-
1.
Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.
Schroor, MM, Joris, PJ, Plat, J, Mensink, RP
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2024;15(1):100130
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets, such as the 5:2 diet, time-restricted eating (TRE), and alternate-day fasting (ADF), are gaining popularity. According to previous research, IER protocols effectively manage obesity and may have many other health benefits, including improving metabolic health. This systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-eight parallel-design randomised controlled trials looked at the benefits of IER protocols, such as ADF, TRE, and the 5:2 diet, and the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that both the IER and CER are equally beneficial. However, IER protocols showed greater but clinically insignificant improvements in fat-free mass and waist circumference in healthy adults. IER and CER protocols were not different in improving the lipid profile, glucose and insulin levels and blood pressure. Different IER diets showed different positive effects on metabolic parameters. Future robust studies are required to assess the effects of these energy-restriction diets on metabolic and anthropometric parameters because of the high variability in the included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the potential clinical utility of various energy-restriction diets.
Abstract
The interest in intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets as a weight-loss approach is increasing. Different IER protocols exist, including time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and the 5:2 diet. This meta-analysis compared the effects of these IER diets with continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy adults. Twenty-eight trials were identified that studied TRE (k = 7), ADF (k = 10), or the 5:2 diet (k = 11) for 2-52 wk. Energy intakes between intervention groups within a study were comparable (17 trials), lower in IER (5 trials), or not reported (6 trials). Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. Changes in body weight [WMD: -0.42 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.96 to 0.13; P = 0.132] and fat mass (FM) (WMD: -0.31 kg; 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.36; P = 0.362) were comparable when results of the 3 IER diets were combined and compared with those of CER. All IER diets combined reduced fat-free mass (WMD: -0.20 kg; 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.01; P = 0.044) and waist circumference (WMD: -0.91 cm; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.06; P = 0.036) more than CER. Effects on body mass index [BMI (kg/m2)], glucose, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, and blood pressure did not differ. Further, TRE reduced body weight, FM, and fat-free mass more than CER, whereas ADF improved HOMA-IR more. BMI was reduced less in the 5:2 diet compared with CER. In conclusion, the 3 IER diets combined did not lead to superior improvements in anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers compared with CER diets. Slightly greater reductions were, however, observed in fat-free mass and waist circumference. To what extent differences in energy intakes between groups within studies may have influenced these outcomes should be addressed in future studies.
-
2.
Nuts and seeds consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and their risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnesen, EK, Thorisdottir, B, Bärebring, L, Söderlund, F, Nwaru, BI, Spielau, U, Dierkes, J, Ramel, A, Lamberg-Allardt, C, Åkesson, A
Food & nutrition research. 2023;67
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nuts and seeds consumption is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nuts and seeds contain beneficial components to reduce the risk of CVD and CHD; hence dietary addition may benefit heart health. This systematic review and meta-analysis included sixty studies to analyse the effects of the consumption of nuts and seeds on the incidence of mortality from type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CVD and intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors. High nuts and seed consumption showed a 19% reduction in CVD risk and a 23% reduction in CVD mortality. In addition, high consumption lowered the risk of CHD by 25%. Increased nut consumption up to 30 g/day showed a dose-dependent relationship with reduced risk of CVD. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the association between nuts and seeds consumption and CHD, CVD and blood lipid levels. However, further robust studies are required to evaluate the effect of specific nuts and seeds on CHD and CVD risk reduction.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to systematically review studies and evaluate the strength of the evidence on nuts/seeds consumption and cardiometabolic diseases and their risk factors among adults. METHODS A protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270554). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus up to September 20, 2021 for prospective cohort studies and ≥12-week randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and type 2 diabetes (T2D), secondary total-/low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, blood pressure and glycaemic markers. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessments (using RoB 2.0 and RoB-NObS) were performed in duplicate. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and expressed as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI); heterogeneity quantified as I 2. One-stage dose-response analyses assessed the linear and non-linear associations with CVD, CHD, stroke and T2D. The strength of evidence was classified per the World Cancer Research Fund criteria. RESULTS After screening 23,244 references, we included 42 papers from cohort studies (28 unique cohorts, 1,890,573 participants) and 18 RCTs (2,266 participants). In the cohorts, mainly populations with low consumption, high versus low total nuts/seeds consumption was inversely associated with total CVD (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.75, 0.86; I 2 = 67%), CVD mortality (0.77; 0.72, 0.82; I 2 = 59.3%), CHD (0.82; 0.76, 0.89; I 2 = 64%), CHD mortality (0.75; 0.65, 0.87; I 2 = 66.9%) and non-fatal CHD (0.85; 0.75, 0.96; I 2 = 62.2%). According to the non-linear dose-response analyses, consumption of 30 g/day of total nuts/seeds was associated with RRs of similar magnitude. For stroke and T2D the summary RR for high versus low intake was 0.91 (95% CI 0.85, 0.97; I 2 = 24.8%) and 0.95 (0.75, 1.21; I 2 = 82.2%). Intake of nuts (median ~50 g/day) lowered total (-0.15 mmol/L; -0.22, -0.08; I 2 = 31.2%) and LDL-cholesterol (-0.13 mmol/L; -0.21, -0.05; I 2 = 68.6%), but not blood pressure. Findings on fasting glucose, HbA1c and insulin resistance were conflicting. The results were robust to sensitivity and subgroup analyses. We rated the associations between nuts/seeds and both CVD and CHD as probable. There was limited but suggestive evidence for no association with stroke. No conclusion could be made for T2D. CONCLUSION There is a probable relationship between consumption of nuts/seeds and lower risk of CVD, mostly driven by CHD, possibly in part through effects on blood lipids. More research on stroke and T2D may affect the conclusions. The evidence of specific nuts should be further investigated.
-
3.
Treatment of obesity and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease with a diet or orlistat: A randomized controlled trial.
Feng, X, Lin, Y, Zhuo, S, Dong, Z, Shao, C, Ye, J, Zhong, B
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(4):691-700
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is characterised by excessive lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. Weight management by the treatment to target strategy through lifestyle intervention remains the primary approach for MAFLD treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a conventional energy-restricted diet (the control group), orlistat, and an experimental diet in the Asian population with obesity and MAFLD. This study was a prospective, open-label, monocentric randomised controlled study. Participants (n = 118) were randomly assigned to the control (n = 39), orlistat (n = 40), or experimental diet (n = 39) groups at a 1:1:1 allocation. Results showed that: - orlistat and the experimental diet were superior to lifestyle intervention in ameliorating liver steatosis [fatty liver]. - the experimental diet had an advantage over lifestyle intervention when patients adhered to the diet. - orlistat was superior to the experimental diet and lifestyle modifications in decreasing liver fat content. Authors conclude that more multicentre, large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify the long-term efficacy and safety of the experimental diet and orlistat treatment in subjects with MAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Losing weight by lifestyle interventions is the first-line treatment for metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) but is limited by low compliance. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the effects of orlistat or an experimental high-protein/lower-carbohydrate diet with a control diet in Asian patients with obesity and MAFLD. METHODS A total of 118 Asian patients with obesity and MAFLD confirmed with MRI-based proton density fat fraction with Dixon sequence were enrolled and allocated to the control group, the orlistat group, or the experimental diet group for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was the relative change in liver fat content (LFC) assessed by MRI-based proton density fat fraction. RESULTS A total of 118 subjects with obesity and MAFLD were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 39), the orlistat group (n = 40), or the experimental diet group (n = 39). All 3 groups demonstrated improvement in liver steatosis at wk 24. The absolute decrease in LFC in the orlistat group was 9.1% and 5.4% in the experimental diet group, both significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The relative reduction in LFC was 30.2% in the experimental diet group, which was significantly higher than the 12.2% observed in the control group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Orlistat and the experimental diet group reduced liver steatosis compared to the control group. This trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-1900027172). http://www.chictr.org.cn.
-
4.
Ameliorating effects of L-carnitine and synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric measures and cardiometabolic traits in women with obesity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fallah, F, Mahdavi, R
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1237882
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a multifactorial relapsing chronic disease attributed to the complicated interaction of behavioural, environmental, and genetic factors. Given the adverse effects of anti-obesity medications, there has been a great appeal in the consumption of weight loss supplements among individuals suffering from obesity seeking a “magic bullet,” which is less demanding than conventional weight management protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of concomitant supplementation of L-carnitine and a multistrain/multispecies synbiotic compared with L-carnitine single therapy on the anthropometric and cardiometabolic indices in healthy women with obesity. This study was a double-blind, controlled, randomised clinical trial. Following a 2-week run-in period, the participants were randomly allocated to the “L-carnitine + synbiotic” or “L-carnitine + placebo” groups (1:1 ratio). Results showed that supplementation of multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (250 mg/day) concomitant with L-carnitine (2 × 500 mg/day) for 8 weeks led to greater amendments in anthropometric and glycaemic indices, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in healthy female individuals with obesity without any severe side effects. Authors concluded that co-administration of L-carnitine and synbiotic may be an encouraging therapeutic strategy for obesity and related cardiometabolic complications.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity, a multifactorial disorder with pandemic dimensions, is conceded a major culprit of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating efficient therapeutic strategies. Nutraceuticals and functional foods are considered promising adjuvant/complementary approaches for weight management in individuals with obesity who have low adherence to conventional treatments. Current literature supports the weight-reducing efficacy of pro/pre/synbiotics or L-carnitine; however, the superiority of the nutraceutical joint supplementation approach over common single therapies to counter obesity and accompanying comorbidities is well documented. This study was designed to assess the effects of L-carnitine single therapy compared with L-carnitine and multistrain/multispecies synbiotic co-supplementation on anthropometric and cardiometabolic indicators in women with obesity. METHODS The current placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 46 women with obesity, randomly allocated to either concomitant supplementation [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + multistrain/multispecies synbiotic (1 capsule/day)] or monotherapy [L-carnitine tartrate (2 × 500 mg/day) + maltodextrin (1 capsule/day)] groups for 8 weeks. Participants in both groups received healthy eating dietary advice. RESULTS Anthropometric, lipid, and glycemic indices significantly improved in both intervention groups; however, L-carnitine + synbiotic co-administration elicited a greater reduction in the anthropometric measures including body mass index (BMI), body weight, and neck, waist, and hip circumferences (p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, = 0.012, and =0.030, respectively) after adjusting for probable confounders. Moreover, L-carnitine + synbiotic joint supplementation resulted in a greater reduction in fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin (though marginal), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and more increment in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI; p = 0.014, 0.051, 0.024, and 0.019, respectively) compared with the L-carnitine + placebo monosupplementation. No significant intergroup changes were found for the lipid profile biomarkers, except for a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations (HDL-C) in the L-carnitine + synbiotic group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION L-carnitine + synbiotic co-supplementation was more beneficial in ameliorating anthropometric indices as well as some cardiometabolic parameters compared with L-carnitine single therapy, suggesting that it is a promising adjuvant approach to ameliorate obesity or associated metabolic complications through potential synergistic or complementary mechanisms. Further longer duration clinical trials in a three-group design are demanded to verify the complementary or synergistic mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.irct.ir, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20080904001197N13.
-
5.
The Effect of Resveratrol on Blood Lipid Profile: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Cao, X, Liao, W, Xia, H, Wang, S, Sun, G
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is well known that cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death. Imbalances in the blood lipid levels, such as elevation of total cholesterol, Triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. It has been shown that resveratrol, a polyphenol found in grapes, blueberries, mulberries, raspberries, peanuts, and knotweeds, has protective effects against cardiovascular disease. In this meta-analysis, 17 randomised controlled trials were included, with varying durations of 4 to 48 weeks and intervention dosages ranging from 10 to 3000 mg/day. According to the results of this meta-analysis, Resveratrol supplementation significantly reduced total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, but not HDL cholesterol. In addition, the reduction in LDL cholesterol was more significant in type 2 diabetic patients when resveratrol was supplemented for 12 weeks or more. A crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of resveratrol supplementation is its dosage. High doses over 500 mg/day were found to have the opposite effect of increasing body mass index and body weight and suppressing the cardioprotective effect. The effects of different dosages and durations of resveratrol supplementation on cardiometabolic health require further robust research. Healthcare professionals may use the results of this study to understand the importance of careful consideration when supplementing resveratrol as a nutraceutical.
Abstract
(1) Background: The effects of resveratrol on blood lipids are controversial. Whether there is a dose-response of the lipid profile upon resveratrol supplementation is unknown. (2) Methods: This dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to explore the effects of resveratrol supplementation on lipid profile. A systematical and comprehensive search of several databases was conducted by 30 June 2022. (3) Results: The results indicated that the intake of resveratrol could significantly decrease the total cholesterol (TC) (mean difference = -10.28; 95%CI: -13.79, -6.76, p < 0.001), triglyceride (TG) (Mean difference = -856; 95%CI: -12.37, -4.75, p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (mean difference = -5.69; 95%CI: -11.07, -0.31, p = 0.038) level, but did not alter the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). In the non-linear dose-response analysis, we observed a significant effect of the supplementation dosage on the level of LDL-C (p-nonlinearity = 0.002). Results from the sub-group analysis showed that the reduction of LDL-C was more significant in the trials with a duration of ≥12 weeks and in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. (4) Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that resveratrol may be beneficial to reduce TC, TG, and LDL-C levels in the blood. The dosage of the resveratrol intervention is an essential factor that affects the level of LDL-C.
-
6.
Effect of Intermittent Fasting Diet on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Insulin Resistance in Patients with Impaired Glucose and Lipid Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yuan, X, Wang, J, Yang, S, Gao, M, Cao, L, Li, X, Hong, D, Tian, S, Sun, C
International journal of endocrinology. 2022;2022:6999907
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and neurological conditions. The imbalance in glucose and lipid metabolism and hypertension characterises the development of these chronic diseases. Intermittent fasting (IF) has been considered an effective dietary strategy for reducing the risk of obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and CVD. This systematic review and meta-analysis include ten randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effects of IF intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome. IF intervention regulated glucose metabolism by improving fasting blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, insulin, and insulin resistance. IF intervention also positively impacted the body mass index and waist circumference. The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein levels, and triglyceride levels also improved, followed by the IF, showing the impact on lipid metabolism. Further robust studies are required due to heterogeneity between the included studies in type of IF, duration, the health status of participants, ethnicity, and outcome measurements. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the therapeutic effect of IF intervention on glycolipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- IF does not require calorie restriction which may result in greater compliance
- IF does not restrict macronutrients such as CHO and fats, so may avoid the exclusion of key nutrients e.g. healthy fats and wholegrains.
- IF may have fewer adverse effects on daily routines and quality of life, which may mean adherence is easier.
- Improved glucose and lipid metabolism may prevent the development of chronic health conditions such as T2D, CVD and cancer.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Management of glucose and lipid metabolism can be achieved through weight reduction using dietary interventions such as very low calorie or CHO diets, which may be effective but difficult to sustain long term. An alternative approach for weight management, improved insulin resistance and subsequent prevention of comorbitities e.g. Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and cancer, is Intermittent Fasting (IF). such as time restricted or periodic fasting.
This study summarises the effects of IF dietary interventions lasting less than three months in overweight and obese women with Metabolic Syndrome, defined as the presence of any metabolic dysfunction including obesity, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia or hypertension.
The meta-anlaysis was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search in PubMed and Medline using the keywords obesity/overweight, IF diet, metabolic syndrome, RCT’s and humans resulted in 10 studies with 12 types of intervention for analysis. The following outcomes were evaluated: glucose and lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, weight loss and blood pressure.
Results were analysed in R software using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, and either random or fixed effects depending on the Cochrane’s Q and I(2) statistics. Funnel plots were inspected for potential bias and Egger’s regression tests for publication bias.
There were significant differences before and after the interventions for all glucose and lipid metabolism markers as well as body weight and systolic blood pressure :
Glucose metabolism:
- Fasting glucose reduced by 0.15mmol/L
- Insulin plasma reduced by 13.25uUI
- HbA1c reduced by 0.08%
- HOMA-IR (insulin resistance index) reduced by 0.31 on average
Lipid metabolism:
- Total cholesterol reduced by 0.32mmol/L
- LDL reduced by 0.22mmol/L
- Triglyceride reduced by 0.04mmol/L
Weight loss:
- Body weight reduced by 1.87kg
- BMI reduced by 0.8kg/m2
- Waist circumference reduced by 2.08cm
Blood pressure:
- Systolic reduced by 2.58mmHg
- Diastolic reduced by 3.12mmHg
Despite limitations of the meta-analysis, this study demonstrates IF has therapeutic effects on those with disordered lipid and glucose metabolism, and may prove to be an effective and sustainable approach.
Clinical practice applications:
- IF may be an effective alternative to restricted calorie or CHO diets for weight management with the associated benefits of glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF has been shown to have therapeutic effects on individuals with impaired glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF may be considered as a sustainable lifestyle choice rather than a ‘weight loss’ programme such as a very low calorie diet, which can result in poor quality of life and subsequent reduced adherence.
- Since it may take time for impaired glucose and lipid metabolism to progress to more serious disease states, establishing IF as an early intervention, may be considered as a prudent form of preventative medicine.
- IF has shown to have other health benefits such as reduced blood pressure and may be considered as adjuvant therapy.
Considerations for future research:
- Compares the effects of IF on different ethnicities, sex and age categories
- Evaluates the effect of IF on other disease states e.g. cancer, auto-immune conditions
- Assesses the response of other biomarkers e.g. inflammatory cytokines
- Compares different types and durations of IF on health biomarkers (eg periodic, time restricted)
Abstract
The question of whether or not intermittent fasting diets improve the clinical indicators of glycolipid metabolism remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed the relevant clinical trials to evaluate the effects of intermittent fasting diet on glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in patients with metabolic syndrome. To evaluate the effect of intermittent fasting diet intervention on patients with disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism, random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis models were used to calculate the average difference before and after intermittent fasting diet intervention and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After intermittent fasting diet intervention, in terms of glucose metabolism, fasting blood glucose reduced by 0.15 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.23; -0.06), glycosylated hemoglobin reduced by 0.08 (95% CIs: -0.25; -0.10), insulin plasma levels reduced by 13.25 uUI (95% CIs: -16.69; -9.82), and HOMA-IR decreased by 0.31 on an average (95% CIs: -0.44; -0.19). In addition, BMI decreased by 0.8 kg/m2 (95% CIs: -1.32; -0.28), body weight reduced by 1.87 kg (95% CIs: -2.67; -1.07), and the waist circumference decreased by 2.08 cm (95% CIs: -3.06; -1.10). Analysis of lipid metabolism showed that intermittent fasting diet intervention effectively reduced the total cholesterol level by 0.32 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.60; -0.05), low-density lipoprotein level by 0.22 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.37; -0.07), and triglyceride level by 0.04 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.15; -0.07). Intermittent fasting diets have certain therapeutic effects on blood glucose and lipids in patients with metabolic syndrome and significantly improve insulin resistance. It may be considered as an auxiliary treatment to prevent the occurrence and development of chronic diseases.
-
7.
Egg and Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Darooghegi Mofrad, M, Naghshi, S, Lotfi, K, Beyene, J, Hypponen, E, Pirouzi, A, Sadeghi, O
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:878979
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eggs are a rich source of vitamins, carotenoids, and dietary cholesterol. However, dietary cholesterol may contribute to an imbalance in blood lipid levels, increasing the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. Therefore, this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis evaluated the impact of egg and dietary cholesterol on the risk of CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis included fifty-five prospective cohort studies. This research showed a positive association between egg and dietary cholesterol consumption with all-cause mortality and cancer mortality. However, daily consumption of up to 1.5 eggs or 450 mg of dietary cholesterol did not affect the mortality risk. Further robust studies are required due to the high heterogeneity between the included studies. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the impact of egg and dietary cholesterol consumption on CVD, cancer and all-cause mortality.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies examined the associations between egg and dietary cholesterol intake and the risk of mortality from all causes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar until April 2021, as well as references to the relevant articles retrieved. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest vs. lowest categories of egg and dietary cholesterol intake. Also, linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were conducted to examine the dose-response relationships. RESULTS We included 55 studies, comprising data from 2,772,486 individuals with 228,425, 71,745, and 67,211 cases of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, respectively. Intake of each additional egg per day was associated with a 7% higher risk of all-cause (1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12, I2 = 84.8%) and a 13% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, I2 = 54.2%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.09, I2 = 81.5%). Non-linear analyses showed increased risks for egg consumption of more than 1.5 and 0.5 eggs/day, respectively. Each 100 mg/day increment in dietary cholesterol intake was associated with a 6% higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, I2 = 34.5%) and a 6% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.05-1.07, I2 = 0%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, I2 = 85.9%). Non-linear analyses demonstrated elevated risks of CVD and cancer mortality for intakes more than 450 and 250 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-dietary intake of eggs and cholesterol was associated with all-cause and cancer mortality. Little evidence for elevated risks was seen for intakes below 0.5 egg/day or 250 mg/day of dietary cholesterol. Our findings should be considered with caution because of small risk estimates and moderate between-study heterogeneity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=252564, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021252564.
-
8.
Buckwheat and Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Llanaj, E, Ahanchi, NS, Dizdari, H, Taneri, PE, Niehot, CD, Wehrli, F, Khatami, F, Raeisi-Dehkordi, H, Kastrati, L, Bano, A, et al
Journal of personalized medicine. 2022;12(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Buckwheat is a gluten-free, pseudo-grain rich in bioactive compounds that are cardiometabolic health protective. Bioactive cardioprotective compounds include proteins, fibre, and polyphenols such as rutin and quercetin-3-glucoside. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the supplementation and consumption of buckwheat and its effects on cardiovascular risk markers. Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review, and ten were included in the meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a modest, non-significant improvement in total cholesterol and glucose levels. Further robust studies are required to investigate the beneficial effects of bioactive compounds found in buckwheat due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies and the poor quality of the included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the potential of buckwheat in improving or maintaining cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
Buckwheat (BW) is suggested to have beneficial effects, but evidence on how it affects cardiometabolic health (CMH) is not yet established. We aimed to assess the effects of BW and/or its related bioactive compounds on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers in adults. Five databases were searched for eligible studies. Observational prospective studies, nonrandomized or randomized trials were considered if they assessed BW, rutin or quercetin-3-glucoside intake and CVD risk markers. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting. We selected 16 human studies based on 831 subjects with mild metabolic disturbances, such as hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and/or overweight. Eight studies, investigating primarily grain components, were included in the meta-analyses (n = 464). High study heterogeneity was present across most of our analyses. Weighted mean difference (WMD) for subjects receiving BW supplementation, compared to controls, were - 0.14 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.30; 0.02) for total cholesterol (TC), -0.03 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.22; 0.16) for LDL cholesterol, -0.14 kg (95% CI: -1.50; 1.22) for body weight, -0.04 mmol/L (95% CI: - 0.09;0.02) for HDL cholesterol, -0.02 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.15; 0.11) for triglycerides and -0.18 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.36; 0.003) for glucose. Most of the studies (66.7%) had concerns of risk of bias. Studies investigating other CVD markers were scarce and with inconsistent findings, where available. Evidence on how BW affects CMH is limited. However, the available literature indicates that BW supplementation in mild dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes may provide some benefit in lowering TC and glucose, albeit non-significant. Our work highlights the need for more rigorous trials, with better methodological rigor to clarify remaining uncertainties on potential effects of BW on CMH and its utility in clinical nutrition practice.
-
9.
The Effect of Walnut Intake on Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Alshahrani, SM, Mashat, RM, Almutairi, D, Mathkour, A, Alqahtani, SS, Alasmari, A, Alzahrani, AH, Ayed, R, Asiri, MY, Elsherif, A, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(21)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of cardiovascular disease increases as the modifiable risk factors increase, such as metabolic syndrome, obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and high blood pressure. Walnuts are a rich source of anti-inflammatory polyunsaturated fatty acids and omega-3 fatty acids. Walnuts are also known for their antioxidant properties and have been found to improve dyslipidaemia by reducing total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c). This systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen randomised controlled trials evaluated the effects of walnut intake on lipid profile. Most of the included studies used walnut dosage ranging from 15 g to 99 g/day for six to sixteen weeks of intervention. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed significant improvements in TC, LDL-c, and triglyceride (TG) levels. Subgroup analysis revealed greater improvement in TC, LDL-c, and TG in overweight and other comorbidities but had normal levels of TC and LDL-C. Additionally, female participants showed greater improvements in TG levels, followed by the walnut intervention. Intervention duration also affected the beneficial effect of the walnut intervention. Further robust studies are required to determine the effects of walnut intake on cardiovascular disease risk reduction due to the high heterogeneity between the included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the benefits of including walnuts as part of a healthy diet and their impact on reducing dyslipidaemia.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading causes of death worldwide. Dyslipidemia is a cardiometabolic risk factor of CVD, yet it can be modifiable. Walnuts have been suggested as a dietary intervention to improve the lipid profile. Therefore, we reviewed the literature to assess the evidence linking walnut intake to the improvement of blood lipids, including total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) cholesterol, and triglycerides (TG). PubMed and Embase databases were searched from 2010 up to March 2022. We limited our search to randomized controlled trials conducted on humans and published in English during the specified period. Cochrane's risk of bias tool for interventional studies was used. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and weighted mean differences were obtained (WMD) Thirteen trials from the U.S., Europe, and Asia were included. Walnut intake was associated with significant reductions in TC (WMD: -8.58 mg/dL), LDL-C (WMD: -5.68 mg/dL), and TG (WMD: -10.94 mg/dL). Walnut consumption was not associated with HDL-C. Subgroup analysis showed that overweight/obese and those with comorbidities had more lipid improvement. A longer trial duration did result in further improvements. However, our results may be prone to bias due to extraneous confounding factors. Additionally, levels of heterogeneity were considerable for some outcomes of interest. Results from this meta-analysis provide evidence for the health benefits of walnuts on blood lipids. Walnuts possibly reduce the risk of CVD; thus, they can be successfully added to a dietary pattern to enhance health benefits.
-
10.
Effect of Peanut Consumption on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis.
Parilli-Moser, I, Hurtado-Barroso, S, Guasch-Ferré, M, Lamuela-Raventós, RM
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:853378
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Peanuts contain bioactive substances that are beneficial for cardiovascular health. This three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial (ARISTOTLE) and meta-analysis evaluated the beneficial effects of high-oleic peanuts and peanut butter in improving cardiometabolic health. Participants in the randomised controlled trial consumed 25 g of skin-roasted peanuts or 32 g of peanut butter, or a control butter made with peanut oil without fibre and polyphenols for six months. The skin-roasted peanuts group showed a reduction in total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios. The meta-analysis was highly heterogeneous in participant ethnicity, health status, peanut intervention dosage and duration. The dosage of peanuts, peanut butter and high oleic peanuts used was between 25 and 200 g/day. The participants were healthy, with metabolic syndrome (MeS), or at risk of MeS. There was a significant increase in body weight among those with or at risk of MeS. In addition, healthy participants showed reduced triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the beneficial impact of peanut consumption on the lipid profile. However, further robust studies are required due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies in the meta-analysis.
Abstract
UNLABELLED Although numerous studies have reported the protective effect of nut consumption on cardiovascular risk, evidence for the role of peanuts in maintaining cardiometabolic health is inconclusive. Presented here are the results from the ARISTOTLE study, a parallel randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of regular peanut intake on anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical measurements. The 63 healthy subjects that completed the study consumed their habitual diet plus either: a) 25 g/day of skin roasted peanuts (SRP, n = 21), b) two tablespoons (32 g)/day of peanut butter (PB, n = 23) or c) two tablespoons (32 g)/day of a control butter based on peanut oil (CB, n = 19) for 6 months. In addition, a meta-analysis of clinical trials, including data from the ARISTOTLE study, was carried out to update the evidence for the effects of consuming peanuts, including high-oleic peanuts, and peanut butter on healthy subjects and those at high cardiometabolic risk. After a systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases up to July 2021, 11 studies were found to meet the eligibility criteria. In the ARISTOTLE study, lower total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios were found in the SRP group compared to the CB group (p = 0.019 and p = 0.008). The meta-analysis of clinical trials revealed that peanut consumption is associated with a decrease in triglycerides (MD: -0.13; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.07; p < 0.0001) and that healthy consumers had lower total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratios compared to the control groups (MD: -0.40; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.09; p = 0.01 and MD: -0.19; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.01; p = 0.03, respectively). However, individuals at high cardiometabolic risk experienced an increase in body weight after the peanut interventions (MD: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.41; p < 0.0001), although not in body fat or body mass index. According to the dose-response analyses, body weight increased slightly with higher doses of peanuts. In conclusion, a regular consumption of peanuts seems to modulate lipid metabolism, reducing triglyceride blood levels. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://osf.io/jx34y/, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MK35Y.