-
1.
Effect of Postoperative Coffee Consumption on Postoperative Ileus after Abdominal Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Watanabe, J, Miki, A, Koizumi, M, Kotani, K, Sata, N
Nutrients. 2021;(12)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous systematic reviews have not clarified the effect of postoperative coffee consumption on the incidence of postoperative ileus (POI) and the length of hospital stay (LOS). We aimed to assess its effect on these postoperative outcomes. METHODS Studies evaluating postoperative coffee consumption were searched using electronic databases until September 2021 to perform random-effect meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee were also compared. RESULTS Thirteen trials (1246 patients) and nine ongoing trials were included. Of the 13 trials, 6 were on colorectal surgery, 5 on caesarean section, and 2 on gynecological surgery. Coffee reduced the time to first defecation (mean difference (MD) -10.1 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -14.5 to -5.6), POI (risk ratio 0.42; 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.69); and LOS (MD -1.5; 95% CI = -2.7 to -0.3). This trend was similar in colorectal and gynecological surgeries. Coffee had no adverse effects. There was no difference in POI or LOS between caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee (p > 0.05). The certainty of evidence was low to moderate. CONCLUSION This review showed that postoperative coffee consumption, regardless of caffeine content, likely reduces POI and LOS after colorectal and gynecological surgery.
-
2.
Reducing ileus after colorectal surgery: A network meta-analysis of therapeutic interventions.
Ashcroft, J, Singh, AA, Ramachandran, B, Habeeb, A, Hudson, V, Meyer, J, Simillis, C, Davies, RJ
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(7):4772-4782
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several treatment strategies for avoiding post-operative ileus have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials. This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different therapeutic interventions on ileus outcome measures. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for post-operative ileus following colorectal surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Direct and indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 48 randomised controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis reporting on 3614 participants. Early feeding was found to be the best treatment for time to solid diet tolerance and length of hospital stay with a probability of P = 0.96 and P = 0.47, respectively. Early feeding resulted in significantly shorter time to solid diet tolerance (Mean Difference (MD) 58.85 h; 95% Credible Interval (CrI) -73.41, -43.15) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD 2.33 days; CrI -3.51, -1.18) compared to no treatment. Epidural analgesia was ranked best treatment for time to flatus (P = 0.29) and time to stool (P = 0.268). Epidural analgesia resulted in significantly shorter time to flatus (MD -18.88 h; CrI -33.67, -3.44) and shorter time to stool (MD -26.05 h; 95% CrI -66.42, 15.65) compared to no intervention. Gastrograffin was ranked best treatment to avoid the requirement for post-operative nasogastric tube insertion (P = 0.61) however demonstrated limited efficacy (OR 0.50; CrI 0.143, 1.621) compared to no intervention. Nasogastric and nasointestinal tube insertion, probiotics, and acupuncture were found to be least efficacious as interventions to reduce ileus. CONCLUSION This network meta-analysis identified early feeding as the most efficacious therapeutic intervention to reduce post-operative ileus in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, in addition to highlighting other therapies that require further investigation by high quality study. In patients undergoing colorectal surgery, emphasis should be placed on early feeding as soon as can be appropriately initiated to support the return of gastrointestinal motility.
-
3.
Effect of stellate ganglion block on postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Wen, B, Wang, Y, Zhang, C, Fu, Z
BMC surgery. 2020;(1):284
Abstract
BACKGROUND The return of gastrointestinal function is an important sign of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia. We aimed to summarize the effects of stellate ganglion block on the recovery of gastrointestinal function as a means of exploring methods through which anaesthesiologists can contribute to postoperative patient recovery. METHODS We performed a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 1988, and November 11, 2019, in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese VIP Information, and the Wanfang and SinoMed databases. Study quality was assessed by using the GRADE criteria and bias of included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The time to peristaltic sound resumption, flatus, postoperative eating and the incidence of abdominal bloating in the stellate ganglion block and control groups were compared. The control group consisted of either a stellate ganglion block with normal saline or no treatment. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. RESULTS After searching for relevant articles, 281 studies were identified, and five articles with data on 274 patients were eligible. Regarding postoperative flatus time, stellate ganglion block resulted in a mean reduction of 15 h (P = 0.02); then a sensitivity analysis was performed, and the standard mean difference decreased to 6 h (P = 0.007). For gastrointestinal surgery, the mean reduction was 23.92 h (P = 0.0002). As for the evaluation of the recovery of peristaltic sounds, stellate ganglion block promoted the recovery of regular peristaltic bowel sounds an average of 14.67 h earlier than in the control (P = 0.0008). When it comes to nutrients, stellate ganglion block shortened the total parenteral nutrition time by more than 50 h in patients who had undergone gastrointestinal surgery (P<0.00001). Finally, stellate ganglion block prevented the occurrence of postoperative abdominal bloating (P = 0.001).) No complications related to stellate ganglion block were reported. CONCLUSION Stellate ganglion block may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery in patients undergoing various surgeries under general anaesthesia. However, additional trials investigating the use of stellate ganglion block are necessary to confirm our finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION This meta-analysis has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42020157602).
-
4.
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].
Tan, SJ, Jiang, Y, Xi, QL, Meng, QY, Zhuang, QL, Han, YS, Wu, GH
Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2020;(6):589-596
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer. Methods: The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria: (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliatively resected by laparoscopic or open procedure. Exclusion criteria: (1) no valid data available in the literature; (2) single study sample size ≤20; (3) subjects with colorectal benign disease; (4) metastatic resection or lymph node dissection was performed intraoperatively in an attempt to perform radical surgery; (5) duplicate publication of the literature. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies. In case of disagreement, the evaluation was performed by discussion or a third researcher was invited to participate. The data were extracted from the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.1.0 version software was used for this meta-analysis. Results: Four CCTs with a total of 864 patients were included in this study, including 216 patients in the laparoscopic group and 648 patients in the open group. Compared with the open group, except for longer operation time (WMD=37.60, 95% CI: 26.11 to 49.08, P<0.05), laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-74.89, 95% CI: -144.78 to -5.00, P<0.05), earlier first flatus and food intake after surgery (WMD=-1.00, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.87, P<0.05; WMD=-1.61, 95%CI: -2.16 to -1.06, P<0.05), shorter hospital stay (WMD=-2.01, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.80, P<0.05) and lower morbidity of postoperative complication (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in time to start postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy rate, and mortality (P > all 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.
-
5.
The Impact of Preoperative Immune Modulating Nutrition on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Adiamah, A, Skořepa, P, Weimann, A, Lobo, DN
Annals of surgery. 2019;(2):247-256
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define the influence of preoperative immune modulating nutrition (IMN) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. BACKGROUND Although studies have shown that perioperative IMN may reduce postoperative infectious complications, many of these have included patients with benign and malignant disease, and the optimal timing of such an intervention is not clear. METHODS The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2000 to 2018, for prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating preoperative oral or enteral IMN in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative infectious complications. Secondary endpoints included postoperative noninfectious complications, length of stay, and up to 30-day mortality. The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.3 software. RESULTS Sixteen studies reporting on 1387 patients (715 IMN group, 672 control group) were included. Six of the included studies reported on a mixed population of patients undergoing all gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Of the remaining, 4 investigated IMN in colorectal cancer surgery, 2 in pancreatic surgery, and another 2 in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. There was 1 study each on liver and esophageal cancer. The formulation of nutrition used in all studies in the treated patients was Impact (Novartis/Nestlé), which contains ω-3 fatty acids, arginine, and nucleotides. Preoperative IMN in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer reduced infectious complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.71, P < 0.0001, I = 16%, n = 1387] and length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference -1.57 days, 95% CI -2.48 to -0.66, P = 0.0007, I = 34%, n = 995) when compared with control (isocaloric isonitrogeneous feed or normal diet). It, however, did not affect noninfectious complications (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.33, P = 0.91, I = 0%, n = 1303) or mortality (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.18-1.68, P = 0.29, I = 0%, n = 955). CONCLUSION Given the significant impact on infectious complications and a tendency to shorten length of stay, preoperative IMN should be encouraged in routine practice in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.
-
6.
Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature.
Dulskas, A, Smolskas, E, Kildusiene, I, Samalavicius, NE
International journal of colorectal disease. 2018;(3):251-260
Abstract
AIM: Up to 80% of patients after low anterior resection, experience (low) anterior resection syndrome (ARS/LARS). However, there is no standard treatment option currently available. This systemic review aims to summarize treatment possibilities for LARS after surgical treatment of rectal cancer in the medical literature. METHODS Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms anterior resection syndrome, low anterior resection, colorectal/rectal/rectum, surgery/operation, pelvic floor rehabilitation, biofeedback, transanal irrigation, sacral nerve stimulation, and tibial nerve stimulation. All English language articles presenting original patient data regarding treatment and outcome of LARS were included. We focused on the effects of different treatment modalities for LARS. The Jadad score was used to assess the methodological quality of trials. The quality scale ranges from 0 to 5 points, with a score ≤ 2 indicating a low quality report, and a score of ≥ 3 indicating a high quality report. RESULTS Twenty-one of 160 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 8 were reporting sacral nerve stimulation, 6 were designed to determine pelvic floor rehabilitation, 3 studies evaluated the effect of transanal irrigation, 2-percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, and the rest of the studies assessed probiotics and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for LARS in patients who had undergone rectal resection. All except one study were poor quality reports according to the Jadad score. CONCLUSIONS LARS treatment still carries difficulties because of a lack of well-conducted, randomized multicenter trials. Well-performed randomized controlled trials are needed.
-
7.
Effect of postoperative coffee consumption on gastrointestinal function after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Eamudomkarn, N, Kietpeerakool, C, Kaewrudee, S, Jampathong, N, Ngamjarus, C, Lumbiganon, P
Scientific reports. 2018;(1):17349
Abstract
Coffee is believed to prevent postoperative ileus. This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of coffee consumption in stimulating gastrointestinal function after abdominal surgery. A number of databases for randomized controlled trials comparing coffee consumption following abdominal surgery versus water drinking or no intervention were searched. Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias in included studies. Six trials involving 601 participants were included. All studies had high risk of performance bias. Three studies had an unclear risk of selection bias. Postoperative coffee consumption reduced time to first defecation (mean difference (MD), -9.98 hours; 95% CI, -16.97 to -2.99), time to first flatus (MD, -7.14 hours; 95% CI, -10.96 to -3.33), time to first bowel sound (MD, -4.17 hours; 95% CI, -7.88 to -0.47), time to tolerance of solid food (MD, -15.55 hours; 95% CI, -22.83 to -8.27), and length of hospital stay (MD, -0.74 days; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.33). Benefits increased with increasing complexity of the procedure. None of the included studies reported adverse events associated with coffee consumption. Postoperative coffee consumption is effective and safe for enhancing the recovery of gastrointestinal function after abdominal surgery.
-
8.
Does preoperative enteral or parenteral nutrition reduce postoperative complications in Crohn's disease patients: a meta-analysis.
Brennan, GT, Ha, I, Hogan, C, Nguyen, E, Jamal, MM, Bechtold, ML, Nguyen, DL
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018;(9):997-1002
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Crohn's disease (CD) patients frequently develop complications that require surgery for management. The high prevalence of malnutrition in CD patients presents a challenge because poor preoperative nutritional status has been shown to increase postoperative complications. In this study, we assessed whether preoperative enteral nutrition (EN) or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) decreases postoperative complications in CD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A three-point systematic and comprehensive literature search was carried out on multiple databases followed by a meta-analysis with results presented as odds ratio (OR) using two models, the Mantel-Haenszel model and the DerSimonian and Laird model. The I measure of inconsistency was utilized to assess heterogeneity. If statistically significant heterogeneity was identified, the results underwent a separate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Five studies met inclusion criteria totaling 1111 CD patients. The rate of postoperative complications in the group receiving preoperative nutrition (EN or TPN) support was 20.0% compared with 61.3% in the group who had standard care without nutrition support [OR=0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.99, P<0.001]. Postoperative complications occurred in 15.0% of patients in the group who received preoperative TPN compared with 24.4% in the group who did not (OR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.23-1.88, P=0.43). Postoperative complications occurred in 21.9% in the group who received preoperative EN compared with 73.2% in the group that did not received preoperative EN (OR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.06-0.13, P<0.001). CONCLUSION Preoperative nutrition supplementation reduces postoperative complications in CD patients. In particular, EN in CD patients before undergoing surgery is superior to standard of care without nutrition support with a number needed to treat of 2. There is a trend toward TPN being superior to standard of care without nutrition support, but this trend did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are necessary to evaluate specific components in EN or TPN that may be most beneficial for CD patients requiring surgical intervention.
-
9.
Goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy in colorectal surgery: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xu, C, Peng, J, Liu, S, Huang, Y, Guo, X, Xiao, H, Qi, D
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2018;:264-273
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) versus conventional fluid therapy (CFT) in colorectal surgery on patients' postoperative outcome and to detect whether the results differ between studies with the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and those without, between studies using different devices for GDFT, or between different surgical approaches (laparoscopy or laparotomy). METHODS The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Wanfang Data and ClinicalTrials.com were searched for studies from January,1990 to February, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing both two abovementioned fluid therapy protocols in colorectal surgery were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after surgery. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rate, ICU admission and gastrointestinal indicators. RESULTS Eleven studies were included, including a total of 1281 patients: the GDFT group included 624 patients and the control group included 657 patients. No significant differences were found between groups in 30-day mortality (relative risk, RR 0.86,0.28 to 2.63, P = 0.79), LOS (weighted mean difference, WMD 0.22,-0.1 to 0.55, P = 0.18), and ICU admission (RR 0.42, 0.17 to 1.04, P = 0.06). However, the GDFT group had a lower complication rate (RR 0.84,0.71 to 0.99, P = 0.04). In subgroup analyses, time to first flatus and time to tolerate an oral diet were shorter in GDFT group than the control group in studies who did not use the ERAS protocol. No publication bias was identified according to Begg's test. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional fluid therapy, GDFT may not improve patients' postoperative outcome in colorectal surgery. However, the improvement of gastrointestinal function associated with GDFT over conventional fluid therapy was significant in the surgeries that did not use the ERAS protocol.
-
10.
Can a nickel-titanium memory-shape device serve as a substitute for the stapler in gastrointestinal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, NN, Zhao, WT, Wu, XT
The Journal of surgical research. 2016;(1):82-93
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, a nickel-titanium (NiTi) memory-shape device has been successfully used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of the device. METHODS Four databases, reference lists, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical efficacy of a NiTi memory-shape device compared with that of a stapler in gastrointestinal or colorectal anastomosis. RESULTS Seven randomized controlled trials regarding the use of compression anastomosis clips (CACs) were enrolled for meta-analysis. The use of CACs was associated with a significant reduction in hospital duration (mean = -0.88 d; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.38 to -0.38), the time to flatus (mean = -0.36 d; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.04), and the start of oral intake (mean = -0.45 d; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.06), as well as a nonsignificant change in postoperative complications and mortality. These clinical outcomes did not significantly change with the use of compression anastomosis rings. CONCLUSIONS Colonic anastomosis with a CAC is likely to reduce hospital duration, time to flatus, and the start of oral intake without influencing mortality or postoperative complications and may be a safe and preferable choice in colonic anastomosis. Further well-designed trials should be performed to determine the safety and efficacy of the newly developed compression anastomosis ring in both ileocolic and colorectal anastomosis.