1.
A meta-analysis for Kuanxiong Aerosol on the treatment of angina pectoris.
Zhuang, J, Dai, X, Zhang, H, Chen, Y, Cai, H, Jin, Z, Zhong, L, Chen, B
The American journal of emergency medicine. 2020;(6):1218-1225
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kuanxiong Aerosol (KA) has been used in patients with angina pectoris (AP) attacks for many years, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of KA versus nitrates in the treatment of AP. METHODS Seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CNKI, VIP, CBM and Wanfang) were searched from inception to November 2019 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacy and safety of KA with nitrates on the treatment of AP. And two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias. RESULT A total of 12 RCTs were eventually included, involving 2001 patients. Compared with the Nitrates group, the KA group showed great significant improvement on the 3-min [relative risk (RR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.03,1.23), P < .05;11 studies,1875 patients] and 5-min [RR = 1.05, 95%CI (1.01,1.08), P < 0.05; 11 studies,1875 patients] angina remission rates, the incidence of adverse reactions [RR = 0.42,95% CI (0.33,0.54), P < 0.00001; 8 studies, 1350 patients], endothelin(ET) [SMD = -0.40, 95%CI (-0.74,-0.07), P < 0.05; 2 studies, 143 patients] and c-reactive protein (CRP) [SMD = -0.58, 95%CI (-0.87,-0.30), P < 0.00001;2 studies, 200 patients],but no significant improvement on electrocardiogram efficacy [RR = 1.03, 95%CI (0.98,1.10), P = 0.26;11 studies, 1549 patients], nitric oxide (NO) [SMD = -0.08, 95%CI (-0.61,0.45), P = 0.76;2 studies, 143 patients]. CONCLUSION The clinical use of KA is effective and safe on the treatment of AP, which appears to be better than nitrates in terms of efficiency, adverse reactions, endothelial function and inflammatory response. Nevertheless, due to some limitations in the sample size and quality of the included studies, more high-quality RCTs were still needed for further verification.
2.
Effects of the Antianginal Drugs Ranolazine, Nicorandil, and Ivabradine on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhu, H, Xu, X, Fang, X, Zheng, J, Zhao, Q, Chen, T, Huang, J
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;(10):2137-2152.e12
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of the antianginal drugs ranolazine, nicorandil, and ivabradine on coronary microvascular function. METHODS Electronic scientific databases were searched for randomized trials investigating the effects of antianginal drugs on coronary microvascular function. Primary outcomes were changes in the coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). The secondary outcome was the Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores. The standardized mean difference or weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% CI) served as a summary statistic. FINDINGS The antianginal drugs ranolazine, nicorandil, and ivabradine did not increase the CFR compared with the control drugs (standardized mean difference, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.85; P = 0.10). Ranolazine did not increase the global MPRI compared with the control drugs (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.11; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.29; P = 0.21). However, in the subgroups with a baseline CFR <2.5 or a global MPRI <2, ranolazine increased the global MPRI (WMD, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.27; P < 0.0001). In addition, the subendocardial midventricular MPRI (mid-subendocardial MPRI) was improved after ranolazine treatment (WMD, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.20; P = 0.007). Moreover, nicorandil significantly reduced the IMR compared with the control drugs (WMD, -7.63; 95% CI, -11.82 to -3.44; P = 0.0004). In addition, ranolazine and ivabradine improved 3 of the 5 Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores. IMPLICATIONS Ranolazine improved the global MPRI in patients with definite coronary microvascular dysfunction and the mid-subendocardial MPRI with suspicious coronary microvascular dysfunction, and nicorandil reduced the IMR. In addition, ranolazine and ivabradine reduced angina. Moreover, it is possible that the IMR and mid-subendocardial MPRI are more sensitive than the CFR and global MPRI for evaluating coronary microvascular function.
3.
Efficacy and safety of oral Panax notoginseng saponins for unstable angina patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Duan, L, Xiong, X, Hu, J, Liu, Y, Wang, J
Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology. 2018;:23-33
Abstract
BACKGROUND Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) is one of the most important active ingredients in Panax notoginseng, which plays an important role against cardiovascular diseases in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). METHODS This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. We searched the following databases from their inception to February 2017: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE Database, WHO ICTRP, CNKI, WANFANG, VIP and SinoMed. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on PNS in patients with unstable angina (UA) which meet the standard were included. RESULT Seventeen studies were included in this systemic review. The included studies indicated that PNS has promising therapeutic effects on reduction of the primary end point [RR 0.05 (95% CI -0.07, -0.02); P < 0.001], electrocardiography (ECG) [RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.23, 0.46); P < 0.001], the frequency and duration of angina attacks [MD -1.88 (95% CI -2.03, -1.72); P < 0.001], and dosage of nitroglycerin [MD -1.13 (95% CI -1.70, -0.56); P < 0.001] of UA patients. Adverse events were described 9 included RCTs. CONCLUSION Oral PNS could reduce the end point, and improve the ECG, the frequency and duration of angina pectoris, dosage of nitroglycerin and lipids in UA patients. And the results indicated oral PNS is safe up to now. However, we need more multi-centre, large-sample, high-quality RCTs to provide high-quality evidence.