-
1.
Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation, Like Fire and Fury.
Carlisle, MA, Fudim, M, DeVore, AD, Piccini, JP
JACC. Heart failure. 2019;(6):447-456
Abstract
Heart failure and atrial fibrillation are 2 common cardiovascular disorders that frequently complicate one another and exert a significant detrimental effect on cardiovascular health and well-being. Both heart failure and atrial fibrillation continue to increase in prevalence as the risk factors underlying each condition become more common. This review encompasses what is currently known about the epidemiology and pathophysiology of these comorbidities along with incorporation of landmark trials that have contributed to current guidelines. The focus is on clinically relevant considerations, including the contribution of inflammation in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. We explore the emerging role of catheter ablation relative to medical therapy in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, along with indications for biventricular pacing modalities in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We discuss current guideline-directed therapies and how practice models and national recommendations will likely change based on the most recent randomized controlled trials.
-
2.
Trends Over Time in Drug Administration During Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Moskowitz, A, Ross, CE, Andersen, LW, Grossestreuer, AV, Berg, KM, Donnino, MW, ,
Critical care medicine. 2019;(2):194-200
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical providers have access to a number of pharmacologic agents during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Few studies have explored medication administration patterns during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Herein, we examine trends in use of pharmacologic interventions during in-hospital cardiac arrest both over time and with respect to the American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guideline updates. DESIGN Observational cohort study. SETTING Hospitals contributing data to the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation database between 2001 and 2016. PATIENTS Adult in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. INTERVENTIONS The percentage of patients receiving epinephrine, vasopressin, amiodarone, lidocaine, atropine, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and dextrose each year were calculated in patients with shockable and nonshockable initial rhythms. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the annual adjusted odds of medication administration. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess change in atropine use after the 2010 American Heart Association guideline update. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 268,031 index in-hospital cardiac arrests were included. As compared to 2001, the adjusted odds ratio of receiving each medication in 2016 were epinephrine (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8), vasopressin (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1), amiodarone (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9-4.0), lidocaine (adjusted odds ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2-0.2), atropine (adjusted odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.06-0.08), bicarbonate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8-2.3), calcium (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.3), magnesium (adjusted odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9-2.7; p < 0.0001), and dextrose (adjusted odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.3-3.4). Following the 2010 American Heart Association guideline update, there was a downward step change in the intercept and slope change in atropine use (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Prescribing patterns during in-hospital cardiac arrest have changed significantly over time. Changes to American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines have had a rapid and substantial effect on the use of a number of commonly used in-hospital cardiac arrest medications.
-
3.
When the Heart Is Not in It: Breastfeeding with Cardiovascular Disease.
Anderson, PO
Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. 2019;(2):80-82
-
4.
Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for atrial fibrillation in pregnancy.
Georgiopoulos, G, Tsiachris, D, Kordalis, A, Kontogiannis, C, Spartalis, M, Pietri, P, Magkas, N, Stefanadis, C
Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2019;(13):1625-1636
Abstract
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is rare during pregnancy but its incidence is expected to rise in parallel to increasing age of women in pregnancy and fraction of pregnant women with structural heart disease. Areas covered: The authors provide a review of the contemporary evidence on diagnostic work-up and optimal pharmacotherapeutic management of AF in pregnancy. The authors have performed a systematic search for relevant articles using MEDLINE, the COCHRANE LIBRARY, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Expert opinion: New-onset AF during pregnancy is usually an indication of underlying heart disease and should lead to hospital admission. Patients should be evaluated by an experienced cardiologist or an electrophysiologist. Direct cardioversion is highly effective and safe in pregnant women and should be prioritized over pharmacologic cardioversion with intravenous ibutilide or flecainide. Amiodarone should be avoided if possible. Digoxin and beta-blockers are the rate-control pharmaceutic agents with the widest experience of use. Catheter ablation during pregnancy should be considered in selected cases of atrial flutter refractory to medication and only performed using fluoroless techniques, preferably during the second trimester. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) can be used after the first trimester, while low molecular weight heparin should be accompanied by periodic evaluation of anti-Xa factor. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants should be avoided because of limited experience in pregnancy.
-
5.
Low-dose Magnesium Sulfate Versus High Dose in the Early Management of Rapid Atrial Fibrillation: Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study (LOMAGHI Study).
Bouida, W, Beltaief, K, Msolli, MA, Azaiez, N, Ben Soltane, H, Sekma, A, Trabelsi, I, Boubaker, H, Grissa, MH, Methemem, M, et al
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019;(2):183-191
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aim to determine the benefit of two different doses magnesium sulfate (MgSO4 ) compared to placebo in rate control of rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) managed in the emergency department (ED). METHODS We undertook a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial in three university hospital EDs between August 2009 and December 2014. Patients > 18 years with rapid AF (>120 beats/min) were enrolled and randomized to 9 g of intravenous MgSO4 (high-dose group, n = 153), 4.5 g of intravenous MgSO4 (low-dose group, n = 148), or serum saline infusion (placebo group, n = 149), given in addition to atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocking agents. The primary outcome was the reduction of baseline ventricular rate (VR) to 90 beats/min or less or reduction of VR by 20% or greater from baseline (therapeutic response). Secondary outcome included resolution time (defined as the elapsed time from start of treatment to therapeutic response), sinus rhythm conversion rate, and adverse events within the first 24 hours. RESULTS At 4 hours, therapeutic response rate was higher in low- and high-MgSO4 groups compared to placebo group; the absolute differences were, respectively, 20.5% (risk ratio [RR] = 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45-3.69) and +15.8% (RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.20-2.99). At 24 hours, compared to placebo group, therapeutic response difference was +14.1% (RR = 9.74, 95% CI = 2.87-17.05) with low-dose MgSO4 and +10.3% (RR = 3.22, 95% CI = 1.45-7.17) with high-dose MgSO4 . The lowest resolution time was observed in the low-dose MgSO4 group (5.2 ± 2 hours) compared to 6.1 ± 1.9 hours in the high-dose MgSO4 group and 8.4 ± 2.5 hours in the placebo group. Rhythm control rate at 24 hours was significantly higher in the low-dose MgSO4 group (22.9%) compared to the high-dose MgSO4 group (13.0%, p = 0.03) and the placebo group (10.7%). Adverse effects were minor and significantly more frequent with high-dose MgSO4 . CONCLUSIONS Intravenous MgSO4 appears to have a synergistic effect when combined with other AV nodal blockers resulting in improved rate control. Similar efficacy was observed with 4.5 and 9 g of MgSO4 but a dose of 9 g was associated with more side effects.
-
6.
Mexiletine Shortens the QT Interval in Patients With Potassium Channel-Mediated Type 2 Long QT Syndrome.
Bos, JM, Crotti, L, Rohatgi, RK, Castelletti, S, Dagradi, F, Schwartz, PJ, Ackerman, MJ
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2019;(5):e007280
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long QT syndrome is a potentially lethal yet highly treatable cardiac channelopathy. Although β-blocker therapy is standard for most patients, concomitant therapy with sodium channel blockers, like mexiletine, is often utilized for patients with sodium channel-mediated type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3). The potential role of sodium channel blockers in patients with potassium channel-mediated long QT syndrome (ie, LQT1 and LQT2) has not been investigated in detail. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review on 12 patients (5 females; median age at diagnosis 14.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 7.7-23; range, 0-59, median heart rate-corrected QT interval [QTc] at diagnosis 557 ms (IQR, 529-605) with genetically established LQT2 (10) or a combination of LQT1/LQT2 (1) or LQT2/LQT3 (1), who received mexiletine. Data were collected on symptomatic status, treatments, and breakthrough cardiac events after diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Additionally, 12-lead ECGs were collected at diagnosis, before initiation of mexiletine and following mexiletine to evaluate the drug's effect on QTc. RESULTS Before diagnosis, 6 patients were symptomatic and, before initiation of mexiletine, 4 patients experienced ≥1 breakthrough cardiac event on β-blocker. Median age at first mexiletine dose was 24.3 years (IQR, 14-32.4). After mexiletine, the median QTc decreased by 65±45 ms from 547 ms (IQR, 488-558) premexiletine to 470 ms (IQR, 409-529) postmexiletine ( P=0.0005) for all patients. In 8 patients (67%), the QTc decreased by ≥ 40 ms with a mean decrease in QTc of 91 ms ( P < 0.008). For the 11 patients maintained on mexiletine therapy, there have been no breakthrough cardiac events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Although commonly prescribed in patients with LQT3, mexiletine also shortens the QTc significantly in two-thirds of a small subset of patients with potassium channel-mediated LQT2. In patients with LQT2, pharmacological targeting of the physiological late sodium current may provide added therapeutic efficacy to β-blocker therapy.
-
7.
Management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency room and in the cardiology ward: the BLITZ AF study.
Gulizia, MM, Cemin, R, Colivicchi, F, De Luca, L, Di Lenarda, A, Boriani, G, Di Pasquale, G, Nardi, F, Scherillo, M, Lucci, D, et al
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2019;(2):230-238
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the number of admissions to the emergency room (ER) of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (af) and their subsequent management. To evaluate the clinical profile and the use of antithrombotics and antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with AF admitted to cardiology wards. METHODS AND RESULTS BLITZ-AF is a multicentre, observational study conducted in 154 centres on patients with AF/af. In each centre, data were collected, retrospectively for 4 weeks in ER and prospectively for 12 weeks in cardiology wards. In ER, there were 6275 admissions. Atrial fibrillation was the main diagnosis in 52.9% of the cases, af in 5.9%. Atrial fibrillation represented 1.0% of all ER admissions and 1.7% of all hospital admissions. A cardioversion has been performed in nearly 25% of the cases. Out of 4126 patients, 52.2% were admitted in cardiology ward; mean age was 74 ± 11 years, 41% were females. Patients with non-valvular AF were 3848 (93.3%); CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥2 in 87.4%. Cardioversion was attempted in 38.8% of the patients. In-hospital mortality was 1.2%. At discharge, 42.6% of the patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists, 39.5% with direct oral anticoagulants, 13.6% with other antithrombotic drugs, and 4.2% did not take any antithrombotic agent. Rate control strategy was pursued in 47.2%, rhythm control in 44.0%, 45.6% were discharged in sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION Atrial fibrillation still represents a significant burden on health care system. Oral anticoagulant use increased over time even if compliance with guidelines, with respect to prevention of the risk of stroke, remains suboptimal.
-
8.
Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction: A Clinical Update.
Elnaggar, MN, Jbeili, K, Nik-Hussin, N, Kozhippally, M, Pappachan, JM
Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2018;(6):333-341
Abstract
Amiodarone is one of the most commonly prescribed antiarrhythmic agents in clinical practice owing to its efficacy, even with high toxicity profile. The high iodine content and the prolonged biological half-life of the drug can result in thyroid dysfunction in a high proportion of patients treated with amiodarone even after cessation of amiodarone. Both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism are common side effects that mandate regular monitoring of patients with thyroid function tests. Amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism (AIH) is diagnosed and managed in the same way as a usual case of hypothyroidism. However, differential diagnosis and clinical management of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) subtypes can be challenging. With the aid of a case snippet, we update the current evidence for the diagnostic work up and management of patients with amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction in this article.
-
9.
Nicorandil improves clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris requiring PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials.
Li, Y, Liu, H, Peng, W, Song, Z
Expert review of clinical pharmacology. 2018;(9):855-865
Abstract
Clinical trials concerning the effects of nicorandil in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remain controversial. This study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of nicorandil following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Areas covered: A meta-analysis including eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with data on the nicorandil in stable CAD from Pubmed, EMBase, and Cochrane library (up to March 2018) was conducted. The primary end points were postprocedural incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The second end point was major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (MACCE). Fourteen RCTs with a total of 1947 elective CAD patients were selected. Nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of MI [n = 8; relative risk (RR) = 0.58; P = 0.001; I2 = 33.7%], and CIN (n = 5; RR = 0.36; P < 0.00001; I2 = 15.4%). However, There was no lowered risk of MACCE in nicorandil-treated patients [n = 10; odds RR = 0.75; P = 0.19; I2 = 0.0%]. Subsequent trial sequential analyses confirmed the effect of nicorandil on MI and CIN in PCI. Expert commentary: The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that nicorandil could improve clinical outcomes in terms of perioperative MI and CIN. However, the effect of nicorandil on the MACCE risk is not obvious. Future high-quality, large-scale clinical trials should majorly concern about the long-term clinical effect of nicorandil.
-
10.
A Focus on Pharmacological Management of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.
Claudio, B, Alice, M, Daniel, S
Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry. 2018;(6):476-482
Abstract
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a channelopathy characterized by adrenergic mediated ventricular arrhythmia. Untreated CPVT is a malignant syndrome with more than 50% of arrhythmic events and up to 25% of fatal or near-fatal cardiac events at 8 years follow-up. Prevention of sudden cardiac death starts with exclusion of competitive sports. Beta blockers (BB) are the cornerstone pharmacological therapy for the prevention of cardiac event in CPVT patients. Dose of BB should be highly tolerable, preferably nadolol. Efficiency of BB is undeniable but uncompleted. Therefore, on top of BB, one can propose the use of Calcium channel blockers or Class 1c antiarrythmic drugs. Indeed Flecainide allows reducing exercise- induced premature ventricular contraction and ventricular arrhythmia. Pharmacological management should be a stepwise approach with BB as the first line of choice. At each step of therapeutic changes, heart rhythm during exercise should be monitored by Holter monitoring and exercise testing. If the pharmacological management fails, left cardiac sympathetic denervation or implantation of cardioverter defibrillator should be considered.