-
1.
Influence of combined treatment with naltrexone and memantine on alcohol drinking behaviors: a phase II randomized crossover trial.
Krishnan-Sarin, S, O'Malley, SS, Franco, N, Cavallo, DA, Tetrault, JM, Shi, J, Gueorguieva, R, Pittman, B, Krystal, JH
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;(2):319-326
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Glutamate and opioid systems play important roles in alcohol drinking behaviors. We examined if combined treatment with the NMDA antagonist memantine and the opioid antagonist naltrexone, when compared with naltrexone alone, would have a greater influence on alcohol drinking behaviors. Fifty-six, non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers, with alcohol dependence and a positive family history (FHP) of alcoholism, participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, including two 6-8 days treatment periods, separated by a 6-day washout, and 3 alcohol drinking paradigm (ADP) sessions. After the first baseline (BAS) ADP1 session, participants were randomized to receive either naltrexone (NTX; 50 mg/day) + placebo memantine, or NTX (50 mg/day) + memantine (MEM; 20 mg/day), during the first treatment period, following which they completed ADP2. After a 6-day washout, participants were crossed over to the treatment they did not receive during the first treatment period, following which they completed ADP3. During each ADP, participants received a priming drink of alcohol followed by 3 1-hour, self-administration periods during which they had ad-lib access to 12 drinks. Individually, both NTX and NTX + MEM, when compared to BAS ADP1, significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed (p's < 0.001) and craving (p's < 0.001). When comparing NTX + MEM vs. NTX on number of drinks consumed, there was a significant treatment* sequence interaction (p = 0.004). Specifically, when NTX + MEM followed NTX alone, NTX + MEM resulted in a further reduction in drinking (mean: -1.94; 95% CI: -2.6, -0.8, p = 0.0005). However, when NTX alone followed NTX + MEM, NTX alone did not lead to further reduction in drinking (mean: 0.59; 95% CI: -0.67, 1.43, p = 0.47). Similar patterns were observed for alcohol craving; specifically, a significant reduction in craving was observed when NTX + MEM followed NTX alone (p = 0.009), but craving reduction was maintained when NTX + MEM was followed by NTX alone. Neither treatment condition significantly influenced alcohol-induced stimulation or sedation. Memantine (at a dose of 20 mg/day) enhances the efficacy of naltrexone (50 mg/day) in reducing alcohol drinking and craving among FHP drinkers with beneficial effects that appear to carryover after discontinuation of memantine treatment.
-
2.
Efficacy and safety of memantine in children with autism spectrum disorder: Results from three phase 2 multicenter studies.
Hardan, AY, Hendren, RL, Aman, MG, Robb, A, Melmed, RD, Andersen, KA, Luchini, R, Rahman, R, Ali, S, Jia, XD, et al
Autism : the international journal of research and practice. 2019;(8):2096-2111
Abstract
Three phase 2 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and long-term safety of weight-based memantine extended release (ER) treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder. MEM-MD-91, a 50-week open-label trial, identified memantine extended-release treatment responders for enrollment into MEM-MD-68, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. MEM-MD-69 was an open-label extension trial in which participants from MEM-MD-68, MEM-MD-91, and open-label trial MEM-MD-67 were treated ⩽48 weeks with memantine extended release. In MEM-MD-91, 517 (59.6%) participants were confirmed Social Responsiveness Scale responders at week 12; mean Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores improved two to three times a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. In MEM-MD-68, there was no difference between memantine and placebo on the primary efficacy parameter, the proportion of patients with a loss of therapeutic response (defined as ⩾10-point increase from baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score). MEM-MD-69 exploratory analyses revealed mean standard deviation improvement in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score of 32.4 (26.4) from baseline of the first lead-in study. No new safety concerns were evident. While the a priori-defined efficacy results of the double-blind trial were not achieved, the considerable improvements in mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores from baseline in the open-label trials were presumed to be clinically important.
-
3.
Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study.
Fang, T, Al Khleifat, A, Meurgey, JH, Jones, A, Leigh, PN, Bensimon, G, Al-Chalabi, A
The Lancet. Neurology. 2018;(5):416-422
Abstract
BACKGROUND Riluzole is the only drug to prolong survival for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and, at a dose of 100 mg, was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality in a clinical trial. A key question is whether the survival benefit occurs at an early stage of disease, late stage, or is spread throughout the course of the disease. To address this question, we used the King's clinical staging system to do a retrospective analysis of data from the original dose-ranging clinical trial of riluzole. METHODS In the original dose-ranging trial, patients were enrolled between December, 1992, and November, 1993, in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, the USA, and the UK if they had probable or definite ALS as defined by the El Escorial criteria. The censor date for the riluzole survival data was set as the original study end date of Dec 31, 1994. For this analysis, King's clinical ALS stage was estimated from the electronic case record data of the modified Norris scale, UK Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, El Escorial category, vital capacity, and gastrostomy insertion data. The lowest allocated stage was 2 because the original trial only included patients with probable or definite ALS. We used a χ2 test to assess the independence of stage at trial enrolment and treatment group, Kaplan-Meier product limit distribution to test the transition from each stage to subsequent stages, and Cox regression to confirm an effect of treatment group on time in stage, controlling for covariates. We did sensitivity analyses by combining treatment groups, using alternative strategies to stage, stratifying by stage at trial enrolment, and using multistate outcome analysis of treatments (MOAT). FINDINGS We analysed the case records of all 959 participants from the original dose-ranging trial, 237 assigned to 50 mg/day riluzole, 236 to 100 mg/day, 244 to 200 mg/day, and 242 to daily placebo. Clinical stage at enrolment did not significantly differ between treatment groups (p=0·22). Time in stage 4 was longer for patients receiving 100 mg/day riluzole than for those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·36-0·83; log-rank p=0·037). Combining treatment groups and stratifying by stage at enrolment showed a similar result (HR 0·638, 95% CI 0·464-0·878; p=0·006), as did analysis with MOAT where the mean number of days spent in stage 4 was numerically higher for patients given riluzole at higher doses compared with patients receiving placebo. Time from stages 2 or 3 to subsequent stages or death did not differ between riluzole treatment groups and placebo (p=0·83 for stage 2 and 0·88 for stage 3). INTERPRETATION We showed that riluzole prolongs survival in the last clinical stage of ALS; this finding needs to be confirmed in a prospective study, and treatment effects at stage 1 still need to be analysed. The ALS stage at which benefit occurs is important for counselling of patients before starting treatment. Staging should be used in future ALS clinical trials to assess the stage at which survival benefit occurs, and a similar approach could be used for other neurodegenerative diseases. FUNDING NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, The European Union Joint Programme on Neurodegeneration, and the King's Summer Undergraduate Studentship.
-
4.
Effect of the Glutamate NMDA Receptor Antagonist Memantine as Adjunctive Treatment in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Exploratory, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Kulkarni, J, Thomas, N, Hudaib, AR, Gavrilidis, E, Grigg, J, Tan, R, Cheng, J, Arnold, A, Gurvich, C
CNS drugs. 2018;(2):179-187
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex, severe and highly stigmatised psychiatric illness. Several lines of evidence highlight the causal link between chronic stress, glucocorticoid response to stress and glutamatergic overactivity as a key event in the pathophysiology of BPD. Therefore, molecular mechanisms capable of regulating glutamate excitotoxicity represent novel and potentially promising treatment targets. Memantine-HCl is a voltage-dependent N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor 'channel blocker' that selectively blocks pathological glutamate overactivity. OBJECTIVE The aim of the current study was to determine if memantine can improve BPD symptoms. METHOD An 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive memantine to treatment as usual was conducted. Treatment as usual comprised antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonin antagonists and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors), mood stabilisers and antipsychotics, as well as psychotherapy and other psychosocial interventions. Sixteen participants received oral placebo while 17 participants received daily oral memantine 10 mg for 7 days, with subsequent titration to daily oral memantine 20 mg. Eligibility criteria included men and women aged between 16-65 years, with a diagnosis of BPD according to the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients. Primary outcome measures included the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD), assessed fortnightly. Secondary measures included an adverse effect questionnaire administered fortnightly to assess adverse effects known to be related to memantine use. RESULTS According to intention-to-treat, latent growth curve analyses, a significant change in total score of ZAN-BPD symptom severity was observed in the memantine group at 20 mg/daily across time, compared with placebo (p = 0.02). No adverse effects were significantly more frequent among participants receiving active memantine than among those receiving placebo. CONCLUSION Memantine at a 20-mg daily dose is a well tolerated drug that can improve BPD symptomatology and may be a promising novel therapeutic for its treatment. Further studies are needed to explore the efficacy of memantine versus placebo, as well as in comparison with other potential treatments for BPD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02097706.
-
5.
Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Ketamine for Adult Bronchoscopy.
Fruchter, O, Manevich, Y, Carmi, U, Rozengarten, D, Kramer, MR
Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology. 2017;(4):279-284
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Ketamine has been used in pediatric flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB). Its efficacy and safety for sedation of adults undergoing FFB has not been thoroughly investigated, and, consequently, it is not used by most interventional bronchoscopists. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sedation for FFB under ketamine-propofol-midazolam (KPM) compared with the fentanyl-propofol-midazolam (FPM) regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective randomized trial of adult patients (n=80) undergoing FFB, randomized to receive sedation with either KPM (n=39) or FPM (n=41). Vital signs including transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (TcPCO2) were continuously monitored. Sedation-related complications and interventions to maintain respiratory and hemodynamic stability were compared. Both operator and patient were blinded to the sedation regimen used. The operator's and patient's satisfaction from sedation were assessed following recovery. RESULTS Maximal intraprocedural TcPCO2 values and minimal oxygen saturation did not differ significantly between the KPM and FPM groups (63.2±11.4 mm Hg vs. 61.1±7.2 mm Hg) and (77.1%±12.5% vs. 81.8%±12.0%), respectively. No significant differences were noted between the KPM and FPM groups with respect to sedation-related respiratory or hemodynamic complications. The operator's and patient's satisfaction from sedation was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Ketamine is as safe and effective as fentanyl for adult analgesia and sedation during FFB. In light of this observation and the fact that ketamine does not cause hemodynamic suppression, like most sedative agents, and is a potent bronchodilator, should encourage its more widespread use for adult sedation during FFB.
-
6.
A Prospective Open-Label Trial of Memantine Hydrochloride for the Treatment of Social Deficits in Intellectually Capable Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Joshi, G, Wozniak, J, Faraone, SV, Fried, R, Chan, J, Furtak, S, Grimsley, E, Conroy, K, Kilcullen, JR, Woodworth, KY, et al
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 2016;(3):262-71
Abstract
This prospective 12-week open-label trial evaluates the tolerability and efficacy of memantine hydrochloride for the treatment of core social and cognitive deficits in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Measures for assessment of therapeutic response included the Social Responsiveness Scale-Adult Research Version (SRS-A), disorder-specific Clinical Global Impression scales, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Self-Report, Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale, and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Eighteen adults (mean age, 28 ± 9.5 years) with high-functioning ASD (SRS-A raw score, 99 ± 17) were treated with memantine (mean dose, 19.7 ± 1.2 mg/d; range, 15-20 mg), and 17 (94%) completed the trial. Treatment with memantine was associated with significant reduction on informant-rated (SRS-A, -28 ± 25; P < 0.001) and clinician-rated (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale ≤2, 83%) measures of autism severity. In addition, memantine treatment was associated with significant improvement in ADHD and anxiety symptom severity. Significant improvement was noted in nonverbal communication on the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale test and in executive function per self-report (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Self-Report Global Executive Composite, -6 ± 8.8; P < 0.015) and neuropsychological assessments (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery). Memantine treatment was generally well tolerated and was not associated with any serious adverse events. Treatment with memantine appears to be beneficial for the treatment of ASD and associated psychopathology and cognitive dysfunction in intellectually capable adults. Future placebo-controlled trials are warranted.
-
7.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: incidence and characteristics of persistent symptoms and future directions NCCTG N08C3 (Alliance).
Kottschade, L, Novotny, P, Lyss, A, Mazurczak, M, Loprinzi, C, Barton, D
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016;(6):2661-7
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite newer agents, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) continues to remain a distressing side effect to a proportion of patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer therapy. METHODS We recently performed an unplanned secondary analysis on a previously reported negative phase III trial (N08C3) looking at the efficacy of gabapentin/placebo in combination with dexamethasone and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist in the prevention of CINV for 413 patients undergoing regimens with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). In the current study, we attempted to better understand the higher than expected rate of overall patient satisfaction, despite a low complete response rate in both arms. Additionally, we looked at patient variables and their relationship to rates of CINV. RESULTS Approximately one third of patients experienced more than mild nausea and reported scores on the Functional Living Index-Emesis that indicated interference with activities. Thirty-five percent reported nausea greater than 2.5 on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 being none), 19 % reported at least one emetic episode, and 49 % reported taking rescue medication. Nausea and vomiting on day 1, cisplatin therapy, and history of motion sickness significantly predicted delayed CINV. Age, combination chemotherapy (HEC with moderately emetogenic), and getting treatment for breast cancer predicted CINV on day 1. DISCUSSION These data confirm previous reports that subgroups of patients may be more prone to acute and delayed CINV. Future CINV study design may benefit from a more individualized approach to CINV management, targeting those patients who are truly at risk for CINV despite continued drug development efforts.
-
8.
Rating depression over brief time intervals with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: standard vs. abbreviated scales.
Luckenbaugh, DA, Ameli, R, Brutsche, NE, Zarate, CA
Journal of psychiatric research. 2015;:40-5
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Although antidepressant trials typically use weekly ratings to examine changes in symptoms over six to 12 weeks, antidepressant treatments may improve symptoms more quickly. Thus, rating scales must be adapted to capture changes over shorter intervals. We examined the use of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) to evaluate more rapid changes. Data were examined from 58 patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies who received a single infusion of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo over 40 min then crossed over to the other condition. HDRS subscales, a single HDRS Depressed mood item, and a visual analogue scale were used at baseline, after a brief interval (230 min), and one week post-infusion. Effect sizes for the ketamine-placebo difference were moderate (d > 0.50), but one and two-item HDRS subscales had the smallest effects. Response rates on active drug were lowest for the complete HDRS (43%); the remaining scales had higher response rates to active drug, but the shortest subscales had higher response rates to placebo. Correlations between the changes from baseline to 230 min post-ketamine across scores were similar for most subscales (r = 0.82-0.97), but correlations using the single items were lower (r < 0.74). Overall, effect sizes for drug-placebo differences and correlations between changes were lower for one- and two-item measures. Response rates were lower with the full HDRS scale. The data suggest that, to best identify rapid antidepressant effects, a scale should have more than two items, but fewer items than a full scale.
-
9.
An open-label multicenter study to assess the safety of dextromethorphan/quinidine in patients with pseudobulbar affect associated with a range of underlying neurological conditions.
Pattee, GL, Wymer, JP, Lomen-Hoerth, C, Appel, SH, Formella, AE, Pope, LE
Current medical research and opinion. 2014;(11):2255-65
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is associated with neurological disorders or injury affecting the brain, and characterized by frequent, uncontrollable episodes of crying and/or laughing that are exaggerated or unrelated to the patient's emotional state. Clinical trials establishing dextromethorphan and quinidine (DM/Q) as PBA treatment were conducted in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or multiple sclerosis (MS). This trial evaluated DM/Q safety in patients with PBA secondary to any neurological condition affecting the brain. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and tolerability of DM/Q during long-term administration to patients with PBA associated with multiple neurological conditions. METHODS Fifty-two-week open-label study of DM/Q 30/30 mg twice daily. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs, and physical examinations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION #NCT00056524. RESULTS A total of 553 PBA patients with >30 different neurological conditions enrolled; 296 (53.5%) completed. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were nausea (11.8%), dizziness (10.5%), headache (9.9%), somnolence (7.2%), fatigue (7.1%), diarrhea (6.5%), and dry mouth (5.1%). TRAEs were mostly mild/moderate, generally transient, and consistent with previous controlled trials. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 126 patients (22.8%), including 47 deaths, mostly due to ALS progression and respiratory failure. No SAEs were deemed related to DM/Q treatment by investigators. ECG results suggested no clinically meaningful effect of DM/Q on myocardial repolarization. Differences in AEs across neurological disease groups appeared consistent with the known morbidity of the primary neurological conditions. Study interpretation is limited by the small size of some disease groups, the lack of a specific efficacy measure and the use of a DM/Q dose higher than the eventually approved dose. CONCLUSIONS DM/Q was generally well tolerated over this 52 week trial in patients with PBA associated with a wide range of neurological conditions.
-
10.
Perampanel, an AMPA antagonist, found to have no benefit in reducing "off" time in Parkinson's disease.
Lees, A, Fahn, S, Eggert, KM, Jankovic, J, Lang, A, Micheli, F, Mouradian, MM, Oertel, WH, Olanow, CW, Poewe, W, et al
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2012;(2):284-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perampanel is a selective, noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptor antagonist. Two multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III studies assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations. METHODS In both phase III studies (301 and 302), levodopa-treated patients were randomized and treated with once-daily oral placebo (n = 504), perampanel 2 mg (n = 509), or perampanel 4 mg (n = 501). The primary end point was change in daily "off" time from baseline. The treatment period was 30 weeks in study 301 and 20 weeks in study 302. RESULTS For any efficacy end point, perampanel 2 or 4 mg was not superior to placebo. Perampanel was well tolerated up to 4 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS Perampanel failed to significantly improve motor symptoms versus placebo. There was also no effect on the duration or disability of levodopa-induced dyskinesia.