-
1.
Discovery and development of trastuzumab deruxtecan and safety management for patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.
Shitara, K, Baba, E, Fujitani, K, Oki, E, Fujii, S, Yamaguchi, K
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2021;(4):780-789
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Approximately 12-15% of gastric cancers (GCs) are human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive (HER2 immunohistochemistry 3 + or 2 + /in situ hybridization + [ERBB2/CEP17 ≥ 2.0]). While the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy, is the standard treatment for HER2-positive GC, other HER2-targeted therapies have not demonstrated survival benefits in patients with GC, despite showing efficacy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. This indicates that there are unique challenges to the use of currently available HER2-targeted therapies for the treatment of HER2-positive GC. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 human monoclonal IgG1 antibody with the same amino acid sequence as trastuzumab, an enzymatically cleavable peptide-based linker, and DXd, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, as its released payload. T-DXd has a high drug-antibody ratio (approximately 8) and a demonstrated bystander antitumor effect. It has demonstrated significant efficacy when compared with standard therapies and is approved as third- or later-line treatment for HER2-positive GC in Japan and second- or later-line treatment in the US. T-DXd treatment is associated with gastrointestinal and hematological adverse events, and a risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), with the ILD risk being higher in Japan than in countries other than Japan. However, most adverse events, including ILD, can be managed with proactive monitoring and T-DXd dose modification, and initiation of adequate treatment. In this review, we summarize the discovery and development of T-DXd and provide guidance for T-DXd safety management, including ILD monitoring, for patients with HER2-positive GC.
-
2.
Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions in Primary Care.
Carpenter, M, Berry, H, Pelletier, AL
American family physician. 2019;(9):558-564
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Drug interactions are common in the primary care setting and are usually predictable. Identifying the most important and clinically relevant drug interactions in primary care is essential to patient safety. Strategies for reducing the risk of drug-drug interactions include minimizing the number of drugs prescribed, re-evaluating therapy on a regular basis, considering nonpharmacologic options, monitoring for signs and symptoms of toxicity or effectiveness, adjusting dosages of medications when indicated, and adjusting administration times. Inhibition or induction of cytochrome P450 drug metabolizing isoenzymes is the most common mechanism by which clinically important drug interactions occur. The antimicrobials most likely to affect the international normalized ratio significantly in patients receiving warfarin are trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, and fluconazole. An empiric warfarin dosage reduction of 30% to 50% upon initiation of amiodarone therapy is recommended. In patients receiving amiodarone, limit dosages of simvastatin to 20 mg per day and lovastatin to 40 mg per day. Beta blockers should be tapered and discontinued several days before clonidine withdrawal to reduce the risk of rebound hypertension. Spironolactone dosages should be limited to 25 mg daily when coadministered with potassium supplements. Avoid prescribing opioid cough medicines for patients receiving benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants, including alcohol. Physicians should consider consultation with a clinical pharmacist when clinical circumstances require the use of drugs with interaction potential.
-
3.
Use of (1→3)-β-d-glucan for diagnosis and management of invasive mycoses in HIV-infected patients.
Farhour, Z, Mehraj, V, Chen, J, Ramendra, R, Lu, H, Routy, JP
Mycoses. 2018;(10):718-722
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
People living with HIV (PLHIV) are highly vulnerable to invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to their immune dysfunction. Diagnosis and treatment of IFIs remain challenging due to the requirement of deep tissue sampling to visualise and culture fungi before initiating treatment. Such techniques are less practical in resource-limited settings due to their cost and requirement of relatively invasive procedures. Hence, identification of surrogate markers for the early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of IFIs is required. Recent studies have shown that (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), a major fungal cell wall antigen, represents a promising soluble marker for the presumptive diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of IFIs in HIV-infected patients. Herein, we review findings on the merits of BDG assays in the diagnosis of IFIs and monitoring of antifungal therapies for PLHIV. Conversely to other types of immunocompromised patients, HIV infection is associated with gut damage and subsequent bacterial and fungal translocation leading to elevated BDG plasma levels.
-
4.
Monitoring guidance for patients with hypophosphatasia treated with asfotase alfa.
Kishnani, PS, Rush, ET, Arundel, P, Bishop, N, Dahir, K, Fraser, W, Harmatz, P, Linglart, A, Munns, CF, Nunes, ME, et al
Molecular genetics and metabolism. 2017;(1-2):4-17
Abstract
Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited, systemic, metabolic disorder caused by autosomal recessive mutations or a single dominant-negative mutation in the gene encoding tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP). The disease is associated with a broad range of signs, symptoms, and complications, including impaired skeletal mineralization, altered calcium and phosphate metabolism, recurrent fractures, pain, respiratory problems, impaired growth and mobility, premature tooth loss, developmental delay, and seizures. Asfotase alfa is a human, recombinant enzyme replacement therapy that is approved in many countries for the treatment of patients with HPP. To address the unmet need for guidance in the monitoring of patients receiving asfotase alfa, an international panel of physicians with experience in diagnosing and managing HPP convened in May 2016 to discuss treatment monitoring parameters. The panel discussions focused on recommendations for assessing and monitoring patients after the decision to treat with asfotase alfa had been made and did not include recommendations for whom to treat. Based on the consensus of panel members, this review provides guidance on the monitoring of patients with HPP during treatment with asfotase alfa, including recommendations for laboratory, efficacy, and safety assessments and the frequency with which these should be performed during the course of treatment. Recommended assessments are based on patient age and include regular monitoring of biochemistry, skeletal radiographs, respiratory function, growth, pain, mobility and motor function, and quality of life. Because of the systemic presentation of HPP, a coordinated, multidisciplinary, team-based, patient-focused approach is recommended in the management of patients receiving asfotase alfa. Monitoring of efficacy and safety outcomes must be tailored to the individual patient, depending on medical history, clinical manifestations, availability of resources in the clinical setting, and the clinician's professional judgment.
-
5.
Mycophenolate revisited.
van Gelder, T, Hesselink, DA
Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 2015;(5):508-15
Abstract
The patent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has expired, and for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), this will happen in 2017. In the twenty years these drugs have been used, they have become extremely popular. In this review, the reasons for the popularity of mycophenolate are discussed, including the benefits compared to azathioprine. MMF and EC-MPS are therapeutically equivalent. Although neither is considered to be a narrow therapeutic index drug, this should not lead to careless switching between the innovator drug and generic formulations, or between one generic formulation and another. The pipeline of new immunosuppressive drugs is dry, and it is very likely that we will be using mycophenolate for many more years to come as a first-line immunosuppressive drug in our transplant population. Whether or not the development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is related to drug exposure (mycophenolic acid concentrations) remains to be investigated.
-
6.
Treatment Options for Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms.
Laufs, U, Scharnagl, H, Halle, M, Windler, E, Endres, M, März, W
Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2015;(44):748-55
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 4.6 million persons in Germany are now taking statins, i.e., drugs that inhibit the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase. Statins lower the concentration of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and thereby lessen the rate of cardiovascular events; the size of this effect depends on the extent of lowering of the LDL cholesterol concentration. Muscle symptoms are a clinically relevant side effect of statin treatment. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search, and on the current recommendations of the European Atherosclerosis Society. RESULTS At least 5% of patients taking statins have statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). The etiology of SAMS is heterogeneous. SAMS may seriously impair quality of life and cause complications of variable severity, up to and including rhabdomyolysis (in about 1 in 100,000 cases). SAMS often lead to a reduction in the prescribed dose of the statin, while also negatively affecting drug adherence. More than 90% of patients with SAMS can keep on taking statins over the long term and gain the full clinical benefit of statin treatment after a switch to another type of statin or a readjustment of the dose or frequency of administration. If the LDL cholesterol concentration is not adequately lowered while the patient is taking a statin in the highest tolerable dose, combination therapy is indicated. CONCLUSION SAMS are important adverse effects of statin treatment because they lessen drug adherence. Patients with SAMS should undergo a thorough diagnostic evaluation followed by appropriate counseling. In most cases, statins can be continued, with appropriate adjustments, even in the aftermath of SAMS.
-
7.
Patients' serum and urine as easily accessible samples for the measurement of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
Harenberg, J, Du, S, Krämer, S, Weiss, C, Krämer, R, Wehling, M
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2015;(2):228-36
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Measurement of the anticoagulant effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) may be desirable, in particular in patients with acute medical conditions. Useful methods should give results rapidly within minutes, should be easy to perform, specific, and sensitive. Using plasma samples, chromogenic assays can be made to be specific for the two types of NOAC (factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors), and also hemoclot and ecarin clotting time specific for dabigatran. If plasma samples anticoagulated with sodium citrate are not available, blood samples anticoagulated with ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid or serum samples may be regarded as alternatives for the determination of NOAC. At present, dabigatran cannot be determined from serum samples because it may be consumed during the clotting process to obtain serum. NOAC can be determined in urine samples due to their renal elimination. Quantitative methods are preferable to qualitative methods, although the latter may be advantageous in some situations, being developed as point-of-care tests for oral factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors. In these tests, the presence and absence of NOAC in urine can be identified with the naked eye after a few minutes and these tests are highly specific and sensitive. New assays such as a semiquantitative determination in urine samples and measurement using other sample matrices are currently under development.
-
8.
Individualizing treatment and choice of medication in lichen planus: a step by step approach.
Manousaridis, I, Manousaridis, K, Peitsch, WK, Schneider, SW
Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG. 2013;(10):981-91
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Although lichen planus is one of the most common dermatological entities, very few reviews on its management exist in the literature. Standard therapeutic approaches include various topical treatments (including topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs) and phototherapy modalities, as well as systemic corticosteroids and systemic retinoids. While localized skin lesions are easily managed with standard modalities, generalized forms and in particular involvement of hair follicles, nails and mucosa, as well as eyes are often challenging. This review proposes an evidence-based and differential therapeutic regime, taking into account many new emerging systemic therapies to help clinicians optimize treatment according to the type, extent and severity of the disease. An individual therapeutic ladder has been developed for each location, starting with standard modalities and ranking alternative systemic treatments (mainly methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, as well as cyclosporine, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) according to efficacy, evidence level and side-effect profile.
-
9.
A practical guide to monitoring for adverse drug reactions during antihypertensive drug therapy.
McDowell, SE, Thomas, SK, Coleman, JJ, Aronson, JK, Ferner, RE
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2013;(3):87-95
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Monitoring of patients taking antihypertensive treatment can identify potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, published guidelines give divergent or incomplete recommendations on monitoring for ADRs. Using a predetermined strategy, we undertook a systematic review to identify hypertension guidelines published from January 2001 to October 2011 with recommendations for monitoring for ADRs. We screened 88 abstracts and 187 web-based guidelines, and identified 19 published guidelines on monitoring the biochemical effects of antihypertensive drug therapy. We then produced a set of practical clinical guidelines, synthesized from those recommendations. Our recommendations are designed to provide efficient monitoring. They reduce the number of tests to a minimum consistent with safe practice and align monitoring schedules, so that creatinine, potassium and sodium concentrations are measured at the same times in all cases. The instructions for biochemical monitoring in current guidelines differ greatly, both in the extent of advice and in the detail provided. The current lack of consistent and workable instructions poses serious difficulties for practitioners. The recommendations distilled from this systematic review should help practitioners when they monitor therapy with antihypertensive drugs.
-
10.
Monitoring of lipids, enzymes, and creatine kinase in patients on lipid-lowering drug therapy.
Wiklund, O, Pirazzi, C, Romeo, S
Current cardiology reports. 2013;(9):397
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
A number of plasma lipid parameters have been used to estimate cardiovascular risk and to be targets for treatment to reduce risk. Most risk algorithms are based on total cholesterol (T-C) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and most intervention trials have targeted the LDL-C levels. Emerging measures, which in some cases may be better for risk calculation and as alternative treatment targets, are apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C. Other lipid measures that may contribute in risk analysis are triglycerides (TG), lipoprotein(a), and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2. The primary treatment target in cardiovascular prevention is LDL-C, and potential alternative targets are apoB and non-HDL-C. In selected individuals at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, TG should be targeted, but HDL-C, Lp(a), and ratios such as LDL-C/HDL-C or apoB/apoAI are not recommended as treatment targets. Lipids should be monitored during titration to targets. Thereafter, lipids should be checked at least once a year or more frequently to improve treatment adherence if indicated. Monitoring of muscle and liver enzymes should be done before the start of treatment. In stable conditions during treatment, the focus should be on clinical symptoms that may alert muscle or liver complications. Routine measurement of CK or ALT is not necessary during treatment with statins.