-
1.
The effect of grape (Vitis vinifera) seed extract supplementation on flow-mediated dilation, blood pressure, and heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with duration- and dose-response analysis.
Foshati, S, Nouripour, F, Sadeghi, E, Amani, R
Pharmacological research. 2022;:105905
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials was to assess the long-term effect of grape seed extract (GSE) supplementation on flow-mediated dilation (FMD), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) in adults. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched up to May 24, 2021. Nineteen trials were included in this study. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. GSE supplementation significantly reduced DBP (WMD: -2.20 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.79 to -0.60, I2 = 88.8%) and HR (WMD: -1.25 bpm, 95% CI: -2.32 to -0.19, I2 = 59.5%) but had no significant effects on FMD (WMD: 1.02%, 95% CI: -0.62 to 2.66, I2 = 92.0%) and SBP (WMD: -3.55 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.59 to 0.49, I2 = 97.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the dose and duration of GSE administration and the characteristics of study participants could be sources of between-study heterogeneity. Significant non-linear relationships were found between DBP and the duration of GSE supplementation (P = 0.044) and its dose (P = 0.007). In conclusion, GSE may be beneficial for individuals with or at risk of cardiovascular disease because it may have hypotensive and HR-lowering properties.
-
2.
Tai Ji Quan as antihypertensive lifestyle therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu, Y, Johnson, BT, Chen, S, Chen, Y, Livingston, J, Pescatello, LS
Journal of sport and health science. 2021;(2):211-221
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional health organizations are not currently recommending Tai Ji Quan alongside aerobic exercise to treat hypertension. We aimed to examine the efficacy of Tai Ji Quan as antihypertensive lifestyle therapy. METHODS Tai Ji Quan interventions published in English and Chinese were included when they involved healthy adults, reported pre- and post-intervention blood pressure (BP), and had a non-exercise/non-diet control group. We systematically searched 11 electronic databases for studies published through July 31, 2018, yielding 31 qualifying controlled trials. We (1) evaluated the risk of bias and methodological study quality, (2) performed meta-regression analyses following random-effects assumptions, and (3) generated additive models representing the largest possible clinically relevant BP reductions. RESULTS Participants (n = 3223) were middle-aged (56.6 ± 15.1 years of age, mean ± SD) adults with prehypertension (systolic BP (SBP) = 136.9 ± 15.2 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) = 83.4 ± 8.7 mmHg). Tai Ji Quan was practiced 4.0 ± 1.4 sessions/week for 54.0 ± 10.6 min/session for 22.3 ± 20.2 weeks. Overall, Tai Ji Quan elicited significant reductions in SBP (-11.3 mmHg, 95%CI: -14.6 to -8.0; d+ = -0.75) and DBP (-4.8 mmHg, 95%CI: -6.4 to -3.1; d+ = -0.53) vs. control (p < 0.001). Controlling for publication bias among samples with hypertension, Tai Ji Quan trials published in English elicited SBP reductions of 10.4 mmHg and DBP reductions of 4.0 mmHg, which was half the magnitude of trials published in Chinese (SBP reductions of 18.6 mmHg and DBP reductions of 8.8 mmHg). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that Tai Ji Quan is a viable antihypertensive lifestyle therapy that produces clinically meaningful BP reductions (i.e., 10.4 mmHg and 4.0 mmHg of SBP and DBP reductions, respectively) among individuals with hypertension. Such magnitude of BP reductions can lower the incidence of cardiovascular disease by up to 40%.
-
3.
The effects of capsinoids and fermented red pepper paste supplementation on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Amini, MR, Sheikhhossein, F, Bazshahi, E, Hajiaqaei, M, Shafie, A, Shahinfar, H, Azizi, N, Eghbaljoo Gharehgheshlaghi, H, Naghshi, S, Fathipour, RB, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(4):1767-1775
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the effects of capsinoids and fermented red pepper paste (FRPP) supplementation on Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP). METHODS Relevant studies, published up to May 2020, were searched through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. All randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of capsinoids and FRPP supplementation on blood pressure including SBP and DBP were included. RESULTS Out of 335 citations, 7 trials that enrolled 363 subjects were included. Capsinoids and FRPP resulted in significant reduction in DBP (Weighted mean differences (WMD): -1.90 mmHg; 95% CI, -3.72 to -0.09, P = 0.04) but no significant change in SBP (WMD: 0.55 mmHg, 95% CI: -1.45, 2.55, P = 0.588). FRPP had a significant reduction in SBP. Greater effects on SBP were detected in trials, lasted ≥12 weeks, and sample size >50. Capsinoids with dosage ≤200 and FRPP with dosage of 11.9 g significantly decreased DBP. CONCLUSION Overall, these data suggest that supplementation with FRPP may play a role in improving SBP and DBP but for capsinoids no effects detected in this analysis on SBP and DBP.
-
4.
ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms rs2681472 and rs17249754 are associated with susceptibility to hypertension and blood pressure levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xie, M, Yuan, S, Zeng, Y, Zheng, C, Yang, Y, Dong, Y, He, Q
Medicine. 2021;(15):e25530
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationships between ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms with blood pressure (BP) level and susceptibility to hypertension. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Databases were systematically searched by 2 independent researchers to screen studies on ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms and BP related phenotypes. The records retrieval period was limited from the formation of the database to March 4, 2021. Pooled odds rations (ORs) or β and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated to assess the association between ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms and the risk of hypertension or BP levels. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential bias. All the statistical analysis were conducted with Stata version 11.0 software. RESULTS A total of 15 articles were ultimately included in the present study, including 15 polymorphisms of ATP2B1 gene. Nine articles (N = 65,362) reported the polymorphism rs17249754, and 7 articles(N = 91,997) reported rs2681472 (both loci were reported in 1 article). Meta-analysis showed that rs17249754 (G/A) and rs2681472 (A/G) were associated with the susceptibility to hypertension (rs17249754: OR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.10-1.28; rs2681472: OR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.12-1.17), and were positively associated with systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (rs17249754: SBP, β=1.01, 95%CI: 0.86-1.16, DBP, β=0.48, 95%CI: 0.30-0.66; rs2681472: SBP, β=0.92, 95%CI: 0.77-1.07, DBP, β=0.50, 95%CI: 0.42-0.58) in the additive genetic model. Subgroup analysis stratified by race, population, sample size, and BP measurement method revealed that the association between A allele in rs2681472 polymorphism and risk of hypertension was slightly stronger in European (EUR) populations (OR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.13-1.20) than in East Asians (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.10-1.17). While in East Asians, relation between rs17249754 with risk of hypertension (OR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.10-1.28) is stronger than rs2681472 (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.10-1.17). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that ATP2B1 gene polymorphism rs2681472 and rs17249754 were associated with BP levels and the susceptibility to hypertension.
-
5.
Effectiveness of HIIE versus MICT in Improving Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Health and Disease: A Meta-analysis.
Mattioni Maturana, F, Martus, P, Zipfel, S, NIEß, AM
Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2021;(3):559-573
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate differences between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE, including high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on physical fitness, body composition, blood pressure, blood lipids, insulin and glucose metabolism, inflammation, and endothelial function. METHODS Differences between HIIE and MICT were summarized using a random-effects meta-analysis on the effect size (Cohen's d). A meta-regression was conducted using the following subgroups: population, age, training duration, men ratio, exercise type, baseline values (clinical relevant ranges), and type of HIIE. Studies were included if at least one of the following outcomes were reported: maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), body mass index (BMI), body mass, percent body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), fasting glucose and insulin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). A total of 55 studies were included. RESULTS Overall, HIIE was superior to MICT in improving V˙O2max (d = 0.40, P < 0.001) and FMD (d = 0.54, P < 0.05). Oppositely, MICT was superior to HIIE in improving HbA1c (d = -0.27, P < 0.05). No differences were observed in BMI (d = -0.02), body mass (d = -0.05), percent body fat (d = 0.04), systolic blood pressure (d = -0.04), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.03), HDL (d = -0.05), LDL (d = 0.08), triglycerides (d = 0.03), total cholesterol (d = 0.14), CRP (d = -0.11), fasting insulin (d = 0.02), fasting glucose (d = 0.02), and HOMA-IR (d = -0.04). Moderator analyses indicated that the difference between HIIE and MICT was affected by different subgroups. CONCLUSION Overall, HIIE showed to be more effective in improving cardiovascular health and cardiorespiratory fitness, whereas MICT was superior in improving long-term glucose metabolism. In the process of personalized training counseling, health-enhancing effects of exercise training may be improved by considering the individual risk profiles.
-
6.
Mediterranean diet and blood pressure reduction in adults with and without hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Filippou, CD, Thomopoulos, CG, Kouremeti, MM, Sotiropoulou, LI, Nihoyannopoulos, PI, Tousoulis, DM, Tsioufis, CP
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(5):3191-3200
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS It is unclear whether the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) has a favorable effect on blood pressure (BP) levels because among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the MedDiet-mediated BP reduction significant methodological and clinical differences are observed. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the MedDiet BP-effect compared to the usual diet or another dietary intervention (e.g. low-fat diet) in adults with and without hypertension, accounting for methodological and clinical confounders. METHODS We systematically searched Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases and identified 35 RCTs (13,943 participants). Random-effects model was used to calculate the mean attained systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) differences during follow-up. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. RESULTS Compared to the usual diet and all other active intervention diets the MedDiet reduced SBP and DBP (difference in means: -1.5 mm Hg; 95% CI: -2.8, -0.1; P = 0.035, and -0.9 mm Hg; 95% CI: -1.5, -0.3; P = 0.002, respectively). Compared only to the usual diet the MedDiet reduced SBP and DBP, while compared to all other active intervention diets or only to the low-fat diet the MedDiet did not reduce SBP and DBP. The MedDiet reduced DBP levels to a higher extent in trials with mean baseline SBP ≥130 mm Hg, while both SBP and DBP were reduced more in trials with a mean follow-up period ≥16 weeks. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate for both outcomes according to the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of the MedDiet was accompanied by a relatively small, but yet significant BP reduction, while higher baseline SBP levels and longer follow-up duration enhanced the BP-lowering effect of the intervention. This meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42020167308. REGISTRY NUMBER CRD42020167308.
-
7.
Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Machowiec, P, Ręka, G, Maksymowicz, M, Piecewicz-Szczęsna, H, Smoleń, A
Nutrients. 2021;(9)
Abstract
Spirulina is a microalga that presents various important pro-health properties, for instance lowering blood pressure in the research. The study aims to appraise the efficacy of Spirulina administration on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved by a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2021 according to a standardized protocol. The effect size of each study was counted from mean and standard deviation before and after the intervention and shown as Un-standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Meta-analysis on 5 RCTs with 230 subjects was eligible. The amount of Spirulina ranged from 1 to 8 g per day, and intervention durations ranged from 2 to 12 weeks. Data analysis indicated that Spirulina supplementation led to a significant lowering of SBP (Mean Difference (MD): -4.59 mmHg, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -8.20 to -0.99, I square statistic (I2) = 65%) and significant lowering of DBP (MD: -7.02 mmHg, CI: -8.86 to -5.18, I2 = 11%), particularly in a subgroup of hypertensive patients. Spirulina administration might have a supportive effect on the prevention and treatment of hypertension. More exact randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the effect of Spirulina supplementation on blood pressure.
-
8.
Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 for Short-term Management of Essential Hypertension Compared With ARBs: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Yang, S, Zhang, H, Yang, P, Wang, C, Wu, Q
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 2021;(5):650-659
Abstract
Whether LCZ696 (neprilysin inhibitor + valsartan) has greater advantages of blood pressure (BP) lowering than angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) is unclear. To provide more detailed information about the benefits of LCZ696, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 for short-term management of hypertension compared with ARBs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, using relevant keywords. We used a random or fixed effects model to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) of changes in BP and the risk ratio (RR) for BP control rates and adverse events (AEs). In this meta-analysis, 9 studies were incorporated. Compared with ARBs, LCZ696 revealed a significant reduction in mean sitting systolic BP [msSBP; WMD -4.79 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -5.46 to -4.11 mm Hg], mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP; WMD -2.12 mm Hg; 95% CI: -2.53 to -1.71 mm Hg), mean sitting pulse pressure (msPP; WMD -2.79 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.52 to -2.07 mm Hg), and mean ambulatory pulse pressure (maPP; WMD -2.96 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.35 to -2.57 mm Hg). LCZ696 had a higher BP control rate than ARBs (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.39 to 1.73). There was no significant difference between LCZ696 and ARBs in the incidence of AEs (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.25) and discontinuations because of AEs (RR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.32). Overall, in short-term treatment, LCZ696 has greater advantages of antihypertensive efficacy and the safety is not inferior to ARBs. Further long-term studies are required to rule out the potential risks of beta amyloid accumulation and the potential for Alzheimer's disease.
-
9.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of spironolactone on blood pressure, glucose, lipids, renal function, fibrosis and inflammation in patients with hypertension and diabetes.
Lin, M, Heizati, M, Wang, L, Nurula, M, Yang, Z, Wang, Z, Abudoyreyimu, R, Wu, Z, Li, N
Blood pressure. 2021;(3):145-153
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypertension commonly co-exists with diabetes mellitus (DM), and both are closely related to adverse health outcomes. The activation of aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) may play important roles in this process. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of MR antagonists on cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure (BP), glucose, lipids, renal function, fibrosis and inflammatory and its safety in patients with both hypertension and DM. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for clinical trials published until December 31, 2019. Studies comparing the effect of spironolactone to placebo in patients with hypertension and DM were included. Mean difference with 95% confidence intervals was used to report outcomes. RESULTS Eleven randomised placebo-controlled trials with 640 participants were finally included with mean follow-up of 5 months. Compared to placebo, spironolactone significantly reduced office systolic (-6.57, 95%CI: -9.21, -3.93) and diastolic BP (-2.63, 95%CI: -4.25, -1.02) as well as ambulatory BP; increased glycosylated haemoglobin by 0.3 but no clear effect on fasting glucose. Spironolactone induced a significantly reduction of urinary albumin but increased serum creatinine (7.60, 95%CI: 4.94, 10.27) and decreased glomerular filtration rate (-4.28, 95%CI: -6.38, -2.18). Markers of fibrosis and inflammation, including NIIINP, PICP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were also decreased after spironolactone therapy. For lipid metabolism, there was no significant difference between groups. Spironolactone mildly increased serum potassium (0.30, 95%CI: 0.23, 0.37). 2.5% subjects treated with spironolactone experienced mild to moderate hyperkalaemia and received medication or dietary advice and another 1.6% developed severe hyperkalaemia and withdrawn from the studies. CONCLUSION Spironolactone reduced BP and urinary albumin, improve fibrosis and inflammation, whereas slightly increases the glycosylated haemoglobin and serum creatinine in patients with hypertension and diabetes. Long-term RCTs to assess the effects of spironolactone on cardiovascular events in this population are warranted.
-
10.
Effect of tomato, lycopene and related products on blood pressure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Rattanavipanon, W, Nithiphongwarakul, C, Sirisuwansith, P, Chaiyasothi, T, Thakkinstian, A, Nathisuwan, S, Pathomwichaiwat, T
Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology. 2021;:153512
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to evaluate the hypotensive effects of tomato, lycopene, and related products. However, the findings were conflicting, partly due to differences in the types of products investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and compare the hypotensive effects of different tomato-related preparations through a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS A network meta-analysis based on a systematic review of RCTs comparing the effect of various tomato, lycopene and related products versus placebo on blood pressure in adults was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases were searched up to October 2020 without language restrictions. The primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Mean differences (MDs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the global inconsistency test. RESULTS A total of 11 studies including six forms of tomato, lycopene and related products met the inclusion criteria. Among these trials, eight (N = 617) and seven trials (N = 501) were included in the analysis of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) outcomes, respectively. The standardized tomato extract (STE) significantly decreased SBP compared to placebo, with a pooled MD (95% CI) of -5.89 (-9.13 to -2.64) mmHg. The effect on DBP was not significant, with a pooled MD (95% CI) of -3.51 (-7.39 to 0.38) mmHg. Subgroup analysis in hypertensive patients showed that STE significantly reduced both SBP and DBP with pooled MDs (95% CIs) of -8.09 (-11.52 to -4.67) and -4.25 (-6.97 to -1.53) mmHg, respectively, compared to placebo. Other forms of tomato, including other dose ranges of standardized tomato extract, tomato-containing diet, lycopene-free preparation, and synthetic lycopene, did not show consistent and significant effects on either SBP or DBP in all analyses. CONCLUSION Standardized tomato extract (STE) significantly decreased SBP compared to placebo in a mixed population of healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients. The BP-lowering effect was more pronounced among hypertensive patients. No significant BP effects were seen with other forms of tomato, lycopene and related products in the overall population or any subgroup of the population.