0
selected
-
1.
The Effect of Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Wang, LL, Wang, Q, Hong, Y, Ojo, O, Jiang, Q, Hou, YY, Huang, YH, Wang, XH
Nutrients. 2018;10(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dietary intervention is a strategy to manage diabetes mellitus, as it can reduce the burden on islet cells and thus improve blood glucose levels, lipid profiles, and cognitive status. The aim of the study was to find out the effectiveness of the ‘six-point formula’ and the effects of a low-fat diet and low-carbohydrate diet on hyperglycaemia. The study is a prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial which recruited 56 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either a low-fat diet or a low-carbohydrate diet. Results show that HbA1c levels (the average blood glucose levels in the last 2 – 3 months) in low-carbohydrate diet decreased significantly compared to the low-fat diet. The body mass index and the total cholesterol levels of the participants following the low-carbohydrate diet also decreased. Authors conclude that a low-carbohydrate diet can improve blood glucose, regulate blood lipids, reduce body mass index and decrease insulin doses more than a low-fat diet in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In China, a low-fat diet (LFD) is mainly recommended to help improve blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) has been shown to be effective in improving blood glucose levels in America and England. A few studies, primarily randomized controlled trials, have been reported in China as well. METHOD Firstly, we designed two 'six-point formula' methods, which met the requirements of LCD and LFD, respectively. Fifty-six T2DM patients were recruited and randomly allocated to the LCD group (n = 28) and the LFD group (n = 28). The LCD group received education about LCD's six-point formula, while the LFD group received education about LFD's six-point formula. The follow-up time was three months. The indicators for glycemic control and other metabolic parameters were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS Forty-nine patients completed the study. The proportions of calories from three macronutrients the patients consumed met the requirements of LCD and LFD. Compared to the LFD group, there was a greater decrease in HbA1c level in the LCD group (-0.63% vs. -0.31%, p < 0.05). The dosages of insulin and fasting blood glucoses (FBG) in the third month were lower than those at baseline in both groups. Compared with baseline values, body mass index (BMI) and total cholesterol (TC) in the LCD group were significantly reduced in the third month (p < 0.05); however, there were no statistically significant differences in the LFD group. CONCLUSIONS LCD can improve blood glucose more than LFD in Chinese patients with T2DM. It can also regulate blood lipid, reduce BMI, and decrease insulin dose in patients with T2DM. In addition, the six-point formula is feasible, easily operable, and a practical educational diet for Chinese patients with T2DM.
-
2.
Effects of Providing High-Fat versus High-Carbohydrate Meals on Daily and Postprandial Physical Activity and Glucose Patterns: a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Parr, EB, Devlin, BL, Callahan, MJ, Radford, BE, Blankenship, JM, Dunstan, DW, Hawley, JA
Nutrients. 2018;10(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The timing of habitual meal consumption and composition is known to be an important factor in health status, particularly for blood glucose regulation. The aim of this randomised crossover study was to assess the effects of altering meal timing and diet composition on postprandial glucose and physical activity levels. Eight overweight or obese men with a sedentary lifestyle completed two 12-day measurement periods including a 7-day habitual period followed by a 5-day experimental period, with an 8-day washout period. The two conditions tested were a high-fat, low carbohydrate diet (HFD) and a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet (HCD) and participants were instructed to consume meals at standardised times throughout both conditions. Body composition, oxygen consumption and blood glucose were measured at baseline and between each experimental condition. This trial found the provision of meals did not alter overall activity patterns or postprandial activity patterns. The authors observed increased sedentary activity across the day, and identify evening time as an important target for sedentary time to be minimised. Based on these results, the authors suggest that future dietary interventions consider habitual meal consumption and composition to best replicate real-world behaviours.
Abstract
We determined the effects of altering meal timing and diet composition on temporal glucose homeostasis and physical activity measures. Eight sedentary, overweight/obese men (mean ± SD, age: 36 ± 4 years; BMI: 29.8 ± 1.8 kg/m²) completed two × 12-day (12-d) measurement periods, including a 7-d habitual period, and then 5 d of each diet (high-fat diet [HFD]: 67:15:18% fat:carbohydrate:protein versus high-carbohydrate diet [HCD]: 67:15:18% carbohydrate:fat:protein) of three meals/d at ±30 min of 0800 h, 1230 h, and 1800 h, in a randomised order with an 8-d washout. Energy intake (EI), the timing of meal consumption, blood glucose regulation (continuous glucose monitor system (CGMS)), and activity patterns (accelerometer and inclinometer) were assessed across each 12-d period. Meal provision did not alter the patterns of reduced physical activity, and increased sedentary behaviour following dinner, compared with following breakfast and lunch. The HCD increased peak (+1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001), mean (+0.5 mmol/L, p = 0.001), and total area under the curve (+670 mmol/L/min, p = 0.001), as well as 3-h postprandial meal glucose concentrations (all p < 0.001) compared with the HFD. In overweight/obese males, the provision of meals did not alter physical activity patterns, but did affect glycaemic control. Greater emphasis on meal timing and composition is required in diet and/or behaviour intervention studies to ensure relevance to real-world behaviours.
-
3.
Effect of an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Johansen, MY, MacDonald, CS, Hansen, KB, Karstoft, K, Christensen, R, Pedersen, M, Hansen, LS, Zacho, M, Wedell-Neergaard, AS, Nielsen, ST, et al
JAMA. 2017;318(7):637-646
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
First-line treatment of Type 2 diabetes includes diet, physical activity, and weight loss prior to or in parallel with initiation of medication. The aim of this study was to examine whether an intensive lifestyle intervention results in equivalent blood sugar control compared with standard care. A secondary aim was to test whether an intensive lifestyle intervention leads to a reduction in glucose-lowering medication in participants with Type 2 diabetes. The study was a randomized, assessor-blind clinical study of 98 adults with Type 2 diabetes diagnosed for less than 10 years. The participants were randomly assigned (2:1; stratified by sex) to the lifestyle group (n = 64) or the standard care group (n = 34). Results show that an intensive lifestyle intervention did not achieve comparable blood sugar control in comparison with standard care, however, the former led to a substantial and parallel reduction in glucose-lowering medication. The authors conclude that even though a lifestyle intervention compared to standard care did not result in the expected glycaemic control, it was still in a direction consistent with benefit.
Abstract
Importance: It is unclear whether a lifestyle intervention can maintain glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To test whether an intensive lifestyle intervention results in equivalent glycemic control compared with standard care and, secondarily, leads to a reduction in glucose-lowering medication in participants with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, assessor-blinded, single-center study within Region Zealand and the Capital Region of Denmark (April 2015-August 2016). Ninety-eight adult participants with non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes who were diagnosed for less than 10 years were included. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1; stratified by sex) to the lifestyle group (n = 64) or the standard care group (n = 34). Interventions: All participants received standard care with individual counseling and standardized, blinded, target-driven medical therapy. Additionally, the lifestyle intervention included 5 to 6 weekly aerobic training sessions (duration 30-60 minutes), of which 2 to 3 sessions were combined with resistance training. The lifestyle participants received dietary plans aiming for a body mass index of 25 or less. Participants were followed up for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 12-month follow-up, and equivalence was prespecified by a CI margin of ±0.4% based on the intention-to-treat population. Superiority analysis was performed on the secondary outcome reductions in glucose-lowering medication. Results: Among 98 randomized participants (mean age, 54.6 years [SD, 8.9]; women, 47 [48%]; mean baseline HbA1c, 6.7%), 93 participants completed the trial. From baseline to 12-month follow-up, the mean HbA1c level changed from 6.65% to 6.34% in the lifestyle group and from 6.74% to 6.66% in the standard care group (mean between-group difference in change of -0.26% [95% CI, -0.52% to -0.01%]), not meeting the criteria for equivalence (P = .15). Reduction in glucose-lowering medications occurred in 47 participants (73.5%) in the lifestyle group and 9 participants (26.4%) in the standard care group (difference, 47.1 percentage points [95% CI, 28.6-65.3]). There were 32 adverse events (most commonly musculoskeletal pain or discomfort and mild hypoglycemia) in the lifestyle group and 5 in the standard care group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with type 2 diabetes diagnosed for less than 10 years, a lifestyle intervention compared with standard care resulted in a change in glycemic control that did not reach the criterion for equivalence, but was in a direction consistent with benefit. Further research is needed to assess superiority, as well as generalizability and durability of findings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02417012.
-
4.
Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chung, M, Ma, J, Patel, K, Berger, S, Lau, J, Lichtenstein, AH
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2014;100(3):833-49
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
There have been increasing concerns on the relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fructose or high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effect of dietary fructose in different forms on NAFLD and various biomarkers of liver health. This review included 21 published intervention studies and found a diet supplemented with fructose or glucose increases liver fat and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations when compared with a maintenance diet in healthy adults. Based on the available research, the authors point out the relationship between liver health markers and fructose, but also recognise this association may be confounded by excess energy intake. Due to the lack of robust findings, they conclude there is insufficient evidence on HFCS and NAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised about the concurrent temporal trend between simple sugar intakes, especially of fructose or high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), and rates of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the United States. OBJECTIVE We examined the effect of different amounts and forms of dietary fructose on the incidence or prevalence of NAFLD and indexes of liver health in humans. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of English-language, human studies of any design in children and adults with low to no alcohol intake and that reported at least one predetermined measure of liver health. The strength of the evidence was evaluated by considering risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision. RESULTS Six observational studies and 21 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall strength of evidence for observational studies was rated insufficient because of high risk of biases and inconsistent study findings. Of 21 intervention studies, 19 studies were in adults without NAFLD (predominantly healthy, young men) and 1 study each in adults or children with NAFLD. We found a low level of evidence that a hypercaloric fructose diet (supplemented by pure fructose) increases liver fat and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations in healthy men compared with the consumption of a weight-maintenance diet. In addition, there was a low level of evidence that hypercaloric fructose and glucose diets have similar effects on liver fat and liver enzymes in healthy adults. There was insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion for effects of HFCS or sucrose on NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of indirect comparisons across study findings, the apparent association between indexes of liver health (ie, liver fat, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, alanine aminotransferase, AST, and γ-glutamyl transpeptase) and fructose or sucrose intake appear to be confounded by excessive energy intake. Overall, the available evidence is not sufficiently robust to draw conclusions regarding effects of fructose, HFCS, or sucrose consumption on NAFLD.