-
1.
Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract in the Treatment of Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.
Zeng, L, Yang, T, Yang, K, Yu, G, Li, J, Xiang, W, Chen, H
Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:891822
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Arthritic disease is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting one or more joints. Over 100 different forms of arthritis have been identified. Despite their different causes (i.e. degenerative, autoimmune), they share common symptoms such as joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and reduced mobility, which can be disabling in many cases. Drug treatment focuses mainly on limiting the progression of the disease, reducing joint inflammation and managing pain. However, these drugs are associated with many side effects. The rhizome of Curcuma longa (CL), also known as turmeric, has longstanding use as an anti-inflammatory in traditional Asian medicines. Research has affirmed its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. Evidence from multiple clinical trials suggests that curcumin, one of the active compounds of CL, can reduce the subjective experience of pain in some conditions and can also improve the symptoms and inflammation associated with arthritis. Hence this systematic review sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CL-extract in 5 types of arthritis (including Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and gout). The review included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 2396 participants, with dosages ranging from 120 mg to 1500 mg for a period of 4-36 weeks. Overall, curcumin and CL extract appeared to improve inflammation and pain levels in arthritic subjects whilst demonstrating safety with no increases in adverse effects. CL and its active constituents appeared to favourably change immune and inflammatory responses, as well as serum uric acid levels in the reviewed forms of arthritis. However, due to the small sample numbers in the trials and some lower quality studies, the authors advocate to interpret the results with caution until more solid evidence is available.
Abstract
Background: Modern pharmacological research found that the chemical components of Curcuma longa L. are mainly curcumin and turmeric volatile oil. Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that curcumin improves symptoms and inflammation in patients with arthritis. Methods: Pubmed, Cochran Library, CNKI, and other databases were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Then, the risk of bias of RCTs were assessed and data of RCTs were extracted. Finally, RevMan 5.3 was utilized for meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-nine (29) RCTs involving 2396 participants and 5 types of arthritis were included. The arthritis included Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Osteoarthritis (OA), Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and gout/hyperuricemia. Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract were administered in doses ranging from 120 mg to 1500 mg for a duration of 4-36 weeks. In general, Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract showed safety in all studies and improved the severity of inflammation and pain levels in these arthritis patients. However, more RCTs are needed in the future to elucidate the effect of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract supplementation in patients with arthritis, including RA, OA, AS and JIA. Conclusion: Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract may improve symptoms and inflammation levels in people with arthritis. However, due to the low quality and small quantity of RCTs, the conclusions need to be interpreted carefully.
-
2.
Association of Retinol and Carotenoids Content in Diet and Serum With Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Han, X, Zhao, R, Zhang, G, Jiao, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, D, Cai, H
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:918777
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The incident rate of malignant tumours has been increasing, and so has colo-rectal cancer (CRC), which is now the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. CRC development is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Diet, diabetes, obesity, lack of physical activity, age, family history and history of benign adenomatous polyps and inflammatory bowel disease are all known risk factors. Modulating diet is one way to modify cancer risk. Vitamin A (retinol) and carotenoids, which are precursors to Vitamin A, are indispensable in the human body and widely occur in a range of vegetables, fruits and animal-derived foods. In some studies high dietary intake of retinol and carotenoids had been linked to a decreased risk of CRC, however, this was not consistent in all findings. To get a better understanding of this matter, the authors of this meta-analysis analysed 22 clinical studies from the last 20 years. The authors found an inverse association with carotenoids in blood serum, so higher blood serum of carotenoids seemed to decrease CRC risk. In regards to dietary intake, total carotenoid intake did not increase CRC risk and in fact the carotenoids carotenes, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin reduced risk, which was particularly noticeable in men. In women, high dietary intake of retinol also showed to reduce CRC risk, but it appeared to increase the risk in men. This raised the idea of gender-specific differences. Of clinical relevance are that carotenoids can be an important dietary contributors in reducing CRC risk. However the protective role of retinol appears to be gender-specific and only seems to benefit women, with the opposite effect in men.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The results of this study were mixed:
- Total dietary intake of carotenoids was not associated with CRC risk.
- Case control studies found that high serum carotenoids may increase CRC risk.
- There were differences in findings between males and females.
- Larger, well-controlled studies over long time frames are needed to further explore the relationship between dietary intake and serum concentrations of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. These studies should include results by sex, race and dose response.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and second in terms of mortality. Diet and environmental factors may have a strong influence and causative effect. Research has linked dietary consumption and serum levels of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. However, results have been mixed.
The aim of this meta analysis was to identify a potential association between CRC and carotenoid and retinol intake. A total of 22 cohort and case control studies published between 2000-2019 from across Europe, North America and Asia were included. The number of CRC cases totalled 19,293 from a sample of more than 450,000 people.
Eligible studies reported data in either relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In the meta analysis, data were combined and expressed as OR with 95% CI.
Cases and control groups were based on high or low carotenoid intake as defined by the included studies and based on dietary intake or serum concentration. Sub-group analysis was undertaken by study type, sex and tumour type. A sensitivity analysis tested the robustness of the results.
Due to the heterogeneity between studies, adjustments were made for potential covariates and confounding factors including age, gender, a family history of CRC, smoking, alcohol consumption and levels of physical activity.
The quality of the studies was assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
The nutrients studied included; beta-carotene, alpha-carotene, lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin, beta-cryptoxanthin and retinol. These were assessed through dietary intake or serum concentrations.
Key Findings
- High dietary intake of beta-carotene was not associated with an increased risk of CRC in females (OR = 0.97; 95%CI 0.79-1.19), however, it may lower CRC risk in males (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99).
- High dietary intake of retinol was not associated with CRC risk (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.89-1.10). However, the findings suggested that it may reduce CRC risk in females but increase CRC risk in males.
- There was a tendency towards a slightly decreased risk of CRC with high dietary intakes of alpha-carotene), lycopene, and beta-cryptoxanthin. The results were more pronounced in males.
- No association was found between high consumption of high lutein/zeaxanthin, retinol or total carotenoids and the risk of CRC
- Case control studies found a negative association between serum carotenoids and CRC risk. This relationship was not found in cohort studies and therefore remains uncertain.
Conclusions
This was a well-conducted meta-analysis that was not subject to any conflicts of interest. Larger, well controlled prospective studies adjusting for sex and with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of carotenoids and CRC.
Notes: The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Clinical practice applications:
- Healthcare practitioners working with people with a family history of CRC or those who may be at increased risk may like to consider increasing carotenoid intake modestly.
- A modest increase in dietary intake of beta-carotene for males may be beneficial.
- A modest increase in dietary retinol may be beneficial for females.
Considerations for future research:
- Further research is needed to explore the differences between sexes for dietary intake of carotenoids and retinol and CRC risk
- Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between serum carotenoids and CRC
- Analysis of results by race and continent may be beneficial
- Further research is needed to define dose response
- Due to heterogeneity between studies, large, well controlled studies over long time frames are needed
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is linked to serum and dietary retinol and carotenoids, according to clinical and epidemiological research. However, the findings are not consistent. As a result, we did this meta-analysis to determine the link between them. Methods: From 2000 through 2022, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, as well as pertinent article references, were searched and filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and literature quality ratings. High and low intake were used as controls, and OR (odds ratio) or RR (relative risk) and 95% confidence interval were extracted. The extracted data were plotted and analyzed using Stata12.0 software. Results: A total of 22 relevant studies were included, including 18 studies related to diet and 4 studies related to serum. For high and low intake or concentration controls, the pooled OR was as follows: β-carotene (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), α-carotene (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-1.03), lycopene (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07), lutein/zeaxanthin (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.07), β-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.01), total carotenoids (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81-1.15), retinol (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10), serum carotenoids (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93), serum retinol (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.26-1.49). Subgroup analysis was performed according to tumor type, study type and sex. Conclusion: Total carotenoid intake and Lutein/Zeaxanthin intake were not associated with CRC risk. High β-carotene, α-carotene, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin all tended to reduce CRC risk. Serum carotenoid concentrations were significantly inversely associated with CRC risk.
-
3.
Evidence for the Efficacy of a High Dose of Vitamin D on the Hyperinflammation State in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sarhan, N, Abou Warda, AE, Sarhan, RM, Boshra, MS, Mostafa-Hedeab, G, ALruwaili, BF, Ibrahim, HSG, Schaalan, MF, Fathy, S
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2022;58(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Vitamin D insufficiency is an example of the factors which may affect snowballed COVID-19 risk and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical results and prognoses of COVID-19 patients are enhanced by supplementing a high dose of vitamin D relative to the conventional low dose. This study is a randomised controlled trial of 116 patients. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups i.e. 58 patients received treatment with low-dose vitamin D and 58 received treatment with high-dose vitamin D. Results show that the incidence of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit hospitalisation, death, sepsis, and atrial fibrillation in the high-dosage vitamin D group was considerably reduced compared to the low-dosage vitamin D group. However, the need for high oxygen was significantly higher in the high-dose vitamin D group compared to the low-dose group. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the monitored parameters before and after treatment in favour of the high-dose vitamin D group, which were significantly lower in the high-dose vitamin D group compared to the low-dose group. Authors conclude that the sooner micronutrients are administered to outpatients, the better the outcome, especially before supportive or specific treatment is commenced.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Vitamin D supplementation plays a key effect in lowering cytokine storms among COVID-19 patients by influencing the activity of the renin-angiotensin system and the production of the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme. The study was conducted to explore the effect of high-dose intramuscular vitamin D in hospitalized adults infected with moderate-to-severe SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with the standard of care in the COVID-19 protocol. Materials and Methods: Two groups of patients were compared in this prospective randomized controlled trial as the vitamin D was administered orally to group 1 (alfacalcidol 1 mcg/day) and intramuscularly to group 2 (cholecalciferol 200,000 IU). One hundred and sixteen participants were recruited in total, with fifty-eight patients in each group. Following the Egyptian Ministry of Health's policy for COVID-19 management, all patients received the same treatment for a minimum of five days. Results: A significant difference was recorded in the length of hospital stay (8.6 versus 6.8 days), need for high oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilator (67% versus 33%), need for a mechanical ventilator (25% versus 75%), clinical improvement (45% versus 55%), the occurrence of sepsis (35% versus 65%), and in the monitored laboratory parameters in favor of high-dose vitamin D. Moreover, clinical improvement was significantly associated with the need for low/high oxygen, an invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilator (MV/NIMV), and diabetes, while mortality was associated with the need for MV, ICU admission, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and the occurrence of secondary infection. Conclusions: Our study showed that high-dose vitamin D was considered a promising treatment in the suppression of cytokine storms among COVID-19 patients and was associated with better clinical improvement and fewer adverse outcomes compared to low-dose vitamin D.
-
4.
Positive Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
De Niet, S, Trémège, M, Coffiner, M, Rousseau, AF, Calmes, D, Frix, AN, Gester, F, Delvaux, M, Dive, AF, Guglielmi, E, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(15)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that having enough vitamin D can help prevent many diseases, such as heart disease, bone disease and cancer. Recent data also showed that vitamin D can reduce the risk of respiratory tract infections, and particularly, the risk of viral infections. The aim of this study was to assess whether the proposed dosing regimen of a daily dose of 25,000 international units (IU) vitamin D administered over 4 consecutive days, followed by a weekly dose of 25,000 IU, was adequate to rapidly increase the concentrations of calcifediol in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and to explore its impact on hospital length and other clinical outcomes of the disease. This study is an interventional, randomized, parallel, two-treatment, two-arm, double-blind and placebo-controlled pilot study, carried out in one clinical site in Belgium. The patients (n=50) were randomized in the two different treatment groups (vitamin D (n=26) or placebo (n=24)). Patients participated in the study for a maximum of 9 weeks, including an up to 6-week treatment period and a maximum of 3-week follow-up period. Results show that the study’s regimen was adequate to rapidly raise the calcifediol level above 20 ng/mL and improve the clinical outcome of patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. In fact, administration of cholecalciferol significantly reduced the hospital length of stay, reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen and improved the clinical status assessed by the World Health Organisation scale. Authors conclude that further studies with a larger number of patients are needed in order to further confirm their study’s findings.
Abstract
Retrospective studies showed a relationship between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, with an inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating calcifediol levels. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the length of hospital stay and clinical improvement in patients with vitamin D deficiency hospitalized with COVID-19. The study was randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and received, in addition to the best available COVID therapy, either vitamin D (25,000 IU per day over 4 consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU per week up to 6 weeks) or placebo. The length of hospital stay decreased significantly in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (4 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). At Day 7, a significantly lower percentage of patients were still hospitalized in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.0161), and none of the patients treated with vitamin D were hospitalized after 21 days compared to 14% of the patients treated with placebo. Vitamin D significantly reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen among the patients who needed it (4 days vs. 7 days in the placebo group; p = 0.012) and significantly improved the clinical recovery of the patients, as assessed by the WHO scale (p = 0.0048). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was improved by administration of vitamin D.
-
5.
The effect of high-polyphenol Mediterranean diet on visceral adiposity: the DIRECT PLUS randomized controlled trial.
Zelicha, H, Kloting, N, Kaplan, A, Yaskolka Meir, A, Rinott, E, Tsaban, G, Chassidim, Y, Bluher, M, Ceglarek, U, Isermann, B, et al
BMC medicine. 2022;20(1):327
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation is one of the main key factors that differentiate between metabolic healthy and unhealthy obese individuals. VAT is closely related to the development of multiple cardiovascular risk factors. The Mediterranean (MED) diet, high in polyphenol content and rich in plant food sources, was shown to have an enhanced effect on VAT reduction in combination with physical activity (PA), regardless of weight loss The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the MED diet, further enriched with polyphenols, and lower in red and processed meat (“green-MED diet”) on visceral adiposity in the 18-month Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial-Polyphenols, Unprocessed trial. This study is a randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups (1:1:1 ratio): healthy dietary guidelines, MED diet, or green-MED diet, all included PA recommendations, with a free gym membership and educational sessions promoting moderate-intensity PA. Results show that participants following the green-MED diet achieved more than twice the degree of VAT reduction compared to those following the MED diet, despite similar weight loss. In fact, VAT loss was specifically related to lower red meat intake and increased walnuts, green tea, Wolfa globosa, and dietary fibre (this was reflected by higher plasma polyphenol and serum folate levels). Authors conclude that a green-MED diet enriched with polyphenols and decreased red meat consumption might serve as an improved version of the MED diet for targeted VAT reduction.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The positive health effects of the traditional MED diet, moderately high in PUFAs and MUFAs and low in red meat, are well-established
- Higher levels of total plasma polyphenol and serum folate may reflect higher consumption of “green” dietary components, which were significantly associated with greater VAT loss
- The green-MED diet, richer in dietary polyphenols and green plant-based proteins and lower in red meat, might be a more effective strategy for VAT loss than the traditional healthy MED diet, achieving more than twice the degree of VAT reduction, despite similar weight loss.
- VAT loss was specifically related to lower red meat intake and increased walnuts, green tea, Wolffia globosa, and dietary fibre and was reflected by higher plasma polyphenol and serum folate levels.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
A mediterranean (MED) diet is a rich source of polyphenols, which benefit adiposity by several mechanisms. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation is one of the main factors that differentiate between metabolic healthy and unhealthy obese individuals.
In this Dietary Intervention Randomised Controlled Trial PoLyphenols UnproceSsed (DIRECT‐ PLUS) weight‐loss trial, 294 participants were randomised to: (A) healthy dietary guidelines (HDG), (B) MED, or (C) green‐MED diets, all combined with physical activity. The study duration was 18‐months.
This study explored the effect of the green‐MED diet, twice fortified in dietary polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat, on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the abdominal adipose tissues.
Both isocaloric (with the same calorific value) MED groups consumed 28 g/day of walnuts (+ 440 mg/day polyphenols). The green‐MED group further consumed green tea (3–4 cups/day) and Wolffia globosa (duckweed strain) plant green shake (100 g frozen cubes/day) (+ 800mg/day polyphenols) and reduced red meat intake.
The mean weight loss (HDG: −0.4% (5.0), MED: −2.7% (5.6), green-MED: −3.9% (6.5)) and WC loss (HDG: −3.6% (5.1), MED: −4.7% (5.0), green-MED: −5.7%(5.7)) after 18 months were similar between the two MED diets (p > 0.05 for all) and higher as compared to the HDG (weight: HDG vs. MED: p = 0.02; HDG vs. green+MED: p < 0.001; WC: HDG vs. MED: p = 0.33, HDG vs. green+MED: p = 0.02).
All three abdominal fat depots decreased over 18 months of intervention (p < 0.05 vs. baseline for all). The green-MED group achieved a greater reduction in VAT than the other intervention groups (HDG: −4.2% (22.5), MED: −6.0%(31.3), green-MED: −14.1%(27.7); p < 0.05 green-MED vs. MED or vs. HDG groups). These differences in VAT loss across the groups remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and 18-month WC change (green-MED vs. MED p = 0.023; green-MED vs. HDG p = 0.002) (Fig. 1)
Limitations of the study included a low proportion of women, and different VAT proportions at baseline across groups limit the generalisability of findings to women.
The authors of the study did not identify the exact components responsible for the dietary effects when they compared dietary regimens and not specific nutrients.
Adherence was by a validated, self-reported dietary intake assessment tool, which the authors acknowledge is subject to error
Strengths of the study included the relatively large sample size, high retention rate, and use of 3-T MRI measurements (considered one of the gold standards tools for the quantification of specific fat depots
Clinical practice applications:
- This trial shows that, when combined with a Mediterranean diet, higher dietary consumption of green tea, walnuts, and dietary fibre and reduced red meat consumption were significantly associated with greater %VAT loss
- The authors observed a significant synergistic interaction effect between decreased red meat consumption and increased serum folate on VAT loss
- A reduction in VAT accumulation, known as a key risk factor in CVD development, may reduce metabolic complications, improve the lipid profile, and decrease cardiometabolic risk.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies are needed to explore the exact mechanisms of specific polyphenol-rich foods on visceral adiposity.
- Future studies could explore whether the results are replicable in both male and female participants, as this sample was largely male.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mediterranean (MED) diet is a rich source of polyphenols, which benefit adiposity by several mechanisms. We explored the effect of the green-MED diet, twice fortified in dietary polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat, on visceral adipose tissue (VAT). METHODS In the 18-month Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial PoLyphenols UnproceSsed (DIRECT-PLUS) weight-loss trial, 294 participants were randomized to (A) healthy dietary guidelines (HDG), (B) MED, or (C) green-MED diets, all combined with physical activity. Both isocaloric MED groups consumed 28 g/day of walnuts (+ 440 mg/day polyphenols). The green-MED group further consumed green tea (3-4 cups/day) and Wolffia globosa (duckweed strain) plant green shake (100 g frozen cubes/day) (+ 800mg/day polyphenols) and reduced red meat intake. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the abdominal adipose tissues. RESULTS Participants (age = 51 years; 88% men; body mass index = 31.2 kg/m2; 29% VAT) had an 89.8% retention rate and 79.3% completed eligible MRIs. While both MED diets reached similar moderate weight (MED: - 2.7%, green-MED: - 3.9%) and waist circumference (MED: - 4.7%, green-MED: - 5.7%) loss, the green-MED dieters doubled the VAT loss (HDG: - 4.2%, MED: - 6.0%, green-MED: - 14.1%; p < 0.05, independent of age, sex, waist circumference, or weight loss). Higher dietary consumption of green tea, walnuts, and Wolffia globosa; lower red meat intake; higher total plasma polyphenols (mainly hippuric acid), and elevated urine urolithin A polyphenol were significantly related to greater VAT loss (p < 0.05, multivariate models). CONCLUSIONS A green-MED diet, enriched with plant-based polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat, may be a potent intervention to promote visceral adiposity regression. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03020186.
-
6.
Prognostic and Therapeutic Role of Vitamin D in COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Dissanayake, HA, de Silva, NL, Sumanatilleke, M, de Silva, SDN, Gamage, KKK, Dematapitiya, C, Kuruppu, DC, Ranasinghe, P, Pathmanathan, S, Katulanda, P
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2022;107(5):1484-1502
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Vitamin D is implicated in optimum function of the immune system. Its deficiency has been linked to susceptibility to respiratory infections. It is postulated that vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency is also associated with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to determine the association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, its severity, mortality and role of vitamin D in its treatment. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventy-six publications. Results show increased odds of developing COVID-19, progression to severe COVID-19 and death in people with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. In fact, people who developed COVID-19, severe COVID-19 and fatal disease had lower 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration compared to people without COVID-19 or non-severe COVID-19 or non-fatal COVID-19 respectively. Authors conclude that Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency may increase the risk of developing COVID-19 infection and susceptibility to more severe disease.
Abstract
PURPOSE Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency may increase the susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, its severity, mortality, and role of vitamin D in its treatment. METHODS We searched CINAHL, Cochrane library, EMBASE, PubMED, Scopus, and Web of Science up to May 30, 2021, for observational studies on association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, severe disease, and death among adults, and, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin D treatment against standard care or placebo, in improving severity or mortality among adults with COVID-19. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies and AUB-KQ1 Cochrane tool for RCTs. Study-level data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 and R (v4.1.0). Heterogeneity was determined by I2 and sources were explored through prespecified sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions. RESULTS Of 1877 search results, 76 studies satisfying eligibility criteria were included. Seventy-two observational studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 1 976 099). Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency increased the odds of developing COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65; P < 0.0001; I2 = 92%), severe disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.52-2.38; P < 0.0001; I2 = 81%), and death (OR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.28-3.35; P = 0.003; I2 = 73%). The 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations were lower in individuals with COVID-19 compared with controls (mean difference [MD] -3.85 ng/mL; 95% CI, -5.44 to -2.26; P ≤ 0.0001), in patients with severe COVID-19 compared with controls with nonsevere COVID-19 (MD -4.84 ng/mL; 95% CI, -7.32 to -2.35; P = 0.0001) and in nonsurvivors compared with survivors (MD -4.80 ng/mL; 95% CI, -7.89 to -1.71; P = 0.002). The association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and death was insignificant when studies with high risk of bias or studies reporting unadjusted effect estimates were excluded. Risk of bias and heterogeneity were high across all analyses. Discrepancies in timing of vitamin D testing, definitions of severe COVID-19, and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency partly explained the heterogeneity. Four RCTs were widely heterogeneous precluding meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Multiple observational studies involving nearly 2 million adults suggest vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency increases susceptibility to COVID-19 and severe COVID-19, although with a high risk of bias and heterogeneity. Association with mortality was less robust. Heterogeneity in RCTs precluded their meta-analysis.
-
7.
The Dose-Response Associations of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake with the Risk of Stroke, Depression, Cancer, and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
Wang, Y, Zhao, R, Wang, B, Zhao, C, Zhu, B, Tian, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is high in today's society, which may lead to weight gain, inflammation, and a number of obesity-associated diseases. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the associations and causal links between the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer, stroke, depression, and cause-specific mortality. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages significantly increased the risk of cancer, strokes, depression, and cause-specific mortality when compared with the consumption of low or no-sugar-sweetened beverages. As little as a 250ml increment of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increase in risk. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% compared to those who consume less or no sugar-sweetened beverages. These findings can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the clinical significance of intervention strategies that reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. It is imperative to conduct additional robust studies as there is an insufficient amount of evidence at present to establish a causal connection between the consumption of sugary beverages and the risk of depression, stroke, cancer, and cause-specific mortality.
Abstract
The associations between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and cause-specific mortality have not been determined, and the quantitative aspects of this link remain unclear. This meta-analysis therefore conducted a systematic review and dose-response analysis to determine their causal links. The database searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science up to 10 November 2021. The intervention effects were evaluated by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidences (CI). Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Higher levels of SSB consumption significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23), depression (1.25, 1.11-1.41), cancer (1.10, 1.03-1.17), and all-cause mortality (1.08, 1.05-1.11) compared with none or lower SSB intake. The associations were dose-dependent, with per 250 mL increment of SSB intake daily increasing the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and all-cause mortality by RR 1.09 (1.03-1.15), 1.08 (1.06-1.10), 1.17 (1.04-1.32), and 1.07 (1.03-1.11), respectively. The link was curved for depression and cancer risk (pnon-linear < 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that higher SSB intake increased ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% than none or lower SSB consumption. It is suggested that SSB accounts for a leading risk factor of stroke, depression, cancer, and mortality, and that the risk rises in parallel with the increment of SSB intake (and is affected by participant characteristics).
-
8.
Effects of Vitamin D Serum Level on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hu, Y, Kung, J, Cave, A, Banh, HL
Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques. 2022;25:84-92
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome resulting from the excessive inflammatory response at 5-7 days. It has been shown that low Vitamin D serum concentration is associated with increased pneumonia and viral respiratory infections. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical effects of Vitamin D serum concentration in COVID-19 patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies. Results show that Vitamin D serum concentration was not statistically associated with mortality and ICU admission, ventilator support requirement, and length of hospital stay. Authors conclude that additional randomized controlled trials are required to provide a specific supplemental vitamin dose and Vitamin D serum concentration.
Abstract
PURPOSE It has been shown that low Vitamin D serum concentration is associated with increased pneumonia and viral respiratory infections. Vitamin D is readily available, inexpensive, and easy to administer to subjects infected with COVID-19. If effective in reducing the severity of COVID-19, it could be an important and feasible therapeutic intervention. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the effects of Vitamin D serum concentration on mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 patients. The primary objectives were to determine if Vitamin D serum concentration decrease mortality, ICU admissions, ventilator support, and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS A total of 3572 publications were identified. Ultimately, 20 studies are included. A total of 12,806 patients aged between 42 to 81 years old were analyzed. The pooled estimated RR for mortality, ICU admission, ventilator support and length of hospital stay were 1.49 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.65), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.14), 1.29 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.84), and 0.84 (95% CI -0.45, 2.13). CONCLUSION There is no statistical difference in mortality, ICU admission rate, ventilator support requirement, and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients with low and high Vitamin D serum concentration.
-
9.
Impact of Replacement of Individual Dietary SFAs on Circulating Lipids and Other Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Humans.
Sellem, L, Flourakis, M, Jackson, KG, Joris, PJ, Lumley, J, Lohner, S, Mensink, RP, Soedamah-Muthu, SS, Lovegrove, JA
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2022;13(4):1200-1225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and metabolic disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension contribute to this risk. Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) can be reduced by reducing saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and replacing them with unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs). Dietary SFA's are classified as a whole group in general dietary guidelines. However, blood lipid levels and other biomarkers of CMD may be affected differently by individual dietary SFAs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 44 randomised controlled trials were included that investigated the effects of replacing SFAs with individual dietary SFAs or UFAs on markers of CMD. CMD markers like Total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, and apoB concentrations were significantly reduced by replacing 1.5%TE of palmitic acid with oleic acid or UFAs for 14 days. The research also showed associations between apoB and LDL-cholesterol and apoA-I and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Dietary palmitic acid substituted with UFAs significantly reduced fasting LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. The majority of studies included in this study focused on dietary palmitic acid and not much on stearic acid, myristic acid, or lauric acid. Therefore, further robust studies are required to assess the effect of individual dietary SFAs on the markers of CMD, including markers of inflammation, hemostasis, glycemic control, or metabolic hormones. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand the benefits of substituting SFAs with UFAs on CMD markers.
Abstract
Little is known of the impact of individual SFAs and their isoenergetic substitution with other SFAs or unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) on the prevention of cardiometabolic disease (CMD). This systematic literature review assessed the impact of such dietary substitutions on a range of fasting CMD risk markers, including lipid profile, markers of glycemic control and inflammation, and metabolic hormone concentrations. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effect of isoenergetic replacements of individual dietary SFAs for ≥14 d on ≥1 CMD risk markers in humans. Searches of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on 14 February, 2021 identified 44 RCTs conducted in participants with a mean ± SD age of 39.9 ± 15.2 y. Studies' risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for RCTs. Random-effect meta-analyses assessed the effect of ≥3 similar dietary substitutions on the same CMD risk marker. Other dietary interventions were described in qualitative syntheses. We observed reductions in LDL-cholesterol concentrations after the replacement of palmitic acid (16:0) with UFAs (-0.36 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.50, -0.21 mmol/L; I2 = 96.0%, n = 18 RCTs) or oleic acid (18:1n-9) (-0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.03 mmol/L; I2 = 89.6%, n = 9 RCTs), with a similar impact on total cholesterol and apoB concentrations. No effects on other CMD risk markers, including HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol, glucose, insulin, or C-reactive protein concentrations, were evident. Similarly, we found no evidence of a benefit from replacing dietary stearic acid (18:0) with UFAs on CMD risk markers (n = 4 RCTs). In conclusion, the impact of replacing dietary palmitic acid with UFAs on lipid biomarkers is aligned with current public health recommendations. However, owing to the high heterogeneity and limited studies, relations between all individual SFAs and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health need further confirmation from RCTs. This systematic review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42020084241.
-
10.
Sedentary behavior and cancer-an umbrella review and meta-analysis.
Hermelink, R, Leitzmann, MF, Markozannes, G, Tsilidis, K, Pukrop, T, Berger, F, Baurecht, H, Jochem, C
European journal of epidemiology. 2022;37(5):447-460
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Globally, cancer is one of the leading causes of death. In modern day-to-day life, sedentary behaviour is prevalent, with adults spending an average of 8.2 hours without any physical activity. It is believed that sedentary behaviour plays a significant role in the increase in all-cause mortality, obesity, chronic diseases, and cancer risk. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to examine previous studies that reported associations between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence and all-cancer mortality. A total of 14 meta-analyses were included in the study, and the strength of the evidence for each association was rated. A significant association was found between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence across various cancer sites, including ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, rectal, and prostate cancers. All-cancer mortality also showed positively significant associations with sedentary behaviour. There is a need for further research to evaluate the mechanisms associated with sedentary behaviour and the development of cancer at various sites. However, the results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to better understand the importance of recommending physical activity and other therapeutic strategies.
Abstract
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the association between sedentary behavior (SB) and cancer. However, the level of evidence and the potential for risk of bias remains unclear. This umbrella review summarized the current data on SB in relation to cancer incidence and mortality, with a particular emphasis on assessing the risk of bias. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the association between SB and cancer incidence and mortality. We also searched for recent observational studies not yet included in existing meta-analyses. We re-calculated summary risk estimates for cancer incidence and mortality using random effects models. We included 14 meta-analyses covering 17 different cancer sites from 77 original studies. We found that high SB levels increase the risk for developing ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, prostate, and rectal cancers, with relative risks of 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.56), 1.29 (95% CI = 1.16-1.45), 1.25 (95% CI = 1.16-1.33), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.04-1.11), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.00-1.17), and 1.07 (95% CI = 1.01-1.12), respectively. Also, we found an increased risk of cancer mortality of 1.18 (95% CI = 1.09-1.26). Most associations between SB and specific cancer sites were supported by a "suggestive" level of evidence. High levels of SB are associated with increased risk of several types of cancer and increased cancer mortality risk.