-
1.
Efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors compared to sulphonylureas in adult patients with diabetes with low c-peptide levels with or without anti-GAD65 antibody positivity.
Sudan, A, Kalra, A, Mirza, AA, Kant, R
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;(4):102197
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adulthood (LADA) is different from type 2 diabetes. Present treatment protocols do not reflect that. DPP-4 and SGLT2 inhibitors have changed therapy. DPP-4 inhibitor use has shown delayed decline in beta-cell reserve in LADA. We studied patients with low c-peptide to assess relationship between c-peptide and anti-GAD65 antibody levels and compare DPP-4 inhibitors with SGLT2 inhibitors and sulphonylureas. METHODS The study was an open-label trial conducted in 156 participants with low c-peptide (<0.8 ng/mL), age > 25 years, recently diagnosed diabetes with HBA1c ≥ 6.5%. Participants were enrolled into three arms: Group A received sulphonylureas + metformin, Group B received DPP-4 inhibitors + metformin, and Group C received SGLT-2 inhibitors + metformin. Serum anti-GAD-65 antibodies were assessed using sandwich ELISA. Participants were assessed on enrolment and after three months of dual pharmacotherapy. RESULTS The three arms were comparable on enrolment. 52% of participants with low c-peptide had high anti-GAD65 antibody titers. Significant differences were observed after three months - DPP-4 inhibitors reduced HbA1c by 1.1 ± 0.3%, compared to SGLT2 inhibitors (0.8 ± 0.13%) and sulphonylureas (0.7 ± 0.3%) CONCLUSION DPP-4 inhibitors appear to provide better glycemic control than alternate therapeutic options in patients with low serum c-peptide.
-
2.
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.
Ji, L, Ma, J, Lu, W, Liu, J, Zeng, J, Yang, J, Li, W, Zhang, X, Xiao, X, Takayanagi, G, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2021;(4):537-545
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION Although the efficacy of teneligliptin, a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, has been amply studied for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, no clinical trials of teneligliptin have been carried out in China. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy compared with a placebo in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, carried out at 42 sites, enrolled type 2 diabetes patients with glycosylated hemoglobin 7.0 to <10.0% and fasting blood glucose <270 mg/dL. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to treatment with 20 mg teneligliptin or a placebo (n = 127, each) administered orally once daily before breakfast for 24 weeks. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was the primary efficacy end-point. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS The least square mean (LSM) change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.95% with teneligliptin versus -0.14% with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -0.80% (P < 0.0001). For the secondary end-point, from baseline to week 24, the LSM change in fasting blood glucose was -21.9 mg/dL with teneligliptin versus -1.4 mg/dL with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -20.5 mg/dL (P < 0.0001). The adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence rates, including hypoglycemia, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS At 24 weeks, teneligliptin was generally well tolerated and effective in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.
-
3.
Efficacy and safety of trelagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease: Results from a randomized, phase 3 study.
Kaku, K, Ishida, K, Shimizu, K, Achira, M, Umeda, Y
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;(2):373-381
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin 25 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study comprised a 12-week double-blind phase followed by a 40-week open-label phase. Patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease (undergoing hemodialysis), and were receiving diet and/or exercise therapy with/without one antidiabetic drug. RESULTS Patients were randomized to trelagliptin (A/A, n = 55) or placebo (P/A, n = 52; double-blind phase). Both groups received trelagliptin in the open-label phase. The least square mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in hemoglobin A1c at the end of the double-blind phase was -0.71% (95% CI -0.885, -0.542) and 0.01% (95% CI -0.170, 0.183) in the A/A and P/A groups, respectively (intergroup least square means difference -0.72%, 95% CI -0.966, -0.473; P < 0.0001). Mean hemoglobin A1c decreased after trelagliptin treatment in the P/A group to similar levels observed in the A/A group and remained comparable in both groups versus baseline up to week 52. In the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 72.7% and 61.5% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively; most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate, except in one patient (P/A group), who experienced two severe TEAEs. The incidence of serious TEAEs was 7.3% and 3.8% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Once-weekly trelagliptin 25 mg was efficacious, with no major safety concerns, and represents a meaningful treatment option in this patient population.
-
4.
Effects of Additional Administration of a Selective Inhibitor of Sodium Glucose co-transporter-2 Inhibitor on the Glycemic Control in Japanese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Receiving Treatment with a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.
Kusunoki, M, Sato, D, Sakazaki, T, Miyata, T, Tsutsumi, K, Oshida, Y
Drug research. 2020;(4):131-136
Abstract
We conducted this study to determine whether additional administration sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor might provide further improvement of glycemic control and also to explore any advantages in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients showing relatively good glycemic control under treatment dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. We divided the patients in two groups, MT group and CT group. The MT group were continued on the DPP-4 inhibitor treatment for 6-months, and CT group were additionally administered an SGLT2 inhibitor treatment for 6-months. The MT group showed a significant decrease of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), but a significant increase of body weight, body mass index and serum uric acid, compared to the baseline values, while the CT group showed a significant decrease of HbA1c, body weight, BMI, and serum uric acid, and also a significant increase of serum HDL-cholesterol and decrease of serum triglyceride levels. Furthermore, this group showed a significant decrease of serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), which are markers of liver function. These results suggest that the combination therapy is useful, in particular, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with hyperlipidemia and liver dysfunction. Among the SGLT2 inhibitors added to the DPP-4 inhibitor treatment, the decreases of serum levels of AST, ALT and γ-GTP were particularly significant in the group receiving luseogliflozin, suggesting that the combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor with luseogliflozin is particularly effective for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with liver dysfunction.
-
5.
Impact of Systemic Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Rahimy, E, Baker, K, Thompson, D, Saroj, N, ,
Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2020;(4):226-234
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate impact of baseline systemic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use in diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of previously completed randomized, controlled clinical trials (VISTA and VIVID) in patients with DME evaluating intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2q4) or every 8 weeks (2q8) or macular laser photocoagulation. RESULTS Overall, a small number of patients (12.2% [n = 35], 9.7% [n = 28], and 15.4% [n = 44]) in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups reported baseline DPP-4 inhibitor use. There were no differences in changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, or rates of 2-or-greater-step improvement in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score based on DPP-4 inhibitor use within each treatment group. CONCLUSION DPP-4 inhibitor use at baseline did not influence the magnitude of visual and anatomic benefit in patients with DME being treated with IAI or laser. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:226-234.].
-
6.
Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with gemigliptin and metformin compared with monotherapy with either drug in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (INICOM study).
Lim, S, Han, KA, Yu, J, Chamnan, P, Kim, ES, Yoon, KH, Kwon, S, Moon, MK, Lee, KW, Kim, DJ, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2017;(1):87-97
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemigliptin is a new dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor. We investigated the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with gemigliptin and metformin compared with monotherapy with either drug in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS A total of 433 T2D patients with a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7.5% to 11.0% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration <270 mg/dL were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) gemigliptin 50 mg qd + metformin 1000 to 2000 mg qd (titrated individually), (2) gemigliptin 50 mg qd, or (3) metformin 1000 to 2000 mg qd. The primary end-point was the change in HbA1c level after 24 weeks. Secondary end-points were the changes in FPG, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels. The percentages of responders who achieved an HbA1c level <7% (or <6.5%) were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS Baseline HbA1c levels were 8.7% in all groups. The mean changes in HbA1c level from baseline to week 24 were -2.06%, -1.24% and -1.47% in the combination, gemigliptin monotherapy and metformin monotherapy groups, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals for between-group differences in HbA1c changes were -1.02 to -0.63 in the combination group vs the gemigliptin group and -0.82 to -0.41 vs the metformin group, which confirmed the superiority of combination therapy. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the combination therapy group reached the target HbA1c level <7% (or <6.5%) compared with the monotherapy groups. No severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS In T2D patients, the initial combination of gemigliptin and metformin had superior efficacy without safety concerns compared with monotherapy with either drug.
-
7.
The Beneficial Effects of the DPP-4 Inhibitor Alogliptin on Hemoglobin A1c and Serum Lipids in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Kusunoki, M, Sato, D, Nakamura, T, Oshida, Y, Tsutsui, H, Natsume, Y, Tsutsumi, K, Miyata, T
Drug research. 2016;(1):18-22
Abstract
It has been reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors improve hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in diabetic patients and may also improve the serum lipids. However, few studies have examined relationship between the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor and the pretreatment HbA1c levels in diabetic patients. Furthermore, it has been reported that prolonged treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors may make glycemic control difficult in some patients. In the present study, we investigated (1) the effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin on HbA1c, blood glucose (BG), and serum lipid in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, (2) the relationship between the HbA1c levels at baseline and the effects of alogliptin, and (3) the effects of switching of the DPP-4 inhibitor to alogliptin after 12 months' administration of sitagliptin on glycemic control and serum lipids. After 6-months' treatment with alogliptin, we found reductions of HbA1c, BG, and serum total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels. Pretreatment level of HbA1c was well correlated with the degree of reduction of both HbA1c and BG levels after the treatment. Also, alogliptin kept levels of HbA1c and BG reduced by sitagliptin for 12 months, and relapsing of these levels and serum lipids were not observed. This study revealed that alogliptin improved HbA1c, BG, and serum lipid profiles in type 2 diabetic patients, and the effect of alogliptin on HbA1c and BG levels was correlated with HbA1c level at pretreatment. Furthermore, long-term treatment with alogliptin did not cause relapsing of glycemic control and serum lipids.
-
8.
Efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared with glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study (GENERATION).
Schernthaner, G, Durán-Garcia, S, Hanefeld, M, Langslet, G, Niskanen, L, Östgren, CJ, Malvolti, E, Hardy, E
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2015;(7):630-8
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive saxagliptin vs glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycaemic control. METHODS In this multinational, randomized, double-blind, phase IIIb/IV study (GENERATION; NCT01006603), patients aged ≥65 years were randomized (1 : 1) to receive saxagliptin 5 mg/day or glimepiride ≤6 mg/day, added to metformin, during a 52-week treatment period. The primary endpoint was achievement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% at week 52 without confirmed/severe hypoglycaemia. The key secondary endpoint was incidence of confirmed/severe hypoglycaemia. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS Of 720 patients randomized (360 in each treatment group; mean age 72.6 years; mean T2D duration 7.6 years), 574 (79.8%) completed the study (saxagliptin 80.3%; glimepiride 79.2%). Similar proportions of patients achieved the primary endpoint with saxagliptin and glimepiride (37.9 vs 38.2%; odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.73, 1.34; p = 0.9415); however, a significant treatment-by-age interaction effect was detected (p = 0.0389): saxagliptin was numerically (but not significantly) superior to glimepiride for patients aged <75 years (39.2 vs 33.3%) and numerically inferior for patients aged ≥75 years (35.9 vs 45.5%). The incidence of confirmed/severe hypoglycaemia was lower with saxagliptin vs glimepiride (1.1 vs 15.3%; nominal p < 0.0001). Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated, with similar incidences of adverse events compared with glimepiride. CONCLUSION As avoiding hypoglycaemia is a key clinical objective in elderly patients, saxagliptin is a suitable alternative to glimepiride in patients with T2D aged ≥65 years.
-
9.
Anagliptin decreases serum lathosterol level in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.
Aoki, K, Ijima, T, Kamiyama, H, Kamiko, K, Terauchi, Y
Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2015;(12):1749-54
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The mechanism responsible for the lipid-lowering effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors remains unknown in humans. We evaluated the effect of anagliptin on serum lipid profiles, including cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS Thirty patients with type 2 diabetes (20 - 70 years old, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level over 120 mg/dl, and no history of treatment with antidiabetic or antihyperlipidemic drugs) were enrolled. One hundred milligrams of anagliptin were administered twice a day for a month. RESULTS After treatment of anagliptin, the LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels did not decrease overall, but the TC level decreased significantly in 28 patients whose HbA1c levels decreased. Lathosterol decreased significantly, whereas no changes in campesterol, sitosterol or cholestanol were observed. CONCLUSION These results of our study show no significant change in LDL-C, a tendency of decrease in TC and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) after treatment of anagliptin for 1 month. Anagliptin therapy decreased the cholesterol synthesis marker lathosterol without changing cholesterol absorption markers.
-
10.
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, combined with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.
Kim, MK, Rhee, EJ, Han, KA, Woo, AC, Lee, MK, Ku, BJ, Chung, CH, Kim, KA, Lee, HW, Park, IB, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2015;(3):309-12
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin in combination with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Patients [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0%, on stable metformin ≥1000 mg/day] were randomized 2 : 1 to receive 20 mg teneligliptin plus metformin (n = 136) or placebo plus metformin (n = 68). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 16. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% in the teneligliptin group and 7.8% in the placebo group. The differences between the teneligliptin and placebo groups regarding changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were -0.78 % and -1.24 mmol/l (22.42 mg/dl), respectively, at week 16. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. The addition of teneligliptin once daily to metformin was effective and generally well tolerated in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes.