-
1.
Viruses belonging to Anelloviridae or Circoviridae as a possible cause of chronic fatigue.
Grinde, B
Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):485
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is often triggered by a virus. This review argues that viruses already present in the body may be the cause of this condition and identifies two groups of viruses the anello and circoviruses as potential causes. The paper explains that both viruses are already present in many individuals, and only become a problem when the immune system is supressed by a secondary infection. When this happens the anello and circoviruses can penetrate the brain resulting in CFS. Therapies that inhibit these viruses are required and recently certain antimalarials have reported to be potential candidates. Further research is required. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to extend research into the role of viruses that are already present within the body on CFS.
Abstract
Chronic fatigue often starts with an acute viral infection-as witnessed in the case of SARS-CoV-2-but indirect consequences of these infections are presumably the actual cause of the condition. As recently reviewed in this journal, the culprit could be a virus already present in the patient. The review covers several types of viruses, but concludes that the question is still open. The focus is on well known, pathogenic viruses for which there are ample diagnostic tools. I argue that there is one lesser-known group of viruses, the related anello- and circoviruses, which ought to be investigated. More or less everyone harbours at least one strain of these viruses in the blood, while not in the spinal fluid. They normally replicate at a low level, but their activity increases in an immune suppressed host; and there are cases where they do reach the brain. The initial infection could facilitate their access to the brain.
-
2.
Nutritional Interventions in the Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome.
Pagliai, G, Giangrandi, I, Dinu, M, Sofi, F, Colombini, B
Nutrients. 2020;12(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain condition, often presenting with widespread body pain, joint stiffness, sleep disorders, depression, anxiety, gastrointestinal and cognitive complaints. Despite being common, the cause of FM is not well understood. In the absence of effective treatments, the current management of FM involves a multidisciplinary approach utilizing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Growing evidence suggests a role for nutrition as a complementary strategy for FM management. This brief review summarises the possible impact of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on FM. Previous reviews concluded that vitamin and mineral deficiencies themselves are unlikely to be significant in the development of FM. Yet, a few interventional studies investigating the use of Vitamin D, magnesium, iron and probiotics showed promising results. To date, there is no or limited evidence for the use of Vitamin C, E, selected amino acids, botanical or antioxidant supplements. Food-wise the inclusion of quality olive oil and the grain Khorasan proved helpful on FM presentation, whilst findings around the role of dietary monosodium glutamate and aspartame seem mixed. Regarding diet patterns, gluten-free, low-calorie, vegetarian, vegan, raw food or Mediterranean diets were all associated with improvement of symptoms. Equally a FODMAP diet can aid FM associated digestive complaints due to the significant overlap of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with FM. The authors concluded that the clinical application of dietary supplements in the management of FM remains controversial. Yet, dietary interventions appear to be an effective tool in the management of FM. Since various diet interventions demonstrated benefits, dietary adequacy and weight loss may be most critical from a clinical perspective.
Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a multifactorial syndrome of unknown etiology, characterized by widespread chronic pain and various somatic and psychological manifestations. The management of FM requires a multidisciplinary approach combining both pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies. Among nonpharmacological strategies, growing evidence suggests a potential beneficial role for nutrition. This review summarizes the possible relationship between FM and nutrition, exploring the available evidence on the effect of dietary supplements and dietary interventions in these patients. Analysis of the literature has shown that the role of dietary supplements remains controversial, although clinical trials with vitamin D, magnesium, iron and probiotics' supplementation show promising results. With regard to dietary interventions, the administration of olive oil, the replacement diet with ancient grains, low-calorie diets, the low FODMAPs diet, the gluten-free diet, the monosodium glutamate and aspartame-free diet, vegetarian diets as well as the Mediterranean diet all appear to be effective in reducing the FM symptoms. These results may suggest that weight loss, together with the psychosomatic component of the disease, should be taken into account. Therefore, although dietary aspects appear to be a promising complementary approach to the treatment of FM, further research is needed to provide the most effective strategies for the management of FM.
-
3.
Food is medicine: actions to integrate food and nutrition into healthcare.
Downer, S, Berkowitz, SA, Harlan, TS, Olstad, DL, Mozaffarian, D
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;369:m2482
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Evidence-based nutrition interventions in the healthcare system is an emerging initiative known as “food is medicine,” where nutrition is integrated as a formal part of patient care. Recent research shows these interventions may be associated with improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence around efforts to incorporate food is medicine interventions in healthcare systems. The thirty-two studies analyzed varied widely in design, implementation and intensity. Benefits included increased access to recommended food, better disease management and fewer admissions to hospital; while challenges included the need for rigorous future research, improved nutrition-based training for clinicians and increased financial support for interventions. The authors conclude in order to integrate food is medicine interventions in healthcare systems, each of these areas must be tackled to achieve a patient care model in which nutrition is at the center of disease prevention and treatment. Food is medicine interventions hold significant promise for meeting both immediate nutrition needs and long-term reform goals in the healthcare and food system.
-
4.
The Role of Diet, Eating Behavior, and Nutrition Intervention in Seasonal Affective Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Yang, Y, Zhang, S, Zhang, X, Xu, Y, Cheng, J, Yang, X
Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:1451
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a mood disorder characterised by annual depression or bipolar disorder in a seasonal pattern. Recent evidence suggests dietary intervention and nutrition status can affect the symptoms in depressed patients, but none have specifically considered depression among SAD patients. The aim of this review was to assess the associations between diet, eating behaviour and nutrition intervention in SAD patients. Eleven studies were included and found vegetarian diet patterns and alcoholism to be associated with higher SAD prevalence. Additionally, SAD patients tend to consume larger dinners, more snacks, and show more cravings for starch-rich foods. Despite these patterns, dietary supplementation or nutrition intervention did not show benefit for SAD symptoms. Overall, the authors conclude there is a lack of evidence to draw conclusions on dietary pattern and nutritional interventions for preventing and managing SAD. The authors suggest further evidence is needed from larger controlled trials and encourage investigation of the role of the B vitamin group, rather than an isolated B12 supplementation.
Abstract
Background: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a biological and mood disorder with a seasonal pattern. Dietary intervention and nutritional status have been reported to affect SAD severity. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence of associations between SAD and diet, eating behavior, and nutrition intervention. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception up to July 1, 2019. Studies that examined diet and eating behaviors in SAD patients and tests of nutrition interventions for SAD were included. Two independent investigators extracted data based on study designs, participants, outcomes, exposures, and association measures. Results: Eleven studies were included: six studies examined distinctive dietary patterns and eating behaviors in SAD patients and five studies explored the efficacy of nutrition interventions for SAD. Vegetarianism and alcoholism were associated with higher SAD prevalence, but normal alcohol intake was not correlated with SAD severity. Compared with non-clinical subjects, SAD patients tended to consume significantly larger dinners and more evening snacks during weekdays and weekends and exhibit a higher frequency of binge eating, external eating, and emotional eating. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, SAD patients presented more cravings for starch-rich food and food with high fiber. However, neither the ingestion of carbohydrate-loaded meals nor Vitamin D/B12 supplementation showed benefit for SAD. Conclusion: Studies suggest that SAD patients may exhibit distinctive diet preferences and eating behaviors, but no current nutrition intervention has demonstrated efficacy for ameliorating SAD symptoms. Further evidence is needed from randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer durations.
-
5.
Effects of 4 weeks of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v supplementation on nutritional status, enteral nutrition tolerance, and quality of life in cancer patients receiving home enteral nutrition - a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial.
Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, K, Folwarski, M, Ruszkowski, J, Skonieczna-Żydecka, K, Szafrański, W, Makarewicz, W
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2020;24(18):9684-9694
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Enteral nutrition (tube feeding) in cancer patients is associated with inadequate nutritional status and gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and flatulence which can have a negative effect on quality of life (QOL). Several factors are thought to mediate these symptoms, one of which is an inadequate composition of the gut microbiome. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 25 cancer patients was to determine the effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v DSM 9843 (Lp299v), 20 billion organisms per day for 4 weeks, on nutritional status, gastrointestinal tolerance and QOL. After 4 weeks, there was no difference in total serum protein, lymphocyte count, QOL, total body, fat or muscle mass between groups. Digestive symptoms improved significantly in the probiotic group, but this was not statistically different from the placebo group. The only significant benefit of Lp299v over placebo was a greater increase in serum albumin, a marker of nutritional status.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several human trials have confirmed that Lactobacillus plantarum 299v (Lp299v) relief the gastrointestinal symptoms observed in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. These symptoms are similar to those associated with home enteral nutrition and they affect nutritional status as well as patients' quality of life. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of Lp299v on nutritional status, enteral formula tolerance, and quality of life in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The current double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study included 35 cancer patients receiving home enteral nutrition. There were 2 groups of participants consuming either 2 x 10^10 CFU of Lp299v (n=21) or placebo (n=14) for 4 weeks. RESULTS An increase in the serum albumin concentration was significantly higher in the Lp299v group than in the placebo group at the endpoint (p=0.032). Moreover, the changes in the frequency of vomiting and flatulence were significantly reduced at week 4 compared to baseline in the Lp299v group (p=0.0117). The improvement of quality of life was observed in both groups; however, with no statistically significant differences between the analyzed groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that administration of Lp299v in cancer patients receiving home enteral nutrition may improve laboratory parameters, predominantly the concentration of albumin, however, overall it does not have an impact on nutritional status. Lp299v may reduce the gastrointestinal symptoms related to enteral nutrition; notwithstanding, the improvement of quality of life may be the result of enteral nutrition rather than the effect of administration of Lp299v.
-
6.
Vegans, Vegetarians, and Omnivores: How Does Dietary Choice Influence Iodine Intake? A Systematic Review.
Eveleigh, ER, Coneyworth, LJ, Avery, A, Welham, SJM
Nutrients. 2020;12(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Popularity to follow a vegan or vegetarian diet has increased in recent years, however iodine deficiency may be an issue in this cohort of people due to the body's low ability to utilise plant-based iodine compared to that of meat. The aim of this systematic review of 15 studies was to assess the iodine status of adults following a vegan or vegetarian diet. The results showed that vegans followed by vegetarians had the lowest iodine status across the studies and both were at suboptimal amounts. However, vegans had higher dietary intakes than vegetarians. Omnivores had the greatest intake of iodine. Seaweed was the main source of iodine for vegans. It was concluded that vegans and vegetarians not consuming seaweed or taking supplements are at an increased risk of iodine deficiency compared to adults on a less restrictive diet. Iodine status needs to be monitored and research into improving the iodine status of vegans and vegetarians is needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that vegans and vegetarians may be at risk of iodine deficiency with a view to recommending seaweed to those who have low iodine intakes.
Abstract
Vegan and vegetarian diets are becoming increasingly popular. Dietary restrictions may increase the risk of iodine deficiency. This systematic review aims to assess iodine intake and status in adults following a vegan or vegetarian diet in industrialised countries. A systematic review and quality assessment were conducted in the period May 2019-April 2020 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were identified in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and secondary sources. Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. Participants included 127,094 adults (aged ≥ 18 years). Vegan groups presented the lowest median urinary iodine concentrations, followed by vegetarians, and did not achieve optimal status. The highest iodine intakes were recorded in female vegans (1448.0 ± 3879.0 µg day-1) and the lowest in vegetarians (15.6 ± 21.0 µg day-1). Omnivores recorded the greatest intake in 83% of studies. Seaweed contributed largely to diets of vegans with excessive iodine intake. Vegans appear to have increased risk of low iodine status, deficiency and inadequate intake compared with adults following less restrictive diets. Adults following vegan and vegetarian diets living in countries with a high prevalence of deficiency may be more vulnerable. Therefore, further monitoring of iodine status in industrialised countries and research into improving the iodine intake and status of adults following vegan and vegetarian diets is required.
-
7.
Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Alsharif, DJ, Alsharif, FJ, Aljuraiban, GS, Abulmeaty, MMA
Nutrients. 2020;12(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
For individuals who are critically ill and cannot eat, the use of a tube through the mouth is the preferred way to ensure nutrition needs are met. However, complications such as diarrhoea and vomiting often means that these individuals still do not achieve optimal nutrition. In these instances, giving individuals nutrients directly into a vein alongside the feeding tube is an option to ensure they do not become nutrient deficient. This is known as a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition. However, studies on the use of this combination are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 studies aimed to determine the effects of a combination of enteral and parenteral feeding on clinical outcomes compared to a feeding tube alone. The results showed that compared to enteral feeding alone the combination decreased infections and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. There was a very small effect on duration of ventilation and no effects were seen on length of hospital stay nor length of ICU stay. It was concluded that enteral feeding alone is insufficient to meet the nutritional needs of critically ill patients. Supplementing in parenteral nutrition may be of benefit to these individuals and help decrease infections and improve ICU mortality. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the health of patients who are being fed through a tube may be compromised through malnutrition and that supplemental ways of getting more nutrients into these individuals is of importance.
Abstract
Enteral nutrition (EN) is considered the first feeding route for critically ill patients. However, adverse effects such as gastrointestinal complications limit its optimal provision, leading to inadequate energy and protein intake. We compared the clinical outcomes of supplemental parenteral nutrition added to EN (SPN + EN) and EN alone in critically ill adults. Electronic databases restricted to full-text randomized controlled trials available in the English language and published from January 1990 to January 2019 were searched. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and the meta-analysis was conducted using the MedCalc software. A total of five studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to EN alone, SPN + EN decreased the risk of nosocomial infections (relative risk (RR) = 0.733, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR = 0.569, p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed between SPN + EN and EN in the length of hospital stay, hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In conclusion, when enteral feeding fails to fulfill the energy requirements in critically ill adult patients, SPN may be beneficial as it helps in decreasing nosocomial infections and ICU mortality, in addition to increasing energy and protein intakes with no negative effects on other clinical outcomes.
-
8.
Nutrition, the digestive system and immunity in COVID-19 infection.
Bold, J, Harris, M, Fellows, L, Chouchane, M
Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench. 2020;13(4):331-340
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Covid-19 needs both prevention and recovery strategies to reduce complications. This review study aimed to discuss the associations between nutrition, obesity, and the impact these have on stomach symptoms associated with Covid-19. Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for Covid-19 and this could be due to several factors such as impaired immune function, increased inflammation, increased susceptibility to infection and the high number of cells on fat tissue, which express the receptor known to allow Covid-19 into cells. The involvement of the gut microbiota of obese individuals was extensively reviewed and gut dysbiosis has been associated with many diseases, thus improving gut microbiota may go some way to improving Covid-19 outcomes. Nutritional interventions to reduce obesity need to be part of a multi-pronged strategy and the possible introduction of vitamin D supplements and probiotics. The paper did not draw any conclusions; however this paper could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the role of obesity in increasing the risk of Covid-19 infection, complications that may arise upon and after infection and nutritional strategies as part of a management plan.
Abstract
The current review aimed to synthesize the literature on the complex relationship between food consumption and nutritional status as well as the digestive system in order to examine the relationship between immunity and potential responses to COVID-19 infection. The goal is to help inform the many healthcare professionals working with COVID-19 patients. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. Hand searches were also undertaken using Google and reference lists to identify recent evidence. Studies were critically appraised, and the findings were analyzed by narrative synthesis. Nutritional status can impact immunity in several ways, including affecting susceptibility to infection, severity of disease, and recovery time, and is therefore a significant consideration in the management of COVID-19. COVID-19 can also impact digestive function, which can further impact nutritional status. The role of Vitamin D deficiency in vulnerability to severe respiratory infections, including COVID-19, has been recognized, and it may have a role in treatment where deficiency is indicated. Healthcare professionals should be aware that obesity may be accompanied by micronutrient malnutrition including vitamin D deficiency and alterations in the microbiome and inflammatory responses, which can further impact immunity and disease severity. Multidisciplinary team-work is recommended in the management of patients with COVID-19, and approaches should include a consideration of nutritional status (both macronutrients and micronutrients), body weight, and gastrointestinal signs and symptom.
-
9.
Comparison of gut microbiota profile in celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.
Transeth, EL, Dale, HF, Lied, GA
The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. 2020;31(11):735-745
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dysbiosis refers to a disturbance in the quantity and composition of the gut microbiota, and this shift in the microbiota profile is associated with a variety of GI disorders including celiac disease (CD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). There is no current clinical distinction between IBS and NCGS although it is hypothesised the characteristics of gut microbiota of these clinical presentations may overlap. The aim of this review is to analyse the gut microbiota profile in these three diagnoses. Thirteen trials were included in this review and show the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota of patients with CD and IBS shared many similarities when compared to healthy controls, including an overall reduction in microbial abundance. There were fewer similarities between IBS and NCGS, in part due to the lack of existing literature. Based on these findings, the authors suggest the bacterial profiles of patients CD and IBS share certain disease-specific trends. While the current data is limited, the authors hope these suggested trends influence further research to examine the overlap between NCGS and IBS and distinguish differential diagnostic and treatment plans.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is vital for human health. Shifts in the microbial diversity can affect bacterial function, and dysbiosis is associated with a variety of gastrointestinal disorders, including celiac disease (CD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The distinction between IBS and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is unclear, and it is conceivable that the gut microbiota profile of these patients may overlap. To our knowledge, no existing literature has evaluated the microbial characteristics in CD, IBS, and NCGS. Hence, this systematic review aims to compare the gut microbiota profile in these three diagnoses. A literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline) until April 2019. Studies investigating bacterial diversity in the gut of patients with CD, IBS, and NCGS were eligible. Inclusion criteria were observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting bacterial profile at baseline. Ninety-one articles were identified, of which 13 trials were eligible for inclusion. Overall, the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota of patients with CD and those with IBS shared the many similarities. The microbial richness was correspondingly reduced in these patient-groups compared with healthy controls, but this was not reported for NCGS. Our findings suggest that the bacterial profiles of patients with IBS and CD share certain disease-specific trends. Fewer similarities were observed between the bacterial profiles of patients with IBS and NCGS. Notably, the data are limited; thus, no solid conclusions can be made on the basis of these findings alone. The suggested trends can be a valuable basis for further research.
-
10.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations of vegan and vegetarian diets with inflammatory biomarkers.
Menzel, J, Jabakhanji, A, Biemann, R, Mai, K, Abraham, K, Weikert, C
Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):21736
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A growing trend towards vegetarianism and veganism has emerged in the past few years. Evidence has led to the assumption that these diets may protect against chronic disease, and one potential mechanism is through the modulation of inflammatory biomarkers. The aim of this review was to investigate the associations of veganism and vegetarianism with inflammatory markers. From the 21 cross-sectional studies included in this study, both vegan and vegetarian diets were associated with lower levels of CRP compared to omnivores. There was no association with all other inflammatory markers. Based on these findings, the authors conclude there is evidence for both vegan and vegetarian diets reducing CRP, a major marker of low-grade inflammation. More research is needed as most inflammatory markers have only been investigated in single studies thus far.
Abstract
Plant-based diets like vegetarian or vegan diets might influence circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers, thereby reducing the risk of chronic diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the associations of veganism and vegetarianism with circulating inflammatory biomarkers in comparison to omnivores. Literature search was conducted in Pubmed and EMBASE until April 2020 and mean differences of biomarkers were assessed for: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-18 (IL-18), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 RA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-ɑ), E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), adiponectin, omentin-1 and resistin. Of initially identified 1073 publications, 21 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Vegan diet was associated with lower levels of CRP compared to omnivores [mean difference - 0.54 mg/l, 95%-CI: - 0.79 to - 0.28, p < 0.0001]. This association was less pronounced in vegetarians [mean difference - 0.25 mg/l, 95%-CI: - 0.49 to 0.00, p = 0.05]. In patients with impaired kidney function, the association between vegetarian nutrition and CRP was much stronger with - 3.91 mg/l (95%-CI: - 5.23 to - 2.60; p < 0.0001). No substantial effects were observed for all other inflammatory biomarkers. Despite strong associations between CRP and a vegan or vegetarian diet were seen, further research is needed, as most inflammatory biomarkers were investigated only in single studies so far.