-
1.
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of renal injury in surgical patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Pathak, S, Olivieri, G, Mohamed, W, Abbasciano, R, Roman, M, Tomassini, S, Lai, F, Wozniak, M, Murphy, GJ
British journal of anaesthesia. 2021;(1):131-138
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated pharmacological interventions for renoprotection in people undergoing surgery. METHODS Searches were conducted to update a previous review using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to August 23, 2019. RCTs evaluating the use of pharmacological interventions for renal protection in the perioperative period were included. The co-primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI). Pooled effect estimates were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS We included 228 trials enrolling 56 047 patients. Twenty-three trials were considered to be at low risk of bias across all domains. Atrial natriuretic peptides (14 trials; n=2207) reduced 30-day mortality (RR: 0.63 [0.41, 0.97]) and AKI events (RR: 0.43 [0.33, 0.56]) without heterogeneity. These effects were consistent across cardiac surgery and vascular surgery subgroups, and in sensitivity analyses restricted to studies at low risk of bias. Inodilators (13 trials; n=2941) reduced mortality (RR: 0.71 [0.53, 0.94]) and AKI events (RR: 0.65 [0.50, 0.85]) in the primary analysis and in cardiac surgery cohorts. Vasopressors (4 trials; n=1047) reduced AKI (RR: 0.56 [0.36, 0.86]). Nitric oxide donors, alpha-2-agonists, and calcium channel blockers reduced AKI in primary analyses, but not after exclusion of studies at risk of bias. Overall, assessment of the certainty of the effect estimates was low. CONCLUSIONS There are multiple effective pharmacological renoprotective interventions for people undergoing surgery.
-
2.
Diltiazem versus metoprolol for the management of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jafri, SH, Xu, J, Warsi, I, Cerecedo-Lopez, CD
The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021;:323-327
-
3.
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients with Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.
Ma, H, Jiang, H, Feng, J, Gan, Y
Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2021;:6628469
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common serious cardiac rhythm disturbances and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in general population. Hypertension is the most prevalent and potentially modifiable risk factor for AF. This study is aimed at evaluating the effect of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB) on AF recurrence among patients with hypertension and AF. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Collaboration of Controlled Clinical Trials registry databases were searched from their inception to September 2020. RESULTS A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 1495 patients were included in our study. This finding showed that ARB had a statistically significant superiority in preventing AF recurrence (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30-0.72, P = 0.0006) and persistent AF (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71, P = 0.001) compared to CCB. Subgroup analysis showed that there was a significant difference in telmisartan subgroup (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23-1.29, P = 0.17) and nontelmisartan subgroup (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.77, P = 0.005). Subgroup analysis indicated that nifedipine subgroup did not show a statistically significant difference on AF recurrence between ARB and CCB (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.46-1.68, P = 0.69), but amlodipine subgroup showed that ARB had a significant superiority in prevention of AF recurrence (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.27-0.56, P < 0.0001) compared with CCB. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that ARB is superior to CCB for preventing the AF recurrence and persistent AF among patients with hypertension and AF.
-
4.
Association of calcium channel blocker use with clinical outcome of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.
Alsagaff, MY, Mulia, EPB, Maghfirah, I, Luke, K, Nugraha, D, Rachmi, DA, Septianda, I, A'yun, MQ
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;(5):102210
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: This meta-analysis aims to analyze the association of calcium channel blocker (CCB) use with COVID-19 clinical outcomes. METHODS PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, Scopus, and medRxiv databases were searched systematically in a limited period. The primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS A total of 119,298 patients from 31 eligible studies were included. Pooled analysis of the random-effect model revealed CCB was not associated with reduced mortality (OR = 1.21 [95%CI: 0.98-1.49], p = 0.08). Interestingly, subgroup analysis in hypertensive patients revealed significantly reduced mortality (OR = 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52-0.91], p = 0.009). CONCLUSION CCB usage was not associated with the outcome of COVID-19. However, CCB was associated with a decreased mortality rate in hypertensive COVID-19 patients.
-
5.
Efficacy and safety of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with vasomotor symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shan, D, Zou, L, Liu, X, Shen, Y, Cai, Y, Zhang, J
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;(6):564-579.e12
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vasomotor symptoms are common among postmenopausal women and patients receiving hormone deprivation therapies, and emerging studies are exploring gabapentin's and pregabalin's effects as nonhormonal treatment options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs. DATA SOURCES Based on a preregistered protocol (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews -CRD42019133650), we searched 10 databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Biological Medical Literature, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Journals Full-text Database [VIP], and Wanfang) as well as the World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform and reference lists of related literatures. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover studies exploring gabapentin and pregabalin among women patients with vasomotor symptoms were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement was followed. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed bias, and extracted data. Mean difference and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals were assessed by random-effects models. Heterogeneities were assessed by I2 statistics, and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Nineteen randomized controlled trials and 2 randomized crossover trials reporting results from 3519 participants were included. Gabapentin could reduce hot flash frequency (mean difference, -1.62, 95% confidence interval, -1.98 to -1.26 after 4 weeks; mean difference, -2.77, 95% confidence interval, -4.29 to -1.24 after 12 weeks) and composite score (standardized mean difference, -0.47, 95% confidence interval, -0.71 to -0.23 after 4 weeks; standardized mean difference, -0.77, 95% confidence interval, -1.15 to -0.40 after 12 weeks) compared with placebo. Both menopausal participants and patients with breast cancer benefited from treatment. Higher risks of dizziness and somnolence were found in the gabapentin group than in the control group (risk ratio, 4.45, 95% confidence interval, 2.50-7.94; risk ratio, 3.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.97-5.48, respectively). Estrogen was more effective in reducing hot flash frequency than gabapentin. No statistically significant difference in reduction of hot flash severity score was found between gabapentin and antidepressants. The trials comparing gabapentin or pregabalin with the other interventions were too limited to make a conclusion. CONCLUSION Favorable effects of gabapentin in relieving vasomotor symptoms were observed, compared with controls, but were less effective than those of estrogen. Evidence supporting the therapeutic effect of pregabalin is still lacking.
-
6.
Intravenous and Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate for Treating Acute Asthma in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Su, Z, Li, R, Gai, Z
Pediatric emergency care. 2018;(6):390-395
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and nebulized magnesium sulfate in acute asthma in children. METHODS The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials of IV and nebulized magnesium sulfate in pediatric acute asthma were included. The outcomes subject to meta-analysis were pulmonary function, hospitalization, and further treatment. If statistical heterogeneity was significant, random-effects models were used for meta-analysis, otherwise, fixed-effects models were applied. RESULTS Ten randomized and quasi-randomized trials (6 IV, 4 nebulized) were identified. Intravenous magnesium sulfate treatment is associated with significant effects on respiratory function (standardized mean difference, 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-3.08; P = 0.0008) and hospital admission (risk ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.95; P = 0.03). But nebulized magnesium sulfate treatment shows no significant effect on respiratory function (standardized mean difference, 0.19; 95% CI, -0.01-0.40; P = 0.07) or hospital admission (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.44; P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis revealed that IV magnesium sulfate is an effective treatment in children, with the pulmonary function significantly improved and hospitalization and further treatment decreased. But nebulized magnesium sulfate treatment showed no significant effect on respiratory function or hospital admission and further treatment.
-
7.
Topical diltiazem ointment in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain relief: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Huang, YJ, Chen, CY, Chen, RJ, Kang, YN, Wei, PL
Asian journal of surgery. 2018;(5):431-437
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemorrhoidectomy is commonly associated with postoperative pain. Calcium channel blockers are known to cause relaxation of gastrointestinal smooth muscle and oral diltiazem has also been shown to reduce the resting anal pressure. OBJECTIVE We attempted to analyze efficacy and side effects of topical diltiazem oint. in post-operative pain control. METHODS This is a meta-analysis of patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy using topical diltiazem oint. versus placebo (Vaseline) for pain control. Patients with third or fourth degree hemorrhoids undergoing traditional hemorrhoidectomy were included. Procedures took place in the colorectal division of a hospital in 5 countries. Five randomized control trials (RCTs) published between 2005 and 2016 including 227 patients were included our meta-analysis (Diltiazem (calcium channel block) group = 137; Placebo (Vaseline) group = 90). Pain assessment was performed using a standardized Visual Analogue Scale. Any side effects of surgery or medication use, which were noted by the patient or the surgeon, also were recorded. RESULTS A total of 227 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that Diltiazem ointment was statistically significant in reducing pain within 48 h, at 72 h, and more than 96 h after operation compared to the placebo group. Regarding overall complications (including headache), there was no statistical significance between diltiazem and placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Topical application of diltiazem effectively relieves pain after hemorrhoidectomy with minimal side effects. Further large studies are needed to substantiate its value in clinical practice.
-
8.
Calcium channel blocker use reduces incident dementia risk in elderly hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Hussain, S, Singh, A, Rahman, SO, Habib, A, Najmi, AK
Neuroscience letters. 2018;:120-127
Abstract
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are an established class of drug for the management of hypertension. Observational studies have found that CCB use is associated with a reduction in the risk of developing dementia; however, studies have variably linked the CCBs use with the risk of dementia. This meta-analysis aims to assess whether, in elderly hypertensive patients, the use of CCBs alters the risk of developing dementia. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from August 2013 to 21st August 2017. Studies were screened on the basis of title and abstract. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The primary outcome was an estimate of the risk of dementia in elderly hypertensive CCBs users. The pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated using a generic inverse variance method. A subgroup analysis was also performed based on CCB class. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. The meta-analysis included ten studies comprising 75,239 patients (53.16% female) with a median age and follow-up duration of 72.24 years and 8.21 years respectively. All of the studies were of high quality. The use of CCBs was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing dementia in elderly hypertensive patients (RR 0.70 [95% CI: 0.58-0.85] p = 0.0003) compared to those not using CCBs. In subgroup analysis we found that the dihydropyridine class was associated with a 44% [RR 0.56 (95% CI: 0.40-0.78) p = 0.0005] reduction in the dementia risk. The use of CCBs was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing dementia in elderly hypertensive patients.
-
9.
Calcium channel blockers for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.
Essali, A, Soares-Weiser, K, Bergman, H, Adams, CE
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;(3):CD000206
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia and related disorders affect a sizable proportion of any population. Antipsychotic medications are the primary treatment for these disorders. Antipsychotic medications are associated with a variety of adverse effects including tardive dyskinesia. Dyskinesia is a disfiguring movement disorder of the orofacial region that can be tardive (having a slow or belated onset). Tardive dyskinesia is difficult to treat, despite experimentation with several treatments. Calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil, flunarizine) have been among these experimental treatments. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of calcium channel blocker drugs (diltiazem, nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil) for treatment of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or other chronic mental illnesses. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (July 2015 and April 2017), inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of trials for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected randomised controlled trials comparing calcium channel blockers with placebo, no intervention or any other intervention for people with both tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia or serious mental illness who remained on their antipsychotic medication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently extracted data and estimated risk ratios of dichotomous data or mean differences (MD) of continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who left the trials early had no improvement. We also created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS Previous versions of this review included no trials. From the 2015 search, we identified three cross-over trials that could be included. The 2017 search found no new studies relevant to this review. The included trials randomised 47 inpatients with chronic mental illnesses in the USA and China. Trials were published in the 1990s and were of short duration (six to 10 weeks). Overall, the risk of bias was unclear, mainly due to poor reporting; allocation concealment was not described, generation of the sequence was not explicit, studies were not clearly blinded, and attrition and outcome data were not fully reported. Findings were sparse, no study reported on the primary outcome 'no clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms,' but two small studies (37 participants) found no difference on the tardive dyskinesia symptoms scale Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores between diltiazem or flunarizine and placebo after three to four weeks' treatment (MD -0.71, 95% CI -2.68 to 1.26, very low quality evidence). Only one study randomising 20 participants reported on adverse events, and reported that there were no adverse events with flunarizine or with placebo (very low quality evidence). One study with 18 participants reported no events of deterioration in mental state with diltiazem or with placebo (very low quality evidence). No studies reported on acceptability of treatment or on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks or personalised quality of life outcomes designated important to patients. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Available evidence from randomised controlled trials is extremely limited and very low quality, conclusions cannot be drawn. The effects of calcium channel blockers for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia are unknown. Their use is experimental and should only be given in the context of well-designed randomised trials.
-
10.
The benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers combined with calcium channel blockers on metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis.
Pongpanich, P, Pitakpaiboonkul, P, Takkavatakarn, K, Praditpornsilpa, K, Eiam-Ong, S, Susantitaphong, P
International urology and nephrology. 2018;(12):2261-2278
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of hypertension and its associated complications are markedly growing. Most patients need more than one drug to achieve blood pressure (BP) target. However, most guidelines only focus on the first-line treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) combined with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trials.gov (until April 7, 2016) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the benefits of ACEIs/ARBs combined with CCBs versus other dual or triple combinations on clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Random effects models were used to compute the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables. RESULTS Sixty RCTs (48,913 patients) were identified. When compared with other combinations, the combination of ACEIs/ARBs and CCBs had comparable WMD of systolic as well as diastolic BP (73 study arms) but provided better benefits on metabolic parameters, such as HDL, FBS, HbA1C, and serum uric acid; renal functions, including serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate; and cardiovascular diseases, including reduction of all cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and syncope/hypotension. A significant increase of serum potassium was observed. CONCLUSION The combination of ACEIs/ARBs with CCBs has superior benefits on metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients. Therefore, this combination should be considered whenever monotherapy does not achieve the guideline target.