-
1.
Probiotics fortify intestinal barrier function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Zheng, Y, Zhang, Z, Tang, P, Wu, Y, Zhang, A, Li, D, Wang, CZ, Wan, JY, Yao, H, Yuan, CS
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1143548
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intestinal barrier function is closely related to the pathogenesis of various immune and inflammatory diseases. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in maintaining gut homeostasis and functionality in the presence of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory microbes. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the role of probiotics in contributing to intestinal barrier function, and the related immune function, inflammatory status, and gut microbiota composition. This study was a systematic review of 28 articles (qualitative synthesis), and a meta-analysis of 26 randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics could significantly improve intestinal barrier function according to specific indicators. The meta-analysis also indicated that probiotic supplementation could reduce inflammatory factors. Furthermore, it also demonstrated that probiotics could modulate gut microbiota compositions by elevating the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Authors conclude that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function to some extent, but more high-quality randomised controlled studies are needed to reach a solid conclusion.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for health by addressing imbalances in gut bacteria (dysbiosis), reducing inflammation in the gut and improving the integrity and function of the gut barrier
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Probiotics are microorganisms that are considered beneficial to health. The aim of this study was to assess the role of probiotics in protecting intestinal barrier function as well as their effects on the composition of gut microbiota, inflammatory status, and immune function for reducing the risk of related diseases.
Methods
26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005-2021 with a total population of n=1891 (n = 955 Intervention, n = 936 controls)) were included in the meta-analysis. Outcome measures were categorised under indicators relating to intestinal barrier function, inflammatory markers, immune function and microbiota composition. Studies were conducted worldwide with participants being healthcare patients or athletes. Study durations ranged from 3 days to 6 months. Different dosages and forms of probiotics were used. Data was pooled for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species.
Results
Gut barrier function in the probiotic groups was improved as measured by transepithelial resistance (TER) mean difference (MD) 5.27 {95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, p = < 0.00001], lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.47 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, p = 0.02), serum zonulin SMD -1.58 (95% CI,-2.49 to -0.66, p = 0.0007), and endotoxin SMD -3.20 (95% CI, -5.41 to - 0.98, p = 0.005).
The inflammatory markers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) were also improved compared to control groups. Lactobacillus (95% CI p=0.02) and Bifidobacterium (95% CI, p=0.01) enhanced microbial composition, however, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species did not. Immune function as measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G IgG and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were not improved.
Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that intestinal barrier function and microbial composition could be improved using probiotics. They were also found to help alleviate inflammation. Further studies of high quality are however needed to confirm these results.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Clinical practice applications:
The use of the probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for:
- supporting the integrity of gut barrier function
- improving the composition of gut microbiota
- lowering inflammation
Considerations for future research:
High heterogeneity between studies may affect the applicability of the results. Future research development should focus on the following areas:
- testing methods
- study durations
- measuring indicators
- the type and dose of probiotics
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics play a vital role in treating immune and inflammatory diseases by improving intestinal barrier function; however, a comprehensive evaluation is missing. The present study aimed to explore the impact of probiotics on the intestinal barrier and related immune function, inflammation, and microbiota composition. A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. METHODS Four major databases (PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, CENTRAL, and Embase) were thoroughly searched. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity among studies was evaluated utilizing I2 statistic (Chi-Square test), and data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS Meta-analysis of data from a total of 26 RCTs (n = 1891) indicated that probiotics significantly improved gut barrier function measured by levels of TER (MD, 5.27, 95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, P < 0.00001), serum zonulin (SMD, -1.58, 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.66, P = 0.0007), endotoxin (SMD, -3.20, 95% CI, -5.41 to -0.98, P = 0.005), and LPS (SMD, -0.47, 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, P = 0.02). Furthermore, probiotic groups demonstrated better efficacy over control groups in reducing inflammatory factors, including CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6. Probiotics can also modulate the gut microbiota structure by boosting the enrichment of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. CONCLUSION The present work revealed that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function, and alleviate inflammation and microbial dysbiosis. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to achieve a more definitive conclusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281822, identifier CRD42021281822.
-
2.
The effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on inflammation, oxidative stress, and circulating adiponectin and leptin concentration in subjects with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a GRADE-assessed systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.
Naseri, K, Saadati, S, Ghaemi, F, Ashtary-Larky, D, Asbaghi, O, Sadeghi, A, Afrisham, R, de Courten, B
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):543-561
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
When acute, inflammation is a necessary function of the immune system allowing the body to recognise and remove foreign stimuli. However, when chronic inflammation occurs, it can contribute to and exacerbate diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). The gut microbiota and the use of probiotics has been shown to modulate processes within the body and decrease chronic inflammation, however research has not consistently shown this and an inverse relationship has been shown in some studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation in individuals with prediabetes and T2D. A total of 32 randomised control trials were included in the meta-analysis and showed that certain, but not all inflammatory markers were reduced. Antioxidants were increased. The effect was especially pronounced in individuals with T2D as opposed to prediabetes. It was concluded that probiotics or synbiotics could be useful for individuals with T2D to reduce inflammation and reduce the risk for other associated diseases such as heart disease.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may significantly reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, potentially lowering the risk of cardiovascular diseases in those with prediabetes and T2DM.
- These supplements may be particularly beneficial for individuals with T2DM and those who are overweight or obese.
- Incorporating probiotics and synbiotics into the diet could be a supportive strategy for improving metabolic health markers.
- The observed benefits vary depending on the type and duration of supplementation, suggesting that consistent, long-term use might be necessary to achieve noticeable health improvements.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review meta-analysis and meta-regression assessed the impact of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation, antioxidants, oxidative stress, and adipokines in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Methodology
The methodology involved searching PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases without date or language restrictions until March 2022. Study quality was evaluated.
- Inclusion criteria: Adults 18+ with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes; interventions with probiotics or synbiotics versus placebo or other treatments; and reporting on inflammatory biomarkers, adipocytokines, and oxidative stress serum biomarkers in RCTs with parallel or cross-over designs.
Results
32 RCTs with 2074 participants were analysed, mostly in Asia (26 studies) and 5 in Europe, Africa, Oceania, and America, over 4 to 24 weeks. Dosages varied, including synbiotic bread with Lactobacillus sporogenes and inulin (1×10^8 CFU, 0.07g/g, thrice daily), 300ml/day fermented milk with L. helveticus, daily synbiotic and probiotic tablets, a probiotic mixture (120g/day), synbiotics (9g, thrice daily), multistrain probiotic yoghurt (300g/day), L. sporogenes-enriched bread (40g, thrice daily), and probiotic honey (2500mg/day). Measurements included CRP (31 RCTs), TNF-α (12 RCTs), GSH (13 RCTs), MDA (12 RCTs), TAC (11 RCTs), and NO levels (8 trials).
Effects of probiotics and synbiotics:
- significantly reduced CRP levels (-0.62 mg/L, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.44, p < 0.001, 31 RCTs), showing greater efficacy in T2DM than prediabetes, particularly in individuals with overweight.
- TNF-α levels decreased in participants with T2D or overweight (-0.48 pg/mL, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.15, p = 0.004, 12 RCTs).
- GSH levels significantly rose (69.80, 95% CI: 33.65 to 105.95, p < 0.001, 13 RCTs), independent of trial duration or baseline BMI.
- MDA levels were significantly reduced (-0.51, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.30, p < 0.001, 12 RCTs) in studies lasting ≥12 weeks.
- TAC significantly increased (73.59, 95% CI: 33.24 to 113.95, p < 0.001, 11 RCTs), with more pronounced effects in longer trials and with probiotics.
- NO levels improved significantly (7.49, 95% CI: 3.12 to 11.86, p = 0.001, 9 trials) in individuals with obesity.
- Positive impacts on CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and TAC were more marked in trials ≥12 weeks.
Conclusions
Probiotic or synbiotic intake may benefit those with prediabetes and T2DM, reducing CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and enhancing TAC, GSH, NO levels, especially in T2DM individuals. Effects are stronger in individuals with overweight or obesity.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation could be recommended to reduce inflammatory biomarkers like CRP and TNF-α, especially in individuals with T2DM.
- The improvements in oxidative stress markers, such as increased TAC and GSH and decreased MDA, support the use of probiotic and synbiotic supplements in managing oxidative stress in T2DM and prediabetes.
- Longer durations (≥12 weeks) of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation may offer a more pronounced effect on antioxidant capacity.
- The findings can guide personalised nutritional recommendations, as for example improvement in inflammation biomarkers and NO were more evident in individuals with T2DM or overweight suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect primarily in these groups. Moreover, markers related to antioxidant capacity were improved in those diagnosed with prediabetes or T2DM irrespective of BMI.
Considerations for future research:
- The beneficial effects on inflammatory and antioxidant/oxidative stress markers suggest a need for larger and longer-term studies to solidify the role of probiotics and synbiotics in benefiting chronic conditions like T2DM and prediabetes.
- There is potential for investigating the specific strains of probiotics that are most effective, considering varying outcomes observed across different studies.
- Research could explore the mechanisms by which probiotics and synbiotics exert their beneficial effects, contributing to a better understanding of gut-health interactions.
- The varying responses based on BMI categories indicate a need for personalised nutrition research to optimise probiotic therapy for individual needs.
- Future studies should consider standardising the dosage and formulation of probiotics to determine the most effective therapeutic doses and combinations.
Abstract
PURPOSE Probiotics or synbiotics consumption have been suggested to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a decline in inflammation and oxidative stress, however, the results from studies are conflicting. This study filled this knowledge gap by evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating probiotics or synbiotics intake on adipokines, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We systematically did search up to March 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane library. A random-effect model was applied to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each outcome. RESULTS A total of 32 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. This intervention led to a significant decrease in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD - 0.62 mg/l; 95% CI - 0.80, - 0.44; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (WMD - 0.27 pg/ml; 95% CI - 0.44, - 0.10; p = 0.002) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (WMD - 0.51 µmol/l; 95% CI - 0.73, - 0.30; p < 0.001), and also a significant increase in levels of glutathione (GSH) (WMD 69.80 µmol/l; 95% CI 33.65, 105.95; p < 0.001), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (WMD 73.59 mmol/l; 95% CI 33.24, 113.95; p < 0.001) and nitric oxide (NO) (WMD 7.49 µmol/l; 95% CI 3.12, 11.86; p = 0.001), without significant alterations in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and adipokines levels. CONCLUSION A consumption of probiotics or synbiotics could be a useful intervention to improve cardiometabolic outcomes through a reduced inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and T2DM.
-
3.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
4.
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, T, Zhang, J, Duan, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), largely classified as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder mediated by genetic, immune, microbial, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to summarise the efficacy of different genetically modified probiotics compared to wild-type probiotics in the treatment of IBD in animal models and patients and to investigate the specific effects and main mechanisms involved. This study was a systematic review of forty-five preclinical studies and one clinical study. Results showed a protective effect of genetically modified organisms (gm) probiotics in colitis. Several protective mechanisms have been identified: reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of the activity of oxidative stress in the colon, improvement of intestinal barrier integrity, modulation of the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, and production of favourable metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, by beneficial bacteria. Authors concluded that gm probiotics are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics, to facilitate clinical translation.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Conclusions of this review were largely based on mouse models and although treatment using probiotics is generally considered safe in humans, with only minor side-effects (flatulence), practitioners need to be aware that in an IBD population the use of GM formulations might not be completely without risk.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This paper summarises the efficacy of specific genetically modified (GM) probiotic formulations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when compared to wild type probiotics. The aim was to ascertain what specific effects and mechanisms such probiotics have on IBD symptomatology.
Methods
- A total of 46 published articles were included; 45 mouse experimental models (induced acute or chronic colitis) (n=15-130) and 1 human IBD population clinical trial (n=10)
- The effect of GM probiotics were compared to placebo and wild-type probiotics in trials including preclinical studies, randomised controlled trials and cohort studies
- Animals received probiotics via gastric gavage (105 - 4 x 1012 CFU) for 3-6 weeks
- The human placebo-uncontrolled trial lasted 7 days and patients received 10 GM capsules of L.lactis (1 x 1010 CFU) twice daily.
Results
- GM probiotics that secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-10 appear to reduce intestinal damage
- The human trial using GM L.lactis resulted in 5 patients who went into complete clinical remission (CDAI, <150) with 3 patients exhibiting a clinical response (decrease in CDAI, >70). with only minor adverse events (flatulence)
- However, human cytokines that promote intestinal barrier function and epithelial restitution were not enhanced with oral administration of probiotics
- Two studies concluded that GM L.lactis and S.boulardii, that secrete atrial natriuretic peptide, might be the most effective options in supporting colitis
- GM L.casei resulted in faster recovery from weight loss in acute colitis models
- Superoxide dismutase (SOD) producing GM L.fermentum increased SOD activity by almost eightfold compared to the wild type
- GM Lact. fermentum furthermore showed a higher survival rate and lower disease activity index (P <0·05) in colitis models
- GM L.lactis improved gut microbial composition and GM S.cerevisiae improved microbial diversity whilst reducing the Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio
- GM E.coli significantly reduced weight loss, colon shortening plus lower disease activity and histological changes (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneity of the trials, GM probiotics appear to play a notable part in ameliorating IBD symptomatology and disease severity when compared to wild-type probiotics. Human efficacy and potential adverse effects require more in-depth trials to ascertain safety and optimal dosages.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotics species used in the trials included S.thermophilus, E.coli, L.lactis, B.ovatus, S.boulardii, L.fermentum, B.longhum, L.casei, L.plantarum, and S.cerevisiae. Wild-types of some of these are already available to use in clinical practice
- Note that oral administration in the human trial showed no significant health outcome, therefore efficacy and safety need to be ascertained on an individual patient level
- Colonisation of beneficial bacteria in the gut of IBD patients might be difficult and any form of supplementation therefore needs to be closely monitored.
Considerations for future research:
- More evidence is needed to demonstrate that GM probiotic formulations result in significantly improved outcomes when compared to wild-types
- Future randomised placebo-controlled trials need to include larger cohorts to determine supplement efficacy
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerance for both Crohn’s Disease and Colitis
- Optimal GM probiotic formulation, doses, and means of application need to be identified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical. RESULTS Forty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that L. lactis producing IL-10 was safe, and a decrease in disease activity was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Gm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
-
5.
A Low-FODMAP Diet Provides Benefits for Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms but Not for Improving Stool Consistency and Mucosal Inflammation in IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Peng, Z, Yi, J, Liu, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(10)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The low-FODMAP diet eliminates carbohydrates that cannot be easily digested in order to reduce functional gastrointestinal symptoms associated with irritable bowel disease (IBD). The symptoms of irritable bowel disease include abdominal pain and bloating. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether a low-FODMAP diet can alleviate functional gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. In comparison with a regular diet, a low-FODMAP diet significantly reduced symptoms of bloating, wind, flatulence, abdominal pain, fatigue, and lethargy in patients with IBD. In addition, patients with Crohn's disease have achieved remission or reduced symptoms after following a low-FODMAP diet. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand better the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on patients with IBD who have functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Further robust studies are, however, required to evaluate the evidence's robustness and identify the mechanism behind the improvement of symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- LFD use in IBD improved symptoms of bloating, wind or flatulence, borborygmi, abdominal pain, and fatigue or lethargy, but not nausea and vomiting.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (UC)] participants with functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang (Chinese) Database up to March 2022. Quality assessment of all included studies was performed.
Results
9 studies (4 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised studies) with a total of 351 participants diagnosed with IBD were included, and compared LFD with a placebo diet or normal diet (ND), overall and individual
LFD Effects of FGS:
- Overall 9 studies: an improvement (0.47, 0.33–0.66, p = 0.0000)
- No difference in the subgroup classified by disease type
- CD and UC: no improvement
Individual improvement:
- Bloating (0.37, 0,24-0,57, p=0.0000); wind or flatulence (0.38, 0,28-0,51, p=0.0000); borborygmi (0.48, 0,26-0,89, p=0.0000), abdominal pain (0.5, 0,37-0,68, p=0.0000), fatigue/lethargy (0.71, 0,61-0,82, p=0.0000)
- No difference in nausea and vomiting (0.54, 0,22-1,32, p=018)
IBS Quality of Life Score:
- 2 studies: reduced Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ) score (11.24, 6.61-15.87, p=0.0000)
Bristol Stool Form Chart:
- 2 studies: normal stool consistency (type 3-4); no difference (5.99, 0.17-216.51, p=0.33)
- 2 other studies: no difference (-0.17, 0.48 - 0.15, p=0.30)
Diseases activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index):
- 2 studies using the Mayo score: no difference (-32, -1,09-0.45, p=0.41)
- 3 studies using BHi score: reduction (-1.09, -1,77-0.42, p=0.002)
Faecal calprotectin:
- 2 studies: no change (-16.03, -36,78-4.73, p=0.13)
Limitations
- Comparison diets were not standardised, suggesting the potential of different dietary habits to bias results..
- Heterogeneity of included studies, and the relatively small sample size of the studies can reduce the reliability of the results.
Conclusion
While the study found inconsistent definition standards for FGS, all the nine studies showed that LFD was associated with an improvement in some symptoms.
Clinical practice applications:
- This study suggests that IBD patients with FGSs may benefit from LFD treatment with the assistance of a healthcare professional.
Considerations for future research:
- This study has shown that LFD can improve FGSs in IBD, but further research with a larger sample size and more comprehensive analysis is warranted to replicate the results.
- The description of the findings and Quality of Life data are a little unclear. The impact on Quality of Life warrants further investigation, as clinicians need to consider the impact of following a restrictive diet on Quality of Life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND A low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) is claimed to improve functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs). However, the role of LFD in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with FGSs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the efficacy of LFD in IBD patients with FGSs. METHODS Six databases were searched from inception to 1 January 2022. Data were synthesized as the relative risk of symptoms improvement and normal stool consistency, mean difference of Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ), IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QoL), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBi), Mayo score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Risk of bias was assessed based on study types. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to analyze publication bias. RESULTS This review screened and included nine eligible studies, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five before-after studies, involving a total of 446 participants (351 patients with LFD vs. 95 controls). LFD alleviated overall FGSs (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, p = 0.0000) and obtained higher SIBDQ scores (MD = 11.24, 95% CI 6.61 to 15.87, p = 0.0000) and lower HBi score of Crohn's disease (MD = -1.09, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.42, p = 0.002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in normal stool consistency, BSFS, IBS-QoL, Mayo score of ulcerative colitis, and FC. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS LFD provides a benefit in FGSs and QoL but not for improving stool consistency and mucosal inflammation in IBD patients. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to develop the optimal LFD strategy for IBD.
-
6.
Igg Food Antibody Guided Elimination-Rotation Diet Was More Effective than FODMAP Diet and Control Diet in the Treatment of Women with Mixed IBS-Results from an Open Label Study.
Ostrowska, L, Wasiluk, D, Lieners, CFJ, Gałęcka, M, Bartnicka, A, Tveiten, D
Journal of clinical medicine. 2021;10(19)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
IBS, also known as irritable bowel syndrome, is a debilitating condition characterised by abdominal pain, irregular bowel movements, and changes in the consistency of stool. Symptoms of IBS may appear shortly after eating a meal. Excluding foods high in FODMAP carbohydrates, such as fermentable oligo- and di-saccharides, mono- and disaccharides, and polyols, or following an elimination rotation diet to reduce IgG-dependent food hypersensitivity, which has been shown to improve IBS symptoms previously. The purpose of this open-label study is to investigate the effectiveness of a low-FODMAPS diet and an elimination rotation diet based on IgG as well as a control diet in reducing symptoms of IBS. During the eight-week study, 73 female subjects with a mix of IBS were assigned to either of the three dietary treatments. Compared to the other diet groups, the IgG based elimination rotation diet group showed a significant improvement in the IBS symptoms and comorbid symptoms after the intervention period. In order to determine whether IgG-mediated food hypersensitivity plays a role in IBS and the efficacy of an IgG-dependent elimination rotation diet in the general population, further robust research is required. Healthcare professionals, however, can make use of these results to gain a better understanding of how an IgG based elimination diet tailored to each individual can improve IBS symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- After implementing the three diets, among patients with IBS-M, a statistically significant reduction of the frequency of the idiopathic abdominal pain, abdominal pain after a meal, abdominal pain during defecation, and sensation of incomplete defecation before and after the diet plans, were only found in Group 2.
- Significantly, only in the Group 2 IgG based elimination-rotation-diet was there a high decrease or complete disappearance of dyspeptic IBS symptoms and co-morbidities together with IBS symptoms.
- This study shows that a personalised dietary approach is more effective in treating IBS than generalised diet recommendations, with elimination diets focused on IgG antibodies providing the best results.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Science supports the use of a low-FODMAP diet for symptom relief of IBS. However, more recently evidence suggests that IBS is a low-grade inflammatory disease that may result from or lead to IgG-dependent food hyper-sensitivities.
This study compared the effectiveness of three dietary treatment plans in 73 female patients diagnosed with mixed-form IBS based on Rome III criteria and no other gastrointestinal condition over 8 weeks.
The 3 dietary groups were:
- Group 1-low FODMAP diet
- Group 2- IgG based elimination-rotation-diet
- Group 3-control diet (control group)
Diets of G1 and G2 were determined individually by a dietitian, based on low-FODMAP dietary information and results from IgG food sensitivity testing respectively. Group 3 received nutrition advice from a gastroenterologist.
In G1, some of the IBS symptoms significantly improved (mucus in stool, p = 0.031; bloating, p < 0.001). Gurgling sensation and gastric fullness also reach statistical significance in G1.
IBS symptoms as well as co-morbid symptoms significantly improved or disappeared completely in G2 (idiopathic abdominal pain, p < 0.001; abdominal pain after a meal, p < 0.001; abdominal pain during defecation, p = 0.008; sensation of incomplete defecation p = 0.001; difficulty to defecate (constipation) p = 0.002; bloating p = < 0.001; gurgling sensation < 0.001; gastric fullness p = < 0.001. However, blood and mucus in the stool were impossible to test because the symptoms were not reported by any patient during the 2nd examination). (p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant).
In group G3 no statistically significant improvements were seen in any measure.
Based on the results of this open-label study, it was concluded that personalised dietary interventions were more effective in the treatment of IBS-M patients than generalised diet recommendations. Dietary elimination based on IgG food sensitivity test results had the greatest impact on IBS and related symptoms.This study supports results from other studies showing an IgG-guided diet as an effective strategy in co-morbid conditions such as fatigue, headache/migraine, and skin conditions.
Conflicts of Interest
C.F.J.L., M.G. and A.B. are employees of the Institute of Microecology in Poznan ,where the ImuPro tests were determined. D.T. is the Head of Laboratory and shareholder of Lab1, offering ImuPro tests in Norway.
Clinical practice applications:
- Low FODMAP diets studies (NICE) showed GI improvements for abdominal pain, abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, gas, and bloating, largely because FODMAPs mainly cause an excessive production of gas, leading to discomfort and pain and an increased osmotic effect leading to increased bowel movement and diarrhoea. However 30% of patients still suffered from bloating on the FODMAP diet. Gurgling sensation decreased from 65% to 15%, and gastric fullness decreased from 58% to 11% in the patients on the low FODMAP diet.
- A potential new approach to resolve functional symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions could be to start with an IgG-guided elimination diet, as it was proven to be the more effective diet in this open study, and in cases of persistent symptoms, it could be combined with a low-FODMAP diet.
- Calprotectin is currently one of the best-known diagnostic markers indicating mucosa inflammation and changes in the inflammation intensity. In this study serious intestinal inflammation was diagnosed at the faecal calprotectin concentration of >50 mg/kg of stool. During the first examination, no statistically significant differences were found in calprotectin concentrations between the compared groups of patients, and the values were low, suggesting that the included patients suffered from low-grade inflammation and were suitable for diet alteration as the best choice of treatment.
Limitations:
- The main limitations of this study are the open-labeled nature, the low number of participants and the bias of only including female participants with only the patients in the G2 group tested for IgG food antibodies.
- Foods consumed by the patients before they entered the study were not ascertained.
Considerations for future research:
- Claims that IgG food antibodies only reveal exposure to food and not intolerance should be reinvestigated in larger double-blinded studies.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disease with recurrent abdominal pain, disturbed bowel emptying, and changes in stool consistency. We compared the effectiveness of three different dietary treatment plans (G1-FM-low FODMAP diet, G2-IP IgG based elimination-rotation-diet, and as control group, the G3-K control diet recommended by an attending gastroenterologist) in treating patients diagnosed with mixed irritable bowel syndrome. A total of seventy-three female patients diagnosed with a mixed form of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-M) were enrolled in the study. The diet of each patient in Group 1 (G1-FM) and 2 (G2-IP) was determined individually during a meeting with a dietitian. Patients from Group 3 (G3-K) received nutrition advice from a gastroenterologist. Significant differences in the reduction of IBS symptoms were found between the groups. IBS symptoms as well as comorbid symptoms significantly improved or disappeared completely in the G2-IP group (idiopathic abdominal pain, p < 0.001; abdominal pain after a meal, p < 0.001; abdominal pain during defecation, p = 0.008), while in the G1-FM group, some of the IBS symptoms significantly improved (mucus in stool, p = 0.031; bloating, p < 0.001). In group G3-K no significant improvement was seen. Based on the results of this open-label study, it was concluded that various dietary interventions in the treatment of IBS-M patients do not uniformly affect the course and outcomes of disease management. Rotation diets based on IgG show significantly better results compared to other diets.
-
7.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Systemic Enzymes and Probiotics in the Resolution of Post-COVID Fatigue.
Rathi, A, Jadhav, SB, Shah, N
Medicines (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;8(9)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) usually lasts for 7-10 days but in a proportion of individuals, long-term symptoms may develop such as fatigue, which can last for at least 12 weeks. Disruptions to the immune system and parts of the cell which produce energy have been observed in these individuals. This randomised control trial of 200 individuals aimed to determine the combined effects of two different multi-enzyme and probiotic supplements; ImmunoSEB and ProbioSEB on Covid-19 induced fatigue. The results showed that supplementation resolved fatigue and lowered fatigue in those who were still fatigued after 14 days compared to taking a placebo. Mental fatigue was also reduced in the supplemented group compared to placebo. It was concluded that 14 days of supplementation with ImmunoSEB and ProbioSEB resolves post-Covid-19 fatigue. This study could be used by health care professionals to recommend the supplementation of ImmunoSEB and ProbioSEB to improve feelings of and in some case resolve fatigue associated with Covid-19.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Multi-enzymes and specific probiotic strains are reported to show positive results in reducing mental and physical fatigue of post-COVID-19 infected patients.
- These multi-enzymes (Peptizyme SP, an enteric coated serratiopeptidase, bromelain, amylase, lysozyme, peptidase, catalase, papain, glucoamylase and lactoferrin) and probiotics (Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus clausii) have also shown early effects (from day four of the intervention) on mental and physical fatigue.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This study reports on a randomized, multicentric, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that was conducted in n=200 subjects with post-COVID-19 fatigue and without active SARSCoV-2 infection, living in India. This study sought to assess the efficacy of a multi-enzyme formulation administered with a probiotic complex on COVID-19-induced fatigue.
Subjects were between the ages of 18 and 75 years, with RT-PCR, confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 at any time followed by an RT-PCR negative test who experienced fatigue and muscle weakness. Subjects were randomized to a test arm (n = 100), an oral supplement of a systemic enzyme complex and a probiotic complex for 14 days, or the control arm (n = 100) which used a placebo.
The multi-enzyme supplement formulation included Peptizyme SP, an enteric coated serratiopeptidase, bromelain, amylase, lysozyme, peptidase, catalase, papain, glucoamylase and lactoferrin. The probiotic supplement included, a blend of Bacillus coagulans LBSC (DSM 17654), Bacillus subtilis PLSSC (ATCC SD 7280) and Bacillus clausii 088AE (MCC 0538).
Treatment efficacy was compared using the Chalder Fatigue scale (CFQ-11), at various time points from days 1 to 14. At endpoint, 200/200 subjects finished the study.
Primary clinical outcomes were:
- The supplemental treatment resulted in the resolution of fatigue by 182 of 200 (91%) in the test arm compared to 30 of 200 (15%) in the control arm on day 14 (p<0.001)
- A beneficial effect was seen even at earlier time points, with a greater proportion of patients in the test arm being fatigue- free on days 4 (16% vs. 0%), 8 (44% vs. 2%), and 11 (87% vs. 7%) vs. the control arm (p<0.001).
The supplements were well tolerated with no adverse events reported.
Secondary clinical outcomes were:
- Subjects in the test arm showed a significant reduction in total as well as physical and mental fatigue scores at all time points vs. the control arm (p<0.001)
- On day 14, there was a significant reduction in all individual measures of physical fatigue (tiredness, need to rest, drowsiness, ability to do things, energy level, muscle strength and feeling of weakness) as well as mental fatigue (concentration, focus and memory) in the test arm vs. the control arm (p<0.001).
Clinical practice applications:
- There have been reports of post-viral fatigue syndrome up to 12 months in other coronavirus infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). A lengthy post-infection fatigue impairs quality of life and has a significant impact on individuals, employers, and the healthcare system. It is therefore essential for clinicians to have early interventions to promote recovery of COVID-19 patients.
- Based on this study, practitioners could therefore consider multi-enzymes and probiotics together with other evidence-based multidisciplinary care approaches to improve functional status and quality of life in patients suffering from post-viral fatigue from COVID-19.
Considerations for future research:
- The treatment period of the study was a one-time intervention of 14 days with no long-term follow-up. A long-term follow-up of patients in future studies is needed to evaluate the potential of recurring fatigue.
- Future studies are also needed to replicate these findings and to test for certain inflammatory and immunity markers to provide further insight into the mechanism of action of supplementing with multi-enzymes, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus clausii.
- Additionally, further investigation is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-enzymes, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus clausii in patients with persistent fatigue for six months or beyond to address the needs of patients suffering from chronic fatigue.
- All the subjects in the study were of Indian ethnicity, therefore further studies of other ethnicities are required.
- This study was capped at 75-year-olds, thus studies in older subjects are warranted.
- Conflict of interest statement: This study was fully funded by the manufacturer of the specialty enzymes and probiotics and the authors are paid employees of the manufacturer.
Abstract
Muscle fatigue and cognitive disturbances persist in patients after recovery from acute COVID-19 disease. However, there are no specific treatments for post-COVID fatigue. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the health supplements ImmunoSEB (systemic enzyme complex) and ProbioSEB CSC3 (probiotic complex) in patients suffering from COVID-19 induced fatigue. A randomized, multicentric, double blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 200 patients with a complaint of post-COVID fatigue. The test arm (n = 100) received the oral supplements for 14 days and the control arm (n = 100) received a placebo. Treatment efficacy was compared using the Chalder Fatigue scale (CFQ-11), at various time points from days 1 to 14. The supplemental treatment resulted in resolution of fatigue in a greater percentage of subjects in the test vs. the control arm (91% vs. 15%) on day 14. Subjects in the test arm showed a significantly greater reduction in total as well as physical and mental fatigue scores at all time points vs. the control arm. The supplements were well tolerated with no adverse events reported. This study demonstrates that a 14 days supplementation of ImmunoSEB + ProbioSEB CSC3 resolves post-COVID-19 fatigue and can improve patients' functional status and quality of life.
-
8.
Impact of Probiotics on the Performance of Endurance Athletes: A Systematic Review.
Díaz-Jiménez, J, Sánchez-Sánchez, E, Ordoñez, FJ, Rosety, I, Díaz, AJ, Rosety-Rodriguez, M, Rosety, MÁ, Brenes, F
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(21)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The relationship between the gut microbiome and exercise has recently been explored to ascertain potential methods of improving athletic performance. Athletes have begun utilising probiotics to improve performance, support the immune system and reduce gastrointestinal problems, however no systematic review has been done to assess the efficacy behind these notions. The aim of this study is to review the use of probiotics in endurance athletes and assess both the direct and indirect associative factors. This review included nine studies and found improvements in athletic performance, oxidative stress markers, immune support, and incidence of upper respiratory tract infections with probiotic use. While there is little scientific evidence on the causative relationship between probiotics and performance, the authors conclude probiotics can enhance athletic performance by ameliorating the indirect consequences of oxidative stress and infection.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Endurance athletes may take probiotic supplements to support immune or GI health or for other reasons
- Currently there is little evidence that probiotics directly or specifically enhance athletic performance
- Probiotic supplementation potentially impacts on immune health particularly during intensive training and may facilitate muscle recovery or maintain performance
- Whilst probiotics may reduced GI symptom frequency and severity, further research is clearly warranted
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- There is current interest in the potential therapeutic benefits of probiotic strategies to support training and in-race performance for endurance athletes.
- Probiotic supplements are typically used by endurance athletes to limit or prevent upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), reduce oxidative stress, support the immune system and modulate gastrointestinal function.
- Based on a limited number of articles sourced in this review (n=26), only 9 met the underlying quality and inclusion criteria. This highlights an important need for further research to be undertaken in this area.
- The review highlighted that different preparations, number of bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs), species type, timecourse and study objectives makes it difficult to determine fundamental conclusions on the efficacy of probiotics.
- That said, papers reviewed indicated the potential for a 55% increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines, reduced prevalence of URTIs, reduced Epstein-Barr and cytomegalovirus citrate antibodies, and improved recovery times.
- Probiotic supplementation likely enhances microbiota diversity and may indirectly support increased training load, and performance maintenance through immune defence. However, there were no indications that endurance performance was specifically enhanced.
Clinical practice applications:
- Most of the papers reviewed used formulae containing either Lactobacillus spp. (e.g. Plantarum, Acidophilus, Casei Shirota) or Bifidobacterium spp. (e.g. animalis subsp., bifidum, lactis, longum subsp.) or combinations. There was little mention of prebiotic or symbiotic strategies.
- Any impact of probiotics on exercise performance is likely to relate to both immune modulation and/or mechanisms leading to reduced muscle damage.
- Surprisingly, there was only partial mention of the use of probiotics for GI support and several notable papers were not included in the review. That said, the authors did note that with increased prevalence of exercise-induced gastrointestinal symptoms with endurance sport due to acute GI hypoperfusion and localised ischemia, acute probiotic strategies have resulted in reduced GI symptom frequency and severity in athletes.
- Importantly no adverse events following probiotic supplementation in endurance athletes were reported.
Considerations for future research:
- Clearly further research is warranted in terms of probiotic strain specific benefits both in training and in-race event effectiveness.
- The authors reported that there were no studies found on the effect of probiotics on hormonal or nervous systems in endurance athletes.
- Further research is needed to consider the impact of acute versus chronic probiotic use on intestinal metabolites, especially considering recent interactions between specific bacterial strains and short-chain fatty acid production being associated with performance (see: https://www.nutrition-evidence.com/article/31235964?term=31235964.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotic supplements contain different strains of living microorganisms that promote the health of the host. These dietary supplements are increasingly being used by athletes to improve different aspects such as athletic performance, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), the immune system, oxidative stress, gastrointestinal (GI) problems, etc. This study aimed to identify the current evidence on the management of probiotics in endurance athletes and their relationship with sports performance. METHODS A systematic review of the last five years was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Sportdiscus and Embase databases. RESULTS Nine articles met the quality criteria. Of these, three reported direct benefits on sports performance. The remaining six articles found improvements in the reduction of oxidative stress, increased immune response and decreased incidence of URTIs. There is little scientific evidence on the direct relationship between the administration of probiotics in endurance athletes and sports performance. CONCLUSIONS Benefits were found that probiotics could indirectly influence sports performance by improving other parameters such as the immune system, response to URTIs and decreased oxidative stress, as well as the monitoring of scheduled workouts.