-
1.
Psychological effects of dopamine agonist treatment in patients with hyperprolactinemia and prolactin-secreting adenomas.
Ioachimescu, AG, Fleseriu, M, Hoffman, AR, Vaughan Iii, TB, Katznelson, L
European journal of endocrinology. 2019;(1):31-40
Abstract
Background Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the main treatment for patients with hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. Recently, an increasing number of reports emphasized DAs' psychological side effects, either de novo or as exacerbations of prior psychiatric disease. Methods Review of prospective and retrospective studies (PubMed 1976, September 2018) evaluating the psychological profile of DA-treated patients with hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. Case series and case reports of psychiatric complications were also reviewed. Results Most studies were cross-sectional and had a control group of healthy volunteers or patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. There were few prospective studies, with/without control group, that included small numbers of patients. Compared with controls, patients with hyperprolactinemia generally had worse quality of life, anxiety, depression and certain personality traits. Patients receiving DAs had higher impulsivity scores than normoprolactinemic controls. Impulse control disorders (ICDs) were reported in both genders, with hypersexuality mostly in men. Multiple ICDs were sometimes reported in the same patient, usually reversible after DA discontinuation. In case reports, DA therapy was temporally associated with severe depression, manic episodes or psychosis, which improved after discontinuation and administration of psychiatric medications. Gender type of DA, dose and duration of therapy did not correlate with occurrence of psychiatric pathology. Conclusion Patients with hyperprolactinemia receiving DAs may develop changes in mood and behavior regardless of prior psychiatric history. Increased awareness for ICDs, depression, mania and other types of psychosis is needed by all physicians who prescribe DAs. Larger prospective controlled clinical studies are needed to delineate prevalence, risk stratification and management.
-
2.
Obesity in Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders.
Chao, AM, Wadden, TA, Berkowitz, RI
Current psychiatry reports. 2019;(1):3
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review synthesized recent research related to obesity in adolescents with psychiatric disorders, with a focus on epidemiology, mechanisms, and weight management approaches. The paper reviews literature on depressive and anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders. RECENT FINDINGS Depression has a bidirectional relationship with obesity. Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and their treatments, increase the risk of developing obesity. Mechanisms underlying this weight gain include lifestyle and environmental factors and psychiatric medications, though emerging evidence has also suggested the role of genetic and neuroendocrine processes. Evidence about the most effective treatments for obesity in adolescents with psychiatric disorders remains limited. Adolescents with psychiatric disorders are at high risk for obesity. Close monitoring for increases in weight and cardiometabolic risk factors with use of antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications is recommended. Clinical trials are needed that test the efficacy of weight management strategies for this population.
-
3.
Beyond evidence-based treatment of bipolar disorder: Rational pragmatic approaches to management.
Post, RM, Yatham, LN, Vieta, E, Berk, M, Nierenberg, AA
Bipolar disorders. 2019;(7):650-659
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The evidence for efficacy of many currently available treatments for bipolar disorder is based on studies of nonrefractory patients with bipolar disorder. Therefore, not surprisingly, most treatment recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder and its many comorbidities depend heavily on data from placebo controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but these RCTs provide little direction for the clinician as to what next steps might be optimal in non- or partial-responders and in those with ongoing medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Given this and the paucity of RCTs at later treatment junctures, we thought it appropriate to begin a discussion of the quality of the data that some experts in the field might consider using in choosing and sequencing drugs and their combination. We acknowledge that many other clinical investigators may prefer very different sequences, but thought the suggestions offered here might be useful to some clinicians in the field, might start discussions of other options in the literature, and, at the same time, provide a preliminary outline for a new round of much-needed clinical trials to better inform clinical practice. Given the very wide range of the quality of the data and clinical principles on which the current suggestions are based, only minimal references are included and a comprehensive review of the literature supporting each option would be outside the scope of this manuscript.
-
4.
Predictors of Response to Ketamine in Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder.
Rong, C, Park, C, Rosenblat, JD, Subramaniapillai, M, Zuckerman, H, Fus, D, Lee, YL, Pan, Z, Brietzke, E, Mansur, RB, et al
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;(4)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Extant evidence indicates that ketamine exerts rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depressive (TRD) symptoms as a part of major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). The identification of depressed sub-populations that are more likely to benefit from ketamine treatment remains a priority. In keeping with this view, the present narrative review aims to identify the pretreatment predictors of response to ketamine in TRD as part of MDD and BD. METHOD Electronic search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles from inception to January 2018. The search term ketamine was cross-referenced with the terms depression, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, predictors, and response and/or remission. RESULTS Multiple baseline pretreatment predictors of response were identified, including clinical (i.e., Body Mass Index (BMI), history of suicide, family history of alcohol use disorder), peripheral biochemistry (i.e., adiponectin levels, vitamin B12 levels), polysomnography (abnormalities in delta sleep ratio), neurochemistry (i.e., glutamine/glutamate ratio), neuroimaging (i.e., anterior cingulate cortex activity), genetic variation (i.e., Val66Met BDNF allele), and cognitive functioning (i.e., processing speed). High BMI and a positive family history of alcohol use disorder were the most replicated predictors. CONCLUSIONS A pheno-biotype of depression more, or less likely, to benefit with ketamine treatment is far from complete. Notwithstanding, metabolic-inflammatory alterations are emerging as possible pretreatment response predictors of depressive symptom improvement, most notably being cognitive impairment. Sophisticated data-driven computational methods that are iterative and agnostic are more likely to provide actionable baseline pretreatment predictive information.
-
5.
Glutamatergic Modulators in Depression.
Henter, ID, de Sousa, RT, Zarate, CA
Harvard review of psychiatry. 2018;(6):307-319
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to evaluate the evidence supporting the antidepressant effects of glutamatergic modulators.Both preclinical and clinical studies have implicated glutamatergic system dysfunction in the pathophysiology of mood disorders such as bipolar depression and major depressive disorder. In particular, rapid reductions in depressive symptoms have been noted in response to subanesthetic doses of the glutamatergic modulator ketamine in subjects with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression. These results have prompted the repurposing or development of other glutamatergic modulators, both as monotherapy or adjunctive to other therapies. Here, we highlight the evidence supporting the antidepressant effects of various glutamatergic modulators, including (1) broad glutamatergic modulators (ketamine, esketamine, dextromethorphan, dextromethorphan-quinidine [Nuedexta], AVP-786, nitrous oxide [N2O], AZD6765), (2) subunit (NR2B)-specific N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (CP-101,606/traxoprodil, MK-0657 [CERC-301]), (3) glycine-site partial agonists (D-cycloserine, GLYX-13, sarcosine, AV-101), and (4) metabotropic glutamate receptor modulators (AZD2066, RO4917523/basimglurant, JNJ40411813/ADX71149, R04995819 [RG1578]).
-
6.
The risks associated with the use of lamotrigine during pregnancy.
Kong, L, Zhou, T, Wang, B, Gao, Z, Wang, C
International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice. 2018;(1):2-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper reviewed the relevant literature on the effects of lamotrigine on pregnancy outcomes to provide useful information regarding lamotrigine use in pregnant women with bipolar disorder. METHODS A systematic search of electronic databases and other original sources was conducted that examined the effects of lamotrigine on pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS It is not clear that foetuses of lamotrigine-exposed pregnant women are at higher risk of malformation or neurodevelopmental delay. When treating pregnant women with bipolar disorder, the risks associated with lamotrigine use have to be balanced with the risks of uncontrolled maternal symptoms. The information obtained from our review of psychotropic medications will assist clinicians in managing pregnant women with bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS Although lamotrigine has emerged as the safest mood stabiliser for use during pregnancy based on the clinical evidence thus far, further studies are needed to inform the best clinical practice when treating bipolar disorder in pregnant women.
-
7.
Mood stabilizers in pregnancy and child developmental outcomes: A systematic review.
Haskey, C, Galbally, M
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 2017;(11):1087-1097
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research suggests that maintaining treatment during pregnancy for women with bipolar affective disorder reduces the risk of relapse. However, one of the key questions for women and clinicians during pregnancy is whether there are implications of exposure to mood stabilizers for longer term child development. Despite these concerns, there are few recent systematic reviews comparing the impact on child developmental outcomes for individual mood-stabilizing agents to inform clinical decisions. OBJECTIVES To examine the strengths and limitations of the existing data on child developmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to mood stabilizers and to explore whether there are any differences between agents for detrimental effects on child development. METHOD Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a rigorous systematic search was carried out of four electronic databases from their respective years of inception to September 2016 to identify studies which examined the effects of mood stabilizers including sodium valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium and second-generation antipsychotics on child developmental outcomes. RESULTS We identified 15 studies for critical review. Of these, 10 examined antiepileptic drugs, 2 studied lithium and 3 studied second-generation antipsychotics. The most consistent finding was a dose-response relationship for valproate with higher doses associated with poorer global cognitive abilities compared to other antiepileptic drugs. The limited data available for lithium found no adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. The limited second-generation antipsychotic studies included a report of a transient early neurodevelopmental delay which resolved by 12 months of age. CONCLUSION This review found higher neurodevelopmental risk with valproate. While the existing data on lithium and second-generation antipsychotics are reassuring, these data are both limited and lower quality, indicating that further research is required. The information from this review is relevant for patients and clinicians to influence choice of mood-stabilizing agent in childbearing women. This must be balanced against the known risks associated with untreated bipolar affective disorder.
-
8.
Medical comorbidity in bipolar disorder: The link with metabolic-inflammatory systems.
SayuriYamagata, A, Brietzke, E, Rosenblat, JD, Kakar, R, McIntyre, RS
Journal of affective disorders. 2017;:99-106
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, several medical comorbidities and a decreased life expectancy. Metabolic-inflammatory changes have been postulated as one of the main links between BD and medical comorbidity, although there are few studies exploring possible mechanisms underlying this relationship. Therefore, the aims of the current narrative review were 1) synthesize the evidence for metabolic-inflammatory changes that may facilitate the link between medical comorbidity and BD and 2) discuss therapeutic and preventive implications of these pathways. METHODS The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant studies. RESULTS Identified studies suggested that there is an increased risk of medical comorbidities, such as autoimmune disorders, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in patients with BD. The association between BD and general medical comorbidities seems to be bidirectional and potentially mediated by immune dysfunction. Targeting the metabolic-inflammatory-mood pathway may potential yield improved outcomes in BD; however, further study is needed to determine which specific interventions may be beneficial. LIMITATIONS The majority of identified studies had cross-sectional designs, small sample sizes and limited measurements of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS Treatment and prevention of general medical comorbidities in mood disorders should include preferential prescribing of metabolically neutral agents and adjunctive lifestyle modifications including increased physical activity, improved diet and decreased substance abuse. In addition, the use of anti-inflammatory agents could be a relevant therapeutic target in future research.
-
9.
Lithium Poisoning.
Baird-Gunning, J, Lea-Henry, T, Hoegberg, LCG, Gosselin, S, Roberts, DM
Journal of intensive care medicine. 2017;(4):249-263
Abstract
Lithium is a commonly prescribed treatment for bipolar affective disorder. However, treatment is complicated by lithium's narrow therapeutic index and the influence of kidney function, both of which increase the risk of toxicity. Therefore, careful attention to dosing, monitoring, and titration is required. The cause of lithium poisoning influences treatment and 3 patterns are described: acute, acute-on-chronic, and chronic. Chronic poisoning is the most common etiology, is usually unintentional, and results from lithium intake exceeding elimination. This is most commonly due to impaired kidney function caused by volume depletion from lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus or intercurrent illnesses and is also drug-induced. Lithium poisoning can affect multiple organs; however, the primary site of toxicity is the central nervous system and clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic supratherapeutic drug concentrations to clinical toxicity such as confusion, ataxia, or seizures. Lithium poisoning has a low mortality rate; however, chronic lithium poisoning can require a prolonged hospital length of stay from impaired mobility and cognition and associated nosocomial complications. Persistent neurological deficits, in particular cerebellar, are described and the incidence and risk factors for its development are poorly understood, but it appears to be uncommon in uncomplicated acute poisoning. Lithium is readily dialyzable, and rationale support extracorporeal treatments to reduce the risk or the duration of toxicity in high-risk exposures. There is disagreement in the literature regarding factors that define patients most likely to benefit from treatments that enhance lithium elimination, including specific plasma lithium concentration thresholds. In the case of extracorporeal treatments, there are observational data in its favor, without evidence from randomized controlled trials (none have been performed), which may lead to conservative practices and potentially unnecessary interventions in some circumstances. More data are required to define the risk-benefit of extracorporeal treatments and their use (modality, duration) in the management of lithium poisoning.
-
10.
Does stress play a significant role in bipolar disorder? A meta-analysis.
Lex, C, Bäzner, E, Meyer, TD
Journal of affective disorders. 2017;:298-308
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that stressful life events (LE) play a crucial role in the etiology of bipolar affective disorder (BD). However, primary studies, as well as narrative reviews, have provided mixed results. The present meta-analysis combined and analyzed previous data in order to address these inconsistencies. METHOD Forty-two studies published in 53 records were identified by systematically searching MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PSYCHINDEX using the terms "bipolar disorder" OR "manic-depressive" OR "bipolar affective disorder" OR "mania" AND "stress" OR "life event" OR "daily hassles" OR "goal attainment". Then, meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS Individuals diagnosed with BD reported more LE before relapse when compared to euthymic phases. They also experienced more LE relative to healthy individuals and to physically ill patients. No significant difference in the number of LE was found when BD was compared to unipolar depression and schizophrenia. LIMITATIONS When interpreting the present meta-analytic findings one should keep in mind that most included studies were retrospective and often did not specify relevant information, e.g., if the LE were chronic or acute or if the individuals were diagnosed with BD I or II. We could not entirely rule out a publication bias. CONCLUSION The present meta-analyses found that individuals with BD were sensitive to LE, which corroborates recent theoretical models and psychosocial treatment approaches of BD. Childbirth, as a specific LE, affected individuals with BD more than individuals with unipolar depression. Future studies that investigate specific LE are warranted.