0
selected
-
1.
The Gut Microbiome and Mental Health: What Should We Tell Our Patients?: Le microbiote Intestinal et la Santé Mentale : que Devrions-Nous dire à nos Patients?
Butler, MI, Mörkl, S, Sandhu, KV, Cryan, JF, Dinan, TG
Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2019;64(11):747-760
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut-brain axis is the bi-directional communication pathway and increasing evidence indicates its impact in neural health and disease. With the field of nutritional psychiatry actively developing, psychiatric patients have become increasingly aware of the therapeutic use of probiotics and mental health. This review aims to inform psychiatrists about the communication between the microbiome and brain and discuss its relevance to the management and treatment of psychiatric illness. In reviewing the common psychiatric illnesses, the current literature shows inconsistent results on specific microbiome compositions related to specific illnesses, yet shows promising effects for probiotic use in many disorders. These findings offer a novel paradigm for approaching mental illness through the lens of nutritional psychiatry. Authors conclude there is much work to be done translating laboratory findings into clinical practice, and highlight the necessity for clinicians to stay informed of the literature and make accurate recommendations to patients.
Abstract
The gut microbiome as a potential therapeutic target for mental illness is a hot topic in psychiatry. Trillions of bacteria reside in the human gut and have been shown to play a crucial role in gut-brain communication through an influence on neural, immune, and endocrine pathways. Patients with various psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorder have been shown to have significant differences in the composition of their gut microbiome. Enhancing beneficial bacteria in the gut, for example, through the use of probiotics, prebiotics, or dietary change, has the potential to improve mood and reduce anxiety in both healthy people and patient groups. Much attention is being given to this subject in the general media, and patients are becoming increasingly interested in the potential to treat mental illness with microbiome-based therapies. It is imperative that those working with people with mental illness are aware of the rationale and current evidence base for such treatment strategies. In this review, we provide an overview of the gut microbiome, what it is, and what it does in relation to gut-brain communication and psychological function. We describe the fundamental principles and basic techniques used in microbiome-gut-brain axis research in an accessible way for a clinician audience. We summarize the current evidence in relation to microbiome-based strategies for various psychiatric disorders and provide some practical advice that can be given to patients seeking to try a probiotic for mental health benefit.
-
2.
Gut feeling: randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the treatment of clinical depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nikolova, V, Zaidi, SY, Young, AH, Cleare, AJ, Stone, JM
Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology. 2019;9:2045125319859963
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depression is a common and complex illness that significantly diminishes quality of life. Currently, most pharmacological treatments target neurotransmitter activity in the brain and are known to have a delayed onset of effect as well as a range of side-effects. The aim of this study was to identify and synthesize all published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of probiotics as treatment for depression in clinically depressed patients. This study is a systematic review of three studies. Within the three included RCTs, a total of 229 clinically depressed patients were randomized, with an average age of 36 years and a gender distribution of 76% female. Results indicate a non-significant difference in depressive symptoms between the probiotic and placebo groups post-intervention. Authors conclude that further larger studies in well-defined clinical populations are needed, both to determine the clinical utility of this novel treatment approach, and to investigate potential underlying mechanisms.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently the gut microbiota has attracted significant interest in psychiatric research due to the observed bidirectional gut-brain communication. A growing body of evidence from preclinical work has suggested that probiotics may be effective in reducing stress and anxiety and alleviating low mood. It is unclear to what extent these effects are seen in clinical populations. We aimed to identify all published evidence on the efficacy of probiotics as treatment for depression in clinically depressed populations. METHODS Randomized controlled trials of patients with depression where probiotics were used as supplementary or standalone treatment were considered eligible. A literature search with the terms (probiotic* OR bacteria OR Lactobacillus OR Bifidobacterium) AND depress* was performed in PubMed and Web of Science. Data on study population characteristics, treatment effectiveness, tolerability and risk of bias were extracted from eligible studies. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses. RESULTS Only three studies met inclusion criteria (229 individuals randomized), two of which administered probiotics as a supplementary treatment to antidepressants and one as a standalone treatment. Upon removal of the latter study from the meta-analysis due to clinical heterogeneity, there was an overall positive effect of probiotics on depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference = 1.371, 95% confidence interval 0.130-2.613). CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in depression at present, although there may be a beneficial effect of probiotics on depressive symptoms when administered in addition to antidepressants. Further studies are required to investigate this and explore potential mechanisms.
-
3.
Small talk: microbial metabolites involved in the signaling from microbiota to brain.
Caspani, G, Swann, J
Current opinion in pharmacology. 2019;48:99-106
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut-brain axis (GBA) is the communication network between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. An array of gut bacteria-derived metabolites mediates this interaction between the gastrointestinal system and the brain, influencing physiological and pathological processes in direct and indirect ways. Thus a variation in the gut microbiome can alter the functional capacity and output of the gut-brain-communication. In this review, the authors summarise key bacterial metabolites from the gut and their effect on the brain. Addressed are short-chain fatty acids, their impact on gut and brain barrier integrity, their role in appetite regulation, and their association with anxiety and depressive disorders amongst other aspects. Secondly, bile acids, which are processed by the microbiome, can activate several receptors. And thus divergence gut bacteria can alter the composition of bile acids and change their signalling capacity. Bile acids can also directly modify gut and blood-brain barrier function and may carry a signalling role in the brain. A few neurotransmitters are covered in this article, as several types of gut bacteria synthesize neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and dopamine. Though, it is uncertain whether all gut-derived neurotransmitters can reach the brain. However, certain GABA-producing bacteria have been shown to elicit higher GABA levels in the brain. The microbiota can also be involved with the conversion of neurotransmitters such as dopamine. The final section briefly capture the evidence of other brain health-relevant molecules derived from the intestinal microbiota, including Lipopolysaccharides, choline, lactate and B-Vitamins. This review yields a short and comprehensive summary highlighting the many ways the gut can influence brain function and health and could be of interest to those providing mental health support in light of gut function.
Abstract
The wealth of biotransformational capabilities encoded in the microbiome expose the host to an array of bioactive xenobiotic products. Several of these metabolites participate in the communication between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system and have potential to modulate central physiological and pathological processes. This biochemical interplay can occur through various direct and indirect mechanisms. These include binding to host receptors in the brain, stimulation of the vagus nerve in the gut, alteration of central neurotransmission, and modulation of neuroinflammation. Here, the potential for short chain fatty acids, bile acids, neurotransmitters and other bioactive products of the microbiome to participate in the gut-brain axis will be reviewed.
-
4.
Current Understanding of Gut Microbiota in Mood Disorders: An Update of Human Studies.
Huang, TT, Lai, JB, Du, YL, Xu, Y, Ruan, LM, Hu, SH
Frontiers in genetics. 2019;10:98
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The bidirectional communication between the brain and gastrointestinal tract has been established, and evidence suggests the gut microbiota can influence brain function. While the underlying cause of mood disorders is multifactorial and complex, the gut microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of disease. The aim of this review is to summarize the human studies of gut microbiota in mood disorders and discuss the cause-effect relationship between microbiota composition and mood disorders. Twelve studies were included and showed the microbiome diversity and composition of those experiencing mood disorders were significantly different compared with healthy individuals. They found an increase in the abundance of Actinobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and a decrease in Faecalibacterium, suggesting a pro-inflammatory state. Based on these results, the authors conclude the gut microbiota plays an important role in mood disorders through the brain-gut-microbiota axis, and suggests it to be a target for improved diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.
Abstract
Gut microbiota plays an important role in the bidirectional communication between the gut and the central nervous system. Mounting evidence suggests that gut microbiota can influence the brain function via neuroimmune and neuroendocrine pathways as well as the nervous system. Advances in gene sequencing techniques further facilitate investigating the underlying relationship between gut microbiota and psychiatric disorders. In recent years, researchers have preliminarily explored the gut microbiota in patients with mood disorders. The current review aims to summarize the published human studies of gut microbiota in mood disorders. The findings showed that microbial diversity and taxonomic compositions were significantly changed compared with healthy individuals. Most of these findings revealed that short-chain fatty acids-producing bacterial genera were decreased, while pro-inflammatory genera and those involved in lipid metabolism were increased in patients with depressive episodes. Interestingly, the abundance of Actinobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae was increased and Faecalibacterium was decreased consistently in patients with either bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder. Some studies further indicated that specific bacteria were associated with clinical characteristics, inflammatory profiles, metabolic markers, and pharmacological treatment. These studies present preliminary evidence of the important role of gut microbiota in mood disorders, through the brain-gut-microbiota axis, which emerges as a promising target for disease diagnosis and therapeutic interventions in the future.
-
5.
Tryptophan Metabolism in Inflammaging: From Biomarker to Therapeutic Target.
Sorgdrager, FJH, Naudé, PJW, Kema, IP, Nollen, EA, Deyn, PP
Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:2565
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammation is a normal physiological process activated by the immune system in response to injury or infection. As we age, the immune system changes and the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory agents can shift. This causes a chronic inflammatory state referred to as inflammaging. The rate of inflammaging is strongly associated with age-related disability, disease and mortality. The way in which the essential amino acid tryptophan (Trp) is broken down affects inflammation. If it is converted to kynurenine (Kyn) and its metabolites, inflammation is modulated. Studies have shown that the Kyn/Trp ratio, measured in blood, is strongly associated with ageing in humans. It could therefore be a useful marker to predict the onset of age-related diseases. This review discusses the metabolism of Trp and the links to inflammation. The authors hypothesize how intervening in these pathways could impact health- and lifespan. Future studies are needed to confirm the value of Trp metabolism as a biomarker for (un)healthy ageing and as drug target for inflammaging-related disease.
Abstract
Inflammation aims to restore tissue homeostasis after injury or infection. Age-related decline of tissue homeostasis causes a physiological low-grade chronic inflammatory phenotype known as inflammaging that is involved in many age-related diseases. Activation of tryptophan (Trp) metabolism along the kynurenine (Kyn) pathway prevents hyperinflammation and induces long-term immune tolerance. Systemic Trp and Kyn levels change upon aging and in age-related diseases. Moreover, modulation of Trp metabolism can either aggravate or prevent inflammaging-related diseases. In this review, we discuss how age-related Kyn/Trp activation is necessary to control inflammaging and alters the functioning of other metabolic faiths of Trp including Kyn metabolites, microbiota-derived indoles and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). We explore the potential of the Kyn/Trp ratio as a biomarker of inflammaging and discuss how intervening in Trp metabolism might extend health- and lifespan.
-
6.
A Review of Dietary (Phyto)Nutrients for Glutathione Support.
Minich, DM, Brown, BI
Nutrients. 2019;11(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Glutathione is made up of 3 amino acids (cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine) and plays important roles in the body, including oxidative stress reduction, supporting the immune system and contributing to detoxification processes. Evidence suggests that it is an important marker and target for treatment in many chronic, age-related diseases. This review article explores the evidence of nutritional strategies to improve glutathione status. The authors examine the evidence for supplementation of the precursors of glutathione as well as with various forms of supplemental glutathione itself, and the impacts on glutathione status and clinical impacts. Crucially, the review article provides information on dietary sources of precursors of glutathione and glutathione itself, which will provide Nutrition Practitioners with compelling information for use in clinic. Lean protein, brassica vegetables, polyphenol-rich fruits and vegetables, green tea, herbs and spices and omega-3 rich foods are all discussed in detail.
Abstract
Glutathione is a tripeptide that plays a pivotal role in critical physiological processes resulting in effects relevant to diverse disease pathophysiology such as maintenance of redox balance, reduction of oxidative stress, enhancement of metabolic detoxification, and regulation of immune system function. The diverse roles of glutathione in physiology are relevant to a considerable body of evidence suggesting that glutathione status may be an important biomarker and treatment target in various chronic, age-related diseases. Yet, proper personalized balance in the individual is key as well as a better understanding of antioxidants and redox balance. Optimizing glutathione levels has been proposed as a strategy for health promotion and disease prevention, although clear, causal relationships between glutathione status and disease risk or treatment remain to be clarified. Nonetheless, human clinical research suggests that nutritional interventions, including amino acids, vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, and foods can have important effects on circulating glutathione which may translate to clinical benefit. Importantly, genetic variation is a modifier of glutathione status and influences response to nutritional factors that impact glutathione levels. This narrative review explores clinical evidence for nutritional strategies that could be used to improve glutathione status.
-
7.
Vitamin D Supplementation in Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disease-Enough Is Enough.
Häusler, D, Weber, MS
International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk and severity of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, whether supplementing vitamin D level alters disease severity, is a matter of ongoing debate. This review looks at both clinical and pre-clinical evidence for supplementing vitamin D in people with MS. In vitro experiments show that vitamin D and its metabolites can alter function of various immune cells, mostly via interaction with vitamin D receptors (VDR). Results from human clinical trials, however, are mixed. Preclinical evidence suggests that high dose vitamin D supplementation, when leading to hypercalcaemia, a potentially serious side effect of excessive vitamin D intake, may worsen MS. The authors also review research which suggests mechanisms by which sun exposure can improve MS symptoms independent of vitamin D production. The authors conclude that moderate sun exposure, combined with adequate dietary intake of vitamin D, and in conjunction with a regular assessment of vitamin D serum levels (to avoid hypercalcaemia), might be the best strategy for patients with MS.
Abstract
The exact cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains elusive. Various factors, however, have been identified that increase an individual's risk of developing this central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease and are associated with an acceleration in disease severity. Besides genetic determinants, environmental factors are now established that influence MS, which is of enormous interest, as some of these contributing factors are relatively easy to change. In this regard, a low vitamin D status is associated with an elevated relapse frequency and worsened disease course in patients with MS. The most important question, however, is whether this association is causal or related. That supplementing vitamin D in MS is of direct therapeutic benefit, is still a matter of debate. In this manuscript, we first review the potentially immune modulating mechanisms of vitamin D, followed by a summary of current and ongoing clinical trials intended to assess whether vitamin D supplementation positively influences the outcome of MS. Furthermore, we provide emerging evidence that excessive vitamin D treatment via the T cell-stimulating effect of secondary hypercalcemia, could have negative effects in CNS demyelinating disease. This jointly merges into the balancing concept of a therapeutic window of vitamin D in MS.
-
8.
The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease.
Besedovsky, L, Lange, T, Haack, M
Physiological reviews. 2019;99(3):1325-1380
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The interaction between sleep and immunity is an established phenomena. This thorough review article summarises sleep changes in response to both infectious and non-infectious immune system challenges and describes the role of sleep in supporting the immune system. Details are provided of how sleep affects the innate immune system (first line, rapid defence against infection) as well as the adaptive immune system (second line, delayed defence against infection), using a feedback system which promotes host defence. Sleep is associated with reduced infection risk and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. Sleep deprivation is also associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation. Nutrition Practitioners wishing to support immunity can focus on sleep as a simple lifestyle measure to enhance resilience.
Abstract
Sleep and immunity are bidirectionally linked. Immune system activation alters sleep, and sleep in turn affects the innate and adaptive arm of our body's defense system. Stimulation of the immune system by microbial challenges triggers an inflammatory response, which, depending on its magnitude and time course, can induce an increase in sleep duration and intensity, but also a disruption of sleep. Enhancement of sleep during an infection is assumed to feedback to the immune system to promote host defense. Indeed, sleep affects various immune parameters, is associated with a reduced infection risk, and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. The induction of a hormonal constellation that supports immune functions is one likely mechanism underlying the immune-supporting effects of sleep. In the absence of an infectious challenge, sleep appears to promote inflammatory homeostasis through effects on several inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines. This notion is supported by findings that prolonged sleep deficiency (e.g., short sleep duration, sleep disturbance) can lead to chronic, systemic low-grade inflammation and is associated with various diseases that have an inflammatory component, like diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegeneration. Here, we review available data on this regulatory sleep-immune crosstalk, point out methodological challenges, and suggest questions open for future research.
-
9.
Mechanisms Underlying Metabolic Syndrome-Related Sarcopenia and Possible Therapeutic Measures.
Rubio-Ruiz, ME, Guarner-Lans, V, Pérez-Torres, I, Soto, ME
International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sarcopenia is a multifactorial process in which losses occur in both muscle mass and function. Although several studies indicate an association between sarcopenia and metabolic syndrome (MetS), the connection has not been extensively reviewed. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between sarcopenia and MetS to better understand the mechanisms underlying disease and assess current therapeutic options. According to the existing literature, this study found insulin resistance, inflammation and obesity to be major underlying factors of MetS-related sarcopenia. Based on this information, the authors suggest the best option for managing MetS-related sarcopenia is preventative lifestyle change around diet and exercise until a consensus on a therapeutic treatment can be established.
Abstract
Although there are several reviews that report the interrelationship between sarcopenia and obesity and insulin resistance, the relation between sarcopenia and the other signs that compose the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has not been extensively revised. Here, we review the mechanisms underlying MetS-related sarcopenia and discuss the possible therapeutic measures proposed. A vicious cycle between the loss of muscle and the accumulation of intramuscular fat might be associated with MetS via a complex interplay of factors including nutritional intake, physical activity, body fat, oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance, hormonal changes, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The enormous differences in lipid storage capacities between the two genders and elevated amounts of endogenous fat having lipotoxic effects that lead to the loss of muscle mass are discussed. The important repercussions of MetS-related sarcopenia on other illnesses that lead to increased disability, morbidity, and mortality are also addressed. Additional research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of MetS-related sarcopenia and its consequences. Although there is currently no consensus on the treatment, lifestyle changes including diet and power exercise seem to be the best options.
-
10.
Role of phosphatidylcholine-DHA in preventing APOE4-associated Alzheimer's disease.
Patrick, RP
FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2019;33(2):1554-1564
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by progressive memory loss, spatial disorientation, cognitive impairment and behavioural changes. Ageing is the main risk factor for AD, with approximately one-third of Americans over the age of 85 being affected by the condition. The APOE gene provides instructions for making the apolipoprotein E family of proteins that are involved in fat metabolism and cholesterol transport. There are three different variants of this gene, one inherited from each parent. The variant called APOE4 is thought to increase AD risk from 2-3-fold (one inherited copy) to as much as 15-fold (two inherited copies), compared to individuals who do not carry this variant. The omega-3 oil docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an essential fatty acid, which comprises approximately 30% of the fats found in the human brain. Low levels of DHA in the brain increase the risk of developing AD, while normal and high levels may prevent the condition and ameliorate symptoms. This review paper brings together several lines of evidence on why individuals with the APOE4 gene variant don’t respond well to DHA supplementation but experience positive effects from dietary intake of DHA. The author suggests that this is due to the different forms of DHA found in dietary and supplemental sources. Some of the DHA present in fish and seafood is in phospholipid form, which is metabolised into lysophosphatidylcholine DHA (DHA-lysoPC) in the body. In contrast, fish oil supplements contain no DHA in phospholipid form, but in other forms that are mostly metabolised to free DHA. This paper puts forward an argument that, due to the breakdown of the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, APOE4 carriers have impaired brain transport of free DHA but not DHA-lysoPC. The author concludes that dietary sources that contain high amounts of DHA in phospholipid form, such as fish and fish roe may help increase plasma levels of DHA-lysoPC, which may be better transported to the brains of APOE4 carriers. She also highlights the pressing need for future clinical trials to evaluate the effects of omega-3 oils in phospholipid form on the cognitive function of APOE4 carriers with AD.
Abstract
Dietary and supplemental intake of the ω-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) reduces risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and ameliorates symptoms. The apolipoprotein E ( APOE) 4 allele is the strongest risk factor for sporadic AD, exclusive of age. APOE4 carriers respond well to the DHA present in fish but do not respond as well to dietary supplements. The mechanisms behind this varied response remain unknown. I posit that the difference is that fish contain DHA in phospholipid form, whereas fish oil supplements do not. This influences whether DHA is metabolized to nonesterified DHA (free DHA) or a phospholipid form called lysophosphatidylcholine DHA (DHA-lysoPC). Free DHA is transported across the outer membrane leaflet of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via passive diffusion, and DHA-lysoPC is transported across the inner membrane leaflet of the BBB via the major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2A. I propose that APOE4 carriers have impaired brain transport of free DHA but not of DHA-lysoPC, as a consequence of a breakdown in the outer membrane leaflet of the BBB, putting them at increased risk for AD. Dietary sources of DHA in phospholipid form may provide a means to increase plasma levels of DHA-lysoPC, thereby decreasing the risk of AD.-Patrick, R. P. Role of phosphatidylcholine-DHA in preventing APOE4-associated Alzheimer's disease.