1.
Lipid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Is There a Link? A New Focus and Meta-Analysis.
Lodi, M, Kiehl, A, Qu, FL, Gabriele, V, Tomasetto, C, Mathelin, C
European journal of breast health. 2022;18(2):108-126
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Incidence of breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for 15.5% of all cancer-related deaths. However, there is a lack of complete understanding of the effects of different types of dietary lipids on breast cancer development, such as saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), dietary cholesterol, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and unsaturated trans fatty acids (TFA). An evaluation of the effect of lipid consumption on breast cancer and the impact it has on menopausal status was conducted in this meta-analysis, which included forty-four studies. Increased saturated fatty acid intake was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, breast cancer risk was not associated with increased consumption of total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and cholesterol in premenopausal women. The effects of estrogen and the release of proinflammatory cytokines by adipocytes should be evaluated, as well as other pathways that contribute to the development of breast cancer. There is a need for further robust studies to evaluate the effects of different types of lipid consumption on breast cancer. Although the association between SFA and breast cancer is weak, healthcare professionals can use this study's findings to better understand the detrimental effect of SFA, despite the fact that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in the current analysis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- Among lifestyle-related breast cancer risk factors, the role of diet in breast cancer remains uncertain.
- The authors highlight a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women.
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Objectives
- To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk.
Results
- Forty-four articles were included in the meta-analysis, consisting of 28 case-control studies and 16 cohort studies.
- In total, this meta-analysis involved 1,185,896 women, of whom 54,553 had breast cancer.
- There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
- In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03–1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85–1.19; p = 0.93).
Limitations
- Studies included in the meta-analysis were carried out on populations from five continents with significant cultural and dietary diversity, and well as different types of oils used in the diet
Conclusion
- At this stage, the authors state it is not possible to establish nutritional recommendations regarding the consumption of lipids to decrease breast cancer risk.
Clinical practice applications:
- The results of this meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant link between high consumption of total lipids, PUFA, MUFA and cholesterol and the occurrence of breast cancer.
- However, the results suggest that there is an association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, although this was only found in case-controlled studies and not cohort studies.
- While obesity is a known breast cancer risk factor after menopause, the link between the effect of diet and the effect of obesity on the breast may be through different mechanisms.
- The authors investigated if high lipid consumption acts on breast tissue by the same mechanisms as obesity, and found the association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women must be through other biological explanations.
- The authors found that while high SFA consumption may increase breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women, biological mechanisms linking SFA and breast cancerogenesis are still unknown.
- The meta-analysis found high blood cholesterol levels appear to increase the risk of breast cancer. However, the authors could not confirm that high dietary cholesterol intake is a risk factor for breast cancer. The authors postulated this may be in part due to the low proportion of cholesterol (about 30%) in the diet, while the rest comes from the degradation of lipids and carbohydrates by the liver.
Considerations for future research:
- As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption
Abstract
Objective: To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all cohort and case-control studies published up to December 2020 with subgroup analysis according to menopausal status. Results: We included 44 articles for analysis. There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women. In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03-1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85-1.19; p = 0.93). Conclusion: There was a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women, however there was high heterogeneity for this analysis. As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption.
2.
Intermittent Fasting in Cardiovascular Disorders-An Overview.
Malinowski, B, Zalewska, K, Węsierska, A, Sokołowska, MM, Socha, M, Liczner, G, Pawlak-Osińska, K, Wiciński, M
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) is an eating pattern that cycles between periods of fasting and eating. IF has gained popularity in recent years with people wanting to lose weight, and it may have many long-term health benefits. In this review, the authors looked at human and animal studies using variations of IF including time restricted eating (TRE), where eating is confined within a specific window during the day (for example 8 hours eating and 16 hours fasting), and alternate day fasting (ADF), where a day of eating normally is alternated with a day of either fasting entirely, or significant calorie restriction. The authors found that IF is related to many beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, involving atherosclerosis progression, benefits for diabetes mellitus type 2 such as improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, lowering of blood pressure, and other cardiovascular risk factors (such as lipid profile and inflammation). It is currently unclear whether the benefits of IF are solely due to weight loss or other mechanisms. The success of every type of diet depends on compliance, and IF seems to be as easy or easier to follow than more traditional diets for many people. Fasting is not recommended for people with hormonal imbalances, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and diabetics. People with eating disorders and underweight people are also not recommended to use the intermittent fasting diet. In recent years, the IF diet and its varieties have become increasingly popular. This diet not only serves to reduce body weight but seems to have other long-term health benefits. However, individuals’ current health and situation should be considered before commencing the IF diet.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting is a form of time restricted eating (typically 16 h fasting and 8 h eating), which has gained popularity in recent years and shows promise as a possible new paradigm in the approach to weight loss and the reduction of inflammation, and has many potential long term health benefits. In this review, the authors will incorporate many aspects of fasting, mainly focusing on its effects on the cardiovascular system, involving atherosclerosis progression, benefits for diabetes mellitus type 2, lowering of blood pressure, and exploring other cardiovascular risk factors (such as lipid profile and inflammation).
3.
A randomised trial of the feasibility of a low carbohydrate diet vs standard carbohydrate counting in adults with type 1 diabetes taking body weight into account.
Krebs, JD, Parry Strong, A, Cresswell, P, Reynolds, AN, Hanna, A, Haeusler, S
Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;25(1):78-84
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
With the advent of self-managed insulin by injection, Type 1 diabetics were able to eat a normal diet and not worry about their carbohydrate intake. However this regime requires careful carbohydrate counting and insulin dosing, which is not always easy to do. With interest in low carbohydrate diets in the management of Type 2 diabetes increasing, some Type 1 diabetics are restricting their carbohydrates in order to better control their blood glucose levels. This pilot study was a small, single-blinded randomised control trial of 10 individuals. It aimed to determine the effects of low carbohydrate diets on glycaemic control, daily insulin requirements and quality of life in Type 1 Diabetes, when compared to those on a normal diet. The results showed that HbA1C reduced significantly in the carbohydrate restricted group compared to the group eating a normal diet. The amount of injected insulin also showed a significant reduction in the low-carbohydrate group. There were no changes in blood pressure, creatinine or lipid profile in either of the groups. A low-carbohydrate diet is a feasible option for clients with Type 1 Diabetes who are looking for improved glycaemic control and reduced doses of insulin, particularly if they would like to lose weight.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of a low carbohydrate diet and standard carbohydrate counting on glycaemic control, glucose excursions and daily insulin use compared with standard carbohydrate counting in participants with type 1 diabetes. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN Participants (n=10) with type 1 diabetes using a basal; bolus insulin regimen, who attended a secondary care clinic, were randomly allocated (1:1) to either a standard carbohydrate counting course or the same course with added information on following a carbohydrate restricted diet (75 g per day). Participants attended visits at baseline and 12 weeks for measurements of weight, height, blood pressure, HbA1c, lipid profile and creatinine. They also completed a 3-day food diary and had 3 days of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. RESULTS The carbohydrate restricted group had significant reductions in HbA1c (63 to 55 mmol/mol (8.9-8.2%), p<0.05) and daily insulin use (64.4 to 44.2 units/day, p<0.05) and non-significant reductions in body weight (83.2 to 78.0 kg). There were no changes in blood pressure, creatinine or lipid profile and all outcomes in the carbohydrate counting group were unchanged. There was no change in glycaemic variability as measured by the mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion in either group. CONCLUSIONS A low carbohydrate diet is a feasible option for people with type 1 diabetes, and may be of benefit in reducing insulin doses and improving glycaemic control, particularly for those wishing to lose weight. 背景与目的:在1 型糖尿病患者中,与标准碳水化合物计数比较,确定低碳水 化合物饮食对血糖控制、血糖波动以及每日胰岛素使用的影响。方法与研究 设计:参加二级保健门诊使用普通膳食以注射胰岛素为治疗方案的10 例1 型 糖尿病患者,按照1:1 的比例随机分配到一个标准的碳水化合物计数组,或限 制碳水化合物饮食组(每天75 g)。测量了所有志愿者基线和12 周的体重、 身高、血压、糖化血红蛋白、血脂和肌酐,志愿者完成了为期3 天的食物日记 和3 天持续皮下血糖监测。结果:碳水化合物限制组HbA1c(63-55 mmol/mol (8.9-8.2 %),p<0.05)和每日胰岛素用量(64.4-44.2 U/d,p<0.05)显著减 少,体重(83.2-78 kg)的变化无显著差异。碳水化合物计数组血压、肌酐或 血脂所有指标均无显著改变。通过平均血糖波动幅度计算的血糖变异性在任何 一组中均无改变。结论:低碳水化合物饮食是1 型糖尿病患者一个可行的选 择,可以减少胰岛素剂量和改善血糖控制,特别是对那些希望减肥的患者。.