-
1.
Somatostatin Analogs in Clinical Practice: a Review.
Gomes-Porras, M, Cárdenas-Salas, J, Álvarez-Escolá, C
International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;(5)
Abstract
Somatostatin analogs are an invaluable therapeutic option in the diagnosis and treatment of somatotropinomas, thyrotropinomas, and functioning and non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. They should also be considered an effective and safe therapeutic alternative to corticotropinomas, gonadotropinomas, and prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists. Somatostatin analogs have also shown to be useful in the treatment of other endocrine diseases (congenital hyperinsulinism, Graves' orbitopathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema), non-endocrine tumors (breast, colon, prostate, lung, and hepatocellular), and digestive diseases (chronic refractory diarrhea, hepatorenal polycystosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, dumping syndrome, and intestinal fistula).
-
2.
Lipid Status During Combined Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients.
Wolny-Rokicka, E, Tukiendorf, A, Wydmański, J, Ostrowska, M, Zembroń-Łacny, A
American journal of men's health. 2019;(5):1557988319876488
Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide a specific review of current medical literature regarding the lipid profile during prostate carcinoma (PCa) treatment. The main aim was to analyze the results presented by different authors and to find a commonality in the changes occurring during the treatment-hormonotherapy. The levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were measured before and after the follow-up treatment. The manuscripts reviewed came from the period between 2008 and 2016. The size of the studies ranged from 16 participants to 310. The mean age was from 65 to 74 years in all studies. The Q test was used to attain all lipid parameters and to specify heterogeneity (p < .0001). After 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the patients had a significantly higher level serum TC and TG.
-
3.
Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma - What to do when First-Line Therapy Fails?
Megerle, F, Kroiss, M, Hahner, S, Fassnacht, M
Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2019;(2-03):109-116
Abstract
Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare endocrine malignant disease with a generally unfavorable but heterogeneous prognosis. Although even in advanced stages a subset of patients experiences long-term disease stabilisation, effective systemic treatment options are limited. Mitotane is the only approved drug and the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (plus mitotane) is currently considered as treatment standard for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma based on the results of a large randomized phase III trial. However, progression-free survival is often limited and further treatment options are frequently needed. Here we summarize the current knowledge about second and third-line therapeutic modalities (local and systemic) in advanced disease. Following the recent ESE-ENSAT guidelines local therapies play an important role for these patients. Regarding systemic therapies the best data are available for gemcitabine+capecitabine or streptozotocin (both with or without mitotane). Furthermore, we introduce our own approach to patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma based on our experience as a large multidisciplinary clinic dedicated to the care of patients with this orphan disease.
-
4.
Tamoxifen Resistance: Emerging Molecular Targets.
Rondón-Lagos, M, Villegas, VE, Rangel, N, Sánchez, MC, Zaphiropoulos, PG
International journal of molecular sciences. 2016;(8)
Abstract
17β-Estradiol (E2) plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of breast cancer. As a result, blockade of the E2 signal through either tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors is an important therapeutic strategy to treat or prevent estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. However, resistance to TAM is the major obstacle in endocrine therapy. This resistance occurs either de novo or is acquired after an initial beneficial response. The underlying mechanisms for TAM resistance are probably multifactorial and remain largely unknown. Considering that breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease and patients respond differently to treatment, the molecular analysis of TAM's biological activity could provide the necessary framework to understand the complex effects of this drug in target cells. Moreover, this could explain, at least in part, the development of resistance and indicate an optimal therapeutic option. This review highlights the implications of TAM in breast cancer as well as the role of receptors/signal pathways recently suggested to be involved in the development of TAM resistance. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, Androgen Receptor and Hedgehog signaling pathways are emerging as novel therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators for breast cancer, based on their ability to mediate estrogenic signaling in ERα-positive or -negative breast cancer.
-
5.
Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.
Ghersi, D, Willson, ML, Chan, MM, Simes, J, Donoghue, E, Wilcken, N
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;(6):CD003366
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is generally accepted that taxanes are among the most active chemotherapy agents in the management of metastatic breast cancer. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to compare taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing a taxane in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS In this review update, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 14 February 2013 using keywords such as 'advanced breast cancer' and 'chemotherapy'. We searched reference lists of articles, contacted study authors, and did not apply any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens to regimens without taxanes in women with metastatic breast cancer. We included published and unpublished studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We derived hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival, time to progression, and time to treatment failure where possible, and used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis. We represented objective tumour response rates and toxicity as risk ratios (RRs). We extracted quality of life data where present. MAIN RESULTS This review included 28 studies. The updated analysis included 6871 randomised women, while the original review had 3643 women. Of the 28 included studies, we considered 19 studies to be at low risk of bias overall; however, some studies failed to report details on allocation concealment and methods of outcome assessment for those outcomes that are more likely to be influenced by a lack of blinding (for example tumour response rate). Studies varied in the taxane-containing chemotherapy backbone, and the comparator arms and were categorised into three groups: Regimen A plus taxane versus Regimen A (2 studies); Regimen A plus taxane versus Regimen B (14 studies); and single-agent taxane versus Regimen C (13 studies). Thirteen studies used paclitaxel, 14 studies used docetaxel, and 1 study allowed the investigator to decide on the type of taxane; the majority of studies delivered a taxane every 3 weeks. Twenty studies administered taxanes as first-line treatment, and 21 studies involved anthracycline naïve women in the metastatic setting. The combined HR for overall survival and time to progression favoured the taxane-containing regimens (HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.99, P = 0.002, deaths = 4477; and HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97, P = 0.002, estimated 5122 events, respectively) with moderate to substantial heterogeneity across trials. If the analyses were restricted to studies of first-line chemotherapy, this effect persisted for overall survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99, P = 0.03) but not for time to progression (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.02, P = 0.22). Tumour response rates appeared to be better with taxane-containing chemotherapy in assessable women (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.27, P < 0.00001) with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Taxanes were associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity (RR 4.84, 95% CI 3.18 to 7.35, P < 0.00001, 24 studies) and hair loss (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.87, P = 0.0006, 11 studies) but less nausea/vomiting compared to non-taxane-containing regimens (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83, P = 0.001, 26 studies). Leukopaenia and treatment-related death did not differ between the two groups (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.17, P = 0.16, 28 studies; and RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57, P = 0.99, 23 studies, respectively). For quality of life measures, none of the individual studies reported a difference in overall or any of quality of life subscales between taxane-containing and non-taxane chemotherapy regimens. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Taxane-containing regimens appear to improve overall survival, time to progression, and tumour response rate in women with metastatic breast cancer. Taxanes are also associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity but less nausea and vomiting compared to non-taxane-containing regimens. The considerable heterogeneity encountered across studies probably reflects the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in these studies and indicates that taxane-containing regimens are more effective than some, but not all, non-taxane-containing regimens.
-
6.
Management of endocrine manifestations and the use of mitotane as a chemotherapeutic agent for adrenocortical carcinoma.
Veytsman, I, Nieman, L, Fojo, T
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;(27):4619-29
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy in which patients have poor overall 5-year survival. Patients with ACC can present with symptoms of hormone excess, including Cushing's syndrome, virilization, feminization, or--less frequently--hypertension with hypokalemia. In many patients with ACC, advanced disease at presentation precludes surgery or is followed by local relapse or distant metastatic disease that cannot be managed surgically. In these instances, chemotherapy is often tried, but its limited efficacy all too often leaves the problem of persistent hormonal excess. Physicians who treat patients with ACC and severe hypercortisolism should recognize that uncontrolled hormone production is a malignant disease, which has severe consequences that require aggressive management. Because chemotherapy benefits only a small percentage of patients, steroidogenesis inhibitors, including mitotane, ketoconazole, metyrapone, and etomidate, should be used singly or in combination even as chemotherapy is administered. Diligent management with frequent adjustments is required, especially in patients with chemotherapy-refractory tumors that continue to grow. In the absence of randomized, controlled trials, adjuvant use of mitotane remains controversial, although the authors of a recent case-control study argue for its use. Despite difficulty administering effective doses, most clinicians agree that mitotane should be used if the tumor cannot be removed surgically or should be used as adjuvant therapy if there is a high likelihood of recurrence. The option of long-term monotherapy is restricted to patients who tolerate mitotane and either experience a clinical response or are at high risk for recurrence. Recommendations are provided to help manage patients with this difficult disease and to improve the quality of their lives.
-
7.
Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk.
Cummings, SR, Tice, JA, Bauer, S, Browner, WS, Cuzick, J, Ziv, E, Vogel, V, Shepherd, J, Vachon, C, Smith-Bindman, R, et al
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2009;(6):384-98
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether evidence supports routinely estimating a postmenopausal woman's risk of breast cancer and intervening to reduce risk. METHODS We systematically reviewed prospective studies about models and sex hormone levels to assess breast cancer risk and used meta-analysis with random effects models to summarize the predictive accuracy of breast density. We also reviewed prospective studies of the effects of exercise, weight management, healthy diet, moderate alcohol consumption, and fruit and vegetable intake on breast cancer risk, and used random effects models for a meta-analyses of tamoxifen and raloxifene for primary prevention of breast cancer. All studies reviewed were published before June 2008, and all statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Risk models that are based on demographic characteristics and medical history had modest discriminatory accuracy for estimating breast cancer risk (c-statistics range = 0.58-0.63). Breast density was strongly associated with breast cancer (relative risk [RR] = 4.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.10 to 5.26, for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category IV vs category I; RR = 4.20, 95% CI = 3.61 to 4.89, for >75% vs <5% of dense area), and adding breast density to models improved discriminatory accuracy (c-statistics range = 0.63-0.66). Estradiol was also associated with breast cancer (RR range = 2.0-2.9, comparing the highest vs lowest quintile of estradiol, P < .01). Most studies found that exercise, weight reduction, low-fat diet, and reduced alcohol intake were associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. Tamoxifen and raloxifene reduced the risk of estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer and invasive breast cancer overall. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from this study supports screening for breast cancer risk in all postmenopausal women by use of risk factors and breast density and considering chemoprevention for those found to be at high risk. Several lifestyle changes with the potential to prevent breast cancer should be recommended regardless of risk.
-
8.
Biological roles of estrogen and progesterone in human endometrial carcinoma--new developments in potential endocrine therapy for endometrial cancer.
Ito, K, Utsunomiya, H, Yaegashi, N, Sasano, H
Endocrine journal. 2007;(5):667-79
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most common female pelvic malignancies. It is well known that uterine endometrial cell proliferation is under the control of both estrogen and progesterone. In this review, results of the recent studies on the biosynthesis and action of estrogen and progestin in normal endometrium and its disorders will be summarized and the new aspects of hormonal therapies in the patients with endometrial carcinoma will be discussed including its future prospectives. We reported that the enzymes responsible for intratumoral estrogen metabolism and biosynthesis are markedly different between human breast and endometrial carcinoma, although both of them are considered "estrogen-dependent malignancies". In addition, the biological significance of Progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms is considered to differ between endometrial and breast carcinomas. Clinical data concerning Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and estrogen-dependent cancer risk also support these findings. These basic and clinical findings help to understand the biology and provide the new knowledge for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of human endomerial carcinoma. Specific endocrine treatment of endometrial carcinoma should be explored in future, although aromatase inhibitors are the most effective endocrine treatments of estrogen-responsive breast carcinoma. Retinoid, metabolities of vitamin A, and synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligands, which have been used for the treatment of insulin resistance in type II diabetes mellitus, may be the important candidates as drugs not only for prevention but also for possible endocrine treatment of endometrial carcinoma.
-
9.
[Current status of breast cancer chemoprevention].
Oliveira, VM, Aldrighi, JM, Rinaldi, JF
Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2006;(6):453-9
Abstract
Chemoprevention is defined as the use of natural or synthetic chemical agents to reverse, suppress or prevent carcinogenic progression of invasive cancer. Drugs that act as chemoprevention agents for breast cancer are divided into two major groups: drugs that prevent Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers [selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM), aromatase inhibitors GnKH agonists and phytoestrogens] and drugs that prevent ER-negative breast cancers [cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, retinoids, statins, receptor tyrosine, kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibody against HER-2 and telomerase inhibitors]. Results from the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR), which compared the risk-reducing efficacy as well as toxicity of these two SERMs in a similar high-risk for breast cancer population, showed that Raloxifene is as effective as Tamoxifen in reducing the risk of non-invasive breast cancer (p=.83). It has a statistically significant lower risk of thromboembolic events and cataracts, however a non- statistically significant higher risk of noninvasive breast cancer. Based on promising data involving reduction of contralateral breast cancer risk in adjuvant studies, several aromatase inhibitors, including letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane, are being included in trials to evaluate their efficacy in breast cancer prevention in both case-control and cohort studies As such randomized studies to confirm this efficacy are needed. Positive results of several recent clinical trials for preventing breast cancer in high-risk populations suggest that chemoprevention is a rational and attractive strategy.
-
10.
Role of 131I in the treatment of well differentiated thyroid cancer.
Woodrum, DT, Gauger, PG
Journal of surgical oncology. 2005;(3):114-21
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
(131)I is an integral component in postsurgical management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC), which includes papillary and follicular types. (131)I is used postsurgically to either destroy remaining thyroid tissue (thyroid ablation) or to treat recurrence and metastases (radioiodine therapy). (131)I is no longer a routine diagnostic modality, but it is widely used for remnant ablation after thyroidectomy for WDTC > 1 cm, under conditions of thyroxine withdrawal. It is generally-though not unanimously-accepted that postsurgical radioiodine is the most powerful method by which to lengthen disease-free survival. (131)I cannot be used if the residual thyroid remnant is large; many surgeons therefore perform near-total or total thyroidectomy for all WDTC > 1 cm. Since 1997, radioiodine treatment has been performed in outpatient settings, where side effects are common, but mild and transient. Secondary screening is by physical exam, thyroglobulin measurements, and (131)I diagnostic whole-body scans. This is performed under conditions of thyrotropin stimulation, which is accomplished either by thyroxine withdrawal or administration of recombinant human thyrotropin. While most cancers are well treated with radioiodine, some advanced cancers may no longer take up radioiodine, rendering them resistant to treatment. For these cancers, redifferentiation therapy and molecular target-specific medicines hold future promise for improved treatment.