-
1.
Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Xue, C, Zhou, C, Yang, B, Lv, J, Dai, B, Yu, S, Wang, Y, Zhao, G, Mei, C
BMJ open. 2017;(2):e013672
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Co-administration of a diuretic or calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor are both preferred combinations in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to the available evidence, it is still unknown which combination plays a more active role in renal protection. We hypothesised that a combination of fosinopril and benidipine may delay the progression of CKD more effectively than a combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will be a multicentred, prospective, double-blind, randomised parallel controlled trial for hypertensive CKD patients in China. Patients will be randomised to one of two treatment groups: a combination of benidipine 4-8 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day; or a combination of HCTZ 12.5-25 mg/day and fosinopril 20 mg/day. Patients will be followed up for 24 months after a month's fosinopril run-in. There will be dose-titration after 1 and 2 months. The primary endpoint is changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to month 24. Secondary endpoints include changes in home blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP, proteinuria, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, and composite renal events in 24 months. Inclusion criteria are: age 18-80 years, non-dialysis CKD patients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m2, home BP >130 mm Hg systolic or BP >80 mm Hg diastolic at the screening and randomisation, and 24 hour proteinuria <3.5 g. Principal exclusions are hypertensive crisis, transplantation, cancer, severe diabetes complications, hyperkalaemia and severe allergy. The required sample size was 511 patients for detecting a difference in the change of eGFR (one sided α=0.025, power 1-β=0.90). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION BEAHIT (Benidipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Fosinopril Treated Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Hypertension) was approved by Changzheng Hospital Ethics Committee (CZ-20160504-16). The outcomes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02646397.
-
2.
Changes in left ventricular relaxation after azelnidipine treatment in hypertensive patients with diabetes: subanalysis of a prospective single-arm multicentre study.
Iwakura, K, Ito, H, Ishii, K, Date, M, Nakamura, F, Nagano, T, Takiuchi, S, ,
BMJ open. 2014;(9):e006136
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We previously demonstrated that a calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, improves left ventricular relaxation in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction in a multicentre, Clinical impact of Azelnidipine on Left VentricuLar diastolic function and OutComes in patients with hypertension (CALVLOC) trial. The objectives of the present subanalysis were to investigate the differences in diastolic function in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes, and the efficacy of azelnidipine on diastolic function among them. DESIGN Subanalysis of a prospective single-arm multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS 228 hypertensive patients with normal ejection fraction and impaired left ventricular relaxation (septal e' velocity<8 cm/s on echocardiography) enrolled for CALVLOC trial. They were divided into two groups based on presence or absence of diabetes. INTERVENTIONS Administration of 16 mg of azelnidipine for 8 months (range 6-10 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Septal e' velocity before and at the end of the study. RESULTS Whereas patients with diabetes (n=53, 23.2%) had lower systolic blood pressure (BP) than patients without diabetes (155±17 vs 161±16 mm Hg, p=0.03), they had lower e' velocity (5.7±1.5 vs 6.1±1.4 cm/s, p=0.04) at baseline. Azelnidipine decreased BP and heart rate, and increased e' velocity similarly in patients with diabetes (5.7±1.5 to 6.3±1.5 cm/s, p=0.0003) and without diabetes (6.1±1.4 to 6.9±1.4 cm/s, p<0.0001). Increase in e' velocity was not influenced by presence of diabetes, and patients with diabetes still had lower e' velocity after treatment (p=0.006). There was a significant correlation between increase in e' velocity and decrease in systolic BP (R=0.25, p=0.0001), which was not influenced by diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid diabetes could impair left ventricular relaxation independently in patients with hypertension, which might not be improved solely by BP lowering.
-
3.
Antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel can be reduced by calcium-channel blockers.
Seo, KD, Kim, YD, Yoon, YW, Kim, JY, Lee, KY
Yonsei medical journal. 2014;(3):683-8
Abstract
PURPOSE Clopidogrel is metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) system into its active thiol metabolite. CYP3A4 is involved in the metabolism of both clopidogrel and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs). A few reports have suggested an inhibitory interaction between CCBs and clopidogrel. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of CCBs on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel by serial P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed changes in antiplatelet activity in patients receiving both clopidogrel and CCBs for at least 2 months prior to enrollment in the study. The antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel was measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in the same patient while medicated with CCBs and at 8 weeks after discontinuation of CCBs. After discontinuation of the CCBs, angiotensin receptor blockers were newly administered to the patients or dosed up for control of blood pressure. RESULTS Thirty patients finished this study. PRU significantly decreased after discontinuation of CCBs (238.1±74.1 vs. 215.0±69.3; p=0.001). Of the 11 patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel (PRU≥275), PRU decreased in nine patients, decreasing below the cut-off value in seven of these nine patients after 8 weeks. Decrease in PRU was not related to CYP2C19 genotype. CONCLUSION CCBs inhibit the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel.
-
4.
Effects of azelnidipine on the autonomic functions and its influence on arterial stiffness and endothelial functions.
Yamada, J, Tomiyama, H, Matsumoto, C, Yoshida, M, Shiina, K, Yamashina, A
Journal of cardiology. 2008;(2):114-20
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study was conducted to clarify whether azelnidipine might have beneficial effects on autonomic functions, and whether such beneficial effects might affect the vascular functions (i.e., arterial stiffness and endothelial function). METHODS AND RESULTS This study with a cross-over design was conducted in 21 hypertensive patients (65 +/- 9 years old) being treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) other than azelnidipine or benidipine (i.e., during the study period, the CCB was switched to either azelnidipine 16 mg/day or benidipine 4 mg/day, administered alternately for 8 weeks each). Blood examinations were conducted and the heart rate variability, baro-receptor sensitivity (BRS), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) in the brachial artery were measured after treatment with each of the two drugs. While the blood pressure levels decreased to a similar degree after both treatments, the BRS (8.8 +/- 5.5 ms/mmHg vs. 6.4 +/- 2.9 ms/mmHg, p < 0.01) and high-frequency power component (HF: 139 +/- 152 ms2/Hz vs. 88 +/- 97 ms2/Hz) were higher after treatment with azelnidipine than after treatment with benidipine (p < 0.05). However, the baPWV, FMD and plasma levels of malonyldialdehyde low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and nitric oxides were similar after treatment with both drugs. CONCLUSION Azelnidipine has greater beneficial effects on the autonomic functions than benidipine although the degree of reduction of blood pressure induced by the two drugs was similar. However, this greater beneficial effect of azelnidipine on the autonomic functions did not produce any distinguishable differences in effects of azelnidipine and benidipine on the arterial stiffness and endothelial functions.
-
5.
Comparison between cilnidipine and amlodipine besilate with respect to proteinuria in hypertensive patients with renal diseases.
Kojima, S, Shida, M, Yokoyama, H
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2004;(6):379-85
Abstract
Unlike other dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine has been reported to exert an N-type calcium-channel-blocking activity and to reduce sympathetic hyperactivity. This study compared cilnidipine and amlodipine with respect to their effects on renal function and proteinuria. Twenty-eight proteinuric hypertensive outpatients (13 men and 15 women, aged 62+/-2 years) who had been maintained on CCBs for more than 3 months were randomly assigned to a group receiving amlodipine besilate (14 patients) or a group receiving cilnidipine (14 patients). CCBs were increased in dosage or other drugs were added until blood pressure decreased below 140/90 mmHg, but no inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin (RA) system were added or changed in dosage. Before and at 6 and 12 months after randomization, the concentrations of urine protein, urine albumin, serum and urine creatinine (Cr), and serum beta2-microglobulin were determined. The amlodipine group showed a significant increase in proteinuria, while the increase was suppressed in the cilnidipine group. The rate of increase in proteinuria at 12 months was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI) -10 to 184) of the baseline value with amlodipine and 4% (95% CI -69 to 77) of baseline with cilnidipine, a significant intergroup difference (p<0.05). The mean blood pressure remained in the 96-99 mmHg range until 12 months after randomization, showing no significant difference between the two groups. The cilnidipine group showed an increase in serum Cr levels (baseline vs. 12 months, 1.36+/-0.20 vs. 1.50+/-0.23 mg/dl, p<0.01). Overall, an inverse correlation existed between the changes in Cr and proteinuria (r= -0.477, p<0.01). These results suggest that cilnidipine results in a greater suppression of the increase in proteinuria and greater reduction in glomerular filtration rate than amlodipine, and that these effects are similar between cilnidipine and RA inhibitors. However, additional large-cohort and longer-term studies will be needed to clarify whether cilnidipine is superior to other CCBs in maintaining renal function.
-
6.
Effect of cilnidipine on insulin sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension.
Yagi, S, Goto, S, Yamamoto, T, Kurihara, S, Katayama, S
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2003;(5):383-7
Abstract
To clarify the effect of cilnidipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine Ca-antagonist that blocks both L- and N-type Ca(2+)-channels, on insulin sensitivity, cilnidipine at 5 to 10 mg/day was administered to ten patients with essential hypertension for 12 weeks. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 57.7 +/- 5.0 (SEM) years old and 27.1 +/- 1.5, respectively. Blood pressure, serum levels of catecholamines, glucose and lipid were determined before and after the treatment. Insulin sensitivity was also measured by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method using an artificial pancreas (STG-22; Nikiso, Tokyo, Japan) before and after the treatment. Cilnidipine administration significantly lowered blood pressure from 154/96 to 137/84 mmHg (p<0.05). The glucose infusion rate was significantly increased by 20.8%, from 3.27 +/- 0.36 to 3.95 +/- 0.55 mg/kg/min (p<0.05). HbA1C and serum lipid levels such as total cholesterol and triglyceride were not altered. In addition, cilnidipine treatment did not significantly increase serum norepinephrine levels (278 +/- 25.2 vs. 332 +/- 33.6 pg/ml). Our results suggest that cilnidipine improves insulin sensitivity, possibly due to its exerting a vasodilatory action without stimulating sympathetic nervous activity.
-
7.
Cilnidipine more highly attenuates cold pressor stress-induced platelet activation in hypertension than does amlodipine.
Tomiyama, H, Kimura, Y, Kuwabara, Y, Maruyama, C, Yoshida, Y, Kuwata, S, Kinouchi, T, Yoshida, H, Doba, N
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2001;(6):679-84
Abstract
The clinical significance of N-type calcium channel blockade has not been fully examined. We here compared the effects of the N-type calcium channel blockers cilnidipine and amlodipine on the sympathetic nervous system and platelet function in hypertension under resting and stressed conditions. Thirty-two patients with hypertension (58+/-9 years) received cilnidipine or amlodipine for 4 weeks in this crossover study. On day 28 of each treatment, plasma levels of epinephrine (EP), norepinephrine (NEP), and beta-thromboglobulin (BTG), and EC50 of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (ADPE50) were determined at rest and after a cold pressor test. On day 29, the group receiving cilnidipine was switched to amlodipine treatment, and vice versa. At rest, the blood pressure, heart rates, EP, NEP, ADPEC50, and BTG, were similar in both treatments. After the cold pressor test, increases in EP (35+/-17 to 44+/-25 pg/ml; p<0.05) and BTG (40+/-13 to 49+/-22 ng/ml; p<0.01) and a decrease in ADPEC50 (32+/-26 to 27+/-24 micromol; p<0.05) were observed in the amlodipine treatment, but not in the cilnidipine treatment. In addition, the increase in NEP was significantly greater (p<0.05) in the amlodipine (276+/-78 to 318+/-87 pg/ml; p<0.01) than in the cilnidipine treatment (273+/-88 to 291+/-100 pg/ml; p<0.05). Cilnidipine more highly attenuates the activation of platelet function in response to cold pressor stress than does amlodipine. Attenuated activation of the sympathetic nervous system via N-type calcium channel blockade may contribute to this phenomenon.
-
8.
Cilnidipine is as effective as benazepril for control of blood pressure and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis.
Rose, GW, Kanno, Y, Ikebukuro, H, Kaneko, M, Kaneko, K, Kanno, T, Ishida, Y, Suzuki, H
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2001;(4):377-83
Abstract
To investigate the beneficial effects of cilnidipine, a calcium channel blocker that shows high selectivity for N-type receptors, on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency, we compared the efficacy of cilnidipine to that of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with known renal protective effects, in a one-year trial evaluating hypertensive control, serum creatinine, and albuminuria in a cohort of patients. Given the seeming importance of the etiology of chronic renal insufficiency in determining drug efficacy, we limited our study to 20 patients with a single common condition, benign nephrosclerosis. The average age of the patients was 62+/-4 years old. The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year revealed a similar reduction with cilnidipine and benazepril. Both cilnidipine and benazepril induced similar reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year. The baseline levels of serum creatinine were 1.40+/-0.2 mg/dl and urinary excretion of albumin was 168+/-10 mg daily. The levels of serum creatinine were not significantly changed throughout the study in either group, although the levels of urinary excretion of albumin were significantly decreased in both groups. There were no significant differences in either of these values between the two groups. In conclusion, both cilnidipine and benazepril equally and effectively reduced blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis in a one-year trial.