-
1.
Treatment of drug-eluting stents in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: Insights from the French "real-world" prospective GARO Registry.
Auffret, V, Berland, J, Barragan, P, Waliszewski, M, Bonello, L, Delarche, N, Furber, A, Albert, F, Carrié, D, Eltchaninoff, H, et al
International journal of cardiology. 2016;:690-6
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data about paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PCB) angioplasty to treat drug-eluting stents (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) were mainly collected in selected patient populations in the setting of randomized trials. The main goal of this prospective registry was to confirm the positive findings of these studies in an unselected population in clinical practice. METHODS Consecutive patients with DES-ISR treated by PCB angioplasty were recruited in this prospective real-world registry. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary endpoints included acute technical success, in-hospital outcomes, 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and TLR and the occurrence of target vessel revascularization. RESULTS A total of 206 patients (67.7 ± 10.2 years, 80.6% male, 41.3% diabetics) with 210 lesions were recruited. Unstable coronary artery disease was present in 55.3% of patients. The time from DES implantation to DES-ISR was 3.0 ± 2.4 years. Quantitative analyses revealed that patterns of treated DES-ISR were focal in 55.7% and diffuse in 44.3%. The reference diameter was 2.76 ± 0.64 mm. The 9-month follow-up rate was 90.8% (187/206). At 9 months, the TLR rate was 7.0% (13/187) whereas the rates for MACE, MI and cardiac death were 10.7% (20/187), 4.8% (9/187) and 2.1% (4/187) respectively. Results were consistent in patients with paclitaxel and non-paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) ISR. CONCLUSION This large prospective registry demonstrated acceptable rates of TLR and MACE at 9 months after treatment of DES-ISR by PCB angioplasty. PCB angioplasty was equally effective in patients with PES-ISR and non PES-ISR.
-
2.
Prospective 'real world' registry for the use of the 'PCB only' strategy in small vessel de novo lesions.
Zeymer, U, Waliszewski, M, Spiecker, M, Gastmann, O, Faurie, B, Ferrari, M, Alidoosti, M, Palmieri, C, Heang, TN, Ong, PJ, et al
Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2014;(4):311-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective registry assessed the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease in Europe and Asia with the intention to treat lesions without additional stenting. The use of PCBs in small vessels seems to be associated with favourable outcomes; however, prospective data for the use of PCBs without stenting are limited. METHODS The SeQuent Please Small Vessel 'PCB only' Registry was an international, prospective, multicentre registry enrolling patients with de novo lesions of small reference diameters (≥ 2.0 mm, ≤ 2.75 mm). The primary end point was clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary end points were acute technical success, in-hospital outcomes, 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR), and the occurrence of definite lesion and vessel thrombosis. RESULTS A total of 479 patients (66.1 ± 10.9 years, 36.7% diabetics) were enrolled, 105 (23.5%) with an acute coronary syndrome, 41 (9.2%) with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 60 (14.8%) with non-STEMI. The initial procedural success rate was 99.0%; 27 patients (6%) needed additional bare metal stent implantation. TLR at 9.4±1.7 months occurred in 14 patients (3.6%), while three patients (0.6%) had vessel thrombosis in non-target lesions. There was no cardiac death or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CONCLUSIONS To date, this is the largest prospective study with PCBs in small vessel de novo lesions in unselected patients. Rates of TLR and MACE were low, suggesting the use of PCBs may be an attractive alternative treatment option to drug eluting stents in small vessels.
-
3.
Left ventricular remodeling and 1-year clinical follow-up of the REOPEN-AMI trial.
Niccoli, G, Spaziani, C, Crea, F, ,
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;(14):1454-5
-
4.
Coronary artery treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon using a BTHC excipient: clinical results of the international real-world DELUX registry.
Toelg, R, Merkely, B, Erglis, A, Hoffman, S, Bruno, H, Kornowski, R, Slagboom, T, Naber, C, Witzenbichler, B, Graf, K, et al
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014;(5):591-9
Abstract
AIMS: Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions using the Pantera Lux paclitaxel-coated balloon have been demonstrated in the PEPPER first-in-man trial. This prospective, multicentre, clinical registry aims to evaluate its safety and efficacy in an international real-world setting in a larger cohort of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Between April 2010 and April 2011, 1,064 patients were treated for predominantly diffuse and proliferative in-stent restenosis of bare metal stents (BMS-ISR) and drug-eluting stents (DES-ISR), or for de novo lesions. Clinical device success was obtained in 98.2% of the patients. The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and clinically driven target vessel revascularisation, and was 8.5% in the overall, 6.0% in the BMS-ISR, 11.5% in the DES-ISR and 7.0% in the de novo population at six months, and 15.1%, 11.6%, 20.6% and 9.4% at 12 months, respectively. Definitive stent thrombosis occurred in 0.4% of the patients within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Safety and efficacy of the Pantera Lux paclitaxel-coated balloon was confirmed in a real-world setting with low major adverse cardiac event rates in patients with in-stent restenosis or de novo lesions. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01081366).
-
5.
Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in the SPIRIT III randomized trial at three years.
Lansky, AJ, Brar, SS, Yaqub, M, Sood, P, Applegate, RJ, Lazar, D, Jankovic, I, Hermiller, JB, Koo, K, Sudhir, K, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2012;(1):21-9
Abstract
Routine angiographic follow-up after bare-metal stent implantation has been associated with an increase in coronary revascularization. The impact of angiographic follow-up after drug-eluting stent placement remains poorly characterized. The prospective, randomized, single-blinded SPIRIT III trial assigned patients to the everolimus-eluting stent or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization [ID-TLR]) at 3 years were assessed by angiographic versus clinical-only follow-up at 8 months ± 28 days and a landmark survival analysis from 9 months to 3 years. Of 1,002 patients, 564 patients were assigned to angiographic follow-up at 8 months ± 28 days and 438 patients underwent clinical follow-up alone. Three-year major adverse cardiovascular event rates were 10.6% in the angiographic group and 12.0% in the clinical follow-up group (p = 0.64). Ischemia-driven revascularization increased twofold at 9 months, but no difference was noted in ID-TLR for either device. Non-ID-TLR was significantly higher in patients in the angiographic group (4.5% vs 1.0%, p = 0.002), a difference resulting from PES (9.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.0007) rather than everolimus-eluting stent (2.2% vs 1.1%, p = 0.36) treatment. The landmark analysis showed no significant differences between the angiographic and clinical follow-up groups from 9 months to 3 years of major clinical outcomes. In conclusion, routine angiographic follow-up in SPIRIT III did not increase rates of ID-TLR compared to clinical follow-up alone. Despite higher nonischemia-driven revascularization rates with angiographic follow-up of patients with PESs, none of the safety end points were adversely affected.
-
6.
A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.
Carrié, D, Berland, J, Verheye, S, Hauptmann, KE, Vrolix, M, Violini, R, Dibie, A, Berti, S, Maupas, E, Antoniucci, D, et al
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;(15):1371-6
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (Cre8, CID, Saluggia, Italy) versus permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in de novo percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND Although the efficacy of the drug-eluting stent has been well established, the risk-benefit balance is still suboptimal, and the safety of polymers remains uncertain. METHODS Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomly assigned 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté stents. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) within a noninferiority scope. Six-month intravascular ultrasound was performed in 20% of the patients. All patients will be clinically followed up to 5 years. RESULTS Out of 323 patients enrolled, 162 received Cre8 and 161 Taxus Liberté stents. In-stent LLL was significantly lower in Cre8 group (0.14 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, p noninferiority <0.0001, p superiority <0.0001). Clinical endpoints (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The Cre8 stent in de novo lesions showed significantly lower in-stent LLL at 6 months than the Taxus Liberté stent did, with a trend toward better 12-month clinical safety and efficacy results. (International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions [NEXT]; NCT01373502).
-
7.
Outcomes of patients treated with triple antithrombotic therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] trial).
Nikolsky, E, Mehran, R, Dangas, GD, Yu, J, Parise, H, Xu, K, Pocock, SJ, Stone, GW
The American journal of cardiology. 2012;(6):831-8
Abstract
In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), patients at high risk of systemic emboli who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using stents might require triple antithrombotic therapy (a combination of aspirin, thienopyridine, and vitamin K antagonist [VKA]). The risks and benefits of such therapy in the setting of STEMI have been incompletely characterized. We, therefore, assessed the outcomes of patients who received triple therapy after primary PCI in the large-scale, contemporary Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] trial. Among the 3,320 patients triaged to primary PCI, 126 (3.8%) were prescribed triple therapy and 3,194 (96.2%) were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy. The most frequent indications for VKA treatment were a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction with a large akinetic area, atrial fibrillation (23.8% each), and mural thrombus (23.0%). The assignment to triple therapy was associated with older age, female gender, rhythm disturbances, Killip class > 1 on admission, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, left anterior descending artery territory infarcts, and Final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade < 3. Patients treated with triple versus dual therapy had comparable short- and long-term ischemic outcomes but had significantly increased rates of major bleeding during the index hospitalization (17.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.0001), resulting in premature VKA discontinuation in 14.3% of those patients. In conclusion, in the setting of STEMI treated with primary PCI, the combination of aspirin, thienopyridine, and VKA results in an excess of bleeding complications and premature discontinuation of VKA. The risk of adding oral anticoagulation to patients admitted for STEMI should be carefully considered before choosing drug-eluting or bare metal stents.
-
8.
Impact of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast agents on contrast-induced nephropathy and tissue reperfusion in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction [CONTRAST-AMI] Trial).
Bolognese, L, Falsini, G, Schwenke, C, Grotti, S, Limbruno, U, Liistro, F, Carrera, A, Angioli, P, Picchi, A, Ducci, K, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2012;(1):67-74
Abstract
Conflicting data have been reported on the effects of low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). In particular, no clinical trial has yet focused on the effect of contemporary contrast media on CI-AKI, epicardial flow, and microcirculatory function in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Coronary Revascularization by Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction (CONTRAST-AMI) trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority study aiming to evaluate the effects of the low-osmolar contrast medium iopromide compared to the iso-osmolar agent iodixanol on CI-AKI and tissue-level perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Four hundred seventy-five consecutive, unselected patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to iopromide (n = 239) or iodixanol (n = 236). All patients received high-dose N-acetylcysteine and hydration. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with serum creatinine (sCr) increases ≥25% from baseline to 72 hours. Secondary end points were Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade, increase in sCr ≥50%, increase in sCr ≥0.5 or ≥1 mg/dl, and 1-month major adverse cardiac events. The primary end point occurred in 10% of the iopromide group and in 13% of the iodixanol group (95% confidence interval -9% to 3%, p for noninferiority = 0.0002). A TIMI myocardial perfusion grade of 0 or 1 was present in 14% of patients in the 2 groups. No differences between the 2 groups were found in any of the secondary analyses of sCr increase. No significant difference in 1-month major adverse cardiac events was found (8% vs 6%, p = 0.37). In conclusion, in a population of unselected patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, iopromide was not inferior to iodixanol in the occurrence of CI-AKI; no significant differences were found in terms of tissue-level reperfusion and major adverse cardiac events between the 2 contrast agents.
-
9.
A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study.
Rittger, H, Brachmann, J, Sinha, AM, Waliszewski, M, Ohlow, M, Brugger, A, Thiele, H, Birkemeyer, R, Kurowski, V, Breithardt, OA, et al
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;(15):1377-82
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to define the impact of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is associated with favorable results for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis. METHODS In this prospective, single-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, the authors randomly assigned 110 patients with drug-eluting stent restenoses located in a native coronary artery to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty or uncoated balloon angioplasty. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss. The secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. Angiographic follow-up rate was 91%. Treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon was superior to balloon angioplasty alone with a late loss of 0.43 ± 0.61 mm versus 1.03 ± 0.77 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. Restenosis rate was significantly reduced from 58.1% to 17.2% (p < 0.001), and the composite clinical endpoint was significantly reduced from 50.0% to 16.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty is superior to balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. (PEPCAD DES-Treatment of DES-In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Eluting PTCA Catheter [PEPCAD-DES]; NCT00998439).
-
10.
Comparison between the first and second generation bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a six month virtual histology study.
Brugaletta, S, Garcia-Garcia, HM, Diletti, R, Gomez-Lara, J, Garg, S, Onuma, Y, Shin, ES, van Geuns, RJ, de Bruyne, B, Dudek, D, et al
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;(9):1110-6
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the intravascular ultrasound virtual histology (IVUS-VH) appearance of the polymeric struts of the first (Revision 1.0) and the second (Revision 1.1) generation bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). METHODS AND RESULTS IVUS-VH misrepresents polymeric struts as dense calcium (DC) and necrotic core (NC) so that their presence and disappearance could be used as potential artifactual surrogate of bioresorption. DC and NC were assessed in both revisions of the BVS by analysing IVUS-VH from all patients in the ABSORB cohort A (Revision 1.0) and cohort B (Revision 1.1) study who had an IVUS-VH post-treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Post-treatment and 6-month follow-up IVUS-VH results, available in 60 patients (BVS 1.0 n=28; BVS 1.1 n=32), indicated an insignificant rise in DC+NC area compared to baseline with Revision 1.1 (0.10 ± 0.46 mm2, p=0.2), whilst a significant reduction was seen with Revision 1.0 (-0.57 ± 1.3 mm2, p=0.02). A significant correlation has been found between the change in the DC+NC area and the change in external elastic membrane area (y=0.68x-0.1; r=0.58, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Based on 6-months IVUS-VH analysis, the BVS 1.1 appears to have a different backscattering signal compared to the BVS 1.0, which may reflect differences in the speed of chemical and structural alteration.