-
1.
Experimental Studies of Front-of-Package Nutrient Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Ultra-Processed Foods: A Scoping Review.
Taillie, LS, Hall, MG, Popkin, BM, Ng, SW, Murukutla, N
Nutrients. 2020;12(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Food packages with nutrient warnings are increasingly being produced to promote healthier eating. However, better understanding is needed to see how these affect consumer behaviour. This scoping review summarises evidence for randomised control trials on how behaviour is affected by nutrient package warnings and what the trials are assessing to determine this. The results included 22 studies which showed that studies focused on positive outcomes such as attention, comprehension, and behavioural intentions, but not behavioural change, negative effects, or social interactions. Amongst the studies nutrient warnings were attention grabbing, easy to understand, and discouraged buying, however why this is the case was left unexplained. It was concluded that front of package warnings are easy to understand and discouraged buying, however further studies are needed to determine negative effects.
Abstract
Policies that require front-of-package (FoP) nutrient warnings are becoming increasingly common across the globe as a strategy to discourage excess consumption of sugary drinks and ultra-processed food. However, a better understanding of the pathway through which FoP nutrient warnings work, as well as a review of how outcomes being measured in recent studies map onto this pathway, are needed in order to inform policy on the most effective FoP label design for reducing purchases of ultra-processed foods. This scoping review describes a conceptual model for how FoP nutrient warnings affect consumer behavior, examines which of these outcomes are currently being measured, and summarizes evidence from randomized controlled experiments. Twenty-two studies which experimentally tested nutrient warnings against a control label or other labeling systems were included for full-text review. Our conceptual model includes attention; comprehension, cognitive elaboration, and message acceptance; negative affect and risk perception; behavioral intentions, and behavioral response, along with other elements such as external factors and interpersonal communications. We found that many studies focused on outcomes such as attention, comprehension, and behavioral intentions, but considerable gaps in the evidence remain, particularly for intermediary steps on the pathway to behavioral change, such as negative affect and social interactions. FoP nutrient warnings were visually attended to by consumers, easy to understand, helped consumers identify products high in nutrients of concern, and discouraged them from purchasing these products, although other labeling systems were perceived as containing more information and performed better at helping consumers rank the healthfulness of products. More research is needed to understand whether and how nutrient warnings work in the real world to discourage consumer purchases of sugary drinks and ultra-processed food.
-
2.
Effect of ultra-processed diet on gut microbiota and thus its role in neurodegenerative diseases.
Martínez Leo, EE, Segura Campos, MR
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2020;71:110609
-
-
-
Plain language summary
The consumption of ultra-processed foods has increased dramatically in recent years, resulting in an overconsumption of foods that are nutritionally only suitable to be consumed occasionally. Prolonged and short-term dietary modifications can affect the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota and in turn, dysregulation of the gut microbiota may be associated with diseases of the brain. This systematic review study aimed to determine the relationship between diets high in ultra-processed foods, gut microbiota dysregulation and how this may influence early development of brain diseases. The authors first reviewed literature surrounding the role of gut microbiota on health owing to their ability to produce signalling molecules that have various functions around the body. An imbalance in the gut microbiota can result in an overproduction of signalling molecules that contribute to an unhealthy state. These signalling molecules can also act on the brain through several ways such as the nervous, circulatory, and immune systems. The review demonstrates that high fat, high sugar diets are related to increased risk for diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and that diets high in fibre, are related to a low incidence of brain disorders, but as very few studies have looked at this in relation to gut microbiota relationships are only speculative. It was concluded that gut microbiota dysregulation could act as a clinical indicator between brain diseases and ultra-processed foods, however further studies are needed on the relationship between diet, gut microbiota and brain diseases.
Abstract
The current dietary pattern is characterized by high consumption of ultra-processed foods and lower consumption of fiber and vegetables, environmental factors that are associated directly with the current incidence of chronic metabolic diseases. Diet is an environmental factor that influences the diversity and functionality of the gut microbiota, where dietary changes have a direct action on their homeostasis. The environment created in the gut by ultra-processed foods, a hallmark of the Western diet that are recognized as trigger factors for low-grade systemic inflammatory and oxidative changes, favor the development of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). From a systematic search, the present review analyzes the relationship and effect of the current feeding pattern, with the dysregulation of the microbiota and its influence on the development of cognitive decline. Because diagnosis of NDs is usually at late stages, this review highlights the importance of a search for stricter public health strategies regarding access to and development of ultra-processed foods.
-
3.
Current Perspectives on Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis and Depression.
Capuco, A, Urits, I, Hasoon, J, Chun, R, Gerald, B, Wang, JK, Kassem, H, Ngo, AL, Abd-Elsayed, A, Simopoulos, T, et al
Advances in therapy. 2020;37(4):1328-1346
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome has been implicated in several neurological disorders; however exact mechanisms are still not fully understood. This review of recent studies, aimed to investigate the relationship between an imbalanced gut microbiome and depression. The authors first looked at the epidemiology of disease, concluding that significant burden needs to be assessed through improved preventative measures. This will depend upon the correct identification of risk factors, and the study focused on the role of the gut microbiome in this through animal and human studies. Imbalances in inflammation through altered gut microbiota, depleted biodiversity and stress induced microbiome changes were all implicated in the development of depression. It was concluded that studies on the role of microbiota in depression remain promising but are small and follow many different methodologies. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to better understand the role of gut microbiota in the development of depression and that ensuring a healthy gut may improve symptoms.
Abstract
The human gut microbiome partakes in a bidirectional communication pathway with the central nervous system (CNS), named the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is believed to modulate various central processes through the vagus nerve as well as production of microbial metabolites and immune mediators which trigger changes in neurotransmission, neuroinflammation, and behavior. Little is understood about the utilization of microbiome manipulation to treat disease. Though studies exploring the role of the microbiome in various disease processes have shown promise, mechanisms remain unclear and evidence-based treatments for most illnesses have not yet been developed. The animal studies reviewed here offer an excellent array of basic science research that continues to clarify mechanisms by which the microbiome may affect mental health. More evidence is needed, particularly as it relates to translating this work to human subjects. The studies presented in this paper largely demonstrate encouraging results in the treatment of depression. Limitations include small sample sizes and heterogeneous methodology. The exact mechanism by which the gut microbiota causes or alters neuropsychiatric disease states is not fully understood. In this review, we focus on recent studies investigating the relationship between gut microbiome dysbiosis and the pathogenesis of depression. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
-
4.
Gut Microbiome and Depression: How Microbes Affect the Way We Think.
Limbana, T, Khan, F, Eskander, N
Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9966
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Recent findings have shown that a healthy gut microflora transmits signals to the brain through various pathways, namely the gut-brain axis. With the gut and brain working in a bidirectional relationship, emerging research suggests this could potentially impact stress, anxiety, depression and cognition. Therefore the aim of this review was to determine the role of the gut microbiome in mental health and depression. A total of 26 articles were reviewed and based on these articles, a strong link exists between the gut microbiome and its impact on mental health. Additionally, the literature supports the notion that the gut-brain axis serves as an essential pathway. Based on these findings, the authors agree there is a strong association between the gut microbiome and mental health, while also acknowledging the need to establish a causal link between these two entities. The authors conclude that the microbiome is a promising approach when considering the prevention, treatment and management of mental health diseases in the future.
Abstract
The gut microbiome serves an important role in the human body. Reportedly, one of the benefits of these microflora is on mental health. Once established, food and other dietary sources that enhance quality microbiome content in our gastrointestinal system will be a significant consideration in individuals' day to day lives. This literature review conducted a PubMed search for studies about the gut microbiome and its relation to depression. In using several Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) keywords, relevant literature was selected. A total of 26 articles were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and after checking the articles' accessibility. This literature would like to establish the role of the gut microbiome in depression. This study's findings showed that there is a strong association of microbiome function to mental well-being.
-
5.
The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Dietary Interventions for Depression and Anxiety.
Bear, TLK, Dalziel, JE, Coad, J, Roy, NC, Butts, CA, Gopal, PK
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2020;11(4):890-907
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
A growing body of research suggests diet and mental health are closely connected through the microbiome-gut-brain axis (MGBA). This axis shows how the gut and brain are linked in a bidirectional relationship, and provides a model in which dietary interventions could help prevent, or be an alternative therapy, for depression and anxiety. While there is an increased understanding of the complex interplay between diet, gut microbiome and mental health, the literature has produced conflicting results. The aim of this review is to discuss possible reasons for the conflicting results on the link between diet and mental health and present the current findings. The authors explored the impact of various dietary components on the MGBA including macronutrient ratios, omega 3 fatty acids, prebiotic and probiotic foods, food additives, and whole diet approaches. The research shows mental health is likely to be influenced by the MGBA via changes in gut microbiota composition and function, but conflicting results and limited research elucidates the complexity in understand the extent of this bidirectional relationship. Based on the current findings, the authors suggest dietary patterns for positive mental health should be in support of a healthy gut microbiota. They conclude further research is needed into the mechanisms in which gut microbiota impacts mental health to pave the way for a holistic approach to preventing and treating anxiety and depression.
Abstract
There is emerging evidence that an unhealthy dietary pattern may increase the risk of developing depression or anxiety, whereas a healthy dietary pattern may decrease it. This nascent research suggests that dietary interventions could help prevent, or be an alternative or adjunct therapy for, depression and anxiety. The relation, however, is complex, affected by many confounding variables, and is also likely to be bidirectional, with dietary choices being affected by stress and depression. This complexity is reflected in the data, with sometimes conflicting results among studies. As the research evolves, all characteristics of the relation need to be considered to ensure that we obtain a full understanding, which can potentially be translated into clinical practice. A parallel and fast-growing body of research shows that the gut microbiota is linked with the brain in a bidirectional relation, commonly termed the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Preclinical evidence suggests that this axis plays a key role in the regulation of brain function and behavior. In this review we discuss possible reasons for the conflicting results in diet-mood research, and present examples of areas of the diet-mood relation in which the gut microbiota is likely to be involved, potentially explaining some of the conflicting results from diet and depression studies. We argue that because diet is one of the most significant factors that affects human gut microbiota structure and function, nutritional intervention studies need to consider the gut microbiota as an essential piece of the puzzle.
-
6.
Gut microbes in neurocognitive and mental health disorders.
Halverson, T, Alagiakrishnan, K
Annals of medicine. 2020;52(8):423-443
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Adequately and effectively treating and managing neurocognitive disorders remains a challenge. Increasing evidence suggests gut microbes may contribute to common mental health disorders through the microbiota-gut-brain axis, and better understanding this interaction could lead to improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to discuss the impact of the gut microbiome on neurocognitive and mental health disorders and the mechanisms by which they act. This review reveals that the gut microbiome can influence brain and intestinal cells and that there is an association between gut dysbiosis with different mental health and neurocognitive disorders. Additionally, evidence shows the antimicrobial effect of current pharmaceutical treatments used in mental disorders may adversely affect the gut microbiome. Based on these findings, the authors conclude the gut microbiome is likely involved in the pathophysiology of neurocognitive and mental health conditions. Treatment strategies focusing on the gut microbiome may have a role in the treatment and management of mental health disorders, however further evidence is needed before applying these strategies in clinical practice.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As individuals age, the prevalence of neurocognitive and mental health disorders increases. Current biomedical treatments do not completely address the management of these conditions. Despite new pharmacological therapy the challenges of managing these diseases remain.There is increasing evidence that the Gut Microbiome (GM) and microbial dysbiosis contribute to some of the more prevalent mental health and neurocognitive disorders, such as depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (BP), and dementia as well as the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Methodology: Scoping review about the effect of gut microbiota on neurocognitive and mental health disorders. RESULTS This scoping review found there is an evolving evidence of the involvement of the gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of neurocognitive and mental health disorders. This manuscript also discusses how the psychotropics used to treat these conditions may have an antimicrobial effect on GM, and the potential for new strategies of management with probiotics and faecal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS This understanding can open up the need for a gut related approach in these disorders as well as unlock the door for the role of gut related microbiota management. KEY MESSAGES Challenges of managing mental health conditions remain in spite of new pharmacological therapy. Gut dysbiosis is seen in various mental health conditions. Various psychotropic medications can have an influence on the gut microbiota by their antimicrobial effect.
-
7.
Mental Disorders Linked to Crosstalk between The Gut Microbiome and The Brain.
Choi, TY, Choi, YP, Koo, JW
Experimental neurobiology. 2020;29(6):403-416
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome may have a role in regular brain function and mental health and this review paper aimed to determine the mechanisms through which this may be possible. There are several mental health disorders that may be affected by the gut microbiome, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and addiction. It appears that there is a correlation between a disordered gut microbiome (known as dysbiosis) and MDD, ASD and addiction. Anxiety symptoms in healthy individuals and cognitive deficits in individuals with AD have reportedly been improved with probiotics. How the gut microbiome communicates with the brain was also discussed with the enteric nervous system, vagus nerve, spinal chord, immune system and brain signalling molecules all being implicated as possible routes. Finally, the paper discussed the use of probiotics for the prevention or treatment of mental disorders, with Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus and specifically L. reuteri, L. plantarum and L. helveticus all shown in animal models to improve aspects associated with mental disorders. Amongst the human research B. longum has been shown to relieve stress and increase cognitive function in healthy individuals. It was concluded that studies have elucidated a relationship between the gut microbiome and mental health through various routes of communication. Research should focus on how gut microbiome changes are involved in mental illness. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to further knowledge on the potential relationship between the gut microbiome and mental health.
Abstract
Often called the second brain, the gut communicates extensively with the brain and vice versa. The conversation between these two organs affects a variety of physiological mechanisms that are associated with our mental health. Over the past decade, a growing body of evidence has suggested that the gut microbiome builds a unique ecosystem inside the gastrointestinal tract to maintain the homeostasis and that compositional changes in the gut microbiome are highly correlated with several mental disorders. There are ongoing efforts to treat or prevent mental disorders by regulating the gut microbiome using probiotics. These attempts are based on the seminal findings that probiotics can control the gut microbiome and affect mental conditions. However, some issues have yet to be conclusively addressed, especially the causality between the gut microbiome and mental disorders. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms by which the gut microbiome affects mental health and diseases. Furthermore, we discuss the potential use of probiotics as therapeutic agents for psychiatric disorders.
-
8.
Bacterial Metabolites of Human Gut Microbiota Correlating with Depression.
Averina, OV, Zorkina, YA, Yunes, RA, Kovtun, AS, Ushakova, VM, Morozova, AY, Kostyuk, GP, Danilenko, VN, Chekhonin, VP
International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(23)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is multifactorial disease and it is the most common type of psychiatric disorder. Literature indicates that there are significant differences between the gut microbiota (GM) of patients with depression and healthy controls. The aim of this review was to examine (a) various low-molecular compounds as potential biomarkers of depression in correlation with the metabolism of the GM, and (b) ways to correct the microbiota imbalance. Results show that: - the use of the GM biomarkers, reflecting the neuromodulatory [the process by which nervous activity is regulated through classes of neurotransmitters], immunomodulatory [the process by which the body’s immune system is altered] and antioxidant statuses of the host organism, in the analysis of metagenomic [the study of a collection of genetic material (genomes) from a mixed community of organisms] data from patients with neuropsychiatric diseases, is gaining currency. - diet remains one of the most effective measures that can be taken to restore the microbial balance in the gut and alleviate the symptoms of depression. - a healthy diet during the depression therapy, along with the application of probiotics and psychobiotics, may potentially improve the course of the disease and contribute to the progress of treatment. Authors conclude that further progress in the practical understanding of the role of the GM in depression will greatly depend on correct planning of future metagenomic studies.
Abstract
Depression is a global threat to mental health that affects around 264 million people worldwide. Despite the considerable evolution in our understanding of the pathophysiology of depression, no reliable biomarkers that have contributed to objective diagnoses and clinical therapy currently exist. The discovery of the microbiota-gut-brain axis induced scientists to study the role of gut microbiota (GM) in the pathogenesis of depression. Over the last decade, many of studies were conducted in this field. The productions of metabolites and compounds with neuroactive and immunomodulatory properties among mechanisms such as the mediating effects of the GM on the brain, have been identified. This comprehensive review was focused on low molecular weight compounds implicated in depression as potential products of the GM. The other possible mechanisms of GM involvement in depression were presented, as well as changes in the composition of the microbiota of patients with depression. In conclusion, the therapeutic potential of functional foods and psychobiotics in relieving depression were considered. The described biomarkers associated with GM could potentially enhance the diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders in clinical practice and represent a potential future diagnostic tool based on metagenomic technologies for assessing the development of depressive disorders.
-
9.
Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease.
Heneka, MT, Golenbock, D, Latz, E, Morgan, D, Brown, R
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2020;12(1):69
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Covid-19 may cause brain dysfunction evidenced by symptoms individuals experience once they have contracted the disease. Loss of smell, taste and confusion have all been reported by patients and a number of severe cases have reported incidences of stroke. These are all of concern, as Covid-19 can severely affect the elderly who ordinarily are the most likely to suffer from brain disorders. This small review paper of 27 studies stated that there are four possible ways in which Covid-19 may affect the brain, which put Covid-19 sufferers at an increased risk of long-term brain disorders. This was supported by findings, which showed one third of Covid-19 patients leave hospital with evidence of brain dysfunction. Inflammation was heavily reviewed by the authors as a possible causal factor. It was concluded that patients who survive Covid-19 infection are at an increased risk for developing brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, however it was acknowledged that further studies are required. Clinicians could use this study to understand the possible need for both short-term and long-term monitoring of brain function in individuals who have survived Covid-19, especially if they are elderly.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that infection with Sars-CoV-2 causes neurological deficits in a substantial proportion of affected patients. While these symptoms arise acutely during the course of infection, less is known about the possible long-term consequences for the brain. Severely affected COVID-19 cases experience high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute respiratory dysfunction and often require assisted ventilation. All these factors have been suggested to cause cognitive decline. Pathogenetically, this may result from direct negative effects of the immune reaction, acceleration or aggravation of pre-existing cognitive deficits, or de novo induction of a neurodegenerative disease. This article summarizes the current understanding of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 and hypothesizes that affected patients may be at higher risk of developing cognitive decline after overcoming the primary COVID-19 infection. A structured prospective evaluation should analyze the likelihood, time course, and severity of cognitive impairment following the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
10.
British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society Guidelines on perioperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery-2020 update.
O'Kane, M, Parretti, HM, Pinkney, J, Welbourn, R, Hughes, CA, Mok, J, Walker, N, Thomas, D, Devin, J, Coulman, KD, et al
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2020;21(11):e13087
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
All bariatric surgery procedures impact on nutrition to varying degrees and can potentially cause clinically significant deficiencies of micronutrients. The British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society (BOMSS) published its first nutritional guidelines in 2014. In fact, the aim of this document is to systematically review the current evidence for preoperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for adolescents and adults undergoing bariatric surgery, and to update the recommendations for safe practice in the U.K. setting. One hundred and thirty-nine papers were included in the review. Results show that following surgery, the risk of nutritional deficiencies increases because of the impact of bariatric surgery on both oral intake and absorption. Thus, preoperative care should include: - a comprehensive nutritional assessment prior to bariatric surgery, - a clinically investigative and corrective approach of nutritional deficiencies before surgery, - preparatory support and education by a dietitian, and - guidance on following a low calorie/low carbohydrate diet. Whereas, postoperative care should include access to lifelong monitoring following bariatric surgery to ensure that nutritional requirements are met, and risks of developing post-bariatric surgery related nutritional deficiencies are reduced. Authors conclude that these guidelines have the potential to improve clinical practice and safety for people undergoing bariatric surgery and should be considered for adoption by healthcare organizations.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is recognized as the most clinically and cost-effective treatment for people with severe and complex obesity. Many people presenting for surgery have pre-existing low vitamin and mineral concentrations. The incidence of these may increase after bariatric surgery as all procedures potentially cause clinically significant micronutrient deficiencies. Therefore, preparation for surgery and long-term nutritional monitoring and follow-up are essential components of bariatric surgical care. These guidelines update the 2014 British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society nutritional guidelines. Since the 2014 guidelines, the working group has been expanded to include healthcare professionals working in specialist and non-specialist care as well as patient representatives. In addition, in these updated guidelines, the current evidence has been systematically reviewed for adults and adolescents undergoing the following procedures: adjustable gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch. Using methods based on Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology, the levels of evidence and recommendations have been graded. These guidelines are comprehensive, encompassing preoperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring, vitamin and mineral supplementation and correction of nutrition deficiencies before, and following bariatric surgery, and make recommendations for safe clinical practice in the U.K. setting.