-
1.
The effects of bariatric surgery on psychological aspects of eating behaviour and food intake in humans.
Bryant, EJ, Malik, MS, Whitford-Bartle, T, Waters, GM
Appetite. 2020;:104575
Abstract
Bariatric surgery has emerged as an increasingly popular weight loss intervention, with larger and more endurable weight loss compared to pharmacological and behavioural interventions. The degree of weight loss patients experience varies, between individuals, surgeries and over time. An explanation as to why differing weight loss trajectories exist post-surgery could be due to the complex interplay of individual differences in relation to eating behaviours and appetite. Thus the aim of this narrative review is to explore literature between 2008 and 2018, to assess the impact of impact of bariatric surgery on food selection and nutrient status, on eating behaviour traits and on disturbed and disordered eating behaviour, to determine their impact of weight loss success and weight loss trajectories. Immediately post-surgery, up until 1-2 years post-surgery, there is a reliance upon the surgery's alteration of the gastrointestinal tract to control food intake and subsequently lose weight. Energy intake is reduced, dietary adherence is higher, supplement intake is higher, appetite ratings are lower, there is a reduction in psychopathology, and an increase in wellbeing. After this point, patients become more susceptible to weight regain, as this is the point where passive observation of the weight reducing action of surgery, moves into more cognitive effort, on the part of the individual, to control energy intake. There are various factors which influence an individual's ability to successfully regulate their energy intake post-surgery, such as their level of Disinhibition, Restraint, Hunger, Emotional Eating, Uncontrolled Eating, psychopathology and wellbeing. The need for continued psychological and nutritional support post-surgery is necessary to reduce weight regain susceptibility.
-
2.
Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease or Kidney Transplant.
Guggino, J, Coumes, S, Wion, N, Reche, F, Arvieux, C, Borel, AL
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;(12):2290-2304
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate (1) the effectiveness, complications, and postoperative access to transplantation in end-stage chronic kidney disease (ECKD) and (2) the effectiveness and complications of bariatric surgery in patients who had already undergone kidney transplant. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality and complications rates were performed. Thirty studies were reviewed. RESULTS After bariatric surgery, patients with ECKD had similar postoperative weight loss to patients from the general population. Meta-analysis showed post-bariatric surgery rates of 2% (95% CI: 0%-3%) for mortality and 7% (95% CI: 2%-14%) for complications. Approximately one-fifth of the patients had access to a transplant. This rate may be underestimated because of the short duration of follow-up. The lack of control groups did not allow for a conclusion on the role of bariatric surgery in facilitating access to kidney transplantation. In patients who had received a kidney transplant, bariatric surgery seemed to improve renal function but increased graft-rejection risk, possibly because of changes in the bioavailability of immunosuppressant drugs. CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery yields significant weight loss in patients with ECKD that improves patients' chances of accessing a transplant but does not guarantee it; however, the risk for complications and death is higher than in other patients. After transplantation, bariatric surgery-induced weight loss appeared to positively impact the function of the grafted kidney, but careful monitoring of immunosuppressant medications is required.
-
3.
Comparative risk of fracture for bariatric procedures in patients with obesity: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Dong, J, Zhou, D, Liu, F
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2020;:13-23
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bariatric surgery (malabsorptive [i.e., biliopancreatic diversion, BPD], restrictive [i.e., sleeve gastrectomy, SG; adjustable gastric banding, AGB] and mixed [i.e., gastric bypass, GB] procedures) has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of fracture; however, which procedure poses the greatest risk of fracture is still controversial. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to investigate the degree of fracture risk after different bariatric procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic databases, including Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were systematically searched from inception to July 11, 2019 with no language restrictions to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies evaluating the impact of any kind of bariatric surgery on postoperative fractures in patients with obesity. Pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to pool the outcome estimates of interest, including fracture incidence and fracture risk. The values of the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probability for fracture risk were calculated and sorted according to the different surgical procedures. RESULTS A total of twelve studies published between 2010 and 2019, comprising 159,916 participants with obesity were identified for the analysis. The incidence of fracture increased from 3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-4%) in patients with non-surgical intervention (drug treatment, alteration in life style and diet control) to 5% (95% CI 4-7%) in those who had undergone bariatric surgery (pooled relative risk [RR] = 1.41 95% CI: 1.22-1.63). Network meta-analysis revealed that based on the SUCRA ranking of the different surgical procedures, the malabsorptive procedure had the highest possibility of increased fracture risk in patients with obesity (74.75%), followed by the mixed procedures (73.85%), nonsurgical intervention (43.55%) and the restrictive procedure (7.85%); for different surgery types. The BPD group had the highest possibility of increased fracture risk (99.49%), followed by the GB (74.92%), nonsurgical intervention (44.49%), AGB (26.64%) and SG (4.45%) groups. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences exist among different bariatric surgeries impacting on fracture risk. The malabsorptive and mixed procedures, but not the restrictive procedure, increase the postoperative risk of fracture. Considering the weight-reduction effects and fracture risk, the sleeve gastrectomy procedure may be the best choice for patients with obesity, especially those who are susceptible to osteoporosis.
-
4.
Dietary Recommendations for Bariatric Patients to Prevent Kidney Stone Formation.
Ormanji, MS, Rodrigues, FG, Heilberg, IP
Nutrients. 2020;(5)
Abstract
Bariatric surgery (BS) is one of the most common and efficient surgical procedures for sustained weight loss but is associated with long-term complications such as nutritional deficiencies, biliary lithiasis, disturbances in bone and mineral metabolism and an increased risk of nephrolithiasis, attributed to urinary metabolic changes resultant from low urinary volume, hypocitraturia and hyperoxaluria. The underlying mechanisms responsible for hyperoxaluria, the most common among all metabolic disturbances, may comprise increased intestinal oxalate absorption consequent to decreased calcium intake or increased dietary oxalate, changes in the gut microbiota, fat malabsorption and altered intestinal oxalate transport. In the current review, the authors present a mechanistic overview of changes found after BS and propose dietary recommendations to prevent the risk of urinary stone formation, focusing on the role of dietary oxalate, calcium, citrate, potassium, protein, fat, sodium, probiotics, vitamins D, C, B6 and the consumption of fluids.
-
5.
Are there really any predictive factors for a successful weight loss after bariatric surgery?
Cadena-Obando, D, Ramírez-Rentería, C, Ferreira-Hermosillo, A, Albarrán-Sanchez, A, Sosa-Eroza, E, Molina-Ayala, M, Espinosa-Cárdenas, E
BMC endocrine disorders. 2020;(1):20
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity and its metabolic complications; however, 15-35% of the patients that undergo bariatric surgery do not reach their goal for weight loss. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients that didn't reach the goal of an excess weight loss of 50% or more during the first 12 months and determine the factors associated to this failure. METHODS We obtained the demographic, anthropometric and biochemical information from 130 patients with severe obesity who underwent bariatric surgery in our institution between 2012 and 2017. We used self-reports of physical activity, caloric intake and diet composition. An unsuccessful weight loss was considered when the patient lost < 50% or more of the excess weight 12 months after surgery. We compared the characteristics between the successful and unsuccessful groups in order to find the factors associated with success. RESULTS We included 130 patients (mean age 48 ± 9 years, 81.5% were women). One year after surgery, 26 (20%) had loss < 50% EBW. Unsuccessful surgery was associated with an older age, previous history of hypertension, abdominal surgery or depression/anxiety, also the number of comorbidities and unemployment affected the results. These patients loss enough weight to improve some of their comorbidities, but they are more prone to regain weight 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS A fifth of the patients undergoing bariatric surgery may not lose enough weight to be considered successful by current standards. Some patients may benefit from the surgery in the short term, but they are more likely to regain weight after 2 years. The factors influencing this result are still controversial but may be population-specific. Early detection of the patients that are more likely to fail is imperative to establish additional therapeutic strategies, without denying them the opportunity of surgery or waiting for weight re-gain to occur.
-
6.
Preoperative and post-operative psychosocial interventions for bariatric surgery patients: A systematic review.
David, LA, Sijercic, I, Cassin, SE
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2020;(4):e12926
Abstract
Psychosocial interventions are increasingly being utilized to help patients prepare for, and adjust to changes following, bariatric surgery in order to optimize psychosocial adjustment and weight loss. The current systematic review examined the impact of preoperative and post-operative psychosocial interventions with a behavioural and/or cognitive focus on weight, dietary behaviours, eating pathology, lifestyle behaviours, and psychological functioning. A PsycINFO and Medline search of publications was conducted in March 2019. Two authors assessed retrieved titles and abstracts to determine topic relevance and rated the quality of included studies using a validated checklist. Forty-four articles (representing 36 studies) met the study inclusion criteria. The current evidence is strongest for the impact of psychosocial interventions, particularly cognitive behavioural therapy, on eating behaviours (eg, binge eating and emotional eating) and psychological functioning (eg, quality of life, depression, and anxiety). The evidence for the impact of psychosocial interventions on weight loss, dietary behaviours (eg, dietary intake), and lifestyle behaviours (eg, physical activity) is relatively weak and mixed. Psychosocial interventions can improve eating pathology and psychosocial functioning among bariatric patients, and the optimal time to initiate treatment appears to be early in the post-operative period before significant problematic eating behaviours and weight regain occur.
-
7.
The use of Ursolit for gallstone prophylaxis following bariatric surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.
Sakran, N, Dar, R, Assalia, A, Neeman, Z, Farraj, M, Sherf-Dagan, S, Gralnek, IM, Hazzan, R, Mokary, SE, Nevo-Aboody, H, et al
Updates in surgery. 2020;(4):1125-1133
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although bariatric surgery (BS) predisposes patients to development of gallstone formation, a preventive strategy is still in debate. AIM: To compare the incidence of gallstone formation between patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) vs. placebo for a duration of 6 months following BS. METHODS This multicenter randomized, double-blind controlled trial entails treatment with UDCA vs. an identical-looking placebo. The primary outcome was gallstone formation, as measured by abdominal ultrasound. RESULTS The data of 209 subjects were enrolled in the study, and 92 subjects completed the study and were analyzed (n = 46 for each study group). The high dropout rate was mainly due to difficulties in adding more medications and swallowing the pill. Among the subjects who completed the study, 77.2% were women, and their mean age and pre-surgery BMI were 42.2 ± 10.2 years and 44.4 ± 6.1 kg/m2, respectively. Gallstone formation was recorded in 45.7% (n = 21) vs. 23.9% (n = 11) of subjects among placebo vs. UDCA groups, respectively, p = 0.029. Subgroup-analysis, according to surgery type, found that the results were significant only for SG subjects (p = 0.041), although the same trend was observed for OAGB/RYGB. Excess Weight Loss percent (%EWL) at 6 months post-surgery was 66.0 ± 17.1% vs. 71.8 ± 19.5% for the placebo and UDCA groups, respectively; p = 0.136. A trend towards a reduction in prescribed comorbidity medications was noted within-groups during the follow-up period, as compared to baseline, with no between-group differences (p ≥ 0.246). Moreover, no between-group differences were found for blood test results (p ≥ 0.063 for all). CONCLUSION Administration of UDCA significantly decreased gallstone formation at 6 months at following BS. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER NCT02319629.
-
8.
Immunometabolism, Micronutrients, and Bariatric Surgery: The Use of Transcriptomics and Microbiota-Targeted Therapies.
Galyean, S, Sawant, D, Shin, AC
Mediators of inflammation. 2020;:8862034
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with the gut microbiota and decreased micronutrient status. Bariatric surgery is a recommended therapy for obesity. It can positively affect the composition of the gut bacteria but also disrupt absorption of nutrients. Low levels of micronutrients can affect metabolic processes, like glycolysis, TCA cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation, that are associated with the immune system also known as immunometabolism. METHODS MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Google Scholar were searched. Articles involving gut microbiome, micronutrient deficiency, gut-targeted therapies, transcriptome analysis, micronutrient supplementation, and bariatric surgery were included. RESULTS Studies show that micronutrients play a pivotal role in the intestinal immune system and regulating immunometabolism. Research demonstrates that gut-targeting therapies may improve the microbiome health for bariatric surgery populations. There is limited research that examines the role of micronutrients in modulating the gut microbiota among the bariatric surgery population. CONCLUSIONS Investigations are needed to understand the influence that micronutrient deficiencies have on the gut, particularly immunometabolism. Nutritional transcriptomics shows great potential in providing this type of analysis to develop gut-modulating therapies as well as more personalized nutrition recommendations for bariatric surgery patients.
-
9.
Rethinking Patient and Medical Professional Perspectives on Bariatric Surgery as a Medically Necessary Treatment.
Ames, GE, Maynard, JR, Collazo-Clavell, ML, Clark, MM, Grothe, KB, Elli, EF
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2020;(3):527-540
Abstract
The prevalence of class 3 obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) is 7.7% of the United States adult population; thus, more than 25 million people may be medically appropriate for consideration of bariatric surgery as therapy for severe obesity. Although bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for patients with severe obesity, the surgery is performed in less than 1% of patients annually for whom it may be appropriate. Patients' and medical professionals' misperceptions about obesity and bariatric surgery create barriers to accessing bariatric surgery that are not given adequate attention and clinical consideration. Commonly cited patient barriers are lack of knowledge about the severity of obesity, the perception that obesity is a lifestyle problem rather than a chronic disease, and fear that bariatric surgery is dangerous. Medical professional barriers include failing to recognize causes of obesity and weight gain, providing recommendations that are inconsistent with current obesity treatment guidelines, and being uncomfortable counseling patients about treatment options for severe obesity. Previous research has revealed that medical professional counseling and accurate perception of the health risks associated with severe obesity are strong predictors of patients' willingness to consider bariatric surgery. This article reviews patient and medical professional barriers to acceptance of bariatric surgery as a treatment of medical necessity and offers practical advice for medical professionals to rethink perspectives about bariatric surgery when it is medically and psychologically appropriate.
-
10.
The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach.
Mahawar, KK, Himpens, JM, Shikora, SA, Ramos, AC, Torres, A, Somers, S, Dillemans, B, Angrisani, L, Greve, JWM, Chevallier, JM, et al
Surgical endoscopy. 2020;(4):1648-1657
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) constitutes a possible solution for patients who experience an inadequate response following bariatric surgery or significant weight regain following an initial satisfactory response. This paper reports results from the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise on RBS. METHODS We created a committee of 22 recognised opinion-makers with a special interest in RBS. The committee invited 70 RBS experts from 27 countries to vote on 39 statements concerning RBS. An agreement amongst ≥ 70.0% experts was regarded as a consensus. RESULTS Seventy experts from twenty-seven countries took part. There was a consensus that the decision for RBS should be individualised (100.0%) and multi-disciplinary (92.8%). Experts recommended a preoperative nutritional (95.7%) and psychological evaluation (85.7%), endoscopy (97.1%), and a contrast series (94.3%). Experts agreed that Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (94.3%), One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (82.8%), and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) (71.4%) were acceptable RBS options after gastric banding (84.3%). OAGB (84.3%), bilio-pancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS) (81.4%), and SADI-S (88.5%) were agreed as consensus RBS options after sleeve gastrectomy. lengthening of bilio-pancreatic limb was the only consensus RBS option after RYGB (94.3%) and OAGB (72.8%). CONCLUSION Experts achieved consensus on a number of aspects of RBS. Though expert opinion can only be regarded as low-quality evidence, the findings of this exercise should help improve the outcomes of RBS while we develop robust evidence to inform future practice.