-
1.
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.
Ji, L, Ma, J, Lu, W, Liu, J, Zeng, J, Yang, J, Li, W, Zhang, X, Xiao, X, Takayanagi, G, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2021;(4):537-545
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION Although the efficacy of teneligliptin, a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, has been amply studied for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, no clinical trials of teneligliptin have been carried out in China. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin monotherapy compared with a placebo in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, carried out at 42 sites, enrolled type 2 diabetes patients with glycosylated hemoglobin 7.0 to <10.0% and fasting blood glucose <270 mg/dL. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to treatment with 20 mg teneligliptin or a placebo (n = 127, each) administered orally once daily before breakfast for 24 weeks. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was the primary efficacy end-point. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS The least square mean (LSM) change in glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.95% with teneligliptin versus -0.14% with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -0.80% (P < 0.0001). For the secondary end-point, from baseline to week 24, the LSM change in fasting blood glucose was -21.9 mg/dL with teneligliptin versus -1.4 mg/dL with a placebo, yielding an LSM difference (teneligliptin vs placebo) of -20.5 mg/dL (P < 0.0001). The adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence rates, including hypoglycemia, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS At 24 weeks, teneligliptin was generally well tolerated and effective in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.
-
2.
Efficacy and safety of trelagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease: Results from a randomized, phase 3 study.
Kaku, K, Ishida, K, Shimizu, K, Achira, M, Umeda, Y
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;(2):373-381
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin 25 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study comprised a 12-week double-blind phase followed by a 40-week open-label phase. Patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease (undergoing hemodialysis), and were receiving diet and/or exercise therapy with/without one antidiabetic drug. RESULTS Patients were randomized to trelagliptin (A/A, n = 55) or placebo (P/A, n = 52; double-blind phase). Both groups received trelagliptin in the open-label phase. The least square mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in hemoglobin A1c at the end of the double-blind phase was -0.71% (95% CI -0.885, -0.542) and 0.01% (95% CI -0.170, 0.183) in the A/A and P/A groups, respectively (intergroup least square means difference -0.72%, 95% CI -0.966, -0.473; P < 0.0001). Mean hemoglobin A1c decreased after trelagliptin treatment in the P/A group to similar levels observed in the A/A group and remained comparable in both groups versus baseline up to week 52. In the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 72.7% and 61.5% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively; most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate, except in one patient (P/A group), who experienced two severe TEAEs. The incidence of serious TEAEs was 7.3% and 3.8% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Once-weekly trelagliptin 25 mg was efficacious, with no major safety concerns, and represents a meaningful treatment option in this patient population.
-
3.
Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with gemigliptin and metformin compared with monotherapy with either drug in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (INICOM study).
Lim, S, Han, KA, Yu, J, Chamnan, P, Kim, ES, Yoon, KH, Kwon, S, Moon, MK, Lee, KW, Kim, DJ, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2017;(1):87-97
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemigliptin is a new dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor. We investigated the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with gemigliptin and metformin compared with monotherapy with either drug in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS A total of 433 T2D patients with a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7.5% to 11.0% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration <270 mg/dL were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) gemigliptin 50 mg qd + metformin 1000 to 2000 mg qd (titrated individually), (2) gemigliptin 50 mg qd, or (3) metformin 1000 to 2000 mg qd. The primary end-point was the change in HbA1c level after 24 weeks. Secondary end-points were the changes in FPG, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels. The percentages of responders who achieved an HbA1c level <7% (or <6.5%) were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS Baseline HbA1c levels were 8.7% in all groups. The mean changes in HbA1c level from baseline to week 24 were -2.06%, -1.24% and -1.47% in the combination, gemigliptin monotherapy and metformin monotherapy groups, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals for between-group differences in HbA1c changes were -1.02 to -0.63 in the combination group vs the gemigliptin group and -0.82 to -0.41 vs the metformin group, which confirmed the superiority of combination therapy. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the combination therapy group reached the target HbA1c level <7% (or <6.5%) compared with the monotherapy groups. No severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS In T2D patients, the initial combination of gemigliptin and metformin had superior efficacy without safety concerns compared with monotherapy with either drug.
-
4.
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, combined with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.
Kim, MK, Rhee, EJ, Han, KA, Woo, AC, Lee, MK, Ku, BJ, Chung, CH, Kim, KA, Lee, HW, Park, IB, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2015;(3):309-12
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin in combination with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Patients [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0%, on stable metformin ≥1000 mg/day] were randomized 2 : 1 to receive 20 mg teneligliptin plus metformin (n = 136) or placebo plus metformin (n = 68). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 16. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% in the teneligliptin group and 7.8% in the placebo group. The differences between the teneligliptin and placebo groups regarding changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were -0.78 % and -1.24 mmol/l (22.42 mg/dl), respectively, at week 16. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. The addition of teneligliptin once daily to metformin was effective and generally well tolerated in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes.
-
5.
Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition on glycemic, gut hormone, triglyceride, energy expenditure, and energy intake responses to fat in healthy males.
Heruc, GA, Horowitz, M, Deacon, CF, Feinle-Bisset, C, Rayner, CK, Luscombe-Marsh, N, Little, TJ
American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2014;(9):E830-7
Abstract
Fat is the most potent stimulus for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion. The aims of this study were to determine whether dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibition would enhance plasma active incretin [glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), GLP-1] concentrations and modulate the glycemic, gut hormone, triglyceride, energy expenditure, and energy intake responses to intraduodenal fat infusion. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover design, 16 healthy lean males received 50 mg vildagliptin (V), or matched placebo (P), before intraduodenal fat infusion (2 kcal/min, 120 min). Blood glucose, plasma insulin, glucagon, active GLP-1, and GIP and peptide YY (PYY)-(3-36) concentrations; resting energy expenditure; and energy intake at a subsequent buffet meal (time = 120-150 min) were quantified. Data are presented as areas under the curve (0-120 min, means ± SE). Vildagliptin decreased glycemia (P: 598 ± 8 vs. V: 573 ± 9 mmol·l⁻¹·min⁻¹, P < 0.05) during intraduodenal lipid. This was associated with increased insulin (P: 15,964 ± 1,193 vs. V: 18,243 ± 1,257 pmol·l⁻¹·min⁻¹, P < 0.05), reduced glucagon (P: 1,008 ± 52 vs. V: 902 ± 46 pmol·l⁻¹·min⁻¹, P < 0.05), enhanced active GLP-1 (P: 294 ± 40 vs. V: 694 ± 78 pmol·l⁻¹·min⁻¹) and GIP (P: 2,748 ± 77 vs. V: 4,256 ± 157 pmol·l⁻¹·min⁻¹), and reduced PYY-(3-36) (P: 9,527 ± 754 vs. V: 4,469 ± 431 pM/min) concentrations compared with placebo (P < 0.05, for all). Vildagliptin increased resting energy expenditure (P: 1,821 ± 54 vs. V: 1,896 ± 65 kcal/day, P < 0.05) without effecting energy intake. Vildagliptin 1) modulates the effects of intraduodenal fat to enhance active GLP-1 and GIP, stimulate insulin, and suppress glucagon, thereby reducing glycemia and 2) increases energy expenditure. These observations suggest that the fat content of a meal, by enhancing GLP-1 and GIP secretion, may contribute to the response to DPP-IV inhibition.
-
6.
Very short-term effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on the secretion of insulin, glucagon, and incretin hormones in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: analysis of meal tolerance test data.
Murai, K, Katsuno, T, Miyagawa, J, Matsuo, T, Ochi, F, Tokuda, M, Kusunoki, Y, Miuchi, M, Namba, M
Drugs in R&D. 2014;(4):301-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sitagliptin inhibits dipeptidyl peptidase-4, which inactivates the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. To assess its antidiabetic potency, we used meal tolerance tests (MTTs) to determine the very short-term effects of sitagliptin on plasma concentrations of insulin and glucagon. METHODS On day 1, patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus started a calorie-restricted diet. On day 2, the first MTT was performed, before treatment with sitagliptin 50 mg/day started later the same day. On day 5, a second MTT was performed. Area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of relevant laboratory values were calculated [AUC from time zero to 2 h (AUC0-2h) and from time zero to 4 h (AUC0-4h)]. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled. AUCs for postprandial plasma glucose were decreased after 3 days of sitagliptin treatment [AUC0-2h 457 ± 115 mg/dL·h (25.4 ± 6.4 mmol/L·h) to 369 ± 108 mg/dL·h (20.5 ± 6.0 mmol/L·h); AUC0-4h 896 ± 248 mg/dL·h (49.7 ± 13.8 mmol/L·h) to 701 ± 246 mg/dL·h (38.9 ± 13.7 mmol/L·h); both p < 0.001]. AUC0-2h and AUC0-4h for postprandial plasma glucagon also decreased: 195 ± 57 to 180 ± 57 pg/mL·h (p < 0.05) and 376 ± 105 to 349 ± 105 pg/mL·h (p < 0.01), respectively. The AUC0-2h [median with quartile values (25%, 75%)] for active GLP-1 increased: 10.5 (8.5, 15.2) to 26.4 (16.7, 32.4) pmol/L·h (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Very short-term (3-day) treatment with sitagliptin decreases postprandial plasma glucose significantly. This early reduction in glucose may result partly from suppression of excessive glucagon secretion, through a direct effect on active GLP-1. Improvement in postprandial plasma glucose, through suppression of glucagon secretion, is believed to be an advantage of sitagliptin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
-
7.
Sitagliptin reduces albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Hattori, S
Endocrine journal. 2011;(1):69-73
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We investigated the inhibitory effect of sitagliptin on albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Thirty-six patients (19 men and 17 women) whose HbA1c was higher than 6.5% (NGSP) despite receiving education on diet and exercise and medical treatment for at least 6 months at our clinic were enrolled into this study and were successfully followed over 6 months of sitagliptin treatment. Sitagliptin (50 mg/day) treatment significantly lowered both systolic and diastolic blood pressures, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, and glycated albumin at 3 months and 6 months. Significant reductions in highly sensitive C-reactive protein and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 were also observed at 6 months. Urinary albumin excretion (measured as urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR: mg/g Cr)) did not change in the 6 months before sitagliptin treatment (ΔACR: 2.3 ± 19.9) and decreased in the 6 months after sitagliptin treatment (ΔACR: -20.6 ± 24.6); these differences were statistically significant. At 6 months, the ACR decreased from 11.6 ± 8.4 to 4.5 ± 5.0 in 13 patients with normoalbuminuria (ACR < 30), from 98.4 ± 79 to 24.9 ± 20 in 15 patients with microalbuminuria (30 < ACR < 300), and from 1263 ± 492 to 561 ± 89 in 8 patients with macroalbuminuria (ACR > 300). Thus, the present findings strongly suggest that sitagliptin reduces albuminuria without lowering the estimated glomerular filtration rate, most likely depending on known factors such as blood sugar reduction, blood pressure reduction, and inflammation reduction, as well as yet undetermined factors caused by an increase in active glucagon-like peptide-1.
-
8.
Design, statistical analysis and sample size calculation of a phase IIb/III study of linagliptin versus voglibose and placebo.
Horie, Y, Hayashi, N, Dugi, K, Takeuchi, M
Trials. 2009;:82
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) require a combination of antidiabetic drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower their hemoglobin A1c levels to achieve therapeutic targets and reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications. Linagliptin is a novel member of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor class of antidiabetic drugs. DPP-4 inhibitors increase incretin (glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide) levels, inhibit glucagon release and, more importantly, increase insulin secretion and inhibit gastric emptying. Currently, phase III clinical studies with linagliptin are underway to evaluate its clinical efficacy and safety. Linagliptin is expected to be one of the most appropriate therapies for Japanese patients with DM, as deficient insulin secretion is a greater concern than insulin resistance in this population. The number of patients with DM in Japan is increasing and this trend is predicted to continue. Several antidiabetic drugs are currently marketed in Japan; however there is no information describing the effective dose of linagliptin for Japanese patients with DM. METHODS This prospective, randomized, double-blind study will compare linagliptin with placebo over a 12-week period. The study has also been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linagliptin by comparing it with another antidiabetic, voglibose, over a 26-week treatment period. Four treatment groups have been established for these comparisons. A phase IIb/III combined study design has been utilized for this purpose and the approach for calculating sample size is described. DISCUSSION This is the first phase IIb/III study to examine the long-term safety and efficacy of linagliptin in diabetes patients in the Japanese population.