1.
Energy Availability and Nutritional Intake during Different Training Phases of Wheelchair Athletes.
Hertig-Godeschalk, A, Ruettimann, B, Valido, E, Glisic, M, Stoyanov, J, Flueck, JL
Nutrients. 2023;15(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
To maintain a long-term and successful career, elite athletes try to prevent health problems and maximize training adaptations. This includes not only managing training volume and intensity, along with recovery, but also tailoring nutrition to individual needs. The aim of this study was to assess dietary intake, energy availability (EA), and blood biochemical parameters at four consecutive time points during the pre-competition and competition phases in elite wheelchair athletes participating in a pilot feasibility study. This study was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. In the main study the participants were athletes who received either daily probiotic or prebiotic supplementation for four weeks, followed by a four-week washout period, and another four weeks of daily supplementation with another supplement. Results showed that: - neither EA nor energy intake (EI) displayed significant differences across the various time points. - all athletes experienced low EA for at least one day, indicating how tough fuelling is for elite athletes. - daily macronutrient intake and timing were frequently suboptimal, with athletes not adjusting EI to accommodate higher training loads. Authors concluded that their findings highlight the need for specific nutritional guidelines tailored to wheelchair athletes, as well as the importance of continuous education and guidance from qualified sports nutritionists.
Abstract
Optimizing nutritional intake and timing helps athletes to improve performance and long-term health. Different training phases can require varying nutritional needs. In this study, we conducted a descriptive assessment of dietary intake, energy availability (EA), and blood biochemical parameters in elite wheelchair athletes during distinct training phases. Data analyzed in this study were collected as part of a randomized controlled crossover trial exploring the feasibility of probiotics and prebiotic supplementation. Data were obtained from consecutive three-day diaries and blood samples, both collected at four different time points across four consecutive months. We included 14 athletes (mean (standard deviation) age 34 (9) years, eight females, and six males) active in different wheelchair sports. The mean daily nutritional intake (g/kg body mass) for females and males was 2.7 (0.9) and 4.0 (0.7) for carbohydrates, 1.1 (0.3) and 1.5 (0.3) for protein, and 0.8 (0.3) and 1.4 (0.2) for fat. EA did not change across the four time points in either female (p = 0.30) or male (p = 0.05) athletes. The mean EA was lower in female athletes compared to male athletes (p = 0.03). Low EA (≤30 kcal/ kg fat-free mass/day) was observed in female (58 (29) % of days) and male (34 (23) % of days) athletes. Iron deficiency with anemia was observed in two female athletes. Mean vitamin D levels were insufficient (<75 nmol/L). Macronutrient intake, EA, and blood biochemical parameters were suboptimal in this cohort of elite wheelchair athletes, especially in female athletes.
2.
Ameliorating effects of L-carnitine and synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric measures and cardiometabolic traits in women with obesity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fallah, F, Mahdavi, R
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1237882
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a multifactorial relapsing chronic disease attributed to the complicated interaction of behavioural, environmental, and genetic factors. Given the adverse effects of anti-obesity medications, there has been a great appeal in the consumption of weight loss supplements among individuals suffering from obesity seeking a “magic bullet,” which is less demanding than conventional weight management protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of concomitant supplementation of L-carnitine and a multistrain/multispecies synbiotic compared with L-carnitine single therapy on the anthropometric and cardiometabolic indices in healthy women with obesity. This study was a double-blind, controlled, randomised clinical trial. Following a 2-week run-in period, the participants were randomly allocated to the “L-carnitine + synbiotic” or “L-carnitine + placebo” groups (1:1 ratio). Results showed that supplementation of multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (250 mg/day) concomitant with L-carnitine (2 × 500 mg/day) for 8 weeks led to greater amendments in anthropometric and glycaemic indices, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in healthy female individuals with obesity without any severe side effects. Authors concluded that co-administration of L-carnitine and synbiotic may be an encouraging therapeutic strategy for obesity and related cardiometabolic complications.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity, a multifactorial disorder with pandemic dimensions, is conceded a major culprit of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating efficient therapeutic strategies. Nutraceuticals and functional foods are considered promising adjuvant/complementary approaches for weight management in individuals with obesity who have low adherence to conventional treatments. Current literature supports the weight-reducing efficacy of pro/pre/synbiotics or L-carnitine; however, the superiority of the nutraceutical joint supplementation approach over common single therapies to counter obesity and accompanying comorbidities is well documented. This study was designed to assess the effects of L-carnitine single therapy compared with L-carnitine and multistrain/multispecies synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in women with obesity. METHODS The current placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 46 women with obesity, randomly allocated to either concomitant supplementation [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (1 capsule/day)] or monotherapy [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + maltodextrin (1 capsule/day)] groups for 8 weeks. Participants in both groups received healthy eating dietary advice. RESULTS Anthropometric, lipid, and glycemic indices significantly improved in both intervention groups; however, L-carnitine + synbiotic co-administration elicited a greater reduction in the anthropometric measures including body mass index (BMI), body weight, and neck, waist, and hip circumferences (p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, = 0.012, and =0.030, respectively) after adjusting for probable confounders. Moreover, L-carnitine + synbiotic joint supplementation resulted in a greater reduction in fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin (though marginal), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and more increment in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI; p = 0.014, 0.051, 0.024, and 0.019, respectively) compared with the L-carnitine + placebo monosupplementation. No significant intergroup changes were found for the lipid profile biomarkers, except for a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations (HDL-C) in the L-carnitine + synbiotic group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION L-carnitine + synbiotic co-supplementation was more beneficial in ameliorating anthropometric indices as well as some cardiometabolic parameters compared with L-carnitine single therapy, suggesting that it is a promising adjuvant approach to ameliorate obesity or associated metabolic complications through potential synergistic or complementary mechanisms. Further longer duration clinical trials in a three-group design are demanded to verify the complementary or synergistic mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.irct.ir, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20080904001197N13.