-
1.
Egg and Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Darooghegi Mofrad, M, Naghshi, S, Lotfi, K, Beyene, J, Hypponen, E, Pirouzi, A, Sadeghi, O
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:878979
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eggs are a rich source of vitamins, carotenoids, and dietary cholesterol. However, dietary cholesterol may contribute to an imbalance in blood lipid levels, increasing the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. Therefore, this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis evaluated the impact of egg and dietary cholesterol on the risk of CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis included fifty-five prospective cohort studies. This research showed a positive association between egg and dietary cholesterol consumption with all-cause mortality and cancer mortality. However, daily consumption of up to 1.5 eggs or 450 mg of dietary cholesterol did not affect the mortality risk. Further robust studies are required due to the high heterogeneity between the included studies. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals can use the results of this research to understand the impact of egg and dietary cholesterol consumption on CVD, cancer and all-cause mortality.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies examined the associations between egg and dietary cholesterol intake and the risk of mortality from all causes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar until April 2021, as well as references to the relevant articles retrieved. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest vs. lowest categories of egg and dietary cholesterol intake. Also, linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were conducted to examine the dose-response relationships. RESULTS We included 55 studies, comprising data from 2,772,486 individuals with 228,425, 71,745, and 67,211 cases of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, respectively. Intake of each additional egg per day was associated with a 7% higher risk of all-cause (1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12, I2 = 84.8%) and a 13% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, I2 = 54.2%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.09, I2 = 81.5%). Non-linear analyses showed increased risks for egg consumption of more than 1.5 and 0.5 eggs/day, respectively. Each 100 mg/day increment in dietary cholesterol intake was associated with a 6% higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, I2 = 34.5%) and a 6% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.05-1.07, I2 = 0%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, I2 = 85.9%). Non-linear analyses demonstrated elevated risks of CVD and cancer mortality for intakes more than 450 and 250 mg/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-dietary intake of eggs and cholesterol was associated with all-cause and cancer mortality. Little evidence for elevated risks was seen for intakes below 0.5 egg/day or 250 mg/day of dietary cholesterol. Our findings should be considered with caution because of small risk estimates and moderate between-study heterogeneity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=252564, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021252564.
-
2.
Sedentary behavior and cancer-an umbrella review and meta-analysis.
Hermelink, R, Leitzmann, MF, Markozannes, G, Tsilidis, K, Pukrop, T, Berger, F, Baurecht, H, Jochem, C
European journal of epidemiology. 2022;37(5):447-460
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Globally, cancer is one of the leading causes of death. In modern day-to-day life, sedentary behaviour is prevalent, with adults spending an average of 8.2 hours without any physical activity. It is believed that sedentary behaviour plays a significant role in the increase in all-cause mortality, obesity, chronic diseases, and cancer risk. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to examine previous studies that reported associations between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence and all-cancer mortality. A total of 14 meta-analyses were included in the study, and the strength of the evidence for each association was rated. A significant association was found between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence across various cancer sites, including ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, rectal, and prostate cancers. All-cancer mortality also showed positively significant associations with sedentary behaviour. There is a need for further research to evaluate the mechanisms associated with sedentary behaviour and the development of cancer at various sites. However, the results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to better understand the importance of recommending physical activity and other therapeutic strategies.
Abstract
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the association between sedentary behavior (SB) and cancer. However, the level of evidence and the potential for risk of bias remains unclear. This umbrella review summarized the current data on SB in relation to cancer incidence and mortality, with a particular emphasis on assessing the risk of bias. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the association between SB and cancer incidence and mortality. We also searched for recent observational studies not yet included in existing meta-analyses. We re-calculated summary risk estimates for cancer incidence and mortality using random effects models. We included 14 meta-analyses covering 17 different cancer sites from 77 original studies. We found that high SB levels increase the risk for developing ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, prostate, and rectal cancers, with relative risks of 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.56), 1.29 (95% CI = 1.16-1.45), 1.25 (95% CI = 1.16-1.33), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.04-1.11), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.00-1.17), and 1.07 (95% CI = 1.01-1.12), respectively. Also, we found an increased risk of cancer mortality of 1.18 (95% CI = 1.09-1.26). Most associations between SB and specific cancer sites were supported by a "suggestive" level of evidence. High levels of SB are associated with increased risk of several types of cancer and increased cancer mortality risk.
-
3.
Coffee Consumption and Cancer Risk: An Assessment of the Health Implications Based on Recent Knowledge.
Pauwels, EKJ, Volterrani, D
Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2021;30(5):401-411
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages worldwide. Coffee is a good source of polyphenolic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds such as caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. This review included one hundred and five cohort studies and meta-analyses to evaluate the relationship between coffee consumption and cancer of the breast, liver, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, colorectum, kidney, bladder, prostate, and ovaries. The results of this review found an inverse association between coffee consumption and reduced risk of hepatocellular cancer. A slight risk reduction is observed against breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This review found no considerable association between coffee consumption and decreased cancer risk in other organs. Further robust studies are required to investigate the benefits of coffee consumption on cancer risk reduction due to the high heterogeneity of included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of coffee consumption.
Abstract
A significant number of studies suggest that coffee consumption reduces cancer risk. This beneficial effect is usually ascribed to the presence of polyphenolic antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents, including caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. To summarize recent literature on this subject, we performed a bibliographic search in PubMed and Embase over the period January 2005 to December 2020 to identify cohort studies and meta-analysis (with data collection ensuring quality of selected reports) that could provide quantitative data on the relationship between coffee consumption and common cancers. The totality of eligible scientific articles supports the evidence that coffee intake is inversely associated with risk of hepatocellular cancer and, to a slight extent, risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. As to the association with other organs, including the esophagus, pancreas, colorectum, kidneys, bladder, ovaries, and prostate, the results are less clear as reports reveal conflicting results or statistically nonsignificant data. Therefore, this overview does not provide broad-based conclusions. Important uncertainties include general study design, inhomogeneous patient sampling, different statistical analysis (deliberate), misreporting of socioeconomic status, education, coffee-brewing methods, consumption of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee, smoking habits, and alcohol intake. Clearly, more epidemiologic research needs to be conducted before solid science-based recommendations can be made with regard to coffee consumption.
-
4.
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure.
Al Saadi, T, Assaf, Y, Farwati, M, Turkmani, K, Al-Mouakeh, A, Shebli, B, Khoja, M, Essali, A, Madmani, ME
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;(2):CD008684
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
As per the definition given by the NHS, heart failure happens when the heart fails to pump blood around the body due to stiffness or weakness of the heart muscle. Coenzyme Q10 reduces oxidative stress and toxic effects in the body by acting as a fat-soluble antioxidant nutrient. Due to these beneficial effects, CoQ10 may effectively reduce damage to cardiac cells and disruption to cellular signalling. CoQ10 is also a cell membrane stabiliser, and previous studies have shown a correlation between the severity of heart failure and CoQ10 deficiency. In addition, dietary absorption of CoQ10 is relatively slow and ineffective; therefore, supplementation is effective and safe with no side effects. This review included eleven randomised controlled studies to compare the beneficial effects of Coenzyme Q10 for the treatment of people with heart disease. This review showed that Coenzyme Q10 might reduce all-cause mortality and hospitalisation due to heart failure. In addition, CoQ10 may stabilise myocardial calcium‐dependent ion channels and encourage adenosine‐5'‐triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. However, the effectiveness of CoQ10 in lowering the risk of myocardial infarction or stroke, left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise capacity is inconclusive. Healthcare professionals can use this study's results to understand the potential beneficial effects of CoQ10 supplementation on maintaining heart health. However, due to the high heterogeneity in the current research, further robust long-term studies are required to evaluate the therapeutic value of Coenzyme Q10 in managing heart disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coenzyme Q10, or ubiquinone, is a non-prescription nutritional supplement. It is a fat-soluble molecule that acts as an electron carrier in mitochondria, and as a coenzyme for mitochondrial enzymes. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency may be associated with a multitude of diseases, including heart failure. The severity of heart failure correlates with the severity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Emerging data suggest that the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species are increased in people with heart failure, and coenzyme Q10 may help to reduce these toxic effects because of its antioxidant activity. Coenzyme Q10 may also have a role in stabilising myocardial calcium-dependent ion channels, and in preventing the consumption of metabolites essential for adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Coenzyme Q10, although not a primary recommended treatment, could be beneficial to people with heart failure. Several randomised controlled trials have compared coenzyme Q10 to other therapeutic modalities, but no systematic review of existing randomised trials was conducted prior to the original version of this Cochrane Review, in 2014. OBJECTIVES To review the safety and efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and AMED on 16 October 2020; ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 July 2020, and the ISRCTN Registry on 11 November 2019. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of either parallel or cross-over design that assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of coenzyme Q10 in people with heart failure. When we identified cross-over studies, we considered data only from the first phase. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods, assessed study risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and GRADE methods to assess the quality of the evidence. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR); for continuous data, the mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where appropriate data were available, we conducted meta-analysis. When meta-analysis was not possible, we wrote a narrative synthesis. We provided a PRISMA flow chart to show the flow of study selection. MAIN RESULTS We included eleven studies, with 1573 participants, comparing coenzyme Q10 to placebo or conventional therapy (control). In the majority of the studies, sample size was relatively small. There were important differences among studies in daily coenzyme Q10 dose, follow-up period, and the measures of treatment effect. All studies had unclear, or high risk of bias, or both, in one or more bias domains. We were only able to conduct meta-analysis for some of the outcomes. None of the included trials considered quality of life, measured on a validated scale, exercise variables (exercise haemodynamics), or cost-effectiveness. Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence). There was low-quality evidence of inconclusive results between the coenzyme Q10 and control groups for the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.27 to 9.59; 1 study, 420 participants), and stroke (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.48; 1 study, 420 participants). Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces hospitalisation related to heart failure (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.78; 2 studies, 1061 participants; NNTB 9.7; moderate-quality evidence). Very low-quality evidence suggests that coenzyme Q10 may improve the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 1.77, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.44; 7 studies, 650 participants), but the results are inconclusive for exercise capacity (MD 48.23, 95% CI -24.75 to 121.20; 3 studies, 91 participants); and the risk of developing adverse events (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; 2 studies, 568 participants). We downgraded the quality of the evidence mainly due to high risk of bias and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The included studies provide moderate-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 probably reduces all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure. There is low-quality evidence of inconclusive results as to whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on the risk of myocardial infarction, or stroke. Because of very low-quality evidence, it is very uncertain whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on either left ventricular ejection fraction or exercise capacity. There is low-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 may increase the risk of adverse effects, or have little to no difference. There is currently no convincing evidence to support or refute the use of coenzyme Q10 for heart failure. Future trials are needed to confirm our findings.
-
5.
Dietary flavanols improve cerebral cortical oxygenation and cognition in healthy adults.
Gratton, G, Weaver, SR, Burley, CV, Low, KA, Maclin, EL, Johns, PW, Pham, QS, Lucas, SJE, Fabiani, M, Rendeiro, C
Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):19409
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fruits and vegetables contain flavonoids that can protect against vascular diseases and cognitive ageing. Studies have shown that cocoa flavonoids can enhance the function of endothelial cells and blood vessels in peripheral arteries. This randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study assessed the effects of cocoa flavanols on cerebral and peripheral vascular and cognitive function. The healthy young subjects showed greater tissue oxygenation and cerebrovascular reactivity in the frontal parts of the brain during the carbon dioxide challenge after high cocoa flavonoid intervention. Furthermore, the cocoa flavonoid intervention improved cognitive and peripheral endothelial functions in healthy young subjects. Even though the mechanistic link behind the beneficial effects of flavonoids is not understood completely, the positive effects could be due to the ability of flavanols to enhance the bioavailability of circulation Nitric Oxide (NO). The study also found that flavonoids improved cognitive function in healthy individuals only when there was a high cognitive demand. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the mechanisms behind the benefits associated with acute flavonoid intake. Healthcare professionals can utilise the findings from this study to gain insight into the advantages of consuming a flavonoid-rich diet. Additionally, they can learn about the differing responses to flavanol intake between individuals.
Abstract
Cocoa flavanols protect humans against vascular disease, as evidenced by improvements in peripheral endothelial function, likely through nitric oxide signalling. Emerging evidence also suggests that flavanol-rich diets protect against cognitive aging, but mechanisms remain elusive. In a randomized double-blind within-subject acute study in healthy young adults, we link these two lines of research by showing, for the first time, that flavanol intake leads to faster and greater brain oxygenation responses to hypercapnia, as well as higher performance only when cognitive demand is high. Individual difference analyses further show that participants who benefit from flavanols intake during hypercapnia are also those who do so in the cognitive challenge. These data support the hypothesis that similar vascular mechanisms underlie both the peripheral and cerebral effects of flavanols. They further show the importance of studies combining physiological and graded cognitive challenges in young adults to investigate the actions of dietary flavanols on brain function.