-
1.
The entero-endocrine response following a mixed-meal tolerance test with a non-nutritive pre-load in participants with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: A crossover randomized controlled trial proof of concept study.
Muilwijk, M, Beulens, JWJ, Groeneveld, L, Rutters, F, Blom, MT, Agamennone, V, van den Broek, T, Keijser, BJF, Hoevenaars, F
PloS one. 2023;18(8):e0290261
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a process within the mouth and gut that is responsible for sensing nutrients and releasing hormones, which is called the entero-endocrine response. This response is responsible for ensuring that we do not overeat and maintain normal metabolism. The use of stevia, which is a sweetener, instead of sugar in food has been reported to have blood sugar lowering effects, which may be of benefit to individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, it is not fully understood how stevia can affect the entero-endocrine response, especially in individuals with T2D and prediabetes. This cross-over randomised control trial aimed to determine the entero-endocrine response in 20 individuals with either T2D or prediabetes following the consumption of stevia before a meal. The results showed that there was an enhanced entero-endocrine response to stevia in individuals with T2D compared to those with prediabetes. Blood sugar and the hormones responsible for lowering blood sugar and appetite suppression were all higher in individuals with T2D. There were no associations between the composition of the oral or gut microbiota and the entero-endocrine response. It was concluded that the consumption of stevia before a meal differentially effects the entero-endocrine response in individuals with T2D and prediabetes. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the consumption of stevia before a meal elicits an individual response. However, as this was a small study, further understanding of the mechanisms involved would be of benefit.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated differences in short-term entero-endocrine response to a mixed-meal tolerance test preceded by nutrient sensing between participants with pre-diabetes (pre-T2D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Additionally, differences in gut and oral microbiome composition between participants with a high and low entero-endocrine response were investigated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Ten participants with pre-T2D and ten with T2D underwent three test days with pre-loads consisting of either swallowing water (control), or rinsing with a non-nutritive sweetener solution, or swallowing the sweetener solution before a mixed-meal tolerance test. Blood glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucagon, glucose, insulin and peptide YY (PYY) were determined at t = -20, 0, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes. The composition of the oral and gut microbiome at baseline were also determined. RESULTS The entero-endocrine response differed by pre-loads, e.g. a lower PYY response after swallowing the non-nutritive sweetener (-3585.2pg/mL [95% CI: -6440.6; -729.8]; p = 0.01). But it also differed by T2D status, e.g. a higher glucose, glucagon and PYY response was found in participants with T2D, compared to those with pre-T2D. Evidence for associations between the oral and gut microbiome composition and the entero-endocrine response was limited. Still, the level of entero-endocrine response was associated with several oral microbiome measures. Higher oral anterior α-diversity was associated with a lower PYY response (e.g. Inverse Simpson index -1357pg/mL [95% CI -2378; -336; 1.24]), and higher oral posterior α-diversitywith a higher GIP response (e.g. Inverse Simpson index 6773pg/mL [95% CI 132; 13414]) in models adjusted for sex, age and T2D status. CONCLUSIONS Non-nutritive pre-loads influence the entero-endocrine response to a mixed-meal, and this effect varies based on (pre-)T2D status. The entero-endocrine response is likely not associated with the gut microbiome, and there is limited evidence for association with the α-diversity of the oral microbiome composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial register: Netherlands Trial Register NTR7212, accessible through International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: ICTRP Search Portal (who.int).
-
2.
Cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes and prediabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Filippini, T, Wise, LA, Vinceti, M
Environment international. 2022;158:106920
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cadmium is a toxic metal released in the environment after both natural and anthropogenic activities, particularly in contaminated and industrial areas devoted to smelting and refining of metals, and the manufacturing of batteries, coatings, or plastics. Exposure to cadmium may occur through occupational activities, smoking, food, and air pollution. The aim of this study was to provide updated literature on cadmium exposure and the risk of both type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, and to model the shape of these associations using a dose response approach. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of forty-two studies. Diabetes was investigated as an outcome in thirty-one studies, prediabetes in four studies, and both diabetes and prediabetes in seven studies. Results show that higher cadmium exposure was associated with increased risks of both diabetes and prediabetes. Diabetes risk increased linearly in studies using urinary cadmium concentrations, while disease risk increased only at the highest exposure levels when assessed using blood concentrations. The analysis for prediabetes also showed a linear increase in risk from low exposure, with a flattening effect at higher urinary cadmium concentrations. Authors conclude that their findings add to the available evidence on potential adverse health effects of environmental exposure to cadmium.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Cadmium exposure through diet, occupational exposure and smoking may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in affected individuals.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Cadmium exposure might occur through occupational activities, food, air pollution, and smoking. Smokers, in particular, have higher blood cadmium concentrations than non-smokers. Food is the main transmission route for non-smokers, particularly cereals, vegetables, mollusks, and offal. Females and older adults are at a greater risk due to an increased risk of iron deficiency in these population groups, leading to increased absorption, as well as greater age-related bioaccumulation.
Furthermore, cadmium exposure has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes in a number of studies, as referenced in the present manuscript. However, the magnitude and shape of the correlation are uncertain.This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore investigates the relationship between exposure to cadmium and type 2 diabetes and prediabetes risk.
Methods
- The systematic review was conducted and reported in line with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Search strings related to the terms “cadmium” and “diabetes”, or “prediabetes state” in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE databases were employed to search for relevant articles. Latest search date: 1 October 2021.
- Eligibility criteria included: studies evaluating cadmium exposure via biomarker levels with outcomes of interest being type 2 diabetes or prediabetes using WHO criteria and the American Diabetes Association; and reporting of relative risk estimates using the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), or odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CIs). For inclusion in dose-response meta-analysis: reported effect estimates for all exposure categories along with dose in each category.
- Studies were assessed for risk of bias using theROBINS-E tool. Overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
- The meta-analysis involved estimating RRs with corresponding 95% CIs from each study. Generalised least-squares regression with a random effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation were used. The highest versus lowest exposure categories were compared. The association between exposure and risk of diabetes or prediabetes was investigated using a one-stage dose-response meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed and heterogeneity between studies was assessed..
Results
- 42 eligible studies (case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies), ranging 65-34, 814 male and female adult participants, were identified investigating the association between cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes or prediabetes. Seven of the included studies were at overall high risk of bias; heterogeneity in the resulting meta-analyses was moderate to substantial. Sensitivity analyses indicated comparable results. Assessment with GRADE found no major inconsistency, indirectness or imprecision for either outcome.
- Comparing the highest versus lowest cadmium exposure concentrations associated with type 2 diabetes resulted in a RR of 1.24 (95% CI 0.96–1.59), RR 1.21 (CI 95% 1.00–1.45), and RR 1.47 (CI 95% 1.01–2.13) for blood, urinary, and toenail matrices, respectively. Concurrently, there was an elevated risk of prediabetes for cadmium levels in urine of RR 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15–1.73) and blood RR 1.38 (95% CI: 1.16–1.63), respectively.
- In the dose-response meta-analysis, a linear positive correlation between increasing urinary cadmium levels and diabetes risk was observed, with a RR 1.25 (95% CI 0.90–1.72) at concentration 2.0 µg/g of creatinine compared with no exposure. Conversely, for blood cadmium concentrations, the diabetes risk seemed to rise above 1 µg/L compared with no exposure. Moreover, prediabetes risk increased up to approximately 2 µg/g creatinine beyond which a plateau was reached with RR 1.40 (95% CI 1.12–1.76) at 2 µg/g creatinine.
- The meta-regression showed a negligible correlation between blood cadmium levels and diabetes risk. However, a positive yet imprecise association was found with increasing urinary cadmium concentrations. Similarly, no association was observed between blood cadmium concentrations and risk of prediabetes, whereas a positive relationship with urinary cadmium levels was observed. However, these findings were based on a limited cohort of studies.
Conclusions
- A positive linear correlation between cadmium concentration (measured in multiple matrices) and risk of both type 2 diabetes and prediabetes with a dose-response relationship (moderate-certainty evidence) were observed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes risk increased linearly in studies using urinary cadmium concentrations, whereas disease risk increased only at the highest exposure levels when assessed using blood levels. The analysis for prediabetes also demonstrated a linear increase in risk from low exposure, which plateaued at higher urinary cadmium concentrations.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners and clients of the risks of cadmium exposure in the diet, through occupational exposure, and through smoking.
- To motivate practitioners to educate themselves and their clients regarding the foods which may pose a higher risk of cadmium exposure (not reviewed in the present article).
- To advise clients on prediabetes and type 2 diabetes risk from cadmium exposure through smoking.
Considerations for future research:
- As cited by the authors, future studies could incorporate stratified analysis in specific subgroups, e.g., non-smokers, or could be restricted to prospective cohort studies with more sufficient data,
- Large-scale observational studies could be conducted investigating cadmium exposure in smokers versus non-smokers.
- Clinical trials could be performed to evaluate the effect of reduction or cessation of tobacco smoking on total body cadmium concentrations .
- Continuous surveillance of dietary cadmium exposure and other heavy metals should be prioritised to inform public health.
- Dietary interventions could assess the possibility to attenuate the risk of cadmium exposure.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cadmium exposure has been associated with increased diabetes risk in several studies, though there is still considerable debate about the magnitude and shape of the association. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the relation between cadmium exposure and risk of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, and to summarize data on the magnitude and shape of the association. DATA SOURCE After conducting an online literature search through October 1, 2021, we identified 42 eligible studies investigating the association between cadmium exposure and risk of diabetes and prediabetes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies that assessed cadmium exposure through biomarker levels; examined type 2 diabetes or prediabetes among outcomes; and reported effect estimates for cadmium exposure for meta-analysis only. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Studies were evaluated using ROBINS-E risk of bias tool. We quantitively assessed the relation between exposure and study outcomes using one-stage dose-response meta-analysis with a random effects meta-analytical model. RESULTS In the meta-analysis, comparing highest-versus-lowest cadmium exposure levels, summary relative risks (RRs) for type 2 diabetes were 1.24 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.59), 1.21 (1.00-1.45), and 1.47 (1.01-2.13) for blood, urinary, and toenail matrices, respectively. Similarly, there was an increased risk of prediabetes for cadmium concentrations in both urine (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.73) and blood (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.16-1.63). In the dose-response meta-analysis, we observed a consistent linear positive association between cadmium exposure and diabetes risk, with RRs of 1.25 (0.90-1.72) at 2.0 µg/g of creatinine. Conversely for blood cadmium, diabetes risk appeared to increase only above 1 µg/L. Prediabetes risk increased up to approximately 2 µg/g creatinine above which it reached a plateau with RR of 1.42 (1.12-1.76) at 2 µg/g creatinine. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides moderate-certainty evidence for a positive association between cadmium exposure (measured in multiple matrices) and risk of both diabetes and prediabetes.
-
3.
Time-restricted eating and exercise training improve HbA1c and body composition in women with overweight/obesity: A randomized controlled trial.
Haganes, KL, Silva, CP, Eyjólfsdóttir, SK, Steen, S, Grindberg, M, Lydersen, S, Hawley, JA, Moholdt, T
Cell metabolism. 2022;34(10):1457-1471.e4
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A healthy diet and regular physical activity are primary lifestyle strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity and its associated conditions. However, poor adherence rates to these strategies limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a popular dietary strategy that emphasises the timing of meals in alignment with diurnal circadian rhythms, permitting ad libitum energy intake during a restricted eating window (8–10 h between the first and last energy intake of the day). The aim of this study was to investigate the isolated and combined effects of TRE and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic health outcomes in women with overweight/obesity. This study is a 7-week randomised controlled trial with four parallel groups: TRE (energy intake limited to a %10-h eating window every day), HIIT (three supervised treadmill exercise sessions per week), a combination (TREHIIT), and a control group (CON, no intervention). Participants (n=131) were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. . Results show that 7 weeks of TRE, HIIT, or a combination failed to improve glycaemic control in reproductive-aged women with overweight/obesity. However, the combination of TRE and HIIT significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin levels compared with CON and induced greater losses in body weight, fat mass, and visceral fat area compared with either intervention alone. Isolated TRE resulted in lower nocturnal glucose concentrations compared with CON. Authors conclude that combining TRE with HIIT can rapidly induce several health benefits and decrease metabolic disease risk in women with overweight/obesity. In fact, the high rates of compliance and adherence shown in their findings, highlight the potential of these diet-exercise (TRE and HIIT) protocols to be implemented in clinical practice for treatment and primary prevention of overweight/ obesity.
Abstract
Diet modification and exercise training are primary lifestyle strategies for obesity management, but poor adherence rates limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve cardiometabolic health in at-risk individuals, but whether these two interventions combined induce superior improvements in glycemic control than each individual intervention is not known. In this four-armed randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019860), we determined the isolated and combined effects of 7 weeks of TRE (≤10-h daily eating window, with ad libitum energy intake) and HIIT (three exercise sessions per week), compared with a non-intervention control group, on glycemic control and secondary cardiometabolic outcomes in 131 women (36.2 ± 6.2 years) with overweight/obesity. There were no statistically significant effects after isolated TRE, HIIT, or a combination (TREHIIT) on glucose area under the curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (the primary outcome) compared with the control group (TRE, -26.3 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -82.3 to 29.7, p = 0.36; HIIT, -53.8 mmol/L; 95% CI, -109.2 to 1.6, p = 0.057; TREHIIT, -41.3 mmol/L; 95% CI, -96.4 to 13.8, p = 0.14). However, TREHIIT improved HbA1c and induced superior reductions in total and visceral fat mass compared with TRE and HIIT alone. High participant adherence rates suggest that TRE, HIIT, and a combination thereof may be realistic diet-exercise strategies for improving markers of metabolic health in women at risk of cardiometabolic disease.
-
4.
Type 2 diabetes preventive effects with a 12-months sardine-enriched diet in elderly population with prediabetes: An interventional, randomized and controlled trial.
Díaz-Rizzolo, DA, Serra, A, Colungo, C, Sala-Vila, A, Sisó-Almirall, A, Gomis, R
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;40(5):2587-2598
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Older people have a higher risk of developing Type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to the possibility of β-cell dysfunction due to ageing. Sardines are believed to be protective against the development of T2D. Therefore, this randomised controlled trial evaluated the preventative effects of a sardine-rich diet in elderly prediabetic patients. For one year, both the sardine group (SG) and control group (CG) followed a T2D prevention diet, with the SG consuming 200 g of sardines each week. Both groups improved body weight, BMI, waist and hip circumference, and body composition. Taurine, EPA, DHA, omega-3 fatty acid, calcium, iodine, zinc, phosphorous and fluoride, vitamin B12 and D, and lycopene and tocopherols were found to be higher in the SG than the CG, indicating the sardines were protective against T2D. In SG, HDL cholesterol and adiponectin levels were significantly increased, and blood pressure and triglycerides were decreased, signalling a reduced risk of T2D and cardiovascular disease. In addition, SG showed a reduction in HOMA-IR and an Omega-3 fatty acid was substituted for Omega-6 fatty acids in the erythrocyte membrane, suggesting a reduced risk of T2D. Further robust research is required to confirm the protective effect of a sardine-enriched diet against T2D. It may be useful to healthcare providers to comprehend how a sardine-enriched diet could improve obesity, T2D and CVD markers in pre-diabetic elderly patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fish could play a role in preventing type 2 diabetes (T2D) but there has been little specification about the type of fish and the preventive mechanism involved in its health claim. The sardine is a source of omega-3 and taurine that, in isolation or in synergy, would produce T2D-delaying through different molecular mechanism. HYPOTHESIS The consumption of twice a week of sardine, during one year would reduce T2D-developing risk in a population with prediabetes (preDM) and old age. DESIGN 152 subjects with fasting glucose between 100-124 mg/dL aged ≥65 yo were recruited from three primary care centers in Barcelona and were randomly distributed among two interventional groups: control group (CG) and sardine group (SG). Both groups received same T2D-prevention nutritional during a year but only SG had to add 200 g of sardine per week. All variables were collected before to start and at the end of the diet. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03557541). RESULTS 152 people were randomized into CG (n=77) and SG (n=75) with 18 and 12 drop outs respectively. Subjects in SG, significantly compared to CG, decreased percentage classified-individuals in a very high risk group to develop T2D according to FINDRISC (p=0.035). In addition to increasing HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin and decreasing triglycerides (p<0.05) and blood pressure (<0.05), SG showed a lower HOMA-IR (p=0.032). The consumption of sardine characteristics nutrients as omega-3, EPA and DHA, vitamin D, fluorine and taurine were higher for SG (p<0.05). These results agreed with the increased of taurine, fatty acid (FA) omega-3 and bile acids circulating metabolites (p<0.05). Changes erythrocyte membrane FA were detected only in SG with a decrease of 5 omega-6 FA (p<0.001) and an increase of 3 omega-3 FA types (p<0.001). CONCLUSION We conclude that a year T2D-prevention diet with sardine supplementation has a greater protective effect against developing T2D and CV events.
-
5.
Dietary Flaxseed as a Strategy for Improving Human Health.
Parikh, M, Maddaford, TG, Austria, JA, Aliani, M, Netticadan, T, Pierce, GN
Nutrients. 2019;11(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Flaxseed is a rich source of the omega-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid, lignans and fibre. Four common forms of flaxseed include whole flaxseed, ground flaxseed, flaxseed oil, partially defatted flaxseed meal and flax “milk”. The aim of this review was to provide a broad summary of the highlights of the research that have supported the growth of flaxseed as a commodity with significance in the fields of health and medicine. Research shows that: - flaxseed supplementation reduced blood glucose in subjects with type 2 diabetes and lowered blood glucose in subjects with prediabetes. - flaxseeds are used extensively in animal studies to treat a variety of cancers namely breast cancer. - dietary flaxseed may also improve aspects of brain function during conditions of neural disease. - dietary flaxseed may also exhibit a protective effect against menopausal symptoms. - flaxseed supplementation in the diet may alter the bacterial flora in the intestines of animals. Authors conclude that supplementation of the diet with milled flaxseed has many healthy benefits to the body.
Abstract
Flaxseed is a rich source of the omega-3 fatty acid, alpha linolenic acid, the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside and fiber. These compounds provide bioactivity of value to the health of animals and humans through their anti-inflammatory action, anti-oxidative capacity and lipid modulating properties. The characteristics of ingesting flaxseed or its bioactive components are discussed in this article. The benefits of administering flaxseed or the individual bioactive components on health and disease are also discussed in this review. Specifically, the current evidence on the benefits or limitations of dietary flaxseed in a variety of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, gastro-intestinal health and brain development and function, as well as hormonal status in menopausal women, are comprehensive topics for discussion.
-
6.
Olive Polyphenols and the Metabolic Syndrome.
Saibandith, B, Spencer, JPE, Rowland, IR, Commane, DM
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2017;22(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Up to 25% of the world’s population has metabolic syndrome (MetS), characterised by a combination of high blood pressure, high blood sugar, obesity and abnormal levels of fats in the blood. People with MetS have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease. The development of MetS is related to modifiable diet and lifestyle factors. This review presents evidence from previous studies investigating the relationship between consumption of olive products, and aspects of MetS, and discusses potential mechanisms linking olive consumption to improvements in markers of health. The authors found good evidence from previous human studies showing that the consumption of olives and olive oil lowers blood pressure in people diagnosed with high blood pressure. There is also good evidence that olives and olive oil can improve blood glucose levels in those with prediabetes and improve markers of lipid peroxidation. There is limited, but promising evidence for effects on dyslipidaemia and the inhibition of weight gain. Studies that used extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) used doses of up to 50g per day, well above the amount that is consumed habitually in most diets. Further evidence is needed to confirm the mechanisms and benefits of olive polyphenols, but the authors suggest that they may explain some of the metabolic benefits associated with a Mediterranean diet.
Abstract
Here, the effects of consuming polyphenol-rich olive products, including olive leaves, their crude extract, and extra virgin olive oil, on aspects of the metabolic syndrome are reviewed. We have sought to summarize the available scientific evidence from dietary intervention trials demonstrating a role for these phytochemicals in ameliorating aberrant glucose metabolism, high blood pressure and elevated blood lipids, and we discuss the potential mechanisms underpinning these observations. Searches for relevant literature published in English were conducted via PubMed and Science Direct. Based on published dietary intervention studies, there is convincing evidence to show that olive polyphenols, independently of olive lipids, reduce risk factors for metabolic syndrome, in particular by improving blood sugar and blood pressure control, and in reducing low density lipoprotein oxidation. There is more limited evidence to suggest that the consumption of olive polyphenols or related products can reduce body weight and visceral fat or impede weight gain, and similarly there are some limited data suggesting improved lipid profiles. There is some mechanistic data to support observations made in human volunteers, but further work is needed in this area. The consumption of olive polyphenols within the context of a healthy pattern of food intake may, in part, explain the reduced risk of metabolic disease associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
-
7.
Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.
Mozaffarian, D
Circulation. 2016;133(2):187-225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet-related cardiometabolic conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, pose a significant health and economic burden across the world. In recent years, scientific advances and research have generated enormous insights, yet there remain many controversies and unanswered questions. This extensive review summarizes recent evidence of key-dietary components and their impact on cardiometabolic health. Amongst the topics covered are dietary patterns, food quality and processing, genetics, personalized nutrition, supplements, functional foods and the existing knowledge on selected food groups such as carbohydrates, meat and fats alongside relevant vitamins, minerals and plant compounds. The author highlights how an oversimplified concept of nutrition from previous decades, has led to an array of conflicting advice and undermined the nuanced and complex impact that diet and nutrition can have on the body. Thus in light of the evidence, food-based interventions and dietary patterns are suggested as favourable, with less focus on dietary components in isolation. Throughout the paper, the need for adjunct support to facilitate sustainable health-promoting behaviour changes is recognized. Calling for additional measures to address behaviour change, health systems reforms, targeting socioeconomic inequalities, employing novel technologies, and adequate policymaking. This overview of recent evidence yields a comprehensive source of information, worthwhile reviewing when designing personalised diet plans in support of cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of poor health. Nutrition and policy science have advanced rapidly, creating confusion yet also providing powerful opportunities to reduce the adverse health and economic impacts of poor diets. This review considers the history, new evidence, controversies, and corresponding lessons for modern dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Major identified themes include the importance of evaluating the full diversity of diet-related risk pathways, not only blood lipids or obesity; focusing on foods and overall diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients; recognizing the complex influences of different foods on long-term weight regulation, rather than simply counting calories; and characterizing and implementing evidence-based strategies, including policy approaches, for lifestyle change. Evidence-informed dietary priorities include increased fruits, nonstarchy vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, vegetable oils, yogurt, and minimally processed whole grains; and fewer red meats, processed (eg, sodium-preserved) meats, and foods rich in refined grains, starch, added sugars, salt, and trans fat. More investigation is needed on the cardiometabolic effects of phenolics, dairy fat, probiotics, fermentation, coffee, tea, cocoa, eggs, specific vegetable and tropical oils, vitamin D, individual fatty acids, and diet-microbiome interactions. Little evidence to date supports the cardiometabolic relevance of other popular priorities: eg, local, organic, grass-fed, farmed/wild, or non-genetically modified. Evidence-based personalized nutrition appears to depend more on nongenetic characteristics (eg, physical activity, abdominal adiposity, gender, socioeconomic status, culture) than genetic factors. Food choices must be strongly supported by clinical behavior change efforts, health systems reforms, novel technologies, and robust policy strategies targeting economic incentives, schools and workplaces, neighborhood environments, and the food system. Scientific advances provide crucial new insights on optimal targets and best practices to reduce the burdens of diet-related cardiometabolic diseases.