0
selected
-
1.
Effects of n-3 EPA and DHA supplementation on fat free mass and physical performance in elderly. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial.
Rondanelli, M, Perna, S, Riva, A, Petrangolini, G, Di Paolo, E, Gasparri, C
Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2021;:111476
Abstract
The most studied n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) are eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3), and their intake seem to have a positive effect on skeletal muscle. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of n-3 EPA and DHA supplementation on fat free mass, and on different indexes of physical performance in the elderly. Eligible studies included RCT studies that investigated EPA and DHA intervention. Random-effects models have been used in order to estimate pooled effect sizes, the mean differences, and 95 % CIs. Findings from 14 studies (n = 2220 participants) lasting from 6 to 144 weeks have been summarized in this article. The meta-analyzed mean differences for random effects showed that daily n-3 EPA + DHA supplementation (from 0.7 g to 3.36 g) decreases the time of Time Up and Go (TUG) test of -0.28 s (CI 95 %-0.43, -0.13;). No statistically significant effects on physical performance indicators, such as 4-meter Walking Test, Chair Rise Test and Handgrip Strength, have been found. The fat free mass follows an improvement trend of +0.30 kg (CI 95 % -0.39, 0.99) but not statistically significant. N-3 EPA + DHA supplementation could be a promising strategy in order to enhance muscle quality and prevent or treat frailty.
-
2.
Effects of dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 33 randomized controlled trials.
Zhang, HJ, Gao, X, Guo, XF, Li, KL, Li, S, Sinclair, AJ, Li, D
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(7):4538-4550
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effects of pure preparations of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in reducing metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk factors, but the results were inconsistent. The present study aimed to clarify whether EPA and DHA have differential effects on MetS features in humans. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in CNKI, PubMed, Embase and Scopus updated to February 2021. The mean changes in the characteristics of MetS were calculated as weighted mean differences by using a random-effects model. Thirty-three RCTs were included. RESULTS The results showed that both EPA and DHA were effective at lowering serum triglycerides (TG) levels. EPA supplementation decreased the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) (WMD = -0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.43, -0.05 mmol/L), TG (WMD = -0.77 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.54, -0.00 mmol/L) and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD = -0.13 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.25, -0.01 mmol/L), while DHA increased the serum levels of TC (WMD = 0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.25 mmol/L), LDL-C (WMD = 0.26 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.15, 0.38 mmol/L) and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (WMD = 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.04, 0.09 mmol/L). Moreover, DHA increased the serum levels of insulin compared with EPA, especially in subgroups whose mean age was <60 years (0.43 mU/L; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.81 mU/L) and duration of DHA supplementation < 3 months (0.39 mU/L; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.77 mU/L). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis provides evidence that EPA and DHA have different effects on risk factors of MetS.
-
3.
Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Balachandar, R, Soundararajan, S, Bagepally, BS
European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2020;(5):639-648
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the role of DHA supplementation in preventing age-related cognitive decline (ARCD) in individual cognitive domains by conducting systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Relevant clinical trials were systematically searched at Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Embase databases since inception to June 2018. The PRISMA guidelines were adhered for data abstraction, quality assessment, and validation of included studies. Study details such as participant characteristics, DHA supplementation, and cognitive function outcome measures, i.e., memory, attention, working memory, and executive function, were extracted to perform meta-analysis according to the Cochrane guidelines. Additional meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to detect confounding variables and sensitivity of results, respectively. RESULTS Ten studies including 2327 elderly individuals were part of the final results. Study exhibited minimal or no pooled incremental effects on memory (0.22, 95%CI = - 0.17 to 0.61, I2 = 94.36%), attention (0.1, 95%CI = - 0.04 to 0.25, I2 = 32.25%), working memory (0.01, 95%CI = - 0.10 to 0.12, I2 = 0%), and executive function (0.03, 95%CI = - 0.05 to 0.11, I2 = 78.48%) among the DHA-supplemented group. The results from standard mean difference between the groups, on memory (0.08, 95%CI = - 0.12 to 0.28, I2 = 76.82%), attention (0.04, 95%CI = - 0.09 to 0.23, I2 = 42.63%), working memory (- 0.08, 95%CI = - 0.26 to 0.10, I2 = 37.57%), and executive function (0.17, 95%CI = - 0.01 to 0.36, I2 = 78.48%) were similar to the results of pooled incremental analysis. Lastly, results remained unaffected by sensitivity and sub-group analyses. CONCLUSIONS Current pieces of evidence do not support the role of DHA supplementation, in preventing/retarding ARCD of memory, executive function, attention, and working memory. Protocol registered at PROSPERO (ID: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018099401).
-
4.
Omega-3 and its domain-specific effects on cognitive test performance in youths: A meta-analysis.
Emery, S, Häberling, I, Berger, G, Walitza, S, Schmeck, K, Albert, T, Baumgartner, N, Strumberger, M, Albermann, M, Drechsler, R
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2020;:420-436
Abstract
Omega-3 fatty acids are vital for brain development. The aim of this meta-analysis was to broaden current knowledge of the effects of omega-3 supplementation on cognitive test performance in youths. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting selection criteria were identified through two independent literature searches on PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycARTICLES and PsycINFO (last search June 2019). Twenty-nine out of 1126 studies assessing 4247 participants met all selection criteria. A meta-analysis using random-effects model was performed for eight different cognitive domains. This first analysis revealed no main effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on domain-specific cognitive test performance in youths. Subgroup analyses identified beneficial effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-rich but not docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-rich formulations in the domains of long-term memory, working memory and problem solving and a tendency towards beneficial effects in clinical rather than non-clinical populations. Future research should investigate differential effects of EPA and DHA and consider their baseline levels, other nutritional components and interactions with gene variations as potential predictors of response.
-
5.
International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research Practice Guidelines for Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.
Guu, TW, Mischoulon, D, Sarris, J, Hibbeln, J, McNamara, RK, Hamazaki, K, Freeman, MP, Maes, M, Matsuoka, YJ, Belmaker, RH, et al
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 2019;(5):263-273
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex mental illness with unmet therapeutic needs. The antidepressant effects of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been widely reported. The subcommittee of the International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research organized an expert panel and conducted a literature review and a Delphi process to develop a consensus-based practice guideline for clinical use of n-3 PUFAs in MDD. The guideline focuses on 5 thematic areas: general concepts, acute treatment strategy, depression recurrence monitoring and prevention, use in special populations, and potential safety issues. The key practice guidelines contend that: (1) clinicians and other practitioners are advised to conduct a clinical interview to validate clinical diagnoses, physical conditions, and measurement-based psychopathological assessments in the therapeutic settings when recommending n-3 PUFAs in depression treatment; (2) with respect to formulation and dosage, both pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or an EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) combination of a ratio higher than 2 (EPA/DHA >2) are considered effective, and the recommended dosages should be 1-2 g of net EPA daily, from either pure EPA or an EPA/DHA (>2:1) formula; (3) the quality of n-3 PUFAs may affect therapeutic activity; and (4) potential adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal and dermatological conditions, should be monitored, as well as obtaining comprehensive metabolic panels. The expert consensus panel has agreed on using n-3 PUFAs in MDD treatment for pregnant women, children, and the elderly, and prevention in high-risk populations. Personalizing the clinical application of n-3 PUFAs in subgroups of MDD with a low Omega-3 Index or high levels of inflammatory markers might be regarded as areas that deserve future research.
-
6.
Effects of EPA and DHA on blood pressure and inflammatory factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Guo, XF, Li, KL, Li, JM, Li, D
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2019;(20):3380-3393
Abstract
The present study aimed to clarify whether eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have differential effects on blood pressure and inflammatory mediators. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus updated to Apr. 2018. The mean changes in risk factors of chronic diseases were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) by using a random-effects model. Twenty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The summary estimate showed that EPA intervention significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-2.6 mmHg; 95%confident interval (CI): -4.6, -0.5 mmHg), especially in subjects with dyslipidemia (-3.8 mmHg; 95%CI: -6.7, -0.8 mmHg). The pooled effect indicated that supplemental DHA exerted a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in subjects with dyslipidemia (-3.1 mmHg; 95%CI: -5.9, -0.2 mmHg). Both EPA (-0.56 mg/L; 95%CI: -1.13, 0.00) and DHA (-0.5 mg/L; 95%CI: -1.0, -0.03) significantly reduced the concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), respectively, especially in subjects with dyslipidemia and higher baseline CRP concentrations. Given that limited trials have focused on EPA or DHA intervention on concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, further RCTs should be explored on these inflammatory factors. The present meta-analysis provides substantial evidence that EPA and DHA have independent (blood pressure) and shared (CRP concentration) effects on risk factors of chronic diseases, and high-quality RCTs with multi-center and large simple-size should be performed to confirm the present findings.