0
selected
-
1.
Stimulant Drugs of Abuse and Cardiac Arrhythmias.
Dominic, P, Ahmad, J, Awwab, H, Bhuiyan, MS, Kevil, CG, Goeders, NE, Murnane, KS, Patterson, JC, Sandau, KE, Gopinathannair, R, et al
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2022;(1):e010273
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Nonmedical use of prescription and nonprescription drugs is a worldwide epidemic, rapidly growing in magnitude with deaths because of overdose and chronic use. A vast majority of these drugs are stimulants that have various effects on the cardiovascular system including the cardiac rhythm. Drugs, like cocaine and methamphetamine, have measured effects on the conduction system and through several direct and indirect pathways, utilizing multiple second messenger systems, change the structural and electrical substrate of the heart, thereby promoting cardiac dysrhythmias. Substituted amphetamines and cocaine affect the expression and activation kinetics of multiple ion channels and calcium signaling proteins resulting in EKG changes, and atrial and ventricular brady and tachyarrhythmias. Preexisting conditions cause substrate changes in the heart, which decrease the threshold for such drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias. The treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in patients who take drugs of abuse may be specialized and will require an understanding of the unique underlying mechanisms and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. The use of primary or secondary prevention defibrillators in drug abusers with chronic systolic heart failure is both sensitive and controversial. This review provides a broad overview of cardiac arrhythmias associated with stimulant substance abuse and their management.
-
2.
Novel insights on caffeine supplementation, CYP1A2 genotype, physiological responses and exercise performance.
Barreto, G, Grecco, B, Merola, P, Reis, CEG, Gualano, B, Saunders, B
European journal of applied physiology. 2021;(3):749-769
Abstract
Caffeine is a popular ergogenic aid due to its primary physiological effects that occur through antagonism of adenosine receptors in the central nervous system. This leads to a cascade of physiological reactions which increases focus and volition, and reduces perception of effort and pain, contributing to improved exercise performance. Substantial variability in the physiological and performance response to acute caffeine consumption is apparent, and a growing number of studies are implicating a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the CYP1A2 gene, responsible for caffeine metabolism, as a key factor that influences the acute responses to caffeine ingestion. However, existing literature regarding the influence of this polymorphism on the ergogenic effects of caffeine is controversial. Fast caffeine metabolisers (AA homozygotes) appear most likely to benefit from caffeine supplementation, although over half of studies showed no differences in the responses to caffeine between CYP1A2 genotypes, while others even showed either a possible advantage or disadvantage for C-allele carriers. Contrasting data are limited by weak study designs and small samples sizes, which did not allow separation of C-allele carriers into their sub-groups (AC and CC), and insufficient mechanistic evidence to elucidate findings. Mixed results prevent practical recommendations based upon genotype while genetic testing for CYP1A2 is also currently unwarranted. More mechanistic and applied research is required to elucidate how the CYP1A2 polymorphism might alter caffeine's ergogenic effect and the magnitude thereof, and whether CYP1A2 genotyping prior to caffeine supplementation is necessary.
-
3.
Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Other Hypersomnia Syndromes.
Trotti, LM, Arnulf, I
Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2021;(1):20-31
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
There are numerous disorders of known or presumed neurologic origin that result in excessive daytime sleepiness, collectively known as the central disorders of hypersomnolence. These include narcolepsy types 1 and 2, idiopathic hypersomnia, Kleine-Levin syndrome, and hypersomnia due to or associated with medical disease, neurologic disease, psychiatric disease, medications or substances, and insufficient sleep durations. This chapter focuses on the treatment of nonnarcoleptic hypersomnia syndromes, from those that are commonly encountered in neurologic practice, such as hypersomnia due to Parkinson's disease, to those that are exceedingly rare but present with dramatic manifestations, such as Kleine-Levin syndrome. The level of evidence for the treatment of sleepiness in these disorders is generally lower than in the well-characterized syndrome of narcolepsy, but available clinical and randomized, controlled trial data can provide guidance for the management of each of these disorders. Treatments vary by diagnosis but may include modafinil/armodafinil, traditional psychostimulants, solriamfetol, pitolisant, clarithromycin, flumazenil, sodium oxybate, melatonin, methylprednisolone, and lithium.
-
4.
What is bronchopulmonary dysplasia and does caffeine prevent it?
Jensen, EA
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2020;(6):101176
Abstract
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is among the most severe complications of very premature birth. Clinical and laboratory studies indicate that lung immaturity, inflammatory lung injury, and disordered lung repair are the primary mechanisms responsible for the development of BPD. Caffeine, initiated within the first 10 days after birth, is one of few drug therapies shown to significantly decrease the risk of BPD in very low birth weight infants. This benefit is likely derived, at least in part, from reduced exposure to positive airway pressure and supplemental oxygen with caffeine therapy. Additional cardiorespiratory benefits of caffeine that may contribute to the lower risk of BPD include less frequent treatment for a PDA, improved pulmonary mechanics, and direct effects on pulmonary inflammation, alveolarization, and angiogenesis. Routine administration of caffeine is indicated in the vast majority of very low birth weight infants. However, current preventative strategies including widespread use of caffeine do not avert BPD in all cases. As such, there is continued need for novel methods to further reduce the risk of BPD in very low birth weight infants.
-
5.
National and international guidelines for neonatal caffeine use: Are they evidenced-based?
Eichenwald, EC
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2020;(6):101177
Abstract
The Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) trial showed that caffeine was safe when used with standard dosing and provided both pulmonary and neurological benefits to preterm infants. Since its publication almost 15 years ago, the use of caffeine in extremely premature infants in Newborn Intensive Care Units worldwide has increased, with almost all receiving the drug during their hospital stay. Subsequent observational studies suggested that administration of caffeine before 3 days of age may have greater benefits, leading many neonatologists to start caffeine prophylactically in all very low birth weight infants. Several publicly available national and international guidelines on caffeine advocate prophylactic use, and some recommend higher doses than those used in the CAP trial. This article will review the evidence basis for neonatal caffeine therapy in light of these guidelines.
-
6.
Pharmacologic Treatment of Eating Disorders.
Crow, SJ
The Psychiatric clinics of North America. 2019;(2):253-262
Abstract
Medications are a useful adjunct to nutritional and psychotherapeutic treatments for eating disorders. Antidepressants are commonly used to treat bulimia nervosa; high-dose fluoxetine is a standard approach, but many other antidepressants can be used. Binge eating disorder can be treated with antidepressants, with medications that diminish appetite, or with lisdexamfetamine. Anorexia nervosa does not generally respond to medications, although recent evidence supports modest weight restoration benefits from olanzapine.
-
7.
Drug-Induced Hypertension.
Foy, MC, Vaishnav, J, Sperati, CJ
Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2019;(4):859-873
Abstract
Untoward side effects of pharmaceuticals can result in considerable morbidity and expense to the health care system. There is likely a sizable fraction of the hypertensive population with disease either induced or exacerbated by polypharmacy. The elevation of blood pressure in drug-induced hypertension occurs through a variety of mechanisms, most notably, sodium and fluid retention, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, alteration of vascular tone, or a combination of these pathways. Recognition of common medications causing drug-induced hypertension is important to effectively control blood pressure. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of these agents are discussed.
-
8.
Are low doses of caffeine as ergogenic as higher doses? A critical review highlighting the need for comparison with current best practice in caffeine research.
Pickering, C, Kiely, J
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2019;:110535
Abstract
Caffeine is a popular and widely consumed sporting ergogenic aid. Over the years, the effects of different caffeine doses have been researched, with the general consensus being that 3 to 6 mg/kg of caffeine represents the optimal dose for most people. Recently, there has been increased attention placed on lower (≤3 mg/kg) caffeine doses, with some research suggesting these doses are also ergogenic. However, a critical consideration for athletes is not merely whether caffeine is ergogenic at a given dose, but whether the consumed dose provides an optimized performance benefit. Following this logic, the aim of this review was to identify a potential oversight in the current research relating to the efficacy of lower caffeine doses. Although low caffeine doses do appear to bestow ergogenic effects, these effects have not been adequately compared with the currently accepted best practice dose of 3 to 6 mg/kg. This methodological oversight limits the practical conclusions we can extract from the research into the efficacy of lower doses of caffeine, as the relative ergogenic benefits between low and recommended doses remains unclear. Here, we examine existing research with a critical eye, and provide recommendations both for those looking to use caffeine to enhance their performance, and those conducting research into caffeine and sport.
-
9.
Administration of Caffeine in Alternate Forms.
Wickham, KA, Spriet, LL
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2018;(Suppl 1):79-91
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
There has been recent interest in the ergogenic effects of caffeine delivered in low doses (~ 200 mg or ~ 3 mg/kg body mass) and administered in forms other than capsules, coffee and sports drinks, including chewing gum, bars, gels, mouth rinses, energy drinks and aerosols. Caffeinated chewing gum is absorbed quicker through the buccal mucosa compared with capsule delivery and absorption in the gut, although total caffeine absorption over time is not different. Rapid absorption may be important in many sporting situations. Caffeinated chewing gum improved endurance cycling performance, and there is limited evidence that repeated sprint cycling and power production may also be improved. Mouth rinsing with caffeine may stimulate nerves with direct links to the brain, in addition to caffeine absorption in the mouth. However, caffeine mouth rinsing has not been shown to have significant effects on cognitive performance. Delivering caffeine with mouth rinsing improved short-duration, high-intensity, repeated sprinting in normal and depleted glycogen states, while the majority of the literature indicates no ergogenic effect on aerobic exercise performance, and resistance exercise has not been adequately studied. Studies with caffeinated energy drinks have generally not examined the individual effects of caffeine on performance, making conclusions about this form of caffeine delivery impossible. Caffeinated aerosol mouth and nasal sprays may stimulate nerves with direct brain connections and enter the blood via mucosal and pulmonary absorption, although little support exists for caffeine delivered in this manner. Overall, more research is needed examining alternate forms of caffeine delivery including direct measures of brain activation and entry of caffeine into the blood, as well as more studies examining trained athletes and female subjects.
-
10.
Effect of caffeine on vestibular evoked myogenic potential: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Souza, MEDCA, Costa, KVTD, Menezes, PL
Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2018;(3):381-388
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Caffeine can be considered the most consumed drug by adults worldwide, and can be found in several foods, such as chocolate, coffee, tea, soda and others. Overall, caffeine in moderate doses, results in increased physical and intellectual productivity, increases the capacity of concentration and reduces the time of reaction to sensory stimuli. On the other hand, high doses can cause noticeable signs of mental confusion and error induction in intellectual tasks, anxiety, restlessness, muscle tremors, tachycardia, labyrinthine changes, and tinnitus. OBJECTIVE Considering that the vestibular evoked myogenic potential is a clinical test that evaluates the muscular response of high intensity auditory stimulation, the present systematic review aimed to analyze the effects of caffeine on vestibular evoked myogenic potential. METHODS This study consisted of the search of the following databases: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, SciELO and ClinicalTrials.gov. Additionally, the gray literature was also searched. The search strategy included terms related to intervention (caffeine or coffee consumption) and the primary outcome (vestibular evoked myogenic potential). RESULTS Based on the 253 potentially relevant articles identified through the database search, only two full-text publications were retrieved for further evaluation, which were maintained for qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION Analyzing the articles found, caffeine has no effect on vestibular evoked myogenic potential in normal individuals.