-
1.
Citrate dose for continuous hemofiltration: effect on calcium and magnesium balance, parathormone and vitamin D status, a randomized controlled trial.
Boer, W, Fivez, T, Vander Laenen, M, Bruckers, L, Grön, HJ, Schetz, M, Oudemans-van Straaten, H
BMC nephrology. 2021;(1):409
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional citrate anticoagulation may cause a negative calcium balance, systemic hypocalcemia and parathormone (PTH) activation but randomzed studies are not available. Aim was to determine the effect of citrate dose on calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) balance, PTH and Vitamin D. METHODS Single center prospective randomized study. Patients, requiring continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with citrate, randomized to low dose citrate (2.5 mmol/L) vs. high dose (4.5 mmol/L) for 24 h, targeting post-filter ionized calcium (pfiCa) of 0.325-0.4 mmol/L vs. 0.2-0.275 mmol/L, using the Prismaflex® algorithm with 100% postfilter calcium replacement. Extra physician-ordered Ca and Mg supplementation was performed aiming at systemic iCa > 1.0 mmol/L. Arterial blood, effluent and post-filter aliquots were taken for balance calculations (area under the curve), intact (i), oxidized (ox) and non-oxidized (nox) PTH, 25-hydroxy-Vitamin D (25D) and 1,25-dihydroxy-Vitamin D (1,25D). RESULTS 35 patients were analyzed, 17 to high, 18 to low citrate. Mean 24-h Ca balance was - 9.72 mmol/d (standard error 1.70) in the high vs - 1.18 mmol/d (se 1.70)) (p = 0.002) in the low citrate group and 24-h Mg-balance was - 25.99 (se 2.10) mmol/d vs. -17.63 (se 2.10) mmol/d (p = 0.008) respectively. Physician-ordered Ca supplementation, higher in the high citrate group, resulted in a positive Ca-balance in both groups. iPTH, oxPTH or noxPTH were not different between groups. Over 24 h, median PTH decreased from 222 (25th-75th percentile 140-384) to 162 (111-265) pg/ml (p = 0.002); oxPTH from 192 (124-353) to 154 pg/ml (87-231), p = 0.002. NoxPTH did not change significantly. Mean 25 D (standard deviation), decreased from 36.5 (11.8) to 33.3 (11.2) nmol/l (p = 0.003), 1,25D rose from 40.9 pg/ml (30.7) to 43.2 (30.7) pg/ml (p = 0.046), without differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS A higher citrate dose caused a more negative CVVH Ca balance than a lower dose, due to a higher effluent Calcium loss. Physician-ordered Ca supplementation, targeting a systemic iCa > 1.0 mmol/L, higher in the high citrate group, resulted in a positive Ca-balance in both groups. iPTH and oxPTH declined, suggesting decreased oxidative stress, while noxPTH did not change. 25D decreased while 1,25-D rose. Mg balance was negative in both groups, more so in the high citrate group. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02194569. Registered 18 July 2014.
-
2.
BRAzil magnesium (BRAMAG) trial: a double-masked randomized clinical trial of oral magnesium supplementation in pregnancy.
de Araújo, CAL, Ray, JG, Figueiroa, JN, Alves, JG
BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;(1):234
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is conflicting evidence about the role of oral magnesium supplementation in the prevention of preterm birth and related adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare magnesium citrate with placebo in the prevention of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes among women at higher risk. METHODS This multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized superiority clinical trial compared oral magnesium citrate 300 mg to matched placebo, from 12 to 20 weeks' gestation until delivery. This trial was completed in three centers in northeastern Brazil. Eligible women were those with a singleton pregnancy and ≥ 1 risk factor, such as prior preterm birth or preeclampsia, or current chronic hypertension or pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus, age > 35 years or elevated body mass index. The primary perinatal composite outcome comprised preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation, stillbirth > 20 weeks, neonatal death or NICU admission < 28 days after birth, or small for gestational age birthweight < 3rd percentile. The co-primary maternal composite outcome comprised preeclampsia or eclampsia < 37 weeks, severe gestational hypertension < 37 weeks, placental abruption, or maternal stroke or death during pregnancy or ≤ 7 days after delivery. RESULTS Analyses comprised 407 women who received magnesium citrate and 422 who received placebo. The perinatal composite outcome occurred among 75 (18.4%) in the magnesium arm and 76 (18.0%) in the placebo group - an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.10 (95% CI 0.72-1.68). The maternal composite outcome occurred among 49 (12.0%) women in the magnesium arm and 41 women (9.7%) in the placebo group - an aOR of 1.29 (95% CI 0.83-2.00). CONCLUSIONS Oral magnesium citrate supplementation did not appear to reduce adverse perinatal or maternal outcomes in high-risk singleton pregnancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02032186, registered January 9, 2014.
-
3.
Comparison of Two Dietary Supplements for Treatment of Uric Acid Renal Lithiasis: Citrate vs. Citrate + Theobromine.
Hernandez, Y, Costa-Bauza, A, Calvó, P, Benejam, J, Sanchis, P, Grases, F
Nutrients. 2020;(7)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uric acid (UA) renal lithiasis has a high rate of recurrence and a prevalence ranging from 10% and 15%, depending on the population. The most important etiological factor is persistence of urinary pH below 5.5 and one of the most common treatments is alkalization with citrate. Recent studies demonstrated that theobromine, which is abundant in chocolate and cocoa, is a potent inhibitor of UA crystallization. AIM: The aim was to compare the efficacy of citrate versus citrate + theobromine as treatment for UA lithiasis. METHODS This randomized cross-over trial investigated the efficacy of two treatments in 47 patients with UA renal lithiasis. Urine volume, pH, UA excretion, theobromine excretion, and risk of UA crystallization (RUAC) at baseline and at the end of each intervention period were measured. RESULTS Each treatment significantly reduced the risk of UA crystallization compared to basal values. The RUAC after citrate + theobromine was lower than the RUAC after citrate, although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The combined consumption of citrate and theobromine may be a promising strategy for the prevention of UA kidney stones.
-
4.
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).
Hung, SY, Chen, HC, Chen, WT
Scientific reports. 2020;(1):5604
Abstract
Bowel cleansing is essential for a successful colonoscopy, but the ideal clearing agent and the volume have yet to be determined. A small-volume cleanser is important for patient compliance. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability of a 300-mL small-volume sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (PSMC) preparation-Bowklean with one 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)/bisacodyl-Klean-Prep/Dulcolax preparation under identical dietary recommendations. This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, pre-specified noninferiority study enrolled 631 outpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy (Bowklean = 316 and Klean-Prep/Dulcolax = 315). After bowel preparation, an independent evaluator blinded to the subject's treatment allocation rated the quality of the colon cleansing. Efficacy was evaluated using the Aronchick Scale and Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OPBS). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Tolerability and acceptability were measured via a patient questionnaire. Bowklean was non-interior to Klean-Prep/Dulcolax in overall colon cleansing but was associated with significantly better preparation quality. Notably, Bowklean was associated with significantly greater tolerability and acceptability of bowel preparations than Klean-Prep/Dulcolax. Safety profiles did not differ significantly between the groups. Our data indicate that Bowklean is a more effective and better-tolerated bowel cleansing preparation before colonoscopy than Klean-Prep/Dulcolax. Bowklean may therefore increase positive attitudes toward colonoscopies and participation rates.
-
5.
Citric-acid dialysate improves the calcification propensity of hemodialysis patients: A multicenter prospective randomized cross-over trial.
Ter Meulen, KJ, Dekker, MJE, Pasch, A, Broers, NJH, van der Sande, FM, van der Net, JB, Konings, CJAM, Gsponer, IM, Bachtler, MDN, Gauly, A, et al
PloS one. 2019;(12):e0225824
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The concentration of dialysate calcium (dCa) has been suggested to affect vascular calcification, but evidence is scarce. Calcification propensity reflects the intrinsic capacity of serum to prevent calcium and phosphate to precipitate. The use of citric-acid dialysate may have a beneficial effect on the calcification propensity due to the chelating effect on calcium and magnesium. The aim of this study was to compare the intradialytic and short-term effects of haemodialysis with either standard acetic-acid dialysate with dCa1.50 (A1.5) or dCa1.25 (A1.25), as well as citric-acid dialysate with dCa1.50 (C1.5) in bicarbonate dialysis on the calcification propensity of serum. METHODS Chronic stable hemodialysis patients were included. This multicenter randomized cross-over study consisted out of a baseline week (A1.5), followed by the randomized sequence of A1.25 or C1.5 for one week after which the alternate treatment was provided after a washout week with A1.5. Calcification propensity of serum was assessed by time-resolved nephelometry where the T50 reflects the transition time between formation of primary and secondary calciprotein particles. RESULTS Eighteen patients (median age 70 years) completed the study. Intradialytic change in T50 was increased with C1.5 (121 [90-152]min) compared to A1.25 (83 [43-108]min, p<0.001) and A1.5 (66 [18-102]min, p<0.001). During the treatment week, predialysis T50 increased significantly from the first to the third session with C1.5 (271 [234-291] to 280 [262-339]min, p = 0.002) and with A1.25 (274 [213-308] to 307 [256-337]min, p<0.001), but not with A1.5 (284 [235-346] to 300 [247-335]min, p = 0.33). CONCLUSION Calcification propensity, as measured by the change in T50, improved significantly during treatment in C1.5 compared to A1.25 and A1.5. Long-term studies are needed to investigate the effects of different dialysate compositions concentrations on vascular calcification and bone mineral disorders.
-
6.
Impact of Potassium Citrate vs Citric Acid on Urinary Stone Risk in Calcium Phosphate Stone Formers.
Doizi, S, Poindexter, JR, Pearle, MS, Blanco, F, Moe, OW, Sakhaee, K, Maalouf, NM
The Journal of urology. 2018;(6):1278-1284
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To our knowledge no medication has been shown to be effective for preventing recurrent calcium phosphate urinary stones. Potassium citrate may protect against calcium phosphate stones by enhancing urine citrate excretion and lowering urine calcium but it raises urine pH, which increases calcium phosphate saturation and may negate the beneficial effects. Citric acid can potentially raise urine citrate but not pH and, thus, it may be a useful countermeasure against calcium phosphate stones. We assessed whether these 2 agents could significantly alter urine composition and reduce calcium phosphate saturation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a crossover metabolic study 13 recurrent calcium phosphate stone formers without hypercalciuria were evaluated at the end of 3, 1-week study phases during which they consumed a fixed metabolic diet and received assigned study medications, including citric acid 30 mEq twice daily, potassium citrate 20 mEq twice daily or matching placebo. We collected 24-hour urine specimens to perform urine chemistry studies and calculate calcium phosphate saturation indexes. RESULTS Urine parameters did not significantly differ between the citric acid and placebo phases. Potassium citrate significantly increased urine pH, potassium and citrate compared to citric acid and placebo (p <0.01) with a trend toward lower urine calcium (p = 0.062). Brushite saturation was increased by potassium citrate when calculated by the relative supersaturation ratio but not by the saturation index. CONCLUSIONS Citric acid at a dose of 60 mEq per day did not significantly alter urine composition in calcium phosphate stone formers. The long-term impact of potassium citrate on calcium phosphate stone recurrence needs to be studied further.
-
7.
Association of Urinary Citrate With Acid-Base Status, Bone Resorption, and Calcium Excretion in Older Men and Women.
Shea, MK, Dawson-Hughes, B
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2018;(2):452-459
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
CONTEXT Elevated urine net acid excretion (NAE), indicative of subclinical metabolic acidosis, has been associated with higher bone turnover. Urine citrate, which is a common clinical measure, changes in response to acid-base status but its association with bone turnover is uncertain. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the association between change in urine citrate and change in bone turnover and calcium excretion. DESIGN, INTERVENTION, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 233 healthy men and women ≥60 years old were randomly assigned to 1.0 mmol/kg/d potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3), 1.5 mmol/kg/d KHCO3, or placebo for 84 days. OUTCOME MEASURES Urine citrate, NAE, N-telopeptide of collagen type-I (NTX), calcium excretion, and serum amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP) were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS Urine citrate increased dose dependently after KHCO3 supplementation (P trend < 0.001). The urine citrate change was significantly inversely associated with P1NP change (P = 0.021) but not with change in NTX (P = 0.051) or calcium excretion (P = 0.652). The NAE change was positively associated with change in NTX and calcium excretion (P ≤ 0.003) but not with change in P1NP (P = 0.051). When the urine citrate change and NAE change were included in the same model, the urine citrate change was not associated with change in NTX, calcium excretion, or serum P1NP (P ≥ 0.086), whereas change in NAE remained associated with change in NTX and calcium excretion (P ≤ 0.003). CONCLUSION Urine citrate may not be a suitable alternative to NAE when assessing acid-base status in relation to bone turnover in older adults.
-
8.
A noninferiority trial comparing a heparin-grafted membrane plus citrate-containing dialysate versus regional citrate anticoagulation: results of the CiTED study.
Meijers, B, Metalidis, C, Vanhove, T, Poesen, R, Kuypers, D, Evenepoel, P
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;(4):707-714
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anticoagulation is a prerequisite for successful haemodialysis. Heparin and low-molecular weight heparins are routinely used despite increased bleeding risk. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is efficacious, but is laborious and may induce metabolic disturbances. Heparin-grafted membranes are less efficacious. It is not known whether combining citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid anticoagulation strategy. METHODS We performed a randomized crossover noninferiority trial, with a prespecified noninferiority threshold of 10% in maintenance dialysis patients ( n = 25). We compared the combination of citrate-containing dialysate plus a heparin-grafted membrane [CiTrate and EvoDial (CiTED) protocol] with RCA. The primary endpoint was completion of dialysis without significant clotting. Secondary endpoints included time to clotting, achieved Kt / V urea , loss of total cell volume, venous air chamber clotting score and systemic-ionized calcium concentration. RESULTS In total, 1284 sessions were performed according to study protocol, 636 in the CiTED arm and 648 in the RCA arm. The primary outcome of preterm interruption due to clotting occurred in 36 (5.7%) of sessions in the CiTED arm, and in 40 (6.2%) sessions in the RCA arm, thereby meeting noninferiority criteria (P < 0.0001). Most of the clotting events occurred in the fourth hour of dialysis. Repetitive clotting occurred in four patients in the CiTED arm and one patient in the RCA arm. Time to preterm interruption due to clotting and achieved Kt / V urea was not significantly different. Systemic-ionized calcium levels during treatment were significantly lower in the RCA arm and clinically relevant hypocalcaemia was noted only in the RCA arm. CONCLUSION The combination of citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid alternative to RCA.
-
9.
Effects of citrate dialysate in chronic dialysis: a multicentre randomized crossover study.
Schmitz, M, Loke, O, Fach, B, Kalb, K, Heering, PJ, Meinke, D, Rawer, P, Galle, J, Kozik-Jaromin, J
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2016;(8):1327-34
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although citrate dialysate (CiDi) is regarded to be safe, dialysis modalities using higher dialysate volumes, like haemodiafiltration (HDF), may expose patients to higher citrate load and thus increase the risk of complications. We investigated the residual risk of CiDi compared with standard dialysate (StDi) in patients on different dialysis modalities and its effect on dialysis dose. METHODS In a multicentre randomized crossover study, 92 dialysis patients (HDF post-dilution: n = 44, HDF pre-dilution: n = 26, haemodialysis: n = 25) were treated for 4 weeks with each dialysate (StDi and CiDi). Hypocalcaemia (ionized calcium ≤0.9 mmol/L), alkalosis (pH ≥7.55), post-treatment bicarbonate ≥32 mmol/L, pre-treatment bicarbonate ≥27 mmol/L, intra-dialytic events (IEs) and adverse events (AEs) between dialysis sessions were investigated as primary end points. The secondary objective was dialysis efficacy, i.e. dose and removal ratios of urea, creatinine, phosphate and β-2-microglobulin. RESULTS Post-dialysis overcorrection of bicarbonate (>32 mmol/L) was less frequent with CiDi (P = 0.008). Other predefined calcium and acid-base disturbances did not vary. There was no significant difference in IE. However, more patients developed AEs such as fatigue, muscle spasms or pain using CiDi (StDi: 41 versus CiDi: 55 patients, P = 0.02), particularly in the first 2 weeks of exposure. Dialysis efficacy was comparable with both dialysates. CONCLUSIONS It can be confirmed that CiDi is not associated with the development of severe calcium and acid-base disorders, even when dialysis modalities with higher citrate loads are used. However, a refinement of the CiDi composition to minimize AEs is necessary.
-
10.
Citrate vs. acetate dialysate on intradialytic heparin dose: A double blind randomized crossover study.
Leung, KC, Tai, DJ, Ravani, P, Quinn, RR, Scott-Douglas, N, MacRae, JM
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2016;(4):537-547
Abstract
Introduction Citrate containing dialysate has a calcium-binding anticoagulant effect compared to standard acetic acid containing dialysate. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in maintenance HD patients to determine if citrate dialysate ("citrate") safely allows for a lower cumulative heparin dose ("heparin dose"). Methods Intradialytic heparin was adjusted to the minimum during a 2-week run-in phase. Patients remaining on heparin at the end of the run-in phase were then randomized to two weeks of HD with acetate dialysate ("acetate") followed by two weeks of citrate (sequence 1) or two weeks of citrate followed by two weeks of acetate (sequence 2). We estimated a minimum of 14 patients are required to show a 30% reduction in heparin dose per HD session with citrate compared with acetate. Twenty-five patients entered the run-in phase, 20 were randomized, and 19 completed the study. Findings The mean heparin dose was reduced by 19% (656 units, 95% CI -174 to -1139 units, P = 0.011) in the acetate group, and 30% (1046 units 95% CI -498 to 1594 units, P < 0.001) in the citrate group. There was no difference in the mean heparin dose reduction between the two dialysates (P > 0.05). The intradialytic ionized calcium in the citrate group was lowered by 0.10 mmol/L (95% CI 0.07 to 0.14 mmol/L, P < 0.001), and remained unchanged in the acetate group. Discussion Although citrate is a safe alternative to acetate, it does not result in additional heparin dose reduction.