-
1.
COVID-19 and comorbidities: A role for dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in disease severity?
Bassendine, MF, Bridge, SH, McCaughan, GW, Gorrell, MD
Journal of diabetes. 2020;(9):649-658
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by a novel betacoronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), similar to SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), which cause acute respiratory distress syndrome and case fatalities. COVID-19 disease severity is worse in older obese patients with comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and chronic lung disease. Cell binding and entry of betacoronaviruses is via their surface spike glycoprotein; SARS-CoV binds to the metalloprotease angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), MERS-CoV utilizes dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), and recent modeling of the structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein predicts that it can interact with human DPP4 in addition to ACE2. DPP4 is a ubiquitous membrane-bound aminopeptidase that circulates in plasma; it is multifunctional with roles in nutrition, metabolism, and immune and endocrine systems. DPP4 activity differentially regulates glucose homeostasis and inflammation via its enzymatic activity and nonenzymatic immunomodulatory effects. The importance of DPP4 for the medical community has been highlighted by the approval of DPP4 inhibitors, or gliptins, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This review discusses the dysregulation of DPP4 in COVID-19 comorbid conditions; DPP4 activity is higher in older individuals and increased plasma DPP4 is a predictor of the onset of metabolic syndrome. DPP4 upregulation may be a determinant of COVID-19 disease severity, which creates interest regarding the use of gliptins in management of COVID-19. Also, knowledge of the chemistry and biology of DPP4 could be utilized to develop novel therapies to block viral entry of some betacoronaviruses, potentially including SARS-CoV-2.
-
2.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment could decrease Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Chen, HH, Chen, CC, Ho, CW, Hsieh, MC, Hsu, SP, Lin, CL, Kao, CH
Postgraduate medicine. 2020;(8):714-719
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) for Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) pneumonia in patients with diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes from 2009 to 2012 were recruited for this population-based and observational study. Diabetes complications severity index (DCSI) score and defined daily dose (DDD) were used for analysis. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of KP pneumonia by DPP4i use, with adjustments for propensity score. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to estimate the risk of KP pneumonia for DPP4i users. RESULTS 34774 patients were included. The incidence rate of KP pneumonia in DDP4i users was 1.51 per 1000 person-years and that for the comparison was 2.25 per 1000 person-years. DDP4i users also had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of KP pneumonia (log-rank test p-value = 0.03). DDP4i users had a significantly lower risk of developing KP pneumonia compared with nonusers (adjusted HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48-0.95). CONCLUSIONS For public health issue with type2 diabetes and infection, DPP4i use decreased KP pneumonia. Male gender, patients with co-morbidities, patients with higher DSCI score and higher DDD of DPP4i were observed to decrease KP pneumonia infection in our analysis. The possible role of DPP4i causing immunological disturbances should be considered.
-
3.
Effects of Basal Insulin on Lipid Profile Compared to Other Classes of Antihyperglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.
Rigato, M, Avogaro, A, Vigili de Kreutzenberg, S, Fadini, GP
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2020;(7)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The lipid profile represents a driver of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. The effect of chronic insulin therapy on cholesterol levels is unclear. We aim to evaluate the effect of basal insulin on lipid profile compared to other classes of antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetic patients. DESIGN We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting changes of lipid parameters in type 2 diabetic patients randomly assigned to basal insulin or other classes of anti-hyperglycemic agents. RESULTS The levels of total (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) appeared to be significantly reduced by therapies with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in comparison to basal insulin (mean difference [MD] -3.80; 95% CI [-6.30 to -1.30] mg/dL, P < .001 and -4.17; 95% CI [-6.04 to -2.30] mg/dL, P < .0001), whereas no difference was detected between basal insulin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-I) or standard therapy (sulfonylurea ± metformin). Thiazolidinediones (TZD) produced a significant improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (MD 3.55; 95% CI: 0.55 to 6.56 mg/dL, P = .02) but were associated with an increase in TC and LDL-C (MD 16.20; 95% CI: 9.09 to 23.31 mg/dL, P < .001 and 5.19: 95% CI: -3.00 to 13.39 mg/dL, P = .21). Basal insulin was superior to standard therapy in triglyceride reduction (MD 3.8; 95% CI: 0.99 to 6.63 mg/dL, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA were superior to basal insulin in the control of TC and LDL-C. Basal insulin effectively reduced serum triglycerides. TZD led to improvement in HDL-C. DPP4-I and standard therapy did not have any significant effect on lipid levels.
-
4.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor anagliptin reduces fasting apolipoprotein B-48 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.
Onoue, T, Goto, M, Wada, E, Furukawa, M, Okuji, T, Okada, N, Kobayashi, T, Iwama, S, Sugiyama, M, Tsunekawa, T, et al
PloS one. 2020;(1):e0228004
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia are diseases that collectively increase the risk of patients developing cardiovascular complications. Several incretin-based drugs are reported to improve lipid metabolism, and one of these medications, anagliptin, is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that has been shown to decrease serum triglyceride and low-density lipoproteins cholesterol. This study aimed to conduct an investigation into the effects of anagliptin on serum lipid profiles. This multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1), parallel group study was designed to evaluate the effects of anagliptin on serum lipid profiles (triglycerides, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cholesterol fractions). The study involved 24 patients with type 2 diabetes at two participating hospitals for a period of 24 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to the anagliptin (n = 12) or control (n = 12) groups. Patients in the anagliptin group were treated with 200 mg of the drug twice daily. Patients in the control group did not receive anagliptin, but continued with their previous treatment schedules. Lipid metabolism was examined under fasting conditions at baseline and 24 weeks. Patients treated with anagliptin for 24 weeks exhibited significantly reduced levels of serum apolipoprotein B-48, a marker for lipid transport from the intestine, compared with the control group patients (P < 0.05). After 24 weeks of treatment, serum adiponectin levels were significantly raised, whereas glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were significantly lower compared with the baseline in the anagliptin group (P < 0.05), but not in the control group. This study showed that the DPP-4 inhibitor anagliptin reduces fasting apolipoprotein B-48 levels, suggesting that this drug may have beneficial effects on lipid metabolism possibly mediated by the inhibition of intestinal lipid transport.
-
5.
Effect of a Moderate Carbohydrate-Restricted Diet on DPP-4 Inhibitor Action among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 6-Month Intervention Study.
Kobayashi, M, Miura, T, Miura, K, Hiroyama, N, Akashi, K
Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology. 2020;(2):114-118
Abstract
To decrease body weight and insulin resistance, a calorie-restricted diet-with minimal caloric intake required for daily activities-is the primary treatment strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japan. However, many patients cannot continue with this diet for long, because calorie restriction is difficult and nutritional balance is hard to understand. Carbohydrate-restricted diets are easier for patients than conventional calorie-restricted diet. In this study we aimed to elucidate the effects of a moderate carbohydrate-restricted diet on glucose metabolism and renal function in patients with T2D on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Nineteen outpatients with T2D continued on a moderate carbohydrate-restricted diet (targeting 50% of calories) for 6 mo. Meanwhile, 10 other outpatients with T2D on DPP-4 inhibitors had the conventional calorie-restricted diet using the food exchange table. No change in prescription drugs occurred for both groups during the study period. After the intervention, the carbohydrate content in dietary intake was lowered significantly from 56.8±8.3 to 46.8±10.1%, while the lipid concentration, primarily n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, was significantly increased. There was no significant change in protein intake. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) fell from 7.22±0.74% to 6.95±0.72% (mean±SD). Furthermore, salt intake decreased significantly from 6.8±2.5 g prior to the intervention, to 5.7±1.9 g after the intervention. The estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) decreased slightly, while serum creatinine levels did not change. These findings suggest that a moderate carbohydrate-restricted diet (50%) is effective in patients with T2D, without affecting kidney function.
-
6.
Long-term efficacy of gliflozins versus gliptins for Type 2 Diabetes after metformin failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Zilli, RW, Rached, CDA, Silva, FPD, Baena, RC
Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2020;(4):458-465
Abstract
After metformin failure in treatment for diabetes type 2, there is no trivial option for adjuvant medication. The last two oral class medications, gliflozins and gliptins, have different mechanisms of action but have never been compared in long run studies. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the overall long-term efficacy of these drugs after metformin failure. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, including all trials with a duration of over 2 years, comparing gliflozins or gliptins after metformin failure in type 2 diabetes. Data Sources: Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Library from inception through July 2016 without language restrictions. The longest study period found in the literature was 4 years. We selected 1 article on empagliflozin, 1 on dapagliflozin, and 1 on saxagliptin with missing data. After one year of treatment, over 50% of the patients presented HbA1c > 7%. Efficacy rate after 4 years of empagliflozin (23%) was better than dapagliflozin (5%) and saxagliptin (7%); however, it presented statistically non-significant values for HbA1c (7.4 and 7.3% between gliflozins), and missing data for saxaglifozin. Nonetheless, empagliflozin performed better than glimepiride in the 4-year period (standardized mean difference SMD 0.4, confidence interval CI 95% 0.23 to 0.56). The failure of the secondary treatment using gliflozins occurs in less than one year of treatment (less than 50% of the patients presenting HbA1c > 7 %). Empagliflozin offered better glycemic control compared to sulfonylureas but was similar to dapagliflozin.
-
7.
Efficacy and safety of trelagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease: Results from a randomized, phase 3 study.
Kaku, K, Ishida, K, Shimizu, K, Achira, M, Umeda, Y
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;(2):373-381
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin 25 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study comprised a 12-week double-blind phase followed by a 40-week open-label phase. Patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease (undergoing hemodialysis), and were receiving diet and/or exercise therapy with/without one antidiabetic drug. RESULTS Patients were randomized to trelagliptin (A/A, n = 55) or placebo (P/A, n = 52; double-blind phase). Both groups received trelagliptin in the open-label phase. The least square mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in hemoglobin A1c at the end of the double-blind phase was -0.71% (95% CI -0.885, -0.542) and 0.01% (95% CI -0.170, 0.183) in the A/A and P/A groups, respectively (intergroup least square means difference -0.72%, 95% CI -0.966, -0.473; P < 0.0001). Mean hemoglobin A1c decreased after trelagliptin treatment in the P/A group to similar levels observed in the A/A group and remained comparable in both groups versus baseline up to week 52. In the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 72.7% and 61.5% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively; most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate, except in one patient (P/A group), who experienced two severe TEAEs. The incidence of serious TEAEs was 7.3% and 3.8% in the A/A and P/A group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Once-weekly trelagliptin 25 mg was efficacious, with no major safety concerns, and represents a meaningful treatment option in this patient population.
-
8.
[Still a role for DPP-4 inhibitors in 2020?].
Caironi, V, Jornayvaz, FR, Gariani, K
Revue medicale suisse. 2020;(697):1186-1190
Abstract
DPP-4 inhibitors are a well-established treatment for type 2 diabetes. They act by improving glycemic control through the incretin system. This class of molecules are well-tolerated and are associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia. Yet, their efficacy in glycemic control is rather moderate and they don't offer a benefit in terms of cardiovascular or renal protection. Even if they have a good safety profile, it is important to pay attention to the risk of cardiac failure and pancreatitis. This article provides an overview of the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in 2020.
-
9.
Mortality and other adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted for COVID-19 in association with glucose-lowering drugs: a nationwide cohort study.
Pérez-Belmonte, LM, Torres-Peña, JD, López-Carmona, MD, Ayala-Gutiérrez, MM, Fuentes-Jiménez, F, Jorge Huerta, L, Muñoz, JA, Rubio-Rivas, M, Madrazo, M, Garcia, MG, et al
BMC medicine. 2020;(1):359
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited evidence exists on the role of glucose-lowering drugs in patients with COVID-19. Our main objective was to examine the association between in-hospital death and each routine at-home glucose-lowering drug both individually and in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted for COVID-19. We also evaluated their association with the composite outcome of the need for ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death as well as on the development of in-hospital complications and a long-time hospital stay. METHODS We selected all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine's registry of COVID-19 patients (SEMI-COVID-19 Registry). It is an ongoing, observational, multicenter, nationwide cohort of patients admitted for COVID-19 in Spain from March 1, 2020. Each glucose-lowering drug user was matched with a user of other glucose-lowering drugs in a 1:1 manner by propensity scores. In order to assess the adequacy of propensity score matching, we used the standardized mean difference found in patient characteristics after matching. There was considered to be a significant imbalance in the group if a standardized mean difference > 10% was found. To evaluate the association between treatment and study outcomes, both conditional logit and mixed effect logistic regressions were used when the sample size was ≥ 100. RESULTS A total of 2666 patients were found in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, 1297 on glucose-lowering drugs in monotherapy and 465 in combination with metformin. After propensity matching, 249 patients on metformin, 105 on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, 129 on insulin, 127 on metformin/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, 34 on metformin/sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and 67 on metformin/insulin were selected. No at-home glucose-lowering drugs showed a significant association with in-hospital death; the composite outcome of the need of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death; in-hospital complications; or long-time hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted for COVID-19, at-home glucose-lowering drugs showed no significant association with mortality and adverse outcomes. Given the close relationship between diabetes and COVID-19 and the limited evidence on the role of glucose-lowering drugs, prospective studies are needed.
-
10.
DPP4 Inhibitors in the Management of Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Rabizadeh, S, Tavakoli Ardakani, MA, Mouodi, M, Bitaraf, M, Shab-Bidar, S, Esteghamati, A, Nakhjavani, M
Advances in therapy. 2020;(9):3660-3675
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We studied the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on glycemic control in non-critically ill patients admitted to hospital. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for published studies in English up to July 2019. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared DPP4 inhibitors plus insulin supplementation versus basal-bolus insulin regimen in the management of hyperglycemia non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to hospital. Mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated to interpret the data. RESULTS Of 401 papers, four RCTs including 648 participants met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in mean daily blood glucose level between the two groups (MD 4.63; 95% CI = - 1.57, 10.83; p = 0.14) (I2 = 14%, p = 0.32). Total insulin dose per day was lower in patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors (MD - 14.27; CI = - 22.47, - 6.07; p = 0.001) (I2 = 92%, p = 0.001). Also, the number of insulin injection was significantly lower in patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors (MD - 0.79; CI = - 1.01, - 0.57; p = 0.001) (I2 = 0%, p = 0.68). The rate of hypoglycemia was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 0.60, CI = 0.34, 1.074; p = 0.08) (I2 = 37.3%, p = 0.18). Treatment failure was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 0.87, CI = 0.64, 4.8; p = 0.38) (I2 = 49%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSION The results indicate that using DPP4 inhibitors plus basal or supplemental insulin in hospitalized patients is non-inferior to a standard basal-bolus insulin regimen and leads to a lower amount of insulin use and a lower rate of insulin injection. Limitations of this study were heterogeneity of baseline characteristics of included patients, small sample size, short duration, and non-uniformly defined outcome assessment parameters in the included studies.