolites affecting the host health. The ratio between Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes is discussed and how different diets can change it. It explains how diet can affect the three main enterotypes: Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Ruminococcus. The food components proteins, carbohydrates, fats and polyphenols are discussed and how they influence gut microbiota. Up to date knowledge suggests that a plant-based diet may be an effective way to promote a diverse ecosystem of beneficial microbes that support overall health. However, due to the complexity and inter-individual differences, further research is required to fully characterize the interactions between diet, the microbiome, and health outcomes.
Abstract
The difference in gut microbiota composition between individuals following vegan or vegetarian diets and those following omnivorous diets is well documented. A plant-based diet appears to be beneficial for human health by promoting the development of more diverse and stable microbial systems. Additionally, vegans and vegetarians have significantly higher counts of certain Bacteroidetes-related operational taxonomic units compared to omnivores. Fibers (that is, non-digestible carbohydrates, found exclusively in plants) most consistently increase lactic acid bacteria, such as Ruminococcus, E. rectale, and Roseburia, and reduce Clostridium and Enterococcus species. Polyphenols, also abundant in plant foods, increase Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, which provide anti-pathogenic and anti-inflammatory effects and cardiovascular protection. High fiber intake also encourages the growth of species that ferment fiber into metabolites as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including acetate, propionate, and butyrate. The positive health effects of SCFAs are myriad, including improved immunity against pathogens, blood-brain barrier integrity, provision of energy substrates, and regulation of critical functions of the intestine. In conclusion, the available literature suggests that a vegetarian/vegan diet is effective in promoting a diverse ecosystem of beneficial bacteria to support both human gut microbiome and overall health. This review will focus on effects of different diets and nutrient contents, particularly plant-based diets, on the gut microbiota composition and production of microbial metabolites affecting the host health.
-
5.
Theoretical Food and Nutrient Composition of Whole-Food Plant-Based and Vegan Diets Compared to Current Dietary Recommendations.
Karlsen, MC, Rogers, G, Miki, A, Lichtenstein, AH, Folta, SC, Economos, CD, Jacques, PF, Livingston, KA, McKeown, NM
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Knowledge of plant-based diets is important for clinicians to be able to engage with patients about the health benefits and potential concerns. To date, the nutrient composition and nutrient adequacy of these diets has not been thoroughly assessed. The aim of this study was to estimate theoretical food and nutrient levels of whole-food plant-based (WFPB) and vegan diets and compare these levels to the US dietary recommendations. Self-identified vegan and WFPB diet followers reported their most frequently used books and websites for nutritional information and recipes. Using these sources, 30 days of theoretical meal plans were created, and this data was compared to recommendations from a MyPlate meal plan. This data was analysed to measure adherence to the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This analysis showed the theoretical nutrient intake from a WFPB diet deviate significantly from MyPlate recommendations. The WFPB diet offered improved quality compared to the typical US diet, providing more nutrient-dense foods with less refined grains and added sugars. While WFPB diets are of higher quality in general, they risk deficiencies of vitamins B12 and D and calcium without adequate supplementation. Based on this analysis, the authors encourage patients to consider a plant-based dietary pattern with attention given to consuming calcium-rich foods, iodised salt, and using supplements for vitamins B12 and D. The authors comment that future research should examine the actual dietary intakes of these groups, rather than the theoretical, to assess actual nutrient intake and adherence to diet.
Abstract
Public interest in popular diets is increasing, in particular whole-food plant-based (WFPB) and vegan diets. Whether these diets, as theoretically implemented, meet current food-based and nutrient-based recommendations has not been evaluated in detail. Self-identified WFPB and vegan diet followers in the Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey reported their most frequently used sources of information on nutrition and cooking. Thirty representative days of meal plans were created for each diet. Weighted mean food group and nutrient levels were calculated using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) and data were compared to DRIs and/or USDA Dietary Guidelines/MyPlate meal plan recommendations. The calculated HEI-2015 scores were 88 out of 100 for both WFPB and vegan meal plans. Because of similar nutrient composition, only WFPB results are presented. In comparison to MyPlate, WFPB meal plans provide more total vegetables (180%), green leafy vegetables (238%), legumes (460%), whole fruit (100%), whole grains (132%), and less refined grains (-74%). Fiber level exceeds the adequate intakes (AI) across all age groups. WFPB meal plans failed to meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA)s for vitamin B12 and D without supplementation, as well as the RDA for calcium for women aged 51⁻70. Individuals who adhere to WFBP meal plans would have higher overall dietary quality as defined by the HEI-2015 score as compared to typical US intakes with the exceptions of calcium for older women and vitamins B12 and D without supplementation. Future research should compare actual self-reported dietary intakes to theoretical targets.
-
6.
Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake.
Hall, KD, Ayuketah, A, Brychta, R, Cai, H, Cassimatis, T, Chen, KY, Chung, ST, Costa, E, Courville, A, Darcey, V, et al
Cell metabolism. 2019;30(1):67-77.e3
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diets high in ultra-processed foods have been related to several poor health outcomes and even death, possibly due to properties that make them highly palatable resulting in overeating and obesity. However, to date, there are few studies that demonstrate this relationship. This randomised control trial of 20 individuals aimed to compare the effects of an ultra-processed diet to an unprocessed diet on energy intake. The results showed that the ultra-processed diet resulted in higher energy intakes due to increased carbohydrates and fat, whereas energy intake during the unprocessed diet remained stable and this was not due to differences in pleasantness of familiarity. During the ultra-processed diet participants gained weight, and lost weight during the unprocessed phase, due to increased energy intake. It was concluded that eliminating ultra-processed foods from the diet decreases energy intake resulting in weight loss. Healthcare professionals could use this study to understand the importance of recommending a diet without ultra-processed foods to decrease overeating and improve health.
Abstract
We investigated whether ultra-processed foods affect energy intake in 20 weight-stable adults, aged (mean ± SE) 31.2 ± 1.6 years and BMI = 27 ± 1.5 kg/m2. Subjects were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to receive either ultra-processed or unprocessed diets for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks. Meals were designed to be matched for presented calories, energy density, macronutrients, sugar, sodium, and fiber. Subjects were instructed to consume as much or as little as desired. Energy intake was greater during the ultra-processed diet (508 ± 106 kcal/day; p = 0.0001), with increased consumption of carbohydrate (280 ± 54 kcal/day; p < 0.0001) and fat (230 ± 53 kcal/day; p = 0.0004), but not protein (-2 ± 12 kcal/day; p = 0.85). Weight changes were highly correlated with energy intake (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001), with participants gaining 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.009) during the ultra-processed diet and losing 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.007) during the unprocessed diet. Limiting consumption of ultra-processed foods may be an effective strategy for obesity prevention and treatment.
-
7.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Food Additives: To Add Fuel on the Flames!
Marion-Letellier, R, Amamou, A, Savoye, G, Ghosh, S
Nutrients. 2019;11(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs), such as Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are becoming increasingly common. Diet is thought to play a role in the development of IBDs. The consumption of Ultra Processed Food (UPF) is increasing and has been associated with a higher risk of some chronic diseases. Food additives may be an aspect of UPF responsible for its harmful effects. This literature review examined the role of food additives in the development and severity of IBDs. The authors discuss how common food additives such as salt, emulsifiers, stabilisers, bulking agents, sweeteners, and food colouring may promote inflammation and disrupt gut bacteria. Metals and compounds found in food packaging such as aluminium and bisphenol A (BPA) may trigger intestinal permeability and increase inflammatory markers. Much of the evidence available is based on clinical trials on animals, whilst epidemiological studies on food additives and IBD risk are still limited. The authors concluded that the majority of food consumed by IBD patients should be home-cooked in order to reduce exposure to additives in the diet.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) develop in genetically predisposed individuals in response to environmental factors. IBDs are concomitant conditions of industrialized societies, and diet is a potential culprit. Consumption of ultra-processed food has increased over the last decade in industrialized countries, and epidemiological studies have found associations between ultra-processed food consumption and chronic diseases. Further studies are now required to identify the potential culprit in ultra-processed food, such as a poor nutritional composition or the presence of food additives. In our review, we will focus on food additives, i.e., substances from packaging in contact with food, and compounds formed during production, processing, and storage. A literature search using PubMed from inception to January 2019 was performed to identify relevant studies on diet and/or food additive and their role in IBDs. Manuscripts published in English from basic science, epidemiological studies, or clinical trials were selected and reviewed. We found numerous experimental studies highlighting the key role of food additives in IBD exacerbation but epidemiological studies on food additives on IBD risk are still limited. As diet is a modifiable environmental risk factor, this may offer a scientific rationale for providing dietary advice for IBD patients.
-
8.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
9.
The Gut Microbiome and Mental Health: What Should We Tell Our Patients?: Le microbiote Intestinal et la Santé Mentale : que Devrions-Nous dire à nos Patients?
Butler, MI, Mörkl, S, Sandhu, KV, Cryan, JF, Dinan, TG
Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2019;64(11):747-760
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut-brain axis is the bi-directional communication pathway and increasing evidence indicates its impact in neural health and disease. With the field of nutritional psychiatry actively developing, psychiatric patients have become increasingly aware of the therapeutic use of probiotics and mental health. This review aims to inform psychiatrists about the communication between the microbiome and brain and discuss its relevance to the management and treatment of psychiatric illness. In reviewing the common psychiatric illnesses, the current literature shows inconsistent results on specific microbiome compositions related to specific illnesses, yet shows promising effects for probiotic use in many disorders. These findings offer a novel paradigm for approaching mental illness through the lens of nutritional psychiatry. Authors conclude there is much work to be done translating laboratory findings into clinical practice, and highlight the necessity for clinicians to stay informed of the literature and make accurate recommendations to patients.
Abstract
The gut microbiome as a potential therapeutic target for mental illness is a hot topic in psychiatry. Trillions of bacteria reside in the human gut and have been shown to play a crucial role in gut-brain communication through an influence on neural, immune, and endocrine pathways. Patients with various psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorder have been shown to have significant differences in the composition of their gut microbiome. Enhancing beneficial bacteria in the gut, for example, through the use of probiotics, prebiotics, or dietary change, has the potential to improve mood and reduce anxiety in both healthy people and patient groups. Much attention is being given to this subject in the general media, and patients are becoming increasingly interested in the potential to treat mental illness with microbiome-based therapies. It is imperative that those working with people with mental illness are aware of the rationale and current evidence base for such treatment strategies. In this review, we provide an overview of the gut microbiome, what it is, and what it does in relation to gut-brain communication and psychological function. We describe the fundamental principles and basic techniques used in microbiome-gut-brain axis research in an accessible way for a clinician audience. We summarize the current evidence in relation to microbiome-based strategies for various psychiatric disorders and provide some practical advice that can be given to patients seeking to try a probiotic for mental health benefit.
-
10.
Systematic Review of Gut Microbiota and Major Depression.
Cheung, SG, Goldenthal, AR, Uhlemann, AC, Mann, JJ, Miller, JM, Sublette, ME
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019;10:34
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A growing body of research points to a possible association between the gut microbiome and major depressive disorder (MDD). The gut microbiome is a collection of trillions of microorganisms, including different taxonomic groups of bacteria. The aim of this review is to assess the literature to identify the relationship between the gut microbiome composition and MDD and to highlight potential metabolic mechanisms contributing to the development of MDD. Six eligible studies demonstrated significant differences in gut microbiome composition between MDD and control groups. While the composition differed between the two groups, there was no consensus on which specific bacteria taxa are most relevant to MDD. Based on these results, the authors conclude the data is very limited and the impact of microbiome differences related to depression is currently unclear. They propose future studies should look beyond taxonomic classification and investigate microbial functioning to provide a larger-scale understanding of how the gut microbiome contributes to the development of MDD.
Abstract
Background: Recently discovered relationships between the gastrointestinal microbiome and the brain have implications for psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Bacterial transplantation from MDD patients to rodents produces depression-like behaviors. In humans, case-control studies have examined the gut microbiome in healthy and affected individuals. We systematically reviewed existing studies comparing gut microbial composition in MDD and healthy volunteers. Methods: A PubMed literature search combined the terms "depression," "depressive disorder," "stool," "fecal," "gut," and "microbiome" to identify human case-control studies that investigated relationships between MDD and microbiota quantified from stool. We evaluated the resulting studies, focusing on bacterial taxa that were different between MDD and healthy controls. Results: Six eligible studies were found in which 50 taxa exhibited differences (p < 0.05) between patients with MDD and controls. Patient characteristics and methodologies varied widely between studies. Five phyla-Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Protobacteria-were represented; however, divergent results occurred across studies for all phyla. The largest number of differentiating taxa were within phylum Firmicutes, in which nine families and 12 genera differentiated the diagnostic groups. The majority of these families and genera were found to be statistically different between the two groups in two identified studies. Family Lachnospiraceae differentiated the diagnostic groups in four studies (with an even split in directionality). Across all five phyla, nine genera were higher in MDD (Anaerostipes, Blautia, Clostridium, Klebsiella, Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis, Parabacteroides, Parasutterella, Phascolarctobacterium, and Streptococcus), six were lower (Bifidobacterium, Dialister, Escherichia/Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Ruminococcus), and six were divergent (Alistipes, Bacteroides, Megamonas, Oscillibacter, Prevotella, and Roseburia). We highlight mechanisms and products of bacterial metabolism as they may relate to the etiology of depression. Conclusions: No consensus has emerged from existing human studies of depression and gut microbiome concerning which bacterial taxa are most relevant to depression. This may in part be due to differences in study design. Given that bacterial functions are conserved across taxonomic groups, we propose that studying microbial functioning may be more productive than a purely taxonomic approach to understanding the gut microbiome in depression.