-
1.
Question 5: Magnesium Sulphate for Acute Asthma in children.
Aniapravan, R, Pullattayil, A, Al Ansari, K, Powell, CVE
Paediatric respiratory reviews. 2020;:112-117
Abstract
Most children who present to the emergency department with acute asthma, respond well to inhaled β2-agonists (spacer or nebuliser), oxygen (if required) and systemic steroids. Guidelines across the world agree on this simple, straight forward evidenced based approach. In children with more severe asthma attacks and those who do not respond to initial treatment, the evidence base for the secondary level treatment is less clear. Many regimens exist for the next step. Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4) is now used frequently in these situations and some centres are starting to use nebulized MgSO4 as part of the initial maximal inhaled therapy options. This paper examines the role of MgSO4 in acute asthma in children. It focusses on how MgSO4 might work, what are the current recommendations for use and then what is the current evidence base to support its use. We have presented the evidence for the use of both nebulized and intravenous MgSO4. At the end of the paper we have suggested future directions for research in this area. Our aim is to present a synthesis of the current role of MgSO4 in the management of an acute asthma attack.
-
2.
Effect of Nebulized Magnesium vs Placebo Added to Albuterol on Hospitalization Among Children With Refractory Acute Asthma Treated in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Schuh, S, Sweeney, J, Rumantir, M, Coates, AL, Willan, AR, Stephens, D, Atenafu, EG, Finkelstein, Y, Thompson, G, Zemek, R, et al
JAMA. 2020;(20):2038-2047
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE While intravenous magnesium decreases hospitalizations in refractory pediatric acute asthma, it is variably used because of invasiveness and safety concerns. The benefit of nebulized magnesium to prevent hospitalization is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma remaining in moderate or severe respiratory distress after initial therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized double-blind parallel-group clinical trial from September 26, 2011, to November 19, 2019, in 7 tertiary-care pediatric emergency departments in Canada. The participants were otherwise healthy children aged 2 to 17 years with moderate to severe asthma defined by a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score of 5 or greater (on a 12-point scale) after a 1-hour treatment with an oral corticosteroid and 3 inhaled albuterol and ipratropium treatments. Of 5846 screened patients, 4332 were excluded for criteria, 273 declined participation, 423 otherwise excluded, 818 randomized, and 816 analyzed. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to 3 nebulized albuterol treatments with either magnesium sulfate (n = 410) or 5.5% saline placebo (n = 408). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was hospitalization for asthma within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included PRAM score; respiratory rate; oxygen saturation at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; blood pressure at 20, 40, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; and albuterol treatments within 240 minutes. RESULTS Among 818 randomized patients (median age, 5 years; 63% males), 816 completed the trial (409 received magnesium; 407, placebo). A total of 178 of the 409 children who received magnesium (43.5%) were hospitalized vs 194 of the 407 who received placebo (47.7%) (difference, -4.2%; absolute risk difference 95% [exact] CI, -11% to 2.8%]; P = .26). There were no significant between-group differences in changes from baseline to 240 minutes in PRAM score (difference of changes, 0.14 points [95% CI, -0.23 to 0.50]; P = .46); respiratory rate (0.17 breaths/min [95% CI, -1.32 to 1.67]; P = .82); oxygen saturation (-0.04% [95% CI, -0.53% to 0.46%]; P = .88); systolic blood pressure (0.78 mm Hg [95% CI, -1.48 to 3.03]; P = .50); or mean number of additional albuterol treatments (magnesium: 1.49, placebo: 1.59; risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.11]; P = .47). Nausea/vomiting or sore throat/nose occurred in 17 of the 409 children who received magnesium (4%) and 5 of the 407 who received placebo (1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among children with refractory acute asthma in the emergency department, nebulized magnesium with albuterol, compared with placebo with albuterol, did not significantly decrease the hospitalization rate for asthma within 24 hours. The findings do not support use of nebulized magnesium with albuterol among children with refractory acute asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01429415.
-
3.
24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study.
Lipson, DA, Birk, R, Brealey, N, Zhu, CQ
Advances in therapy. 2020;(12):4894-4909
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have utilized 24-h serial spirometry to compare the effects of inhaled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies on lung function. The FULFIL study previously reported significant lung function improvements with once-daily single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus twice-daily single-inhaler budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. METHODS This prespecified analysis evaluated 24-h serial spirometry data from a subgroup of 406 patients in FULFIL. BUD/FOR twice-daily dosing was maintained during 24-h spirometry. A post hoc analysis evaluated serial forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at day 1 and week 24 by disease severity at screening (FEV1 < 50% predicted and no moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, FEV1 < 50% predicted and ≥ 1 moderate or severe exacerbation in prior year, and FEV1 ≥ 50% and < 80% predicted and ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbations in prior year). RESULTS Odds of achieving a ≥ 100-mL increase from baseline in FEV1 within the first 6 h post dose on day 1 were significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI than BUD/FOR [odds ratio 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.56-4.98); p < 0.001]. FF/UMEC/VI led to greater improvements in weighted mean FEV1 over 0-6, 0-12, 0-24, and 12-24 h on day 1 and at week 24, with the greatest between-group differences at week 24 (range 196-210 mL; all p < 0.001). Significant between-treatment differences in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) in favor of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR were seen at all time points at week 24 (FEV1 range 156-231 mL, all p < 0.001; FVC range 139-309 mL, all p ≤ 0.002). Serial FEV1 results were consistent irrespective of disease severity at screening. CONCLUSION These findings further demonstrate sustained lung function benefits with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations across a range of disease severities.
-
4.
The pharmacological management of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS).
Albertson, TE, Chenoweth, JA, Pearson, SJ, Murin, S
Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2020;(2):213-231
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS) is a disease phenotype that shares T helper lymphocyte cell Th1/neutrophilic/non-Type-2 Inflammation pathways thought to be key in COPD and Th2/eosinophilic/Type-2 inflammatory pathways of asthma. The pharmacology of treating ACOS is challenging in severe circumstances.Areas covered: This review evaluates the stepwise treatment of ACOS using pharmacological treatments used in both COPD and asthma. The most common medications involve the same inhalers used to treat COPD and asthma patients. Advanced stepwise therapies for ACOS patients are based on patient characteristics and biomarkers. Very few clinical trials exist that focus specifically on ACOS patients.Expert opinion: After inhalers, advanced therapies including phosphodiesterase inhibitors, macrolides, N-acetylcysteine and statin therapy for those ACOS patients with a COPD appearance and exacerbations are available. In atopic ACOS patients with exacerbations, advanced asthma therapies (leukotriene receptor antagonists and synthesis blocking agents.) are used. ACOS patients with elevated blood eosinophil/IgE levels are considered for immunotherapy or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies blocking specific Th2/Type-2 interleukins or IgE. Symptom control, stabilization/improvement in pulmonary function and reduced exacerbations are the metrics of success. More pharmacological trials of ACOS patients are needed to better understand which patients benefit from specific treatments.Abbreviations: 5-LOi: 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor; ACOS asthma - COPD overlap syndrome; B2AR: Beta2 adrenergic receptors; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate; CI: confidence interval; COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRS chronic rhinosinusitis; cys-LT: cysteinyl leukotrienes; DPI: dry powder inhaler; EMA: European Medicines Agency; FDA: US Food and Drug Administration; FDC: fixed-dose combination; FeNO: exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; GM-CSF: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; ICS inhaled corticosteroids; IL: interleukin; ILC2: Type 2 innate lymphoid cells; IP3: Inositol triphosphate; IRR: incidence rate ratio; KOLD Korean Obstructive Lung Disease; LABA long-acting B2 adrenergic receptor agonist; LAMA long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; LRA: leukotriene receptor antagonist; LT: leukotrienes; MDI: metered-dose inhalers; MN: M-subtype muscarinic receptors; MRA: muscarinic receptor antagonist; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; NEB: nebulization; OR: odds ratio; PDE: phosphodiesterase; PEFR peak expiratory flow rate; PGD2: prostaglandin D2; PRN: as needed; RR: risk ratio; SABA short-acting B2 adrenergic receptor agonist; SAMA short-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; SDMI spring-driven mist inhaler; Th1: T helper cell 1 lymphocyte; Th2: T helper cell 2 lymphocytes; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; US : United States.
-
5.
Diagnosis and Outpatient Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review.
Riley, CM, Sciurba, FC
JAMA. 2019;(8):786-797
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There are 30 million adults (12%) in the United States who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease accounts for 3.2% of all physician office visits annually and is the fourth leading cause of death (126 000 deaths per year). Most patients are diagnosed by their primary care clinicians who must address the highly variable clinical features and responses to therapy. The diagnosis and treatment of COPD is rapidly changing, so understanding recent advances is important for the delivery of optimal patient care. OBSERVATIONS Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is characterized by incompletely reversible expiratory airflow limitation. Spirometry is the reference standard for diagnosing and assessing the severity of COPD. All patients should be counseled about and receive preventive measures such as smoking cessation and vaccination. Treatment should be guided by the severity of lung impairment, symptoms such as dyspnea, the amount of cough and sputum production, and how often a patient experiences an exacerbation. When dyspnea limits activity or quality of life, COPD should be treated with once- or twice-daily maintenance long-acting anticholinergic and β-agonist bronchodilators. Patients with acute exacerbations may benefit from the addition of inhaled corticosteroids, particularly those with elevated peripheral eosinophil levels. Pulmonary rehabilitation, which includes strength and endurance training and educational, nutritional, and psychosocial support, improves symptoms and exercise tolerance but is underutilized. Supplemental oxygen for patients with resting hypoxemia (defined as Spo2 <89%) improves survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a complicated disease requiring intensive treatment. Appropriate use of long-acting maintenance bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, and pulmonary rehabilitation decreases symptoms, optimizes functional performance, and reduces exacerbation frequency. Supplemental oxygen in patients with resting hypoxemia prolongs life, and other advanced treatments are available based on specific patient characteristics.
-
6.
A multinational observational study identifying primary care patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control.
Kritikos, V, Price, D, Papi, A, Infantino, A, Ställberg, B, Ryan, D, Lavorini, F, Chrystyn, H, Haughney, J, Lisspers, K, et al
NPJ primary care respiratory medicine. 2019;(1):43
Abstract
Factors related to the discrepancy between patient-perceived and actual disease control remain unclear. Identifying patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control remains elusive. This study aimed to (i) investigate the relationship between patient-reported and actual level of asthma control (ii), compare the characteristics between patients who believe their asthma is well controlled that accurately report 'well-controlled' asthma with those that do not, and (iii) identify factors associated with inaccurately reported 'well-controlled' asthma. A historical, multinational, cross-sectional study using data from the iHARP (initiative Helping Asthma in Real-life Patients) review service for adults with asthma prescribed fixed-dose combination therapy. Data from 4274 patients were analysed. A major discrepancy between patient-reported and Global Initiative for Asthma defined asthma control was detected; 71.1% of patients who reported 'well-controlled' asthma were inaccurate in their perception despite receiving regular maintenance therapy. Significant differences were noted in age, gender, body mass index, education level, medication use, side effects, attitudes to preventer inhaler use, inhaler technique review and respiratory specialist review between patients who accurately reported 'well-controlled' asthma and those who did not. Independent risk factors associated with inaccurately reported 'well-controlled' asthma were: having taken a maximum of 5-12 puffs or more of reliever inhaler on at least one day within the previous 4 weeks; being female; having seen a respiratory specialist more than a year ago (rather than in the previous year); and having required oral corticosteroids for worsening asthma in the previous year. The study highlighted the significant hidden burden associated with under-recognition of poor asthma control, on the part of the patient and the need for targeted interventions designed to address the continuing discrepancy between perceived and actual disease control.
-
7.
Inhalable co-amorphous budesonide-arginine dry powders prepared by spray drying.
Lu, W, Rades, T, Rantanen, J, Yang, M
International journal of pharmaceutics. 2019;:1-8
Abstract
Spray drying is a well-established technology to produce inhalable dry powders. However, the amorphous nature of the particles typically obtained from the process can lead to physically and chemically unstable products. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether spray-drying could be used as a manufacturing method to produce co-amorphous drug amino acid powders with high physical stability and inhalable particulate properties. Budesonide (BUD), a compound for the treatment of lung inflammation, was co-spray-dried at a 1:1 M ratio with arginine (ARG) to produce co-amorphous powders. Two experimental factors, the solid concentration (0.85, 1.00 and 1.13%, w/v) and the ethanol concentration (55 and 75%, v/v) of the feed solution were varied to investigate the formation of co-amorphous BUD-ARG. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry (mDSC) and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) were used for solid state characterization. The particle morphology, the median mass aerodynamic diameter and the aerodynamic properties of the resulting co-amorphous powders were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), and a next generation impactor (NGI), respectively. Furthermore, the physical stability of the obtained dry powder was examined. The co-spray-dried BUD-ARG samples prepared within the experimental range were predominantly amorphous. However, it was observed that while using the feed solution with both high solid and ethanol concentrations, some residual crystallinity related to budesonide was observed. The formation of co-amorphous BUD-ARG, rather than two separate amorphous phases, was confirmed by mDSC analyses. In addition, FTIR analyses indicated that hydrogen bonding occurs between the carbonyl groups of BUD and the amide groups of ARG in the co-amorphous BUD-ARG mixtures. The NGI results indicated that the particulate properties of the co-spray-dried co-amorphous BUD-ARG were at an inhalable range, with emitted doses >80%, and fine particle fractions >50%. In addition, the co-amorphous BUD-ARG was more physically stable than spray-dried BUD when stored at room temperature under dry conditions. This study demonstrated that spray drying is a useful manufacturing approach to produce physically stable co-amorphous dry powders for inhalation purposes.
-
8.
Efficacy and safety of a first-in-class inhaled PDE3/4 inhibitor (ensifentrine) vs salbutamol in asthma.
Bjermer, L, Abbott-Banner, K, Newman, K
Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2019;:101814
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to investigate the dose-response and pharmacology of a range of single doses of nebulised ensifentrine (RPL554), an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor in patients with asthma. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, patients received single nebulised doses of ensifentrine 0.4, 1.5, 6 and 24 mg, salbutamol 2.5 and 7.5 mg, and placebo. Eligible patients were adults with asthma, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 60-90% predicted and ≥1.5 L, with post-salbutamol FEV1 increase ≥15%. The co-primary objectives were peak and average FEV1 over 12 h for ensifentrine vs placebo and salbutamol. Secondary endpoints included: peak and average systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and ECG heart rate; and safety and tolerability (adverse events [AEs], and serum potassium). ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02427165. RESULTS A total of 29 patients were randomised, with 25 (89%) completing the study. For the two co-primary endpoints there was a clear ensifentrine dose-response relationship, with all treatments superior to placebo (p < 0.001). There was no relationship between the ensifentrine dose and AE incidence or blood pressure. Ensifentrine 0.4, 1.5 and 6 mg had significantly lower effects than both salbutamol doses on pulse and heart rates. Ensifentrine did not impact potassium, whereas there was a was a dose-related reduction for salbutamol. Inhalation of ensifentrine resulted in a dose-related increase in plasma exposure. CONCLUSIONS Single-dose ensifentrine demonstrated dose-dependent bronchodilation, and was as effective as a therapeutic dose of nebulised salbutamol. All ensifentrine doses were similarly well tolerated, and did not show the characteristic β2-agonist systemic adverse effects.
-
9.
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for acute wheezing in young children: a randomised double-blind trial.
Pruikkonen, H, Tapiainen, T, Kallio, M, Dunder, T, Pokka, T, Uhari, M, Renko, M
The European respiratory journal. 2018;(2)
Abstract
Magnesium sulfate has been shown to be an effective treatment in older children with asthma exacerbations, but it has not been investigated in acute severe virus-induced wheezing in young children.The study enrolled 61 children aged 6 months to 4 years. Inclusion criteria were severe wheezing, classified as a score of ≥6 points as assessed by the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) after initial treatment with salbutamol, and the symptoms of acute viral infection. The children were randomly allocated to receive either an infusion of magnesium sulfate (40 mg·kg-1) or 0.9% sodium chloride as a placebo infusion for 20 min. Primary outcome measure was mean change in RDAI scores from baseline to 6 h after the treatment.Change in the severity of wheezing from baseline to 6 h after the treatment, as measured by mean±sd RDAI scores, was 4.7±2.6 in the magnesium sulfate group and 4.2±4.2 in the placebo group (difference 0.5, 95% CI -1.3 to 2.3, p=0.594).Intravenous magnesium sulfate was ineffective in treating acute severe virus-induced wheezing in young children, in contrast to the previous efficacy demonstrated in older children.
-
10.
Effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the expression of immune defense genes in bronchial epithelial cells.
van den Berge, M, Jonker, MR, Miller-Larsson, A, Postma, DS, Heijink, IH
Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;:47-56
Abstract
BACKGROUND COPD patients have increased risk of pneumonia when treated with fluticasone propionate (FP), whereas this is generally not the case with budesonide (BUD) treatment. We hypothesized that BUD and FP differentially affect the expression of immune defense genes. METHODS Human bronchial epithelial 16HBE cells and air-liquid interface (ALI)-cultured primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) were pre-treated with clinically equipotent concentrations of BUD or FP (0.16-16 nM BUD and 0.1-10 nM FP), and the expression of immune defense genes was studied at baseline and after exposure to rhinovirus (RV16). RESULTS Using microfluidic cards, we observed that both BUD and FP significantly suppressed CXCL8, IFNB1 and S100A8 mRNA expression in unstimulated 16HBE cells. Interestingly, BUD, but not FP, significantly increased lactotransferrin (LTF) expression. The difference between the effect of BUD and FP on LTF expression was statistically significant and confirmed by qPCR and at the protein level by western blotting. RV16 infection of ALI-cultured PBECs significantly increased the expression of CCL20, IFNB1 and S100A8, but not of LTF or CAMP/LL-37. In these RV16-exposed cells, LTF expression was again significantly higher upon pre-treatment with BUD than with FP. The same was observed for S100A8, but not for CCL20, IFNB1 or CAMP/LL-37 expression. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of human bronchial epithelial cells with BUD results in significantly higher expression of specific immune defense genes than treatment with FP. The differential regulation of these immune defense genes may help to explain the clinical observation that BUD and FP treatment differ with respect to the risk of developing pneumonia in COPD.