1.
Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Jalili, C, Talebi, S, Mehrabani, S, Bagheri, R, Wong, A, Amirian, P, Zarpoosh, M, Ghoreishy, SM, Kermani, MAH, Moradi, S
Lipids in health and disease. 2022;21(1):132
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Research indicates that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by improving blood lipids, blood pressure, and haemostatic factors, among others. Camelina oil, considered a good source of ALA compared to other edible oils, is one of the richest dietary sources of omega-3 fatty acids, with a polyunsaturated fatty acid content over 50%. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycaemic control in human studies. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials with a total of 428 individuals (202 participants in the COS group and 226 in the control group). Results did not show any affects of COS on lipid profile and glycaemic indices compared with placebo intake. However, subgroup analysis showed that COS for more than 8 weeks and at a dose lower than 30g/d could decrease total cholesterol. Authors conclude that COS may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for the improvement of this lipid marker. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings of this study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. METHODS Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to July 1, 2022. RTCs with an intervention duration of less than 2 weeks, without a placebo group, and those that used COS in combination with another supplement were excluded. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were pooled by applying a random-effects model, while validated methods examined sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS Seven eligible RCTs, including 428 individuals, were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that COS significantly improved total cholesterol in studies lasting more than 8 weeks and utilizing dosages lower than 30 g/d compared to the placebo group. The results of fractional polynomial modeling indicated that there were nonlinear dose-response relations between the dose of COS and absolute mean differences in low-density cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and total cholesterol, but not triglycerides. It appears that the greatest effect of COS oil occurs at the dosage of 20 g/day. CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis indicates that COS may reduce cardiovascular disease risk by improving lipid profile markers. Based on the results of this study, COS at dosages lower than 30 g/d may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for lipid control. Further RCTs with longer COS durations are warranted to expand on these results.
2.
Impact of α-Linolenic Acid, the Vegetable ω-3 Fatty Acid, on Cardiovascular Disease and Cognition.
Sala-Vila, A, Fleming, J, Kris-Etherton, P, Ros, E
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2022;13(5):1584-1602
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is an omega-3 fatty acid found in seeds and nuts such as flaxseeds, chia seeds, and walnuts and in oils such as canola oil, soybean oil, flaxseed oil and walnut oil. It has been shown to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease. This meta-analysis examined the results of various studies, including epidemiologic studies, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews, to evaluate the beneficial effects of ALA in improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease. The included studies showed a correlation between ALA intake and a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease, possibly due to ALA's anti-inflammatory properties, as well as its ability to reduce total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure. The analysis also found that ALA intake may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment. Healthcare professionals can leverage the findings of this analysis to educate individuals about the benefits of dietary ALA in improving cardiovascular and cognitive outcomes. However, further studies are necessary to establish definitive conclusions and determine therapeutic dosage.
Abstract
Given the evidence of the health benefits of plant-based diets and long-chain n-3 (ω-3) fatty acids, there is keen interest in better understanding the role of α-linolenic acid (ALA), a plant-derived n-3 fatty acid, on cardiometabolic diseases and cognition. There is increasing evidence for ALA largely based on its major food sources (i.e., walnuts and flaxseed); however, this lags behind our understanding of long-chain n-3 fatty acids. Meta-analyses of observational studies have shown that increasing dietary ALA is associated with a 10% lower risk of total cardiovascular disease and a 20% reduced risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [AlphaOmega trial, Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) trial, and Lyon Diet Heart Study] all showed benefits of diets high in ALA on cardiovascular-related outcomes, but the AlphaOmega trial, designed to specifically evaluate ALA effects, only showed a trend for benefit. RCTs have shown that dietary ALA reduced total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure, and epidemiologic studies and some trials also have shown an anti-inflammatory effect of ALA, which collectively account for, in part, the cardiovascular benefits of ALA. A meta-analysis reported a trend toward diabetes risk reduction with both dietary and biomarker ALA. For metabolic syndrome and obesity, the evidence for ALA benefits is inconclusive. The role of ALA in cognition is in the early stages but shows promising evidence of counteracting cognitive impairment. Much has been learned about the health benefits of ALA and with additional research we will be better positioned to make strong evidence-based dietary recommendations for the reduction of many chronic diseases.
3.
Paleolithic nutrition for metabolic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Manheimer, EW, van Zuuren, EJ, Fedorowicz, Z, Pijl, H
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2015;102(4):922-32
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of 5 risk factors, including waist circumference, blood pressure, and serum concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the fasting condition. These often occur in concert and predispose people to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether current evidence supports the idea that Paleolithic nutrition improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions in people with one or more components of the metabolic syndrome. The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials that compared Paleolithic nutrition with any other dietary intervention in participants with one or more of the 5 components of the metabolic syndrome. Results indicate that Paleolithic nutrition resulted in greater short-term pooled improvements on each of the 5 components of metabolic syndrome than did currently recommended guideline-based control diets. However, the greater pooled improvements did not reach significance for 2 of the 5 components (i.e., HDL cholesterol and fasting blood sugar). Authors conclude that the available data warrant additional evaluations of the health benefits of Paleolithic nutrition.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paleolithic nutrition, which has attracted substantial public attention lately because of its putative health benefits, differs radically from dietary patterns currently recommended in guidelines, particularly in terms of its recommendation to exclude grains, dairy, and nutritional products of industry. OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether a Paleolithic nutritional pattern improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the Paleolithic nutritional pattern with any other dietary pattern in participants with one or more of the 5 components of metabolic syndrome. Two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Outcome data were extracted from the first measurement time point (≤6 mo). A random-effects model was used to estimate the average intervention effect. The quality of the evidence was rated with the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Four RCTs that involved 159 participants were included. The 4 control diets were based on distinct national nutrition guidelines but were broadly similar. Paleolithic nutrition resulted in greater short-term improvements than did the control diets (random-effects model) for waist circumference (mean difference: -2.38 cm; 95% CI: -4.73, -0.04 cm), triglycerides (-0.40 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.76, -0.04 mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-3.64 mm Hg; 95% CI: -7.36, 0.08 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (-2.48 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.98, 0.02 mm Hg), HDL cholesterol (0.12 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.28 mmol/L), and fasting blood sugar (-0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.44, 0.11 mmol/L). The quality of the evidence for each of the 5 metabolic components was moderate. The home-delivery (n = 1) and dietary recommendation (n = 3) RCTs showed similar effects with the exception of greater improvements in triglycerides relative to the control with the home delivery. None of the RCTs evaluated an improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The Paleolithic diet resulted in greater short-term improvements in metabolic syndrome components than did guideline-based control diets. The available data warrant additional evaluations of the health benefits of Paleolithic nutrition. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) as CRD42014015119.