-
1.
Using iron-based phosphate binders in phosphate reduction and anemia improvement in patients receiving dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhu, Y, Rao, J, Liao, X, Ou, J, Li, W, Xue, C
International urology and nephrology. 2021;(9):1899-1909
Abstract
PURPOSE A study was conducted to determine whether iron-based phosphate binders (IBPBs) need to be preferred for hyperphosphatemia and anemia management in patients on dialysis. METHODS For this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IBPBs in decreasing phosphate and correcting anemia in dialysis patients. RESULTS Nineteen trials comprising 4719 participants were included. Compared with placebo, serum phosphate decreased significantly after treatment with ferric citrate (FC), fermagate (one study), and SBR759 (one study). Hemoglobin increased significantly after treatment with FC and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21). In addition, FC and PA21 reduced serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and increased ferritin and transferrin saturation, but SBR759 did not. Compared with active treatment, the non-inferiority of IBPBs in reducing serum phosphate and iPTH was demonstrated. FC significantly improved serum hemoglobin and iron-related parameters and decreased the use of intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, whereas PA21 did not increase serum hemoglobin level. The incidences of infection and hospitalization were similar between the two groups, with FC having a higher risk of diarrhea than the placebo and active treatments. CONCLUSION FC was associated with the control of hyperphosphatemia and the improvement of anemia. However, PA21 did not show superiority for alleviating anemia compared with the active treatment. Other IBPBs, such as fermagate and SBR759, remained poorly understood due to the limited number of studies. Further trials are required to assess the effect of IBPBs on the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.
-
2.
Can Double Fortification of Salt with Iron and Iodine Reduce Anemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Iron Deficiency, Iodine Deficiency, and Functional Outcomes? Evidence of Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety.
Larson, LM, Cyriac, S, Djimeu, EW, Mbuya, MNN, Neufeld, LM
The Journal of nutrition. 2021;(Suppl 1):15S-28S
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia, iron deficiency, and iodine deficiency are problems of important public health concern in many parts of the world, with consequences for the health, development, and work capacity of populations. Several countries are beginning to implement double fortified salt (DFS) programs to simultaneously address iodine and iron deficiencies. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to summarize the evidence for efficacy and effectiveness of DFS on the full range of status and functional outcomes and across different implementation and evaluation designs essential to successful interventions. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and gray literature examining the effects of DFS on nutritional status, cognition, work productivity, development, and morbidity of all population groups. We searched for articles in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register, and ProQuest for randomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, and program effectiveness evaluations. RESULTS A total of 22 studies (N individuals = 52,758) were included. Efficacy studies indicated a significant overall positive effect on hemoglobin concentration [standardized mean difference (95% CI): 0.33 (0.18, 0.48)], ferritin [0.42 (0.08, 0.76)], anemia [risk ratio (95% CI): 0.80 (0.70, 0.92)], and iron deficiency anemia [0.36 (0.24, 0.55)]. Effects on urinary iodine concentration were not significantly different between DFS and iodized salt. The impact on functional outcomes was mixed. Only 2 effectiveness studies were identified. They reported programmatic challenges including low coverage, suboptimal DFS quality, and storage constraints. CONCLUSIONS Given the biological benefits of DFS across several populations in efficacy research, additional evaluations of robust DFS programs delivered at scale, which consider effective implementation and measure appropriate biomarkers, are needed.
-
3.
Anemia and iron metabolism in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Taneri, PE, Gómez-Ochoa, SA, Llanaj, E, Raguindin, PF, Rojas, LZ, Roa-Díaz, ZM, Salvador, D, Groothof, D, Minder, B, Kopp-Heim, D, et al
European journal of epidemiology. 2020;(8):763-773
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Iron metabolism and anemia may play an important role in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate biomarkers of anemia and iron metabolism (hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, hepcidin, haptoglobin, unsaturated iron-binding capacity, erythropoietin, free erythrocyte protoporphyrine, and erythrocyte indices) in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and explored their prognostic value. Six bibliographic databases were searched up to August 3rd 2020. We included 189 unique studies, with data from 57,563 COVID-19 patients. Pooled mean hemoglobin and ferritin levels in COVID-19 patients across all ages were 129.7 g/L (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 128.51; 130.88) and 777.33 ng/mL (95% CI, 701.33; 852.77), respectively. Hemoglobin levels were lower with older age, higher percentage of subjects with diabetes, hypertension and overall comorbidities, and admitted to intensive care. Ferritin level increased with older age, increasing proportion of hypertensive study participants, and increasing proportion of mortality. Compared to moderate cases, severe COVID-19 cases had lower hemoglobin [weighted mean difference (WMD), - 4.08 g/L (95% CI - 5.12; - 3.05)] and red blood cell count [WMD, - 0.16 × 1012 /L (95% CI - 0.31; - 0.014)], and higher ferritin [WMD, - 473.25 ng/mL (95% CI 382.52; 563.98)] and red cell distribution width [WMD, 1.82% (95% CI 0.10; 3.55)]. A significant difference in mean ferritin levels of 606.37 ng/mL (95% CI 461.86; 750.88) was found between survivors and non-survivors, but not in hemoglobin levels. Future studies should explore the impact of iron metabolism and anemia in the pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment of COVID-19.
-
4.
Stunting and Anemia in Children from Urban Poor Environments in 28 Low and Middle-income Countries: A Meta-analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data.
Assaf, S, Juan, C
Nutrients. 2020;(11)
Abstract
Child malnutrition remains a global concern with implications not only for children's health and cognitive function, but also for countries' economic growth. Recent reports suggest that global nutrition targets will not be met by 2025. Large gaps are evident between and within countries. One of the largest disparities in child malnutrition within counties is between urban and rural children. Large disparities also exist in urban areas that have higher rates of child malnutrition in the urban poor areas or slums. This paper examines stunting and anemia related to an urban poverty measure in children under age 5 in 28 low and middle-income countries with Demographic and Health Survey data. We used the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) definition to define urban poor areas as a proxy for slums. The results show that in several countries, children had a higher risk of stunting and anemia in urban poor areas compared to children in urban non-poor areas. In some countries, this risk was similar to the risk between the rural and urban non-poor. Tests of heterogeneity showed that these results were not homogeneous across countries. These results help to identify areas of greater disadvantage and the required interventions for stunting and anemia.
-
5.
Systematic and meta-analysis of factors associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa.
Meazaw, MW, Chojenta, C, Muluneh, MD, Loxton, D
PloS one. 2020;(8):e0237600
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preeclampsia and eclampsia are common complications of pregnancy globally, including sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Although it has a high burden on maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, evidence on the risk of the problem is limited. Therefore, the aim of this review was to examine the factors associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia among mothers in SSA countries. METHODS We searched article from SSA countries using electronic database MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL published in English from January 2000 to May 2020. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted and assessed the quality of the articles. Both random and fixed effect model were used for analysis. Heterogeneity of the studies and publication bias were checked. STATA 16 used for analysis. RESULTS Fifty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and included in this review. The following factors were identified through meta-analysis: being primiparous (OR: 2.52; 95% CI:1.19, 3.86), previous history of maternal preeclampsia/eclampsia (OR:5.6; 95% CI:1.82, 9.28), family history of preeclampsia/eclampsia (OR:1.68; 95% CI:1.26, 2.11), high maternal body mass index (OR: 1.69; 95% CI:1.17, 2.21), chronic hypertension (OR: 2.52; 95% CI:1.29, 3.74), anaemia during pregnancy (OR: 3.22; 95% CI:2.70, 3.75) and lack of antenatal care visits (OR: 2.71; 95% CI:1.45, 3.96). There was inconclusive evidence for a relationship with a number of other factors, such as nutrition and related factors, antenatal care visits, birth spacing, and other factors due to few studies found in our review. CONCLUSIONS The risk of preeclampsia and eclampsia is worse among women who have a history of preeclampsia/eclampsia (either themselves or family members), primiparous, obesity and overweight, living with chronic disease, having anaemia during pregnancy and absence from ANC visits. Therefore, investment must be made in women's health needs to reduce the problem and health service providers need to give due attention to high-risk women.
-
6.
Cytopenias among patients with rheumatic diseases using methotrexate: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Vanni, KMM, Lyu, H, Solomon, DH
Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020;(4):709-717
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of anaemia, leucopoenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia associated with MTX plus folic acid among patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE through August 2016 for all randomized controlled clinical trials with a MTX monotherapy arm. We excluded randomized controlled clinical trials for cancer and included only double-blind studies that reported on haematologic adverse events. Studies were excluded if patients did not receive folic acid or leucovorin supplementation. Full text articles were assessed by two independent reviewers. Incidence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS Of 1601 studies identified, 30 (1.87%) were included, representing 3858 patients; all had RA. Seventeen trials reported on anaemia (n = 2032), 17 reported on leucopoenia (n = 2220), 16 reported on neutropenia (n = 2202) and 12 reported on thrombocytopenia (n = 1507). The incidence for any anaemia was 2.55% (95% CI 0.60-5.47%), any leucopoenia 1.17% (95% CI 0.16-2.80%), any neutropenia 1.77% (95% CI 0.33-4.00%), and any thrombocytopenia 0.19% (95% CI 0.00-0.86%). Four cases of severe anaemia were reported, as defined by authors, along with three cases of severe neutropenia. No cases of severe leucopoenia, severe thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia were reported. CONCLUSION Cytopenias are an uncommon side effect of low-dose MTX with folic acid supplementation among RA patients. Further research is needed to reach a more precise estimate.
-
7.
Roxadustat (FG-4592) treatment for anemia in dialysis-dependent (DD) and not dialysis-dependent (NDD) chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, J, Zhang, A, Hayden, JC, Bhagavathula, AS, Alshehhi, F, Rinaldi, G, Kontogiannis, V, Rahmani, J
Pharmacological research. 2020;:104747
Abstract
The effect of roxadustat (FG-4592) on individuals with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) patients receiving or not receiving the dialysis was unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients who are dialysis dependent (DD) or dialysis independent (NDD) CKD. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with roxadustat versus placebo or epoetin alfa up to November 2019. We investigated the efficacy of roxadustat in the levels of hemoglobin and other clinical parameters in renal anemia in patients with NDD and DD-CKD. We estimated weighted-mean difference (WMD) using random effect models. We included six RCTs comprising 1001 patients of whom 70.6 % were treated with roxadustat and 294 controls. The control group for studies of NDD-CKD patients was placebo whereas an active control of epoetin-alfa was used in studies of DD-CKD patients. Median follow-up time was 8 weeks. All trials were industry-sponsored. Overall, roxadustat increased hemoglobin levels by 1.20 g/dl (95 % CI:0.66, 1.75,P < 0.0001,I2 = 99.3 %). Hemoglobin levels increased by 1.99 g/dl in NDD-CKD patients versus placebo and 0.52 g/dl in DD-CKD patients versus epoetin-alfa. Roxadustat was associated with a decrease the levels of hepcidin by -49.3 ng/dl (-38.5 ng/dl in NDD patients versus placebo and -27.7 ng/dl in DD patients versus epoetin alfa), a decrease in ferritin of -49.7 μmol/l (-52.2 μmol/l in NDD patients versus placebo and -7.3 μmol/l in DD patients versus epoetin alfa), and increase in total iron-binding capacity of 32.2 μmol/l (14.1 μmol/l in NDD patients versus placebo and 13.6 μmol/l in DD patients versus epoetin alfa). The percentage change in the transferrin saturation levels was -2.07 % (-6%, NDD patients versus placebo, and +3.7 % in DD patients versus epoetin alfa) in anemia associated CKD patients. This review found roxadustast increases the levels of hemoglobin, serum transferrin, intestinal iron absorption, and reduces hepcidin in both NDD and DD-CKD patients. Safety data is still emerging.
-
8.
Oral iron-based interventions for prevention of critical outcomes in pregnancy and postnatal care: An overview and update of systematic reviews.
Abraha, I, Bonacini, MI, Montedori, A, Di Renzo, GC, Angelozzi, P, Micheli, M, Germani, A, Carloni, D, Scaccetti, A, Palmieri, G, et al
Journal of evidence-based medicine. 2019;(2):155-166
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to summarize and update the evidence concerning oral iron-based interventions compared to placebo or no iron-based interventions to prevent critical outcomes in pregnancy or treat critical outcomes in the postpartum phase. METHOD Published systematic reviews (Feb 2018) and primary studies (from 2015 to March 2018) retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were examined. The AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool was used to assess the quality of reviews. GRADE was used to rate the quality of the evidence for critical outcomes. RESULTS Antenatal care: Compared to placebo/no treatment, iron-based therapies reduced maternal anemia at term by 59% (seven trials at low risk of bias, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73; I2 = 86%; moderate-quality evidence) and maternal iron deficiency anemia by 67% (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.69; I2 = 49%). There was no evidence of difference between iron-based therapies vs control in terms of side effects (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.91-2.21), preterm delivery (13 studies: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03; low-quality evidence), low birthweight (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.13; low-quality evidence) and infant mortality (RR 0.93, 0.72-1.20; low-quality evidence). POSTNATAL CARE There was insufficient evidence to determine whether iron-based therapies can reduce postpartum anemia. CONCLUSION Iron supplementation is effective in preventing maternal anemia at term but not low birthweight, preterm delivery or infant mortality.
-
9.
Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin and iron therapy to reduce red blood cell transfusion in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kei, T, Mistry, N, Curley, G, Pavenski, K, Shehata, N, Tanzini, RM, Gauthier, MF, Thorpe, K, Schweizer, TA, Ward, S, et al
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2019;(6):716-731
Abstract
PURPOSE Iron restricted anemia is prevalent in surgical patients and is associated with an increased risk of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and adverse events. Treatment of anemia includes oral and intravenous iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). More recent studies have focused on the use of intravenous iron as the primary approach to treating anemia. Nevertheless, the optimal treatment strategy for anemia remains to be established. Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESA and iron therapy relative to iron therapy alone in reducing RBC transfusion in surgical patients. SOURCE We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2018. We included randomized-controlled trials in which adult surgical patients received an ESA and iron, vs iron alone, prior to cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Our primary outcome was RBC transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin concentration (post-treatment and postoperatively), number of RBC units transfused, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal dysfunction, pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In total, 25 studies (4,719 participants) were included. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents and iron therapy reduced RBC transfusion relative to iron therapy (relative risk [RR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.71) without any change in mortality (RR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.16), stroke (RR 1.91; 95% CI, 0.63 to 5.76), MI (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.50), renal dysfunction (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26), PE (RR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.15 to 5.83), or DVT (RR 1.48; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.31). CONCLUSION Administration of ESA and iron therapy reduced the risk for RBC transfusion compared with iron therapy alone in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, publication bias and heterogeneity reduces the confidence of the finding. Although the analysis was probably under-powered for some outcomes, no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events was observed with ESA and iron compared with iron alone. Further large prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.
-
10.
Intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roger, SD, Tio, M, Park, HC, Choong, HL, Goh, B, Cushway, TR, Stevens, V, Macdougall, IC
Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2017;(12):969-976
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: Higher dosages of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been associated with adverse effects. Intravenous iron is used to optimize ESA response and reduces ESA doses in haemodialysis patients; this meta-analysis evaluates the magnitude of this effect. METHODS A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Clinical Trials from inception until December 2014, to identify randomized controlled trials of intravenous iron and ESA, in patients undergoing haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. Dosing of IV iron in concordance with the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines was considered optimal iron therapy. RESULTS Of the 28 randomized controlled trials identified, seven met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results of random-effects meta-analysis show a statistically significant weighted mean (95% CI) difference of -1733 [-3073, -392] units/week in ESA dose for optimal iron versus suboptimal iron. The weighted average change in ESA dose was a reduction of 23% (range -7% to -55%) attributable to appropriate dosing of intravenous iron. A comparison of intravenous iron versus oral iron/no iron (five trials) showed a greater reduction in ESA dose, although this did not reach statistical significance (weighted mean difference, 95% CI: -2,433 [-5183, 318] units/week). The weighted average change in ESA dose across the five trials was a reduction of 31% (range -8% to -55%). CONCLUSION Significant reductions in ESA dosing may be achieved with optimal intravenous iron usage in the haemodialysis population, and suboptimal iron use may require higher ESA dosing to manage anaemia.