-
1.
Pharmacological options for the treatment of chronic migraine pain.
Urits, I, Gress, K, Charipova, K, Zamarripa, AM, Patel, PM, Lassiter, G, Jung, JW, Kaye, AD, Viswanath, O
Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 2020;(3):383-407
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating neurological condition with symptoms typically consisting of unilateral and pulsating headache, sensitivity to sensory stimuli, nausea, and vomiting. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that migraine is the third most prevalent medical disorder and second most disabling neurological condition in the world. There are several options for preventive migraine treatments that include, but are not limited to, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, botulinum toxins, NSAIDs, riboflavin, and magnesium. Patients may also benefit from adjunct nonpharmacological options in the comprehensive prevention of migraines, such as cognitive behavior therapy, relaxation therapies, biofeedback, lifestyle guidance, and education. Preventative therapies are an essential component of the overall approach to the pharmacological treatment of migraine. Comparative studies of newer therapies are needed to help patients receive the best treatment option for chronic migraine pain.
-
2.
Update review of pain control methods of tonsil surgery.
Kim, DH, Jang, K, Lee, S, Lee, HJ
Auris, nasus, larynx. 2020;(1):42-47
Abstract
Pain after tonsil surgery is troublesome because it causes discomfort. In addition, handling patients with postoperative pain is challenging to otolaryngologists. Many laboratory studies have assessed the use of analgesics and surgical techniques to discover methods for effective control of postoperative pain associated with tonsil surgery. In this review article, we summarize and provide a comprehensive overview of current methods for the control of pain after tonsil surgery based on findings of recent studies. Although powered intracapsular tonsillotomy is not popular yet, it seems to be an effective option among various surgical techniques. More discussion about powered intracapsular tonsillotomy should be done in the future. On the other hand, surgery with a harmonic scalpel, fibrin glue, or cryoanalgesia seems ineffective. When reviewing medical treatment methods, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, and/or gabapentin/pregabalin seems to be effective. However, the use of opioid (especially codeine) for children should be avoided because of possible respiratory insufficiency. Ketorolac is dangerous because of the risk of hemorrhage. We should continue to focus on the development of novel postoperative pain control techniques with no or low complications.
-
3.
Mangiferin: Possible uses in the prevention and treatment of mixed osteoarthritic pain.
Garrido-Suárez, BB, Garrido, G, Piñeros, O, Delgado-Hernández, R
Phytotherapy research : PTR. 2020;(3):505-525
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) pain has been proposed to be a mixed pain state, because in some patients, central nervous system factors are superimposed upon the more traditional peripheral factors. In addition, a considerable amount of preclinical and clinical evidence has shown that, accompanying the central neuroplasticity changes and partially driven by a peripheral nociceptive input, a real neuropathic component occurs that are particularly linked to disease severity and progression. Hence, innovative strategies targeting neuroprotection and particularly neuroinflammation to prevent and treat OA pain could be introduced. Mangiferin (MG) is a glucosylxanthone that is broadly distributed in higher plants, such as Mangifera indica L. Previous studies have documented its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory properties. In this paper, we propose its potential utility as a multitargeted compound for mixed OA pain, even in the context of multimodal pharmacotherapy. This hypothesis is supported by three main aspects: the cumulus of preclinical evidence around this xanthone, some preliminary clinical results using formulations containing MG in clinical musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain, and by speculations regarding its possible mechanism of action according to recent advances in OA pain knowledge.
-
4.
Central Neuropathic Mechanisms in Pain Signaling Pathways: Current Evidence and Recommendations.
Viswanath, O, Urits, I, Burns, J, Charipova, K, Gress, K, McNally, A, Urman, RD, Welschmeyer, A, Berger, AA, Kassem, H, et al
Advances in therapy. 2020;(5):1946-1959
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE This is a comprehensive review of the current literature on central neuropathic pain mechanisms that is secondary to spinal cord injury. It reviews recent and seminal findings on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment and compares treatment options and recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS Neuropathic pain (NP) is a common complication of spinal cord injury (SCI). Chronicity of NP is attributed to increased abundance of inflammatory mediators and ion channel dysfunction leading to afferent nerve sensitization; nerve damage and nerve-glia cross talk have also been implicated. Conventional treatment is medical and has had limited success. Recent studies have made headway in identifying novel biomarkers, including microRNA and psychosocial attributes that can predict progress from SCI to chronic NP (CNP). Recent advances have provided evidence of efficacy for two promising drugs. Baclofen was able to provide good, long-lasting pain relief. Ziconotide, a voltage-gated calcium channel blocker, was studied in a small trial and was able to provide good analgesia in most participants. However, several participants had to be withdrawn because of worrisome creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations, and further studies are required to define its safety profile. Non-medical interventions include brain sensitization and biofeedback techniques. These methods have recently had encouraging results, albeit preliminary. Case reports of non-conventional techniques, such as hypnosis, were also reported. CNP is a common complication of SCI and is a prevalent disorder with significant morbidity and disability. Conventional medical treatment is limited in efficacy. Recent studies identified baclofen and ziconotide as possible new therapies, alongside non-medical interventions. Further research into the pathophysiology is required to identify further therapy candidates. A multidisciplinary approach, including psychosocial support, medical and non-medical interventions, is likely needed to achieve therapeutic effects in this difficult to treat syndrome.
-
5.
Mirogabalin besylate in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Burgess, J, Javed, S, Frank, B, Malik, RA, Alam, U
Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2020;(2):135-149
Abstract
Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a global cause of suffering and debilitation leading to significant morbidity and reduced quality of life. New treatments are needed to address the growing prevalence of NeP and its impact on sleep, mood and functionality. Mirogabalin besylate (mirogabalin, Tarlige) is a gabapentinoid therapy developed by Daiichi Sankyo which is approved in Japan for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Mirogabalin has a potent pain-modulating effect with a unique high affinity and prolonged dissociation rate for the a2delta-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium (Ca2+) channels (VGCCs) on the dorsal root ganglion resulting in more sustained analgesia compared with traditional gabapentinoids. Additionally, mirogabalin has a superior adverse events (AEs) profile due to a rapid dissociation from the a2delta-2 subunit of VGCCs potentially implicated in central nervous system-specific AEs. The most common AEs for mirogabalin are dizziness (approximately 8-16%), somnolence (approximately 6-24%) and headache (approximately 6-14%), with a lower incidence of constipation, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, edema, fatigue and weight gain. Postmarketing studies are required to evaluate its analgesic durability and efficacy when combined with other antineuropathic agents such as tricyclics, duloxetine and tramadol/tapentadol.
-
6.
Drugs for Acute Attack of Pediatric Migraine: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Wang, G, Tan, T, Liu, Y, Hong, P
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2020;:105853
Abstract
Migraine in pediatric is a common neurological disease, and its prevalence is varying widely. The medication for the acute attack of pediatric migraine is various. we take advantage of network meta-analysis to address the efficacy and rank of these medications. Database including Pubmed and Cochrane Library were queried using a specific searching strategy. The quality of trials enrolled was assessed according to the Cochrane collaboration'tool for assessing risk of bias. The data analysis was conducted by using the core software for Cochrane reviews (Rev Man 5.3) and the Aggregate Data Drug Information System (Addis v1.16.8). The outcomes were pain-free and pain relief at 2 hours post-dose. Totally, twenty trials with high quality including 6029 migraineurs with 6912 attacks randomly assigned to 14 different drugs. The data of ketorolac and prochlorperazine were missing. We found that sumatriptan nasal spray and zolmitriptan nasal spray were superior to placebo in the two efficacy outcomes, whereas almotriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan with naproxen sodium, ibuprofen and ibuprofen suspension were superior to placebo only in one of the efficacy outcomes. And in network meta-analysis, we found the best 3 treatments were ibuprofen, sumatriptan with naproxen sodium and ibuprofen suspension in achieving pain-free. Meanwhile, the best 3 treatments were ibuprofen suspension, ibuprofen, and rizatriptan in achieving pain relief. In conclusion, in acute treatments of pediatric migraine, most triptans and NSAIDS were effective to achieve pain-free or pain-relief. And the most effective treatment to achieve pain-free is sumatriptan with naproxen sodium. Ibuprofen and ibuprofen suspension were the most effective treatments to achieve pain-relief.
-
7.
[Conventional analgesics and non-pharmacological multidisciplinary therapeutic treatment in endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines].
Wattier, JM
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie. 2018;(3):248-255
Abstract
UNLABELLED A major symptom of endometriosis is pelvic pain with a wide range of intensity, rhythm, type, and expression, without clearly established relationship between pain and the disease. Endometriosis-associated pain has physical, psychological/behavioral and social consequences with a significant impact on patient quality-of-life in relation with the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain. Pain assessment in all of its dimensions, as well as assessing the consequences of pain is therefore a crucial part of therapeutic management. Conventional analgesics are commonly used although studies demonstrating their efficacy in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain are lacking. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), known to be effective in dysmenorrhea unrelated to endometriosis, have not been recently re-assessed in patients with endometriosis. Following rigorous assessment, the characterization of neuropathic components of endometriosis-related pelvic pain may lead to treatment with antiepileptic of antidepressant drugs, although gabapentin and amitriptyline have yet to be specifically assessed in the setting of endometriosis-related pain. Other pharmacologically active compounds have been tested to treat endometriosis-related pain but did not demonstrate efficacy with sufficient level of evidence. Diets, dietary supplements and herbal medicine are often proposed and/or used as adjuncts without any conclusive evidence. Although the effects on endometriosis-related pain are methodologically difficult to assess, physical adjunctive therapies such as acupuncture, transcutaneous neurostimulation, osteopathy/chiropractics, physical therapy and physical activity, the long-term therapeutic relationship they establish may potentiate beneficial effects perceived by patients. However, it remains difficult to demonstrate significant effects of cognitive and/or behavioral interventions on endometriosis-related pain. CONCLUSION The complexity of managing endometriosis-related pain requires a holistic approach with sustained attention to the patient. Treatments, either pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic, including adjuvant therapies, associate a technical expertise to which a human approach must be added in order to bring value to these treatments. Multidisciplinary and/or inter disciplinary approaches are therefore essential to the care of patients suffering from endometriosis.
-
8.
Analgesic Effects of Locally Administered Ketorolac-based Analgesics After Breast Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chen, JY, Feng, IJ, Loh, EW, Wang, LK, Lin, CC, Tam, KW
The Clinical journal of pain. 2018;(6):577-584
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reducing postoperative pain following breast surgery is crucial for rapid recovery and shortening hospital stay. Ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been used as a postoperative analgesic in many surgical procedures. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of locally administered ketorolac-based analgesics in managing pain after breast surgery. METHODS We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry for randomized control trials (RCTs) published up to September 2016. The primary outcome was pain level assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1 and 6 hours following breast surgery. RESULTS We reviewed 4 RCTs with 255 patients. For meta-analysis, VAS at 1 and 6 hours of 3 similar RCTs were compared. At 1 hour, VAS scores were significantly lower in patients administered a ketorolac solution [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.08 to -1.00] or ketorolac-bupivacaine solution (WMD=-2.30; 95% CI, -4.07 to -0.54) than in controls. At 6 hours, the ketorolac-bupivacaine solution reduced VAS scores significantly (WMD=-1.40; 95% CI, -2.48 to -0.32) compared with controls. However, at 1 hour, the ketorolac solution was significantly more effective than the bupivacaine solution was (WMD=-1.70; 95% CI, -2.81 to -0.59). DISCUSSION The effects of ketorolac-based analgesics vary as per the surgery and disease type. Locally administered ketorolac-based analgesics decreased postoperative pain in breast surgery patients, and the effect of local ketorolac was better than local bupivacaine. Therefore, ketorolac-based analgesics demonstrate considerable local infiltration during pain management after breast surgery.
-
9.
Rapid-onset hyponatremia and delirium following duloxetine treatment for postherpetic neuralgia: Case report and literature review.
Wang, D, Lai, J, Lu, S, Huang, M, Hu, S, Xu, Y
Medicine. 2018;(46):e13178
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE Hyponatremia following duloxetine treatment has been reported in patients with major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, diabetic neuropathy, or sciatic pain. The manifestations of duloxetine-induced hyponatremia are varying in different individuals. The overall prognosis for this type of hyponatremia is favorable if properly managed. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSES Herein, we reported rapid-onset hyponatremia and delirium in an older patient after 2 doses of duloxetine, which was used to control his postherpetic neuralgia. Laboratory examinations revealed a rapid decline in serum sodium level and indicated the possibility of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). INTERVENTIONS Discontinuation of duloxetine, restriction of water intake, and intravenous supplement of normal saline were adopted to manage the hyponatremia. OUTCOMES Serum concentration of sodium gradually normalized following aforementioned strategies. LESSONS Special attention to the electrolyte abnormality is recommended in old patients undergoing duloxetine treatment.
-
10.
Baseline Morphine Consumption May Explain Between-Study Heterogeneity in Meta-analyses of Adjuvant Analgesics and Improve Precision and Accuracy of Effect Estimates.
Doleman, B, Sutton, AJ, Sherwin, M, Lund, JN, Williams, JP
Anesthesia and analgesia. 2018;(2):648-660
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statistical heterogeneity can increase the uncertainty of results and reduce the quality of evidence derived from systematic reviews. At present, it is uncertain what the major factors are that account for heterogeneity in meta-analyses of analgesic adjuncts. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify whether various covariates could explain statistical heterogeneity and use this to improve accuracy when reporting the efficacy of analgesics. METHODS We searched for reviews using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. First, we identified the existence of considerable statistical heterogeneity (I > 75%). Second, we conducted meta-regression analysis for the outcome of 24-hour morphine consumption using baseline risk (control group morphine consumption) and other clinical and methodological covariates. Finally, we constructed a league table of adjuvant analgesics using a novel method of reporting effect estimates assuming a fixed consumption of 50 mg postoperative morphine. RESULTS We included 344 randomized controlled trials with 28,130 participants. Ninety-one percent of analyses showed considerable statistical heterogeneity. Baseline risk was a significant cause of between-study heterogeneity for acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, tramadol, ketamine, α2-agonists, gabapentin, pregabalin, lidocaine, magnesium, and dexamethasone (R = 21%-100%; P < .05). There was some evidence that the methodological limitations of the trials explained some of the residual heterogeneity. Type of surgery was not independently associated with analgesic efficacy. Assuming a fixed baseline risk of 50 mg (in order of efficacy), gabapentin, acetaminophen, α2-agonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, pregabalin, tramadol, magnesium, and lidocaine demonstrated moderate clinically significant reductions (>10 mg). We could not exclude a moderate clinically significant effect with ketamine. Dexamethasone demonstrated a small clinical benefit (>5 mg). CONCLUSIONS We empirically identified baseline morphine consumption as the major source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics across all surgical interventions. Controlling for baseline morphine consumption, clinicians can use audit data to estimate the morphine-reducing effect of adding any adjuvant for their local population, regardless which surgery they undergo. Moreover, we have utilized these findings to present a novel method of reporting and an amended method of graphically displaying effect estimates, which both reduces confounding from variable baseline risk in included trials and is able to adjust for other clinical and methodological confounding variables. We recommend use of these methods in clinical practice and future reviews of analgesics for postoperative pain.