1.
Effect of L-Carnosine in Patients with Age-Related Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sureshkumar, K, Durairaj, M, Srinivasan, K, Goh, KW, Undela, K, Mahalingam, VT, Ardianto, C, Ming, LC, Ganesan, RM
Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition). 2023;28(1):18
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
L-carnosine is naturally produced in the body and is found in high concentrations in the brain, muscles and gut. It has many roles including acting as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. As such, it may have a role in the prevention and management of many different chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes and brain degenerative disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical usage of L-carnosine in these chronic diseases. The study included 14 different studies and showed that L-carnosine supplementation may be a potential therapy for age related diseases such as diabetes and brain degenerative diseases. No studies were found for its use in individuals with cancer and the current evidence does not support its use in heart disease. It was concluded that L-carnosine is of benefit to individuals with diabetes and cognitive impairment, but not heart disease. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that L-carnosine supplementation may be of benefit to indivduals with diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION L-carnosine has been found to have multimodal activity. AIM: The aim of this review was to find out the efficacy of L-carnosine in patients with age-related diseases. METHODS Clinical studies evaluated the effect of L-carnosine on cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders were searched in electronic bibliographic databases. The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022314033). The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess all of the reports for risk of bias. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS Following the screening process, 14 papers were selected for systematic review, with 9 of them being qualified for meta-analysis. Many of the included studies showed that L-carnosine has potential therapeutic activity in age related diseases. Results from the meta-analysis showed that in diabetes mellitus, HbA1c [mean difference (MD) 95% CI = -1.25 (-2.49, -0.022); p = 0.05; p = 0.001; I2 = 85%] and fasting blood sugar (FBS) [MD 95% CI = -12.44 (-22.44, -2.44); p = 0.01; p = 0.40; I2 = 0%] and in neurodegenerative disorder, Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory 2 (WMS-LM2) [MD 95% CI = 1.34 (0.83, 1.85); p < 0.00001; p = 0.43; I2 = 0%], showed statistically significant difference, favoring the L-carnosine group over the control group. While in neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer 's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) [MD 95% CI = 0.98 (-1.55, -0.42); p = 0.0007; p = 0.86; I2 = 0%] and Back Depression Inventory (BDI) [MD 95% CI = -1.12 (-1.87, -0.37); p = 0.003; p = 0.73; I2 = 0%] showed statistically significant difference, favoring the control group over L-carnosine group. CONCLUSIONS Clinical studies were conducted to manage chemotherapy induced toxicities and there are no clinical studies available for its anti-cancer use, and the current evidence does not support its use in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
2.
Improving Cognitive Function with Nutritional Supplements in Aging: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Clinical Studies Investigating the Effects of Vitamins, Minerals, Antioxidants, and Other Dietary Supplements.
Fekete, M, Lehoczki, A, Tarantini, S, Fazekas-Pongor, V, Csípő, T, Csizmadia, Z, Varga, JT
Nutrients. 2023;15(24)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dementia has multiple mechanisms involved in its development, which makes treating it with pharmaceuticals a challenge due to the multiple drugs that would be required. Alternative approaches have included nutritional change and supplementation with certain nutrients, low levels of which, have been shown to be associated with poorer brain function. This review paper aimed to discuss potential nutritional supplements for use in dementia. The results showed that there were several supplements that had clinical data on their use for brain function, including vitamins, minerals, essential fatty acids, and naturally occurring plant chemicals. The data was very mixed between and within each of the supplements and showed that dosage and individual requirements play a large part in success of supplementation. It was concluded that there was clinical evidence to support the supplementation of vitamins B, C, D, E, magnesium, iron, selenium, and omega-3 for benefits to brain function, however several factors need to be considered including age, sex, nutritional status, lifestyle, stress levels, and physical activity. Healthcare professionals could use this study to understand that vitamins and minerals play a prominent role in brain health, but everyone has different nutritional requirements and that supplemental recommendations for brain function need to be individually tailored.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment and dementia are burgeoning public health concerns, especially given the increasing longevity of the global population. These conditions not only affect the quality of life of individuals and their families, but also pose significant economic burdens on healthcare systems. In this context, our comprehensive narrative review critically examines the role of nutritional supplements in mitigating cognitive decline. Amidst growing interest in non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive enhancement, this review delves into the efficacy of vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other dietary supplements. Through a systematic evaluation of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analysis, this review focuses on outcomes such as memory enhancement, attention improvement, executive function support, and neuroprotection. The findings suggest a complex interplay between nutritional supplementation and cognitive health, with some supplements showing promising results and others displaying limited or context-dependent effectiveness. The review highlights the importance of dosage, bioavailability, and individual differences in response to supplementation. Additionally, it addresses safety concerns and potential interactions with conventional treatments. By providing a clear overview of current scientific knowledge, this review aims to guide healthcare professionals and researchers in making informed decisions about the use of nutritional supplements for cognitive health.
3.
Cognitive stimulation and psychosocial results in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gómez-Soria, I, Iguacel, I, Cuenca-Zaldívar, JN, Aguilar-Latorre, A, Peralta-Marrupe, P, Latorre, E, Calatayud, E
Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2023;115:105114
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Individuals with dementia and brain function impairment may have difficulty in completing day-to-day tasks. Cognitive stimulation (CS), which involves brain processing activities such as puzzles, word games, and music normally performed in a group setting for around 45 minutes per week, has been shown to be a cost-effective therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 studies aimed to analyse the effect of CS on quality of life (QoL). The results showed that personalised CS was associated with a significantly higher QoL, but had no effect on mood and depression, ability to perform daily activities, or mood and anxiety. Personalised CS improves QoL in older adults with healthy cognitive ageing, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend CS as a therapy for individuals with brain ageing, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. For those who are also suffering from depression and low mood other strategies should be employed.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a popular and cost-effective intervention, which applies different types of techniques focused on cognitive skills and can be administered by different professionals. CS can be defined as activities that involve cognitive processing usually conducted in a social context and often in a group. Therefore, CS can improve psychosocial functioning and quality of life (QoL), depression, anxiety and activities of daily living (ADLs) independent of the pharmacological treatment such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of CS on psychosocial outcomes in older adults (aged 65 years or over), with healthy cognitive ageing, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. METHODS PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were examined from inception to October 2021. A total of 1,997 studies were initially identified in these databases. After discarding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 30 studies were finally included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis performed with robust variance estimator (RVE) due the inclusion of studies with repeated measurements. The quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. RESULTS CS was significantly associated with a higher QoL in participants who received personalized/adapted CS (RVE = 0.11±0.19 [-0.76, 0.99], t(1.86) = 0.6, p = 0.61). . CONCLUSION Personalized/adapted CS seems to improve QoL in older adults.