1.
Impact of probiotics on muscle mass, muscle strength and lean mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Prokopidis, K, Giannos, P, Kirwan, R, Ispoglou, T, Galli, F, Witard, OC, Triantafyllidis, KK, Kechagias, KS, Morwani-Mangnani, J, Ticinesi, A, et al
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2023;14(1):30-44
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sarcopenia is a progressive skeletal muscle disorder involving accelerated loss of muscle mass, strength and function. It generally occurs in older age groups but can also be seen in younger people. Multiple factors contribute to the development of the condition. Besides nutritional management strategies, probiotics have recently caught the interest of researchers. As probiotics promote metabolic building activity, aid digestion and absorption and reduce muscle breakdown by favourably managing inflammation, they present great potential for the management of sarcopenia. This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. The review included 24 studies, with probiotics mainly from the Bifidobacteria or Lactobacilli family. The analysis concluded that probiotic supplementation improved muscle mass in comparison to placebos. It also significantly increased overall muscle strength in 6 randomized controlled trials, which was most obvious in age groups of 50 and above. However, no changes were seen concerning total lean mass. It appeared that longer studies, of >12 weeks or more, showed better outcomes in this review. Furthermore, Bifidobacteria species seemed to exhibit more favourable effects, and the authors also noted the beneficial results were more significant in Asian populations. Further research is needed to understand more about the underlying mechanism, best probiotics strains and the specifics of different demographic groups. This article yields a concise overview of sarcopenia, the nutritional aspects of the disease and how probiotics may be beneficial in disease management, strengthened with data from the review.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This was a well-conducted meta-analysis based on its methodological approach that demonstrated that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation may contribute to improved muscle mass in younger adults and improved muscle strength in older adults.
- Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation was associated with enhanced muscle mass in younger adults, a potential focus for those considering probiotic supplements.
- The duration of probiotic therapy matters, with longer-term (12 weeks or more) supplementation showing improvements in muscle mass and strength..
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in both young and older adults.
Methods
- The search encompassed PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception up to June 2022; studies included spanned a period from 2013 to June 2022.
- The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and included the Risk-of-Bias tool to assess study quality.
- The study focused on changes in muscle mass, total lean mass, and muscle strength.
- Inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adult participants (>18 years); interventions involving any probiotics, and a control group receiving either no treatment or a placebo.
Results
- 24 RCTs were included (709 participants), with studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia. Intervention durations: ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months.
- Participants included overweight, untrained healthy and resistance-trained individuals, and those with specific conditions like metabolic syndrome and frailty.
- Body composition assessments were conducted using bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and/or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
- Probiotic strains employed in the included studies varied, with Lactobacillus the most common, followed by Bifidobacterium; some combined both. 5 of 24 studies also used additional strains.
- Dosages: ranged from 2 × 10^9 to 11.2 × 10^10 colony-forming units (CFU).
- 4 out of 24 studies used fermented food products like cheese and noodles as sources of probiotics.
- 22 RCTs measured muscle mass and total lean mass; 6 RCTs measured global muscle strength.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) moderately increased muscle mass, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.42. This significant effect (95% CI: 0.10–0.74, P=0.009) was observed only in younger Asian adults (<50 years) after Bifidobacterium supplementation, based on a meta-analysis of 10 studies.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) significantly increased global muscle strength in older adults (>50 years; SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33–1.06, P = 0.0002).
- Probiotic supplementation showed no significant impact on lean mass (SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: 0.19 – 0.13, P = 0.69).
Conclusion
Probiotic supplementation, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may have a positive impact on muscle mass and global strength
Clinical practice applications:
- Consumption of probiotics, mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may contribute to improved muscle strength in older individuals (>50y).
- Consumption of Bifidobacterium strains was associated with improved muscle mass in younger individuals (<50y) in Asian countries, in a low number of studies (k=2).
- Bifidobacterium breve B-3 was associated with an improvement in muscle mass in older overweight individuals, although a causal relationship was not established.
- Probiotics may enhance muscle mass or strength by enhancing protein digestion and amino acid absorption for muscle synthesis and function.
- Considering an individual’s goals, a practitioner could consider probiotic supplementation as a complementary intervention when aiming to enhance muscle mass or strength .
Considerations for future research:
- Future research could focus on pinpointing which specific probiotic strains are most effective for muscle strength or muscle mass to tailor more precise interventions.
- Most studies did not exceed 12 weeks, highlighting the need for long-term research on probiotics sustained muscle impact.
- Future research could investigate the effects of probiotics across diverse demographic groups including different ages, sexes, and ethnic backgrounds to understand the impact in different populations.
- Delving deeper into the mechanisms by which probiotics influence muscle health could lead to targeted probiotic therapies that address specific physiological pathways.
- Finally, future research could explore how probiotics can be combined with other interventions, such as exercise or nutritional modifications, to synergistically improve muscle health and function.
Abstract
Probiotics have shown potential to counteract sarcopenia, although the extent to which they can influence domains of sarcopenia such as muscle mass and strength in humans is unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2022. Eligible RCTs compared the effect of probiotic supplementation versus placebo on muscle and total lean mass and global muscle strength (composite score of all muscle strength outcomes) in adults (>18 years). To evaluate the differences between groups, a meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects inverse-variance model by utilizing standardized mean differences. Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effects of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and global muscle strength. Our main analysis (k = 10) revealed that muscle mass was improved following probiotics compared with placebo (SMD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.10-0.74, I2 = 57%, P = 0.009), although no changes were revealed in relation to total lean mass (k = 12; SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.19 - 0.13, I2 = 0%, P = 0.69). Interestingly, a significant increase in global muscle strength was also observed among six RCTs (SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33-1.06, I2 = 64%, P = 0.0002). Probiotic supplementation enhances both muscle mass and global muscle strength; however, no beneficial effects were observed in total lean mass. Investigating the physiological mechanisms underpinning different ageing groups and elucidating appropriate probiotic strains for optimal gains in muscle mass and strength are warranted.
2.
Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Young, IE, Poobalan, A, Steinbeck, K, O'Connor, HT, Parker, HM
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023;24(3):e13537
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity increases an individual's risk of metabolic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis, and some cancers. “Chrononutrition” relates to the timing of meals and distribution of total energy intake across the day. Evidence is building chrononutrition as a potential target in both weight loss and metabolic disease interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss, and to evaluate the potential for utilizing altered energy distribution as a tool in weight loss interventions. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Total number of participants was 485 (earlier distributed total energy intakes: n = 244, later distributed total energy intakes; n = 241). Results show that energy intakes with a focus on earlier distribution resulted in significantly greater weight loss when compared with similarly energy-restricted diets with individuals consuming a larger proportion of their total energy intake later in the day and into the evening. Authors conclude that earlier energy intakes may be a promising tool to be used in conjunction with other weight loss strategies such as energy restriction to enhance weight loss. However, further research is required to elucidate the additional positive impacts that earlier distributed total energy intakes may have on weight and metabolic health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Implementing a dietary strategy where a higher proportion of energy is consumed earlier in the day may offer additional benefits to an energy restricted diet for weight loss, blood glucose, improve markers of insulin resistance, increase satiety and improve hunger management. Based on the findings, earlier distribution of energy intake may serve as an effective component of a weight loss protocol.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Chrononutrition refers to the timing and distribution of total daily energy intake across the day. It has been proposed that consuming a greater proportion of total daily energy intake earlier in the day as opposed to the evening may be beneficial for weight loss and metabolic health.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss.
Results
A total of 9 randomised controlled trials involving 485 participants were included in this analysis. The study durations ranged from 5-16 weeks. All of the studies included in this analysis applied energy-restricted diets to both intervention arms. The mean percentages of energy intake in 8 of the 9 studies per meal were:
- Earlier distributed intakes: breakfast: 34% ± 16%, lunch: 38% ± 7%, dinner: 20% ± 6%.
- Later distributed intakes: breakfast: 19% ± 6%, lunch: 30% ± 10%, dinner; 40% ± 11%.
One of the studies advised percentage of energy intakes as either:
- Earlier: 70% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 30% for afternoon tea and dinner
- Late: 55% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 45% for afternoon tea and dinner.
The earlier distributed energy intake groups demonstrated significantly greater weight loss when compared with later distributed energy intake groups ( Mean Difference (MD) −1.23 kg; 95% CI −2.40, −0.06, p = 0.04;
I2 = 98%).
The earlier energy intake groups also displayed lower fasting and bedtime glucose levels (fasting: −0.83 vs. −0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.001; before sleep: −1.70 vs. −0.28 mmol/L, p = 0.009).
A random-effects model demonstrated that the earlier intake groups displayed greater reductions in LDL (MD: −0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, −0.07, p < 0.01), fasting glucose (MD: 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.23, −0.06, p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (MD: −0.38; 95% CI −0.64, −0.11, p = 0.005).
One study reported that earlier distribution energy intake also led to a greater reduction in medications following the intervention for type 2 diabetics (31% vs. 0%, P=0.002).
Two of the studies assessed both appetite and hunger and identified that earlier distribution of energy led to improvements in their urge to eat, preoccupation with food and cravings for sweets and fats.
Clinical practice applications:
Earlier distribution of energy intake may be beneficial for:
- Weight loss
- Improve fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose and HbA1c
- Reducing LDL
- Improving satiety and hunger management
- Supporting the reduction of medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes
- Improving regularity of sleep and waking times
Considerations for future research:
As the included studies only ranged from 5-16 weeks, longer duration studies would be useful to identify the effect of earlier distribution of energy intake on body weight, metabolic health and appetite over a longer period of time. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies and a lack of uniformity in the distributions of energy intake across the day. Further studies with more uniformity of energy distribution would be needed to identify the optimal distribution of energy across the day to improve body weight and metabolic health.
Abstract
Consuming a greater proportion of total energy intake earlier in the day rather than in the evening is proposed to positively influence weight loss and health, potentially due to greater synchronization of human body circadian rhythms. This systematic review provides an update on existing evidence regarding earlier distributed eating patterns in weight loss interventions. Using a robust search strategy in five electronic databases, nine randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of energy intake distribution on weight loss were identified. Following critical appraisal, a random-effects meta-analyses found that, in the context of an energy-reduced diet, distributing energy intake with a focus on earlier intake resulted in significantly greater weight loss (-1.23 kg; 95% CI 2.40, -0.06, p = 0.04). Improvements in HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, and LDL cholesterol were also seen. The current study provides a timely update on the evidence linking distribution of total daily energy intake and health, showing that a focus on earlier intakes can result in greater short-term weight loss compared with later intakes. Future studies are needed to elucidate the impact that earlier intakes may have on weight management and metabolic health.
3.
The Effects of Polyphenols on Bone Metabolism in Postmenopausal Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
Salvio, G, Ciarloni, A, Gianfelice, C, Lacchè, F, Sabatelli, S, Giacchetti, G, Balercia, G
Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;12(10)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Women who are post-menopause are at a higher risk of osteoporosis due to lower levels of the hormone oestrogen. Oestrogens promote bone building and limit breakdown. In addition, oestrogen protects the bones against oxidative stress, which can cause further bone breakdown. Polyphenols, which are naturally occurring chemicals found in fruits and vegetables, may prevent oxidative stress and subsequent bone breakdown. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomised control trials aimed to determine the effect of polyphenol supplementation on post-menopausal bone density. The results showed that polyphenol supplementation had no effect on bone density in the spine, leg, hip, or across the whole body. If polyphenol supplementation extended beyond 2 years, there was evidence of an improvement in spinal bone density. Supplementation also increased one biomarker associated with bone building and decrease one associated with its breakdown. It was concluded that polyphenol use is not recommended to improve bone health in postmenopausal women. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand polyphenol supplementation is ineffective for the prevention of osteoporosis and other lifestyle modifications should be considered.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Postmenopausal women are susceptible to decreased BMD due to lower oestrogen levels and oxidative stress.
- Although polyphenols have an antioxidant effect, supplementation does not seem to affect bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
- Post-menopausal women should consider other lifestyle modifications to reduce the risk of osteoporosis.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Postmenopausal, low oestrogen levels can decrease osteoclastic activity, increase osteoclastic apoptosis, and make bones more susceptible to oxidative stress, which in turn increases osteoclastogenesis and decreases osteoblastogenesis.
- Polyphenols from fruits and vegetables can have an antioxidant effect. They have been shown in vitro to enhance osteoblastic activity through effects on endothelial function and have been associated with a lower risk of fractures.
- This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of polyphenol supplementation on postmenopausal bone mineral density (BMD).
Methods
- 21 randomised control trials were included.
- The primary outcome assessed the effect of polyphenols on BMD.
- The secondary outcome assessed the effect of polyphenols on bone turnover markers; deoxypyridinoline, osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, and pyridinoline.
- 18 studies reported on lumbar BMD, 12 on femoral neck BMD, and 7 on total body BMD.
- Study durations ranged from 3-36 months
Results
- Polyphenols did not affect BMD of the lumbar spine (sMD: 0.21, 95% CI [−0.08 to 0.51], p = 0.16), femoral neck (sMD: 0.16, 95% CI [−0.23 to 0.55], p = 0.42), total hip (sMD: 0.05, 95% CI [−0.14 to 0.24], p = 0.61), or whole body (sMD: −0.12, 95% CI [−0.42 to 0.17], p = 0.41). However, a sub-analysis based on studies longer than 24 months showed that lumbar BMD was improved (sMD: 1.00, 94% CI [0.19 to 1.81], p=0.02).
- Treatment duration did not affect femoral neck BMD, total hip BMD, or whole-body BMD.
- Polyphenols did not affect deoxypyridinoline or osteocalcin levels, however they did increase bone specific alkaline phosphatase (sMD: 1.27, 95% CI [1.13 to 1.42], p < 0.0001) and decrease pyridinoline (sMD: −0.58, 95% CI [−0.77 to −0.39], p < 0.0001).
- There was high heterogeneity amongst the studies and 14 showed high or unclear risk of bias.
Conclusion
- Polyphenol use is not recommended as the sole preventative therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Clinical practice applications:
- A polyphenol rich diet is not recommended to improve BMD and fracture risk in postmenopausal women.
- Other lifestyle modifications with more robust research should be recommended instead.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies would be interesting in women in perimenopause to determine if life stage affects efficacy of polyphenols.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a condition favored by the postmenopausal decline in estrogen levels and worsened by oxidative stress (OS). Polyphenols are natural compounds abundantly found in fruits and vegetables, and they exert antioxidant and hormonal effects that could be useful in osteoporosis prevention, as suggested by epidemiological studies showing a lower incidence of fractures in individuals consuming polyphenol-rich diets. The aim of our meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of polyphenols on bone mineral density (BMD, primary endpoint) and bone turnover markers (BTMs, secondary endpoint) in postmenopausal women. Twenty-one randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in our analysis after in-depth search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. We found that supplementation with polyphenols for 3-36 months exerted no statically significant effects on BMD measured at lumbar spine (sMD: 0.21, 95% CI [-0.08 to 0.51], p = 0.16), femoral neck (sMD: 0.16, 95% CI [-0.23 to 0.55], p = 0.42), total hip (sMD: 0.05, 95% CI [-0.14 to 0.24], p = 0.61), and whole body (sMD: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.42 to 0.17], p = 0.41). Subgroup analysis based on treatment duration showed no statistical significance, but a significant effect on lumbar BMD emerged when studies with duration of 24 months or greater were analyzed separately. On the other hand, we found a significantly slight increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) levels (sMD: 1.27, 95% CI [1.13 to 1.42], p < 0.0001) and a decrease in pyridinoline (PD) levels (sMD: -0.58, 95% CI [-0.77 to -0.39], p < 0.0001). High heterogeneity among studies and unclear risk of bias in one third of the included studies emerged. A subgroup analysis showed similar effects for different duration of treatment and models of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. More robust evidence is needed before recommending the prescription of polyphenols in clinical practice.
4.
Cardiovascular Health Benefits of Specific Vegetable Types: A Narrative Review.
Blekkenhorst, LC, Sim, M, Bondonno, CP, Bondonno, NP, Ward, NC, Prince, RL, Devine, A, Lewis, JR, Hodgson, JM
Nutrients. 2018;10(5)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diets high in vegetables are linked with a lower incidence of chronic disease. Some vegetables may have much larger health benefits in comparison to others, and therefore dietary guidelines could be developed to include targeted advice on consuming specific types of vegetables with the greatest health benefits. This review of observational studies focused on the cardiovascular health benefits of specific vegetable types. Vegetables discussed in this review were grouped into the following types: leafy green, cruciferous, alliums, yellow-orange-red and legumes. These vegetables contain many nutrients and phytochemicals that have been proposed to have benefits for cardiovascular health. The authors looked at the results from nearly 100 observational studies. Most of the studies were carried out on older adults; some were focussed on a single gender (male or female), and some were mixed. Follow up periods in the studies ranged from 3 years to 28 years. Most of the studies relied on food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) to estimate vegetable consumption, and many did not define the size of a vegetable portion in grams. The percentage of studies demonstrating significant benefits of vegetable consumption on CVD ranged from 25% for legumes to 43% for leafy greens. The strongest beneficial effects on CVD risk were seen for leafy green and cruciferous vegetables. The authors concluded that the evidence in this review suggests intake of leafy green and cruciferous vegetables may confer strong cardiovascular health benefits. Increasing vegetable intake, with a focus on leafy green and cruciferous vegetables may provide the greatest benefits.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
Educator for various organizations, such as Institute for Functional Medicine, American Academy for Anti-Aging Medicine
Take Home Message:
- Green leafy vegetables and cruciferous vegetables were found to most impactful for cardiovascular health.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This review highlights the role of specific types of vegetables based on color and nutrients for cardiovascular health benefit.
Clinical practice applications:
The authors investigated whether some vegetable types were more relevant for cardiovascular-related issues than others. Based on their review of the scientific literature, green, leafy vegetables and cruciferous vegetables were found to be most impactful.
Considerations for future research:
This review suggests that more research is needed to understand how certain plant foods, vegetables, and phytochemicals may be functionally important for certain organ systems.
Abstract
Adequate vegetable consumption is one of the cornerstones of a healthy diet. The recommendation to increase vegetable intake is part of most dietary guidelines. Despite widespread and long-running public health messages to increase vegetable intake, similar to other countries worldwide, less than 1 in 10 adult Australians manage to meet target advice. Dietary guidelines are predominantly based on studies linking diets high in vegetables with lower risk of chronic diseases. Identifying vegetables with the strongest health benefits and incorporating these into dietary recommendations may enhance public health initiatives around vegetable intake. These enhanced public health initiatives would be targeted at reducing the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Specific vegetable types contain high levels of particular nutrients and phytochemicals linked with cardiovascular health benefits. However, it is not clear if increasing intake of these specific vegetable types will result in larger benefits on risk of chronic diseases. This review presents an overview of the evidence for the relationships of specific types of vegetables, including leafy green, cruciferous, allium, yellow-orange-red and legumes, with subclinical and clinical CVD outcomes in observational epidemiological studies.