-
1.
Effect of omega-3 supplementation on lipid profile in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Khorshidi, M, Hazaveh, ZS, Alimohammadi-Kamalabadi, M, Jamshidi, S, Moghaddam, OM, Olang, B, Hatefi, S, Hosseini, A, Jamilian, P, Zarezadeh, M, et al
Nutrition journal. 2023;22(1):9
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dyslipidaemia is considered as a substantial risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is characterised by increased levels of triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Consumption of omega-3 supplements play an important role in reduction of CVD events and its associated mortality by ameliorating lipid profile via lowering triglyceride levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omega 3 supplementation on lipid profile in children and adolescents. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fourteen studies. Three trials out of 14 had cross-over design, while others were parallel randomised trials. Results show that omega-3 supplementation may exert therapeutic effects on triglyceride (TG) levels, however, there weren’t any remarkable effects on HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol status. The subgroup analysis showed an improvement in TG levels in studies conducted on participants ≤13 years old and those with hypertriglyceridemia. Furthermore, due to meta-regression results, the omega-3 supplementation improved HDL levels when administered with longer duration. Authors conclude that omega-3 supplementation may have favourable hypolipidemic effects through reduction of TG levels. Additionally, clinical trials with longer duration of intervention and appropriate designs are recommended for younger children and those with hypertriglyceridemia.
Abstract
PURPOSE Dyslipidemia is considered as a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Yet various trials with wide ranges of doses and durations have reported contradictory results. We undertook this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether omega-3 supplementation can affect lipid profile in children and adolescents. METHODS Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched up to March 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect method. Effect size was expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 index. In order to identification of potential sources of heterogeneity, predefined subgroup and meta-regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS A total of 14 RCTs with 15 data sets were included. Based on the combination of effect sizes, there was a significant reduction in TG levels (WMD: -15.71 mg/dl, 95% CI: -25.76 to -5.65, P=0.002), with remarkable heterogeneity (I2=88.3%, P<0.001). However, subgroup analysis revealed that omega-3 supplementation significantly decreased TG only in studies conducted on participants ≤13 years old (WMD=-25.09, 95% CI: -43.29 to -6.90, P=0.007), (I2=84.6%, P<0.001) and those with hypertriglyceridemia (WMD=-28.26, 95% CI: -39.12 to -17.41, P<0.001), (I2=0.0%, P=0.934). Omega-3 supplementation had no significant effect on total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL levels. Also, results of nonlinear analysis showed significant effect of treatment duration on HDL status (Pnon-linearity=0.047). CONCLUSION Omega-3 supplementation may significantly reduce TG levels in younger children and those with hypertriglyceridemia. Also, based on the HDL-related results, clinical trials with longer duration of intervention are recommended in this population.
-
2.
Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Jalili, C, Talebi, S, Mehrabani, S, Bagheri, R, Wong, A, Amirian, P, Zarpoosh, M, Ghoreishy, SM, Kermani, MAH, Moradi, S
Lipids in health and disease. 2022;21(1):132
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Research indicates that alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by improving blood lipids, blood pressure, and haemostatic factors, among others. Camelina oil, considered a good source of ALA compared to other edible oils, is one of the richest dietary sources of omega-3 fatty acids, with a polyunsaturated fatty acid content over 50%. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycaemic control in human studies. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials with a total of 428 individuals (202 participants in the COS group and 226 in the control group). Results did not show any affects of COS on lipid profile and glycaemic indices compared with placebo intake. However, subgroup analysis showed that COS for more than 8 weeks and at a dose lower than 30g/d could decrease total cholesterol. Authors conclude that COS may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for the improvement of this lipid marker. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings of this study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. METHODS Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to July 1, 2022. RTCs with an intervention duration of less than 2 weeks, without a placebo group, and those that used COS in combination with another supplement were excluded. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were pooled by applying a random-effects model, while validated methods examined sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS Seven eligible RCTs, including 428 individuals, were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that COS significantly improved total cholesterol in studies lasting more than 8 weeks and utilizing dosages lower than 30 g/d compared to the placebo group. The results of fractional polynomial modeling indicated that there were nonlinear dose-response relations between the dose of COS and absolute mean differences in low-density cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and total cholesterol, but not triglycerides. It appears that the greatest effect of COS oil occurs at the dosage of 20 g/day. CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis indicates that COS may reduce cardiovascular disease risk by improving lipid profile markers. Based on the results of this study, COS at dosages lower than 30 g/d may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for lipid control. Further RCTs with longer COS durations are warranted to expand on these results.
-
3.
Impact of α-Linolenic Acid, the Vegetable ω-3 Fatty Acid, on Cardiovascular Disease and Cognition.
Sala-Vila, A, Fleming, J, Kris-Etherton, P, Ros, E
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2022;13(5):1584-1602
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
α-Linolenic acid (ALA) is an omega-3 fatty acid found in seeds and nuts such as flaxseeds, chia seeds, and walnuts and in oils such as canola oil, soybean oil, flaxseed oil and walnut oil. It has been shown to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease. This meta-analysis examined the results of various studies, including epidemiologic studies, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews, to evaluate the beneficial effects of ALA in improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease. The included studies showed a correlation between ALA intake and a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease, possibly due to ALA's anti-inflammatory properties, as well as its ability to reduce total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure. The analysis also found that ALA intake may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment. Healthcare professionals can leverage the findings of this analysis to educate individuals about the benefits of dietary ALA in improving cardiovascular and cognitive outcomes. However, further studies are necessary to establish definitive conclusions and determine therapeutic dosage.
Abstract
Given the evidence of the health benefits of plant-based diets and long-chain n-3 (ω-3) fatty acids, there is keen interest in better understanding the role of α-linolenic acid (ALA), a plant-derived n-3 fatty acid, on cardiometabolic diseases and cognition. There is increasing evidence for ALA largely based on its major food sources (i.e., walnuts and flaxseed); however, this lags behind our understanding of long-chain n-3 fatty acids. Meta-analyses of observational studies have shown that increasing dietary ALA is associated with a 10% lower risk of total cardiovascular disease and a 20% reduced risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [AlphaOmega trial, Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) trial, and Lyon Diet Heart Study] all showed benefits of diets high in ALA on cardiovascular-related outcomes, but the AlphaOmega trial, designed to specifically evaluate ALA effects, only showed a trend for benefit. RCTs have shown that dietary ALA reduced total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure, and epidemiologic studies and some trials also have shown an anti-inflammatory effect of ALA, which collectively account for, in part, the cardiovascular benefits of ALA. A meta-analysis reported a trend toward diabetes risk reduction with both dietary and biomarker ALA. For metabolic syndrome and obesity, the evidence for ALA benefits is inconclusive. The role of ALA in cognition is in the early stages but shows promising evidence of counteracting cognitive impairment. Much has been learned about the health benefits of ALA and with additional research we will be better positioned to make strong evidence-based dietary recommendations for the reduction of many chronic diseases.
-
4.
Effect of Omega-3 Dosage on Cardiovascular Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Interventional Trials.
Bernasconi, AA, Wiest, MM, Lavie, CJ, Milani, RV, Laukkanen, JA
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2021;96(2):304-313
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is mixed evidence to support the use of omega-3 fatty acids for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Animal studies have shown promising results, but randomised control trials are inconsistent, possibly due to differing doses used, or differences in the subject’s omega-3 levels at the start of the trial. This meta-analysis of 40 studies with over 135,000 subjects aimed to determine whether omega-3 supplementation reduces heart disease risk and whether dosage has a role. The results showed that omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of heart attacks, death from heart attacks and deaths due to heart disease, and the higher the dose, the greater the protection. The majority of studies were on individuals who had already had a heart attack or who had suffered from a related condition. It was concluded that supplementation with omega-3 is effective in preventing heart disease and heart attacks and the protective effect increases with dosage. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to prevent further heart disease and heart attacks in individuals who have already suffered from one of these conditions.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the effect of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and the effect of dosage. METHODS This study is designed as a random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized control trials with EPA/DHA supplementation. This is an update and expanded analysis of a previously published meta-analysis which covers all randomized control trials with EPA/DHA interventions and cardiovascular outcomes published before August 2019. The outcomes included are myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD) events, CVD events (a composite of MI, angina, stroke, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, sudden death, and non-scheduled cardiovascular surgical interventions), CHD mortality and fatal MI. The strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. RESULTS A total of 40 studies with a combined 135,267 participants were included. Supplementation was associated with reduced risk of MI (relative risk [RR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.96), high certainty number needed to treat (NNT) of 272; CHD events (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97), high certainty NNT of 192; fatal MI (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91]), moderate certainty NNT = 128; and CHD mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98), low certainty NNT = 431, but not CVD events (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.00). The effect is dose dependent for CVD events and MI. CONCLUSION Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Supplementation with EPA and DHA is an effective lifestyle strategy for CVD prevention, and the protective effect probably increases with dosage.
-
5.
Effects of fish oil supplement on psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yang, SJ, Chi, CC
BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2019;19(1):354
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis which has substantial negative impact on affected patient’s quality of life. The aim of this study was to systemically assess the evidence on the effects of fish oil supplement in treating psoriasis. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen randomized controlled trials with 625 participants. Results demonstrate that fish oil supplement did not significantly reduce the severity of psoriasis. Authors conclude that there is no consistent evidence supporting the use of fish oil supplement in treating psoriasis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fish oils, which contain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as the active ingredients, possess anti-inflammatory activities and may have therapeutic potential in diseases with an inflammatory etiology. Fish oil supplement has been advocated for treating psoriasis which is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the effects of fish oil supplement on psoriasis. METHODS We searched CENTRAL, Embase and MEDLINE on 24 January 2018 for randomized control trials (RCTs) on the effects of fish oil supplement in treating psoriasis. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included RCTs. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to obtain the pooled treatment effect estimates. RESULTS We included 13 RCTs with 625 participants. Three RCTs involving 337 participants provided usable data for meta-analysis. Fish oil supplement did not significantly reduce the severity of psoriasis when assessed by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (mean difference - 0.28; 95% confidence interval - 1.74 to 1.19). CONCLUSION The current evidence does not support the use of fish oil supplement in treating psoriasis.
-
6.
Effect of High-Dose Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Sekikawa, A, Cui, C, Sugiyama, D, Fabio, A, Harris, WS, Zhang, X
Nutrients. 2019;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This systematic review and meta-analysis reports that high dose omega 3 at a dose of 3g/day with 90% purity significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis and is a promising mechanism for reducing cardiovascular (CVD) incidents. The study reviewed 6 articles from 2016-2017 with a total of 693 participants, which met the criteria of omega 3 and a primary outcome on atherosclerosis. Only one trial was placebo controlled with the remaining five open-label trials with no placebo. Four of the trials were conducted in Japan using a highly purified EPA whilst the remaining trials used an EPA / DHA combination. The effect of high dose omega 3 was significant even after removing the two most influential studies. Preclinical studies in animal models show that Omega 3 slows atherosclerosis progression through various molecular mechanisms. In humans there is less conclusive evidence and observational studies report that dietary intake of Omega 3 has no significant correlation with coronary artery calcification, the measure used to assess atherosclerosis. The limitation of this study is that different technologies were used to assess atherosclerosis across the selected trials. However, the authors conclude that the anti-atherosclerotic properties of high-dose OM3 are one potential mechanism in reducing CVD risk.
Abstract
A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), reported that high-dose marine omega-3 fatty acids (OM3) significantly reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, yet the mechanisms responsible for this benefit remain unknown. To test the hypothesis that high-dose OM3 is anti-atherosclerotic, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT of high-dose OM3 on atherosclerosis. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019125566). PubMed, Embase, Cochran Central Register for Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched using the following criteria: adult participants, high-dose OM3 (defined as ≥3.0 g/day, or in Japan 1.8 g/day and purity ≥90%) as the intervention, changes in atherosclerosis as the outcome, and RCTs with an intervention duration of ≥6 months. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates across studies. Among the 598 articles retrieved, six articles met our criteria. Four RCTs evaluated atherosclerosis in the coronary and two in the carotid arteries. High-dose OM3 significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis (standardized mean difference -1.97, 95% confidence interval -3.01, -0.94, p < 0.001). The results indicate that anti-atherosclerotic effect of high-dose OM3 is one potential mechanism in reducing CVD outcomes demonstrated in the REDUCE-IT trial.
-
7.
Immunonutrition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults.
Dushianthan, A, Cusack, R, Burgess, VA, Grocott, MP, Calder, PC
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019;1:CD012041
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition wherein the lungs are inflamed (irritated) and damaged. The aim of this study was to systematically review and critically appraise available evidence on the effects of immunonutrition compared to standard non-immunonutrition formula feeding on mechanically ventilated adults (aged 18 years or older) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This meta-analysis included a total of 13 publications reporting 10 randomised controlled trials. Results indicate that no clinical trials were identified with any other specific immunonutrition intervention for this patient population. Furthermore, evidence is inconclusive to whether this type of nutrition improves the primary outcome of all-cause mortality at the longest period reported. Authors conclude that no mortality benefit is derived from the use of omega-3 fatty acids and/or antioxidants in ARDS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an overwhelming systemic inflammatory process associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pharmacotherapies that moderate inflammation in ARDS are lacking. Several trials have evaluated the effects of pharmaconutrients, given as part of a feeding formula or as a nutritional supplement, on clinical outcomes in critical illness and ARDS. OBJECTIVES To systematically review and critically appraise available evidence on the effects of immunonutrition compared to standard non-immunonutrition formula feeding on mechanically ventilated adults (aged 18 years or older) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, conference proceedings, and trial registries for appropriate studies up to 25 April 2018. We checked the references from published studies and reviews on this topic for potentially eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing immunonutrition versus a control or placebo nutritional formula in adults (aged 18 years or older) with ARDS, as defined by the Berlin definition of ARDS or, for older studies, by the American-European Consensus Criteria for both ARDS and acute lung injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the quality of studies and extracted data from the included trials. We sought additional information from study authors. We performed statistical analysis according to Cochrane methodological standards. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, ventilator days, indices of oxygenation, cardiac adverse events, gastrointestinal adverse events, and total number of adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We identified 10 randomized controlled trials with 1015 participants. All studies compared an enteral formula or additional supplemental omega-3 fatty acids (i.e. eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), and antioxidants. We assessed some of the included studies as having high risk of bias due to methodological shortcomings. Studies were heterogenous in nature and varied in several ways, including type and duration of interventions given, calorific targets, and reported outcomes. All studies reported mortality. For the primary outcome, study authors reported no differences in all-cause mortality (longest period reported) with the use of an immunonutrition enteral formula or additional supplements of omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.07; participants = 1015; studies = 10; low-quality evidence).For secondary outcomes, we are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants reduces ICU length of stay (mean difference (MD) -3.09 days. 95% CI -5.19 to -0.99; participants = 639; studies = 8; very low-quality evidence) and ventilator days (MD -2.24 days, 95% CI -3.77 to -0.71; participants = 581; studies = 7; very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain whether omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improve oxygenation, defined as ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), at day 4 (MD 39 mmHg, 95% CI 10.75 to 67.02; participants = 676; studies = 8), or whether they increase adverse events such as cardiac events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.09 to 8.46; participants = 339; studies = 3; very low-quality evidence), gastrointestinal events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.75; participants = 427; studies = 4; very low-quality evidence), or total adverse events (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.23; participants = 517; studies = 5; very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis of 10 studies of varying quality examined effects of omega-3 fatty acids and/or antioxidants in adults with ARDS. This intervention may produce little or no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. We are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improves the duration of ventilator days and ICU length of stay or oxygenation at day 4 due to the very low quality of evidence. Adverse events associated with immunonutrition are also uncertain, as confidence intervals include the potential for increased cardiac, gastrointestinal, and total adverse events.
-
8.
Effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-supplemented parenteral nutrition on inflammatory and immune function in postoperative patients with gastrointestinal malignancy: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials in China.
Zhao, Y, Wang, C
Medicine. 2018;97(16):e0472
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) can have a beneficial effect on inflammation and immune function. This meta-analysis looked at the effectiveness of omega-3 PUFAs on inflammatory and immune function in patients with stomach or colorectal cancers, following surgery. 16 Chinese randomised controlled trials with over 1000 patients carried out between 2000 and 2017 were included in the analysis. The researchers found that the numbers of immune cells in the omega-3 group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The levels of antibodies in people given omega-3 were significantly higher than those in the control group. Inflammatory markers in the omega-3 group were significantly lower. Those given omega-3 were 64% less likely to experience post-surgical infections. The result of this meta-analysis confirmed that supplementing gastrointestinal cancer patients with omega-3 improves post-surgery indicators of immune function, reduces inflammation, and reduces infections related to surgery. The authors recommend that omega-3 should be added to the nutrition formula given to gastrointestinal cancer patients following surgery.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no consensus regarding the efficacy of omega-3polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on inflammatory and immune function in postoperative patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. METHODS The literatures published randomized control trials (RCT) were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Weipu, and Wanfang Databases. The immune efficacy outcomes of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-supplemented parenteral nutrition in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were compared. RESULTS Sixteen RCTs involving 1008 patients (506 in the omega-3 group, 502 in the control group) were enrolled into the analysis. The results of meta-analysis: the cell immunity: The proportions of CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 in the omega-3 group were significantly higher than those in the control group (CD3: WMD = 4.48; 95% CI, 3.34-5.62; P < .00001; I = 0%; CD4: WMD = 5.55; 95% CI, 4.75-6.34; P < .00001; I = 0%; CD4/CD8: WMD = .28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.44; P = .0004; I = 81%). In the humoral immunity: The levels of IgA, IgM and IgG in the omega-3 group were significantly higher than those in the control group (IgA: WMD = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.25-0.37; P < .00001; I = 0%; IgM: WMD = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-1.81; P < .00001; I = 0%; IgG: WMD = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.80-1.58; P < .00001; I = 0%). The count of lymphocyte in the omega-3 group was significantly higher than that in the control group (WMD = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.33; P < .0001; I = 40%). In the postoperative inflammatory cytokine: The levels of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and C-reactive protein in the omega-3 group were significantly lower than those in the control group (IL-6: WMD = -3.09; 95% CI, -3.91 to 2.27; P < .00001; I = 45%; TNF-α: WMD = -1.65; 95% CI, -2.05 to 1.25; P < .00001; I = 28%; CRP: WMD = -4.28; 95% CI, -5.26 to 3.30; P < .00001; I = 37%). The rate of postoperative infective complications in the omega-3 group was significantly lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.66; P = .0008; I = 0%). CONCLUSION This meta-kanalysis confirmed that early intervention with Omega -3 fatty acid emulsion in gastrointestinal cancer can not only improve the postoperative indicators of immune function, reduce inflammatory reaction, and improve the postoperative curative effect but also improve the immune suppression induced by conventional PN or tumor. Therefore, postoperative patients with gastrointestinal cancer should add omega-3 unsaturated fatty acids in their PN formula. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to verify its efficacy.
-
9.
Paleolithic nutrition for metabolic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Manheimer, EW, van Zuuren, EJ, Fedorowicz, Z, Pijl, H
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2015;102(4):922-32
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of 5 risk factors, including waist circumference, blood pressure, and serum concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the fasting condition. These often occur in concert and predispose people to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether current evidence supports the idea that Paleolithic nutrition improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions in people with one or more components of the metabolic syndrome. The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials that compared Paleolithic nutrition with any other dietary intervention in participants with one or more of the 5 components of the metabolic syndrome. Results indicate that Paleolithic nutrition resulted in greater short-term pooled improvements on each of the 5 components of metabolic syndrome than did currently recommended guideline-based control diets. However, the greater pooled improvements did not reach significance for 2 of the 5 components (i.e., HDL cholesterol and fasting blood sugar). Authors conclude that the available data warrant additional evaluations of the health benefits of Paleolithic nutrition.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paleolithic nutrition, which has attracted substantial public attention lately because of its putative health benefits, differs radically from dietary patterns currently recommended in guidelines, particularly in terms of its recommendation to exclude grains, dairy, and nutritional products of industry. OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether a Paleolithic nutritional pattern improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the Paleolithic nutritional pattern with any other dietary pattern in participants with one or more of the 5 components of metabolic syndrome. Two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Outcome data were extracted from the first measurement time point (≤6 mo). A random-effects model was used to estimate the average intervention effect. The quality of the evidence was rated with the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Four RCTs that involved 159 participants were included. The 4 control diets were based on distinct national nutrition guidelines but were broadly similar. Paleolithic nutrition resulted in greater short-term improvements than did the control diets (random-effects model) for waist circumference (mean difference: -2.38 cm; 95% CI: -4.73, -0.04 cm), triglycerides (-0.40 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.76, -0.04 mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-3.64 mm Hg; 95% CI: -7.36, 0.08 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (-2.48 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.98, 0.02 mm Hg), HDL cholesterol (0.12 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.28 mmol/L), and fasting blood sugar (-0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.44, 0.11 mmol/L). The quality of the evidence for each of the 5 metabolic components was moderate. The home-delivery (n = 1) and dietary recommendation (n = 3) RCTs showed similar effects with the exception of greater improvements in triglycerides relative to the control with the home delivery. None of the RCTs evaluated an improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The Paleolithic diet resulted in greater short-term improvements in metabolic syndrome components than did guideline-based control diets. The available data warrant additional evaluations of the health benefits of Paleolithic nutrition. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) as CRD42014015119.