0
selected
-
1.
Food Exclusion Based on IgG Antibodies Alleviates Symptoms in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study.
Jian, L, Anqi, H, Gang, L, Litian, W, Yanyan, X, Mengdi, W, Tong, L
Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2018;24(9):1918-1925
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory bowel disease that may need lifetime management. Dietary management of UC by eliminating food antigens that may be causing a delayed immune response is one of the approaches used widely to manage the disease. Food intolerance, mediated by immunoglobulin G antibodies in response to food antigens that are otherwise harmless, could be one cause of UC. Low levels of digestive enzymes may result in poor digestion of glucose, amino acids, and glycerol, followed by an immune reaction that leads to food sensitivities. Ninety-seven UC patients were enrolled in this open-label, stratified, prospective, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an elimination diet versus a sham diet (a normal healthy diet). Following an IgG-specific exclusion diet for six months resulted in the alleviation of UC symptoms and an improvement in health-related quality of life. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of the exclusion diet since the intervention group did not show a significant reduction in IgG antibody levels. These results can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the potential role of exclusion diets in the management of UC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) rely predominantly on medication for disease control. Diet interventions can reduce pharmaceutical expenditures and prolong remission. We designed a prospective study to evaluate whether an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-guided exclusion diet would improve symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients with UC. METHODS The 6-month diet intervention included 97 patients with UC, who were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 49) and a control (n = 48) group. Individual diet plans were created for the intervention group according to IgG titers; the control group ate a healthy diet as normal. Observational indices included disease activity, extraintestinal manifestations, nutritional status, and QoL. Relationships between food-specific IgG antibodies and these indices were also analyzed. RESULTS At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups. Food-specific IgG antibodies were detected in 70.10% of participants. After intervention, the Mayo score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (2.41 ± 0.89 vs 3.52 ± 1.15, P < 0.05). The number of patients with extraintestinal manifestations decreased from 7 to 2 in the intervention group and from 6 to 5 in the control group. As for nutritive indices, the intervention group had higher mean body mass index and albumin than the control group (23.88 ± 3.31 vs 21.50 ± 6.24 kg/m2, respectively, P < 0.05; 48.05 ± 6.39 vs 45.72 ± 5.48 g/L, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas prealbumin and transferrin were not significantly different between the groups. QoL improved after food exclusion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS An IgG-guided exclusion diet ameliorated UC symptoms and improved QoL. Interactions between IgG-based food intolerance and UC warrant further study.
-
2.
Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms - an updated evidence-based international consensus.
Hungin, APS, Mitchell, CR, Whorwell, P, Mulligan, C, Cole, O, Agréus, L, Fracasso, P, Lionis, C, Mendive, J, Philippart de Foy, JM, et al
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;47(8):1054-1070
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The role of the gut microbiota in health and disease is far reaching and there is a growing body of evidence on the therapeutic potential of probiotics in gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Patients with GI disease present with a variety of symptoms and current evidence suggests probiotics may play a role in ameliorating these adverse symptoms. The purpose of this review is to update the previous systematic review and incorporate new findings on the role of probiotics in adult patients presenting with a variety of GI symptoms. Based on the updated evidence, this study confirms the finding that specific probiotics are beneficial for certain lower GI problems. According to this review, the author deems this study useful for clinicians when recommending probiotics to patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, a systematic review and Delphi consensus reported that specific probiotics can benefit adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other gastrointestinal (GI) problems. AIM: To update the consensus with new evidence. METHODS A systematic review identified randomised, placebo-controlled trials published between January 2012 and June 2017. Evidence was graded, previously developed statements were reassessed by an 8-expert panel, and agreement was reached via Delphi consensus. RESULTS A total of 70 studies were included (IBS, 34; diarrhoea associated with antibiotics, 13; diarrhoea associated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, 7; other conditions, 16). Of 15 studies that examined global IBS symptoms as a primary endpoint, 8 reported significant benefits of probiotics vs placebo. Consensus statements with 100% agreement and "high" evidence level indicated that specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some patients with IBS and duration/intensity of diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics or H. pylori eradication therapy, and have favourable safety. Statements with 70%-100% agreement and "moderate" evidence indicated that, in some patients with IBS, specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency. CONCLUSIONS This updated review indicates that specific probiotics are beneficial in certain lower GI problems, although many of the new publications did not report benefits of probiotics, possibly due to inclusion of new, less efficacious preparations. Specific probiotics can relieve lower GI symptoms in IBS, prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics and H. pylori eradication therapy, and show favourable safety. This study will help clinicians recommend/prescribe probiotics for specific symptoms.
-
3.
Probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu, MM, Li, ST, Shu, Y, Zhan, HQ
PloS one. 2017;12(6):e0178870
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute radiation-induced diarrhoea is a potentially fatal side effect of radiotherapy for abdominal or pelvic cancers. The mechanisms are not yet known, but effects of the radiation on the microbiota may be a factor and probiotic treatment may therefore be beneficial. The authors of this meta-analysis looked at randomised controlled trials of probiotics in the prevention of radiation-induced diarrhoea with probiotics (there were not enough trials to evaluate probiotics for the treatment of radiation-induced diarrhoea). Only six studies qualified for inclusion into this meta-analysis, with a total of 917 patients (490 receiving probiotics, 427 controls). Compared with placebo, patients receiving probiotics had a significantly lower risk of developing diarrhoea, but there was no significant reduction in anti-diarrhoea medication use or Bristol scale stool form. Most studies did not report adverse events from probiotic treatment. The meta-analysis was limited by several factors: variety of bacterial strains, dosages and timings used, differences in cancer treatment (dose of radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy), variability of patient populations and diseases, and diagnostic criteria for diarrhoea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is commonly used for abdominal or pelvic cancer, and patients receiving radiotherapy have a high risk developing to an acute radiation-induced diarrhea. Several previous studies have discussed the effect of probiotics on prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea, but the results are still inconsistent. OBJECTIVE We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation for prevention the radiation-induced diarrhea. METHODS Relevant RCTs studies assessing the effect of probiotic supplementation on clinical outcomes compared with placebo were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases (up to March 30 2016). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 and H2, and publication bias was evaluated using sensitive analysis. RESULTS Six trials, a total of 917 participants (490 participants received prophylactic probiotics and 427 participants received placebo), were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, probiotics were associated with a lower incidence of radiation-induced diarrhea (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.88; P = 0.01; I2: 87%; 95% CI: 75%-94%; H2: 2.8; 95% CI: 2.0-4.0). However, there is no significant difference in the anti-diarrheal medication use (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.40-1.14; P = 0.14) or bristol scale on stool form (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.35-1.17; P = 0.14). CONCLUSION Probiotics may be beneficial to prevent radiation-induced diarrhea in patients who suffered from abdominal or pelvic cancers during radiotherapy period.
-
4.
Nucleotide supplementation: a randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of IntestAidIB in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome [ISRCTN67764449].
Dancey, CP, Attree, EA, Brown, KF
Nutrition journal. 2006;5:16
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nucleotides are the building blocks of DNA and RNA. Dietary sources of nucleotides are found to varying degrees in many foods – lamb, liver, mushrooms (but not fruit and other vegetables) all are rich in nucleotides. Giving nucleotide supplements to infants has been shown to reduce the incidence and duration of diarrhoea, and animal studies show structural improvements in the intestines when nucleotide supplementation is given. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that nucleotide supplements would improve symptoms in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Thirty-seven people with an IBS diagnosis took part in the study. Participants were asked to rate the severity of their IBS symptoms before and throughout the study period, and psychological measures (anxiety, depression, illness intrusiveness and general health) were also assessed. Participants were assigned to either placebo (56 days) followed by supplement (56 days) or the reverse. The supplement given was IntestAidIB which contained: nucleotides & RNA (concentrated extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisae), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, FOS (fructo-oligosaccharides), Methionine, Glutamine, Inositol, Lysine, Pantothenic acid (Vitamin B5 as Calcium d-pantothenate), Sodium citrate, Riboflavin (Vitamin B2), Vanillin, Folic acid, and Biotin. The supplement improved the severity of all IBS symptoms, apart from diarrhoea, more than the placebo. Symptom improvement ranged from 4 - 6%. A feeling of incomplete evacuation and abdominal pain showed the most improvement and were statistically significant. The differences between groups for diarrhoea, bloating and flatulence were not significant. Although the improvements in symptoms were consistent, the effects were not strong, and the psychological measures showed no improvement. The authors concluded that dietary nucleotide supplementation improves some of the symptoms of IBS. Further studies need to replicate and extend these results, and clarify the mechanism by which improvements occur.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary nucleotide supplementation has been shown to have important effects on the growth and development of cells which have a rapid turnover such as those in the immune system and the gastrointestinal tract. Work with infants has shown that the incidence and duration of diarrhoea is lower when nucleotide supplementation is given, and animal work shows that villi height and crypt depth in the intestine is increased as a result of dietary nucleotides. Dietary nucleotides may be semi-essential under conditions of ill-health, poor diet or stress. Since people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome tend to fulfil these conditions, we tested the hypothesis that symptoms would be improved with dietary nucleotide supplementation. METHODS Thirty-seven people with a diagnosis of Irritable Bowel gave daily symptom severity ratings for abdominal pain, diarrhoea, urgency to have a bowel movement, incomplete feeling of evacuation after a bowel movement, bloating, flatulence and constipation for 28 days (baseline). They were then assigned to either placebo (56 days) followed by experimental (56 days) or the reverse. There was a four week washout period before crossover. During the placebo and experimental conditions participants took one 500 mg capsule three times a day; in the experimental condition the capsule contained the nutroceutical substances. Symptom severity ratings and psychological measures (anxiety, depression, illness intrusiveness and general health) were obtained and analysed by repeated measures ANOVAs. RESULTS Symptom severity for all symptoms (except constipation) were in the expected direction of baseline>placebo>experimental condition. Symptom improvement was in the range 4 - 6%. A feeling of incomplete evacuation and abdominal pain showed the most improvement. The differences between conditions for diarrhoea, bloating and flatulence were not significant at the p < .05 level. There were no significant differences between the conditions for any of the psychological measures. CONCLUSION Dietary nucleotide supplementation improves some of the symptoms of irritable bowel above baseline and placebo level. As expected, placebo effects were high. Apart from abdominal pain and urgency to have a bowel movement, the improvements, while consistent, are modest, and were not accompanied by improvements in any of the psychological measures. We suggest that the percentage improvement over and above the placebo effect is a physiological effect of the nucleotide supplement on the gut. The mechanisms by which these effects might improve symptoms are discussed.
-
5.
Insulin-like growth factor I response during nutritional rehabilitation of persistent diarrhoea.
Bhutta, ZA, Bang, P, Karlsson, E, Hagenäs, L, Nizami, SQ, Söder, O
Archives of disease in childhood. 1999;80(5):438-42
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Persistent diarrhoea in childhood causes severe malnutrition, and morbidity in 15%+ cases. Treatment includes nutritional rehabilitation for weight gain and diarrheal recovery. This study evaluates nutritional recovery (defined as weight gain (> 5 g/kg/day) with a resolution of diarrhea by day 7 of treatment), intestinal permeability and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) response in malnourished children with faltering growth (aged 6-36 months) with persistent diarrhoea ((>/= 14 days) and their relation to concomitant systemic infection(s) (as indicated by serum C reactive protein (CRP)). For a minimum of 7 days, 63 children were fed a previously validated dietary regimen (data not available) of rice–lentil (khitchri) and yogurt aimed at providing at least 100 kcal/kg/day by day 3, with ad libitum feeds thereafter. Children were nursed on a research ward throughout. 49 children were treatment successes. They had a significant increase in serum IGF-I and IGF-I% correlated with weight gain. 14 children did not meet the criteria for nutritional recovery. They had higher serum CRP concentrations and sepsis at admission. They had lower mean (SD) weight gain in spite of overall mean energy intake being comparable with treatment successes. This may indicate malabsoption. Admission CRP concentration and IGF-I were negatively correlated. CRP concentrations at admission and corresponding individual IGF-I values over the 7 days treatment were significantly correlated. Significantly raised CRP concentrations in children with a correspondingly low IGF-I response may indicate a continued inflammatory or infected state in these children. Small but opposing trends of urinary excretion of the oral lactulose dose were seen in both groups over the seven days of treatment, indicating worsening enteropathy (mucosal injury) among treatment failures. None of the permeability parameters correlated with IGF-I at baseline or recovery. The study confirms that a traditional rice–lentil (khitchri) and yogurt diet can be used successfully for enteral nutritional rehabilitation in malnourished children with persistent diarrhoea and leads to adequate weight gain; Serum IGF-I levels correlates closely with weight gain and reduction in stool output; recovery is delayed with sepsis and raised blood CRP concentrations at admission; IGF-I is depressed at admission in children with persistent diarrhoea. The data provide evidence that serum IGF-I response in recovering malnourished children with persistent diarrhoea may provide a sensitive measure of nutritional and diarrhoeal recovery. Further studies are needed to evaluate factors regulating the IGF-I response in such children, especially the effect of intercurrent infections. Arbitrary definition of treatment failure is a study limitation.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of nutritional recovery, intestinal permeability, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) response in malnourished children with persistent diarrhoea and their relation to concomitant systemic infection(s). STUDY DESIGN Open study of severely malnourished children (aged 6-36 months) with persistent diarrhoea (≥ 14 days) admitted for nutritional rehabilitation with a standardised rice-lentil and yogurt diet. Successful recovery was defined prospectively as overall weight gain (> 5 g/kg/day) with a reduction in stool output by day 7 of treatment. Data on coexisting infections and serum C reactive protein (CRP) were collected at admission. RESULTS Of 63 children, 48 (group A) recovered within seven days of dietary treatment. These children had a significant increase in serum IGF-I (DeltaIGF-I%) and, in contrast to serum prealbumin and retinol binding protein, DeltaIGF-I% correlated with weight gain (r = 0.41). There was no correlation between the IGF-I response and intestinal permeability as assessed by urinary lactulose/rhamnose excretion. Treatment failures (group B) included more children with clinical (relative risk, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 19.7) and culture proven sepsis at admission and higher concentrations of serum CRP (median (range), 36 (0-182) v 10 (0-240) mg/l) at admission. There was a negative correlation between admission CRP concentration and DeltaIGF-I% (r = -0.45). CONCLUSIONS In comparison with serum albumin, prealbumin, and retinol binding protein, serum IGF-I increment is a better marker of nutritional recovery in malnourished children with persistent diarrhoea. The possible association of systemic infections, serum IGF-I response, and mucosal recovery needs evaluation in future studies.