-
1.
Safety and efficacy of riboflavin-assisted collagen cross-linking of cornea in progressive keratoconus patients: A prospective study in North East India.
Bhattacharyya, A, Sarma, P, Das, K, Agarwal, B, Medhi, J, Das Mohapatra, SS
Indian journal of pharmacology. 2019;(3):157-167
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Riboflavin- and ultraviolet (UV)-A-mediated collagen cross-linking of the cornea is a frequently used therapeutic measure for the treatment of progressive keratoconus (PK). First, riboflavin increases cross-linking and second, it serves as a protective shield to other deep ocular structures. However, pharmacogenomic variation in riboflavin efficacy is reported. As the Northeast Indian population represents a genetically diverse group of population compared to mainstream India, we have assessed the efficacy of the procedure in a northeastern population with PK. METHODS In this study, 78 eyes with PK were included (n = 39 in the treatment arm and n = 39 in the control arm). The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of corneal collagen cross-linking using riboflavin (C3R) (epithelium off) on maximum keratometry. The secondary objectives were evaluation of change in corneal topography parameters, i.e., minimum keratometry (Kmin), simulated keratometry (Sim K), subjective refraction (cylinder power, spherical power, and spherical equivalent [SE]), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) and safety (intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, and percentage hexagonality) at 1, 3, and 6 months following C3R procedure. RESULTS Statistically significant improvement was noted in Kmin (6 months), Sim K (3 and 6 months), cylinder power (3 and 6 months), spherical power (3 and 6 months), SE (3 and 6 months), BCVA (6 months), and UCVA (1, 6 months) in the C3R group (n = 39) when compared to the control group (n = 39). The mean CS decreased at 1 month and gradually improved to achieve statistically significant value at 6 months in the C3R group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Riboflavin-assisted C3R treatment showed promising efficacy in the treatment of PK patients in our population. As the collagen turnover rate of cornea is 2-3 years and the progression of PK is highly variable, we need long-term studies to evaluate the efficacy of C3R over time, requirement of repeat therapy, and safety of repeat cross-linking.
-
2.
Application of diethylenetriamine grafted on glyoxal cross-linked chitosan composite for the effective removal of metal ions in batch system.
Igberase, E, Osifo, PO
International journal of biological macromolecules. 2019;:1145-1155
Abstract
This investigation studied the removal of Cu2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+ and Cr6+ ions from synthesised wastewater using modified chitosan macromolecules. On this note, chitosan beads (CS) were prepared and cross-linked with glyoxal solution. It was found that cross-linking increased the beads mechanical strength and chemical stability in acid solution and also increased the crystallinity of the beads in the process, which is a shortcoming, as the beads tend to have reduced adsorption capacity. To reduce this shortcoming, the cross-linked chitosan beads (DCS) were grafted with diethylenetriamine. The beads were characterised prior to adsorption studies. The amine concentration of the grafted cross-linked beads (GDCS) was observed to be nearly the same as the adsorption capacity (qmax); this concludes that the amine group of chitosan are the main reactive group. Also, the qmax was found to be 6.3 mmol/g with a 44.2% degree of grafting. The kinetics of the adsorption process was described reasonably well with the Swan model, where the experimental and simulated data were in close agreement. The effective diffusion coefficients (Deff) obtained by fitting the model to experimental data were found to be between 2.25·10-10 to 2.50·10-10 for Cu2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+ and Cr6+ adsorption unto GDCS.
-
3.
Corneal crosslinking: Current protocols and clinical approach.
Beckman, KA, Gupta, PK, Farid, M, Berdahl, JP, Yeu, E, Ayres, B, Chan, CC, Gomes, JAP, Holland, EJ, Kim, T, et al
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2019;(11):1670-1679
Abstract
Members of the ASCRS Cornea Clinical Committee performed a review of the current literature on the corneal crosslinking (CXL) procedure for treating corneal ectasia. The members explored the data on the techniques currently in use and under investigation, including their advantages, safety profiles, risks, and cost analyses, compared with data on corneal transplantation. They concluded that CXL limits the progression of keratoconus, thus reducing the need for transplantation. They also found that compared with permitting the disease to progress naturally, CXL techniques carry significant and long-term cost and safety benefits, primarily by reducing the need for corneal transplantation. Studies of various CXL techniques (eg, epithelium-on treatment, changes in ultraviolet light parameters, riboflavin composition) continue with the ultimate goal of improving the procedure's safety and efficacy.
-
4.
A prospective, randomized clinical study comparing accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking with 5% NaCl hypertonic saline for bullous keratopathy in Asian eyes.
Kasai, K, Kato, N, Den, S, Konomi, K, Shinzawa, M, Shimazaki, J
Medicine. 2019;(51):e18256
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the clinical outcomes of accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) and 5% NaCl hypertonic saline (HS) for the treatment of symptomatic bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS A randomized controlled trial was held at Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan. Twenty-three eyes of 23 consecutive patients with symptomatic BK were enrolled. The etiology of BK included pseudophakic BK, previous keratoplasty, previous endotheliitis, previous glaucoma surgery, trauma, herpes infection, as well as unknown causes. Eleven eyes received epi-off accelerated CXL (with epithelial abrasion and 18 mW/cm ultraviolet A irradiation for 5 minutes) and 12 eyes received HS instillation. In addition to the usual ophthalmic examination, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were determined. The CCT was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and up to 6 months after treatments. Subjective symptoms of pain, blurred vision, photophobia, and irritation were also recorded. RESULTS The follow-up was completed for all patients in the CXL group. However, 6 patients in the HS group requested CXL treatments after 3 months. The BCVA was not significantly changed during the study periods in both groups. The CCT was significantly thinner in the CXL group compared to the HS group at 1 and 6 months (P = .015 and 0.144, respectively). Among the subjective symptoms recorded, irritation was significantly lower in the CXL group at 1 month (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS Accelerated CXL may produce transient improvement in pain and corneal edema in patients with BK.
-
5.
Collagen Cross-Linking in the Management of Microbial Keratitis.
Bonzano, C, Di Zazzo, A, Barabino, S, Coco, G, Traverso, CE
Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019;(3):507-512
Abstract
Increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents has contributed to an elevated risk of complications of infectious keratitis. Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has been widely adopted for the management of keratoconus and post-refractive surgery corneal ectasia. It has recently been introduced as an option for treating keratitis due to multidrug resistant organisms. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale, safety, and evidence for CXL in infectious keratitis and its possible effect on ocular surface inflammation. Published data show that CXL is effective and safe as an adjunct to antibiotic treatment in selected cases of bacterial keratitis. The benefit of CXL probably varies according to the etiology of the infection.
-
6.
Corneal Cross-Linking: The Science Beyond the Myths and Misconceptions.
Rubinfeld, RS, Caruso, C, Ostacolo, C
Cornea. 2019;(6):780-790
Abstract
PURPOSE There has been a recent explosion in the variety of techniques used to accomplish corneal cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of ectatic corneal diseases. To understand the success or failure of various techniques, we review the physicochemical basis of corneal CXL and re-evaluate the current principles and long-standing conventional wisdom in the light of recent, compelling, and sometimes contradictory research. METHODS Two clinicians and a medicinal chemist developed a list of current key topics, controversies, and questions in the field of corneal CXL based on information from current literature, medical conferences, and discussions with international practitioners of CXL. RESULTS Standard corneal CXL with removal of the corneal epithelium is a safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of corneal ectasias. However, the necessity of epithelium removal is painful for patients, involves risk and requires significant recovery time. Attempts to move to transepithelial corneal CXL have been hindered by the lack of a coherent understanding of the physicochemistry of corneal CXL. Misconceptions about the applicability of the Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity and the Lambert-Beer law in CXL hamper the ability to predict the effect of ultraviolet A energy during CXL. Improved understanding of CXL may also expand the treatment group for corneal ectasia to those with thinner corneas. Finally, it is essential to understand the role of oxygen in successful CXL. CONCLUSIONS Improved understanding of the complex interactions of riboflavin, ultraviolet A energy and oxygen in corneal CXL may provide a successful route to transepithelial corneal CXL.
-
7.
Efficacy of eyedrops containing cross-linked hyaluronic acid and coenzyme Q10 in treating patients with mild to moderate dry eye.
Postorino, EI, Rania, L, Aragona, E, Mannucci, C, Alibrandi, A, Calapai, G, Puzzolo, D, Aragona, P
European journal of ophthalmology. 2018;(1):25-31
Abstract
PURPOSE Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition causing substantial burden. A randomized, controlled, single-masked study was performed in 40 patients with mild to moderate DED to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a collyrium based on crosslinked hyaluronic acid (XLHA) with coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). METHODS Enrolled subjects were divided into 2 groups: group A, treated with XLHA + CoQ10; and group B, treated with hyaluronic acid (HA). Eyedrops were administered 4 times daily for 3 months. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining, and meibomian gland assessment (MGD) were evaluated; furthermore, corneal aesthesiometry, in vivo corneal confocal microscopy, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and fundus examination were performed. RESULTS At the end of treatment, OSDI score significantly decreased in groups A and B (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively); the decrease was significantly higher in group A. Corneal staining decreased in both groups, with lower scores in group A. The MGD was significantly ameliorated in group A patients. No differences were found for corneal aesthesiometry or TBUT. Epithelial cell reflectivity was significantly reduced only in group A. For keratocytes and stromal matrix parameters, there was a significant improvement in group A. No changes were found for visual acuity, IOP, or fundus examination. CONCLUSIONS The XLHA + CoQ10 treatment showed greater effectiveness in DED compared to HA alone, probably due to the longer permanency on ocular surface and the antioxidant activity of CoQ10. Therefore, XLHA + CoQ10 eyedrops could represent a new possibility in dry eye treatment.
-
8.
Corneal Scarring and Hyperopic Shift After Corneal Cross-linking for Corneal Ectasia After SMILE.
Voulgari, N, Mikropoulos, D, Kontadakis, GA, Safi, A, Tabibian, D, Kymionis, GD
Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995). 2018;(11):779-782
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a case of severe corneal scarring and hyperopic shift after corneal cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of ectasia following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS Case report and literature review. RESULTS A 35-year-old man was referred with severe unilateral corneal haze that developed after CXL. The patient had undergone SMILE 4 years earlier in both eyes. Nineteen months postoperatively, the patient presented with bilateral decrease in vision and corneal topography revealed corneal ectasia in the right eye. CXL was performed in the right eye and a deep stromal haze was observed 1 year later. Comparative maps showed progressive corneal thinning with corresponding flattening that induced hypermetropization and astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS CXL after SMILE in this original case resulted in severe deep corneal haze and corneal flattening with hyperopic shift. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):779-782.].
-
9.
Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study.
Sadoughi, MM, Einollahi, B, Baradaran-Rafii, A, Roshandel, D, Hasani, H, Nazeri, M
International ophthalmology. 2018;(1):67-74
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of the conventional and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in patients with bilateral progressive keratoconus (KC). METHODS Fifteen consecutive patients with bilateral progressive KC were enrolled. In each patient, the fellow eyes were randomly assigned to the conventional CXL (3 mW/cm2 for 30 min) or accelerated CXL (ACXL) (9 mW/cm2 for 10 min) groups. Manifest refraction; uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity; maximum and mean keratometry; corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor; endothelial cell density and morphology; central corneal thickness; and wavefront aberrations were measured before and 12 months after the CXL. RESULTS Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder improved significantly only in conventional group. Uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity did not change significantly in either group. Also there was no significant change in the maximum and mean keratometry after 12 months. There was significant decrease in central corneal thickness in both groups which was more prominent in conventional group. Endothelial cell density reduced only in the conventional group which was not statistically significant (P = 0.147). CH, CRF, and wavefront aberrations did not change significantly in either group. We did not observe any significant difference in the changes of the variables between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated CXL with 9 mW/cm2 irradiation for 10 min had similar refractive, visual, keratometric, and aberrometric results and less adverse effects on the corneal thickness and endothelial cells as compared with the conventional method after 12 months follow-up. However, randomized clinical trials with longer follow-ups and larger sample sizes are needed.
-
10.
Comparison of Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis.
Wen, D, Li, Q, Song, B, Tu, R, Wang, Q, O'Brart, DPS, McAlinden, C, Huang, J
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;(10):3920-3931
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically compare epithelial-off standard (SCXL) to accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (ACXL) for the treatment of keratoconus. METHODS PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry were searched for trials comparing SCXL and ACXL for keratoconus up to October 2017. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Primary outcomes were changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity, maximum keratometry (Kmax), and mean keratometry (mean K). Secondary outcomes were changes in corrected distance visual acuity, mean refractive spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS Eleven trials were included. For primary outcomes, SCXL showed a greater reduction in Kmax (SMD 0.32; 95% CI 0.16, 0.48) than ACXL. For secondary outcomes, the decrease in CCT (SMD 0.32; 95% CI 0.03, 0.61) and ECD (SMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.06, 0.46) was less with ACXL than with SCXL. For the other outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS SCXL has a greater effect in terms of reduction in Kmax than ACXL, while ACXL induces less reduction in CCT and ECD than SCXL. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing ACXL and SCXL are indicated.