-
1.
Safety and efficacy of laxatives after major abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dudi-Venkata, NN, Seow, W, Kroon, HM, Bedrikovetski, S, Moore, JW, Thomas, ML, Sammour, T
BJS open. 2020;(4):577-586
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery of gastrointestinal function is often delayed after major abdominal surgery, leading to postoperative ileus (POI). Enhanced recovery protocols recommend laxatives to reduce the duration of POI, but evidence is unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of laxative use after major abdominal surgery. METHODS Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PubMed databases were searched from inception to May 2019 to identify eligible RCTs focused on elective open or minimally invasive major abdominal surgery. The primary outcome was time taken to passage of stool. Secondary outcomes were time taken to tolerance of diet, time taken to flatus, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and readmission to hospital. RESULTS Five RCTs with a total of 416 patients were included. Laxatives reduced the time to passage of stool (mean difference (MD) -0·83 (95 per cent c.i. -1·39 to -0·26) days; P = 0·004), but there was significant heterogeneity between studies for this outcome measure. There was no difference in time to passage of flatus (MD -0·17 (-0·59 to 0·25) days; P = 0·432), time to tolerance of diet (MD -0·01 (-0·12 to 0·10) days; P = 0·865) or length of hospital stay (MD 0·01(-1·36 to 1·38) days; P = 0·992). There were insufficient data available on postoperative complications for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Routine postoperative laxative use after major abdominal surgery may result in earlier passage of stool but does not influence other postoperative recovery parameters. Better data are required for postoperative complications and validated outcome measures.
-
2.
Evaluation of a child with suspected nephrolithiasis.
Reusz, GS, Hosszu, A, Kis, E
Current opinion in pediatrics. 2020;(2):265-272
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As the incidence of nephrolithiasis in children doubles every 10 years it is becoming a common disease associated with significant morbidity along with considerable economic burden worldwide. The aim of this review is to summarize current data on the epidemiology and causes of renal stones in children and to provide a frame for the first clinical evaluation of a child with suspected nephrolithiasis. RECENT FINDINGS Dietary and environmental factors are the driving force of changing epidemiology. Diagnosis should be based on medical history, presenting signs, examination, first laboratory and radiological workup. Ultrasound should be the initial diagnostic imaging performed in pediatric patients while low-dose computed tomography is rarely necessary for management. Metabolic factors including hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia, low fluid intake as well as specific genetic diseases should be explored after the resolution of initial signs and symptoms. SUMMARY Appropriate initial evaluation, imaging technique, identification of risk factors and other abnormalities are essential for early diagnosis and prevention of stone-related morbidity in children with suspected nephrolithiasis.
-
3.
Heated fennel therapy promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients after complex abdominal surgery: A single-center prospective randomized controlled trial in China.
Chen, B, He, Y, Xiao, Y, Guo, D, Liu, P, He, Y, Sun, Q, Jiang, P, Liu, Z, Liu, Q
Surgery. 2020;(5):793-799
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction remains a major determinant of the duration of stay after complex abdominal surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of heated fennel therapy in accelerating the recovery of gastrointestinal function. METHODS This surgeon-blinded, prospective randomized controlled study included 381 patients with hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastric tumors who were divided into 2 groups. The patients in the experimental groups received heated fennel therapy, and those in the control groups received heated rice husk therapy. We compared the baseline characteristics, time to first postoperative flatus and defecation, fasting time, duration of postoperative hospital stay, grading of abdominal pain, classification of abdominal distension, inflammatory markers, and nutritional status indicators. RESULTS The time to first flatus and first defecation and the fasting time were statistically significantly less in the heated fennel therapy group than those in the control groups (P < .05 each); and abdominal distension was also relieved in the experimental groups (P < .001). Heated fennel therapy had no obvious beneficial effect on inflammatory markers but improved the serum albumin (ALB) level of the patients at postop day 9 (P < .001). Among the patients with alimentary tract reconstruction, those in the heated fennel therapy group had a clinically important, lesser hospital stay than those in the control group (9.2 5 ± 5.1 versus 11.1 ± 6.4; P < .023). CONCLUSION Heated fennel therapy facilitated the gastrointestinal motility function of patients early postoperatively.
-
4.
The Art and Craft of Reoperative Abdominal Surgery after Prior Trauma or Acute Care Surgery Operation.
Ball, CG, Feliciano, DV
Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2020;(5):e1-e6
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reoperative abdominal surgery is one of the most challenging endeavors that general surgeons face. The aim of this narrative review is to offer a detailed and nuanced discussion of preoperative patient and surgeon preparation and intraoperative surgical technique. STUDY DESIGN The topics discussed in this review are based on both the current literature and the experiences of the authors with complex reoperations in general, trauma, acute care, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. RESULTS Ten essential steps for reoperative abdominal surgery include the following: 1. Review all previous operative notes and discharge summaries; 2. Review all prior outside and current in-house imaging; 3. Assess the patient's overall health status, reverse nutritional deficits, and explain risks of reoperation to the patient and family; 4. Refer the patient to a plastic surgeon when future skin coverage of a prosthesis in the abdominal wall may be needed; 5. Do a bowel preparation preoperatively; 6. Use selected Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols; 7. Operative technique matters; 8. Restoring gastrointestinal continuity simultaneously with abdominal wall reconstruction is not recommended; 9. Technical tips for complex reoperations; and 10. Plan well for the day of the operation. CONCLUSIONS Successful reoperative abdominal surgery in the most complex patients after previous trauma or acute care laparotomies demands adequate preoperative patient preparation, a clear-cut plan for operation, superb intraoperative technique, and solid decision-making; ie an unwavering commitment to making the patient whole again.
-
5.
Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy.
Foss, NB, Kehlet, H
Anaesthesia. 2020;:e83-e89
Abstract
Standardised peri-operative care pathways for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy for non-traumatic pathologies have been shown to be inadequate and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent research has highlighted this problem and showed that simple pathways with 'rescue' interventions have been associated with reduced mortality when implemented successfully. These rescue pathways have focused on early diagnosis and surgery, specialist surgeon and anaesthetist involvement, goal-directed therapy and intensive or intermediary postoperative care for high-risk patients. In elective surgery, enhanced recovery has resulted in reduced length of stay and morbidity by the application of procedure-specific, evidence-based interventions inside rigorously implemented patient pathways based on multidisciplinary co-operation. The focus has been on attenuation of peri-operative stress and pain management to facilitate early recovery. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are a heterogeneous group consisting mostly of patients with intestinal perforations and/or obstruction with varying levels of comorbidity and frailty. However, present knowledge of the different pathophysiology and peri-operative trajectory of complications in these patient groups is limited. In order to move beyond rescue pathways and to establish enhanced recovery for emergency laparotomy, it is essential that research on both the peri-operative pathophysiology of the different main patient groups - intestinal obstruction and perforation - and the potentially differentiated impact of interventions is carried out. Procedure- and pathology-specific knowledge is lacking on key elements of peri-operative care, such as: multimodal analgesia; haemodynamic optimisation and fluid management; attenuation of surgical stress; nutritional optimisation; facilitation of mobilisation; and the optimal use and organisation of specialised wards and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. As such, the future challenges in improving peri-operative patient care in emergency laparotomy are moving from simple rescue pathways to establish research that can form a basis for morbidity- and procedure-specific enhanced recovery protocols as seen in elective surgery.
-
6.
Pharmacokinetics of Ferumoxytol in the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Dosing Study with 1.5- and 3.0-T MRI Relaxometry.
Wells, SA, Schubert, T, Motosugi, U, Sharma, SD, Campo, CA, Kinner, S, Woo, KM, Hernando, D, Reeder, SB
Radiology. 2020;(1):108-116
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Background The off-label use of ferumoxytol (FE), an intravenous iron preparation for iron deficiency anemia, as a contrast agent for MRI is increasing; therefore, it is critical to understand its pharmacokinetics. Purpose To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of FE in the abdomen and pelvis, as assessed with quantitative 1.5- and 3.0-T MRI relaxometry. Materials and Methods R2*, an MRI technique used to estimate tissue iron content in the abdomen and pelvis, was performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T in 12 healthy volunteers between April 2015 and January 2016. Volunteers were randomly assigned to receive an FE dose of 2 mg per kilogram of body weight (FE2mg) or 4 mg/kg (FE4mg). MRI was repeated at 1.5 and 3.0 T for each volunteer at five time points: days 1, 2, 4, 7, and 30. A radiologist experienced in MRI relaxometry measured R2* in organs of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) (ie, liver, spleen, and bone marrow), non-MPS anatomy (kidney, pancreas, and muscle), inguinal lymph nodes (LNs), and blood pool. A paired Student t test was used to compare changes in tissue R2*. Results Volunteers (six female; mean age, 44.3 years ± 12.2 [standard deviation]) received either FE2 mg (n = 5) or FE4 mg (n = 6). Overall R2* trend analysis was temporally significant (P < .001). Time to peak R2* in the MPS occurred on day 1 for FE2mg and between days 1 and 4 for FE4mg (P < .001 to P < .002). Time to peak R2* in non-MPS anatomy, LNs, and blood pool occurred on day 1 for both doses (P < .001 to P < .09). Except for the spleen (at 1.5 T) and liver, MPS R2* remained elevated through day 30 for both doses (P = .02 to P = .03). Except for the kidney and pancreas, non-MPS, LN, and blood pool R2* returned to baseline levels between days 2 and 4 at FE2mg (P = .06 to P = .49) and between days 4 and 7 at FE4mg (P = .06 to P = .63). There was no difference in R2* change between non-MPS and LN R2* at any time (range, 1-71 sec-1 vs 0-50 sec-1; P = .06 to P = .97). Conclusion The pharmacokinetics of ferumoxytol in lymph nodes are distinct from those in mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) organs, parallel non-MPS anatomy, and the blood pool. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
-
7.
Decrease in primary but not in secondary abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease: nationwide cohort study, 1990-2014.
Kalman, TD, Everhov, ÅH, Nordenvall, C, Sachs, MC, Halfvarson, J, Ekbom, A, Ludvigsson, JF, Myrelid, P, Olén, O
The British journal of surgery. 2020;(11):1529-1538
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved in recent decades, with increasing use of immunomodulatory medication since 1990 and biologicals since 1998. In parallel, there has been increased use of active disease monitoring. To what extent these changes have influenced the incidence of primary and repeat surgical resection remains debated. METHODS In this nationwide cohort study, incident patients of all ages with Crohn's disease, identified in Swedish National Patient Registry between 1990 and 2014, were divided into five calendar periods of diagnosis: 1990-1995 and 1996-2000 with use of inpatient registries, 2001, and 2002-2008 and 2009-2014 with use of inpatient and outpatient registries. The cumulative incidence of first and repeat abdominal surgery (except closure of stomas), by category of surgical procedure, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Among 21 273 patients with Crohn's disease, the cumulative incidence of first abdominal surgery within 5 years of Crohn's disease diagnosis decreased continuously from 54·8 per cent in 1990-1995 to 40·4 per cent in 1996-2000 (P < 0·001), and again from 19·8 per cent in 2002-2008 to 17·3 per cent in 2009-2014 (P < 0·001). Repeat 5-year surgery rates decreased from 18·9 per cent in 1990-1995 to 16·0 per cent in 1996-2000 (P = 0·009). After 2000, no further significant decreases were observed. CONCLUSION The 5-year rate of surgical intervention for Crohn's disease has decreased significantly, but the rate of repeat surgery has remained stable despite the introduction of biological therapy.
-
8.
Role of MRI in the Evaluation of Thoracoabdominal Emergencies.
Ludwig, DR, Raptis, CA, Broncano, J, Bhalla, S, Luna, A
Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI. 2020;(6):355-370
Abstract
Thoracic and abdominal pathology are common in the emergency setting. Although computed tomography is preferred in many clinical situations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have emerged as powerful techniques that often play a complementary role to computed tomography or may have a primary role in selected patient populations in which radiation is of specific concern or intravenous iodinated contrast is contraindicated. This review will highlight the role of MRI and MRA in the emergent imaging of thoracoabdominal pathology, specifically covering acute aortic pathology (acute aortic syndrome, aortic aneurysm, and aortitis), pulmonary embolism, gastrointestinal conditions such as appendicitis and Crohn disease, pancreatic and hepatobiliary disease (pancreatitis, choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis, and liver abscess), and genitourinary pathology (urolithiasis and pyelonephritis). In each section, we will highlight the specific role for MRI, discuss basic imaging protocols, and illustrate the MRI features of commonly encountered thoracoabdominal pathology.
-
9.
Perioperative Probiotics or Synbiotics in Adults Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chowdhury, AH, Adiamah, A, Kushairi, A, Varadhan, KK, Krznaric, Z, Kulkarni, AD, Neal, KR, Lobo, DN
Annals of surgery. 2020;(6):1036-1047
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define the impact of perioperative treatment with probiotics or synbiotics on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. BACKGROUND Postoperative surgical infection accounts for a third of all cases of sepsis, and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics (preparations that combine probiotics and prebiotics) are nutritional adjuncts that are emerging as novel therapeutic modalities for preventing surgical infections. However, current evidence on their effects is conflicting. METHODS A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and WHO Global Index Medicus electronic databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating probiotics or synbiotics in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, transplant, or hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. Bibliographies of studies were also searched. The primary outcome measure was incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included incidence of noninfectious complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, and any treatment-related adverse events. Quantitative pooling of the data was undertaken using a random effects model. RESULTS A total of 34 randomized controlled trials reporting on 2723 participants were included. In the intervention arm, 1354 patients received prebiotic or symbiotic preparations, whereas 1369 patients in the control arm received placebo or standard care. Perioperative administration of either probiotics or synbiotics significantly reduced the risk of infectious complications following abdominal surgery [relative risk (RR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.69; P < 0.00001, n = 2723, I = 42%]. Synbiotics showed greater effect on postoperative infections compared with probiotics alone (synbiotics RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.66; P < 0.0001, n = 1399, I = 53% probiotics RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.80; P < 0.0001, n = 1324, I = 18%). Synbiotics but not probiotics also led to a reduction in total length of stay (synbiotics weighted mean difference: -3.89; 95% CI: -6.60 to -1.18 days; P = 0.005, n = 535, I = 91% probiotics RR: -0.65; 95% CI: -2.03-0.72; P = 0.35, n = 294, I = 65%). There were no significant differences in mortality (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.54-1.80; P = 0.96, n = 1729, I = 0%) or noninfectious complications between the intervention and control groups. The preparations were well tolerated with no significant adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics and synbiotics are safe and effective nutritional adjuncts in reducing postoperative infective complications in elective abdominal surgery. The treatment effects are greatest with synbiotics.
-
10.
Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.
Richards, T, Baikady, RR, Clevenger, B, Butcher, A, Abeysiri, S, Chau, M, Macdougall, IC, Murphy, G, Swinson, R, Collier, T, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2020;(10259):1353-1361
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative anaemia affects a high proportion of patients undergoing major elective surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intravenous iron given to anaemic patients before major open elective abdominal surgery would correct anaemia, reduce the need for blood transfusions, and improve patient outcomes. METHODS In a double-blind, parallel-group randomised trial, we recruited adult participants identified with anaemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open abdominal surgery at 46 UK tertiary care centres. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) via a secure web-based service to receive intravenous iron or placebo 10-42 days before surgery. Intravenous iron was administered as a single 1000 mg dose of ferric carboxymaltose in 100 mL normal saline, and placebo was 100 mL normal saline, both given as an infusion over 15 min. Unblinded study personnel prepared and administered the study drug; participants and other clinical and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary endpoints were risk of the composite outcome of blood transfusion or death, and number of blood transfusions from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. The primary analysis included all randomly assigned patients with data available for the primary endpoints; safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients according to the treatment received. This study is registered, ISRCTN67322816, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS Of 487 participants randomly assigned to placebo (n=243) or intravenous iron (n=244) between Jan 6, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, complete data for the primary endpoints were available for 474 (97%) individuals. Death or blood transfusion occurred in 67 (28%) of the 237 patients in the placebo group and 69 (29%) of the 237 patients in the intravenous iron group (risk ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·78-1·37; p=0·84). There were 111 blood transfusions in the placebo group and 105 in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·68-1·43; p=0·93). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the prespecified safety endpoints. INTERPRETATION Preoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placebo to reduce need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anaemia 10-42 days before elective major abdominal surgery. FUNDING UK National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Program.