-
1.
Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of the DPP-4 inhibitor gemigliptin when coadministered with rosuvastatin or irbesartan to healthy subjects.
Choi, HY, Lim, HS, Kim, YH, Jeon, HS, Kim, MJ, Lee, SH, Jung, JH, Lee, YK, Kim, HJ, Bae, KS
Current medical research and opinion. 2015;(2):229-41
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gemigliptin is a selective DPP4 inhibitor used to treat type 2 diabetes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of gemigliptin, rosuvastatin, and irbesartan monotherapies and combination therapies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period, crossover studies were performed on healthy male volunteers. The three treatments were: 50 mg gemigliptin alone; 20 mg rosuvastatin (part A) or 300 mg irbesartan alone (part B); and rosuvastatin or irbesartan with concomitant gemigliptin. Each drug was administered as part of once daily, 7 day, repeated dosing regimens with a 14 day washout period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01823133 (part A) and NCT01825850 (part B). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary PK parameters - Cmax and AUCτ - were compared to the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) that were determined for the combination therapies and monotherapies. RESULTS A total of 60 participants were administered the study drugs, and 52 participants (27 participants in part A; 25 participants in part B) were analyzed as part of the PK dataset. In part A, the GMRs (gemigliptin + rosuvastatin/gemigliptin) of the Cmax and AUCτ values of gemigliptin were 0.955 (90% CI = 0.874-1.044) and 1.023 (90% CI = 0.991-1.057), and those of rosuvastatin were 1.012 (90% CI = 0.946-1.084) and 1.086 (90% CI = 1.032-1.142), respectively. In part B, the GMRs of the Cmax and AUCτ values of gemigliptin were 1.046 (90% CI = 0.964-1.134) and 1.035 (90% CI = 1.005-1.065), and those of irbesartan were 0.966 (90% CI = 0.897-1.040) and 1.050 (90% CI = 0.993-1.111), respectively. The limitations of this study include its relatively short treatment period and small sample size, as only healthy participants were included. CONCLUSIONS Gemigliptin does not affect the PK properties of rosuvastatin or irbesartan; also, rosuvastatin and irbesartan do not affect the PKs of gemigliptin.
-
2.
The effect of rosuvastatin on platelet-leukocyte interactions in the setting of acute coronary syndrome.
Sexton, TR, Wallace, EL, Macaulay, TE, Charnigo, RJ, Evangelista, V, Campbell, CL, Bailey, AL, Smyth, SS
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;(3):306-7
-
3.
Preoperative rosuvastatin protects patients with coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Xia, J, Qu, Y, Yin, C, Xu, D
Cardiology. 2015;(1):30-7
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We explored whether preoperative rosuvastatin could protect the cardiac health of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing emergency, noncardiac surgery. METHODS We randomized 550 noncardiac emergency surgery patients with stable coronary artery disease on long-term statin therapy to treatment with and without preoperative rosuvastatin. All patients received rosuvastatin after surgery. We evaluated the incidence of myocardial necrosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) 30 days and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS Creatinine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) isoform elevations occurred less frequently 12 and 24 h after noncardiac emergency surgery in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.029). After surgery, the incidence of MACCE was also lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.019). The difference was mainly due to the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.029). Multivariable analysis found that rosuvastatin reload reduced the incidence of MACCE 52% 6 months after surgery (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative rosuvastatin reload therapy decreases the incidence of myocardial necrosis and MACCE after noncardiac emergency surgery in patients with stable coronary artery disease on long-term statin therapy.
-
4.
[Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin in Patients of Different Risk Groups of Developing Cardiovascular Diseases].
Drapkina, OM, Eliashevich, SO
Kardiologiia. 2015;(2):72-81
Abstract
The purpose of the review - analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in respect of primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, as well as in patients with acute coronary syndrome. As a primary pathogenetic therapy aimed at reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and death from cardiovascular disease ischemic nature, used statins, which have both lipid-lowering and pleiotropic other positive properties. When analyzing the results of the comparative evaluation of different statins best performance indicators in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events were at the rosuvastatin. The first drug is bioequivalent to the original rosuvastatin in Russia became mertenil company "Gedeon Richter". The therapeutic equivalence of mertenil is comparable with that of the original drug in patients of different groups at risk of developing cardiovascular complications (from low to very high). Mertenil can be regarded as an effective and safe drug from the group of statins for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications in patients of all risk groups.
-
5.
Effects of randomized rosuvastatin compared with placebo on bone and body composition among HIV-infected adults.
Erlandson, KM, Jiang, Y, Debanne, SM, McComsey, GA
AIDS (London, England). 2015;(2):175-82
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statins have a beneficial effect on bone mineral density (BMD) and lean mass in some studies of HIV-uninfected adults; however, this has never been investigated in the setting of HIV infection. DESIGN HIV-infected individuals on stable antiretroviral therapy with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 130 mg/dl or less and evidence of heightened immune activation or inflammation were randomized to rosuvastatin 10 mg daily or placebo for 96 weeks. METHODS This was a prespecified interim analysis at 48 weeks. Between-group and within-group differences were compared; multivariable regression models were constructed. RESULTS Seventy-two individuals were randomized to statin therapy and 75 to placebo. Modest 48-week relative increases in trochanter BMD [0.9%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.9 to 0.6] and total hip BMD (0.6%; 95% CI 0.0-1.1) in the statin arm were significantly greater than placebo (P < 0.05). The relationship between statin use and total hip BMD change was robust to adjustment of age, sex, race and smoking status (P = 0.02) and strengthened by inclusion of baseline (P = 0.01) and week 48 change in soluble tumour necrosis factor-α receptor (sTNFR)-1 (P = 0.009). Relative increases in total body, trunk and limb fat were similar between statin and placebo arms (P ≥ 0.58). Although a significant gain in leg lean mass was seen in the statin arm, this was not significantly different compared with placebo (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION The improvements seen in total hip BMD after 48 weeks of rosuvastatin therapy support further potential benefits of statin therapy in HIV, beyond a reduction of cardiovascular risk.
-
6.
Impact of Rosuvastatin on contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients at high risk for nephropathy undergoing elective angiography.
Abaci, O, Arat Ozkan, A, Kocas, C, Cetinkal, G, Sukru Karaca, O, Baydar, O, Kaya, A, Gurmen, T
The American journal of cardiology. 2015;(7):867-71
Abstract
Although statins have been shown to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes, the benefit of statins is not known for patients at high risk for nephropathy who undergo elective coronary angiography. Two hundred twenty consecutive statin-naive patients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) who underwent elective coronary or peripheral angiography were randomly assigned to receive rosuvastatin (40 mg on admission, followed by 20 mg/day; n = 110) or no statin treatment (control group, n = 110). Contrast-induced acute kidney injury was defined by an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5 mg/dl or a relative increase of ≥25% measured 48 or 72 hours after the procedure. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred in 15 patients (7.2%), 9 (8.5%) in the control group and 6 (5.8%) in the rosuvastatin group (p = 0.44). The incidences of adverse cardiovascular and renal events (death, dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, or persistent renal damage) were similar between the two groups at follow-up. In conclusion, rosuvastatin did not reduce the risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury or other clinically relevant outcomes in at-risk patients who underwent coronary and peripheral vascular angiography.
-
7.
Short-term rosuvastatin treatment for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients receiving moderate or high volumes of contrast media: a sub-analysis of the TRACK-D study.
Zhang, J, Li, Y, Tao, GZ, Chen, YD, Hu, TH, Cao, XB, Jing, QM, Wang, XZ, Ma, YY, Wang, G, et al
Chinese medical journal. 2015;(6):784-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current randomized trials have demonstrated the effects of short-term rosuvastatin therapy in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). However, the consistency of these effects on patients administered different volumes of contrast media is unknown. METHODS In the TRACK-D trial, 2998 patients with type 2 diabetes and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) who underwent coronary/peripheral arterial angiography with or without percutaneous intervention were randomized to short-term (2 days before and 3 days after procedure) rosuvastatin therapy or standard-of-care. This prespecified analysis compared the effects of rosuvastatin versus standard therapy in patients exposed to (moderate contrast volume [MCV], 200-300 ml, n = 712) or (high contrast volume [HCV], ≥ 300 ml, n = 220). The primary outcome was the incidence of CIAKI. The secondary outcome was a composite of death, dialysis/hemofiltration or worsened heart failure at 30 days. RESULTS Rosuvastatin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in CIAKI compared with the controls (2.1% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.050) in the overall cohort and in patients with MCV (1.7% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.029), whereas no benefit was observed in patients with HCV (3.4% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.834). The incidence of secondary outcomes was significantly lower in the rosuvastatin group compared with control group (2.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.049) in the overall cohort, but it was similar between the patients with MCV (2.0% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.081) or HCV (5.1% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.273). CONCLUSIONS Periprocedural short-term rosuvastatin treatment is effective in reducing CIAKI and adverse clinical events for patients with diabetes and CKD after their exposure to a moderate volume of contrast medium.
-
8.
Effect of combination therapy of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease.
Masuda, J, Tanigawa, T, Yamada, T, Nishimura, Y, Sasou, T, Nakata, T, Sawai, T, Fujimoto, N, Dohi, K, Miyahara, M, et al
International heart journal. 2015;(3):278-85
Abstract
Ezetimibe has been reported to provide significant incremental reduction in low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when added to a statin; however, its effect on coronary atherosclerosis has not yet been evaluated in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the add-on effect of ezetimibe to a statin on coronary atherosclerosis evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).In this prospective randomized open-label study, a total of 51 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled, and assigned to a combination group (n = 26, rosuvastatin 5 mg/day + ezetimibe 10 mg/day) or a monotherapy group (n = 25, rosuvastatin 5 mg/day). Volumetric IVUS analyses were performed at baseline and 6 months after the treatment for a non-PCI site. LDL-C level was significantly reduced in the combination group (-55.8%) versus that in the monotherapy group (-36.8%; P = 0.004). The percent change in plaque volume (PV), the primary endpoint, appeared to decrease more effectively in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (-13.2% versus -3.1%, respectively, P = 0.050). Moreover, there was a significant group × time interaction in the effects of the two treatments on PV (P = 0.021), indicating the regressive effect of the combination therapy on PV was greater than that of monotherapy for subtly different values of baseline PV in the two treatment groups. Moreover, percent change in PV showed positive correlations with percent change of LDL-C (r = 0.384, P = 0.015).Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with ezetimibe added to usual-dose statin may provide significant incremental reduction in coronary plaques compared with usual-dose statin monotherapy.
-
9.
Risk of Stroke in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) Trials.
Abdul-Rahim, AH, Perez, AC, Fulton, RL, Jhund, PS, Latini, R, Tognoni, G, Wikstrand, J, Kjekshus, J, Lip, GY, Maggioni, AP, et al
Circulation. 2015;(17):1486-94; discussion 1494
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to describe the incidence and predictors of stroke in patients who have heart failure without atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS We pooled 2 contemporary heart failure trials, the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza cardiaca-Heart Failure trial (GISSI-HF). Of the 9585 total patients, 6054 did not have AF. Stroke occurred in 165 patients (4.7%) with AF and in 206 patients (3.4%) without AF (rates 16.8/1000 patient-years and 11.1/1000 patient-years, respectively). Using Cox proportional-hazards models, we identified the following independent predictors of stroke in patients without AF (ranked by χ(2) value): age (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.63 per 10 years), New York Heart Association class (1.60, 1.21-2.12 class III/IV versus II), diabetes mellitus treated with insulin (1.87, 1.22-2.88), body mass index (0.74, 0.60-0.91 per 5 kg/m(2) up to 30), and previous stroke (1.81, 1.19-2.74). N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (available in 2632 patients) was also an independent predictor of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.31; 1.11-1.57 per log unit) when added to this model. With the use of a risk score formulated from these predictors, we found that patients in the upper third of risk had a rate of stroke that approximated the risk in patients with AF. CONCLUSIONS A small number of demographic and clinical variables identified a subset of patients who have heart failure without AF at a high risk of stroke.
-
10.
Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition by TA-8995 in patients with mild dyslipidaemia (TULIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.
Hovingh, GK, Kastelein, JJ, van Deventer, SJ, Round, P, Ford, J, Saleheen, D, Rader, DJ, Brewer, HB, Barter, PJ
Lancet (London, England). 2015;(9992):452-60
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyslipidaemia remains a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and additional lipid-modifying treatments are warranted to further decrease the cardiovascular disease burden. We assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a novel cholesterol esterase transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor TA-8995 in patients with mild dyslipidaemia. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2 trial, we recruited patients (aged 18-75 years) from 17 sites (hospitals and independent clinical research organisations) in the Netherlands and Denmark with fasting LDL cholesterol levels between 2·5 mmol/L and 4·5 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol levels between 0·8 and 1·8 mmol/L and triglyceride levels below 4·5 mmol/L after washout of lipid-lowering treatments. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive one of the following nine treatments: a once a day dose of 1 mg, 2·5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg TA-8995 or matching placebo; 10 mg TA-8995 plus 20 mg atorvastatin; 10 mg TA-8995 plus 10 mg rosuvastatin or 20 mg atorvastatin or 10 mg rosuvastatin alone. We overencapsulated statins to achieve masking. The primary outcome was percentage change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol from baseline at week 12, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970215. FINDINGS Between Aug 15, 2013, and Jan 10, 2014, 364 patients were enrolled. At week 12, LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by 27·4% in patients assigned to the 1 mg dose, 32·7% in patients given the 2·5 mg dose, 45·3% in those given the 5 mg dose, and 45·3% in those given the 10 mg dose (p<0·0001). LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by 68·2% in patients given 10 mg TA-8995 plus atorvastatin, and by 63·3% in patients given rosuvastatin plus 10 mg TA-8995 (p<0·0001). A daily dose of 1 mg TA-8995 increased HDL cholesterol levels by 75·8%, 2·5 mg by 124·3%, 5 mg by 157·1%, and 10 mg dose by 179·0% (p<0·0001). In patients receiving 10 mg TA-8995 and 20 mg atorvastatin HDL cholesterol levels increased by 152·1% and in patients receiving 10 mg TA-8995 and 10 mg rosuvastatin by 157·5%. We recorded no serious adverse events or signs of liver or muscle toxic effects. INTERPRETATION TA-8995, a novel CETP inhibitor, is well tolerated and has beneficial effects on lipids and apolipoproteins in patients with mild dyslipidaemia. A cardiovascular disease outcome trial is needed to translate these effects into a reduction of cardiovascular disease events. FUNDING Dezima.