-
1.
Metabolic bone disorders after gastrectomy: inevitable or preventable?
Rino, Y, Aoyama, T, Atsumi, Y, Yamada, T, Yukawa, N
Surgery today. 2022;(2):182-188
Abstract
Some authors have suggested that a relationship exists between gastrectomy for gastric cancer and metabolic bone disorders. However, few studies have investigated metabolic bone disorders after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in detail. Thus, we reviewed the findings of our recent prospective study and those of other reports on this subject. Osteoporosis and osteomalacia have been observed after gastrectomy and appear to be caused by reduced food intake and absorption, and steatorrhea. Moreover, the incidence of fracture is high after gastrectomy, although subtotal or total gastrectomy and reconstruction for gastric cancer have not been identified as significant risk factors for decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Recently, we reported that the BMD decreased significantly within 12 months after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in both male and female patients, but there was no significant gender-related difference in the rate of change in BMD. More than 1 year after gastrectomy, the steep decrease in the BMD stabilized and normal levels of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 were maintained, despite the lack of precursor for 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 synthesis after gastrectomy. Alendronate therapy might be effective and prevent postgastrectomy metabolic bone disorders; however, the optimal treatment and prevention strategy for this bone disorder has not been delineated.
-
2.
Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized comparative studies.
Chen, X, Feng, X, Wang, M, Yao, X
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2020;(11):1998-2010
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy persists about the effects of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) on short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival within the field of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS Studies published from January 1994 to February 2020 that compare LDG and ODG for AGC were identified. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The selection of high-quality nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCTs) was based on a validated tool (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies, MINORS). The short- and long-term outcomes of both procedures were compared. RESULTS Overall, 30 studies were included in this meta-analysis, which comprised of 8 RCTs and 22 NRCTs involving 16,029 patients (7864 LDGs, 8165 ODGs). The recurrence, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year OS rates for LDG and ODG were comparable. LDG was associated with a lower postoperative complication rate (OR 0.79; P < 0.00001), lower estimated volume of blood loss (WMD -102.21 mL; P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD -1.96 days; P < 0.0001), shorter time to first flatus (WMD -0.54 day; P = 0.0007) and shorter time to first liquid diet (WMD -0.66 day; P = 0.001). The number of lymph nodes retrieved, mortality, intraoperative complications, intraoperative blood transfusion, and time to ambulation were similar. However, LDG was associated with a longer surgical time (WMD 33.57 min; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy is a safe and effective technique for patients with AGC when performed by experienced surgeons at high-volume specialized centers.
-
3.
Missed Gastric Cancer Metastasis to the Appendix: Case Report and Literature Review.
Alhadid, D, AlShammari, A, Almana, H, Aburahmah, M
The American journal of case reports. 2020;:e920010
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer metastasis to the appendix is a rare condition that might present with symptoms of acute appendicitis or remain asymptomatic and be diagnosed incidentally. This report summaries 6 previously reported cases in addition to the presented case. CASE REPORT We report a 54-years-old female patient who presented with gastric cancer metastasis to the appendix that was found incidentally in the second surgery when she underwent bowel resection due to bowel entrapment in internal hernia, a complication of her primary gastric cancer surgical intervention. Six case-reports on gastric cancer metastasis to the appendix were reviewed. The metastasis was symptomatic in 4 cases, and solitary in 3 cases. The diagnosis was delayed in 4 cases as there was no evidence of metastasis at the diagnosis of the primary tumor; appendectomy was performed in all cases. The prognosis of the cases varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS We question the real incidence of appendiceal metastasis in gastric cancer, and the benefit-risk ratio of appendectomy in every gastrectomy. Guidelines on management of similar cases is also needed.
-
4.
Thirty-Day Readmission After Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Dan, Z, YiNan, D, ZengXi, Y, XiChen, W, JieBin, P, LanNing, Y
The Journal of surgical research. 2019;:180-188
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission is a commonly accepted parameter to evaluate surgical quality, but previous studies reported inconsistent results in radical gastrectomy. The purpose of our study is to clarify the prevalence, potential causes, and risk factors of 30-d readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS PubMed and Embase were systematically searched from inception to September 2018 for any possible inclusion. Prevalence, potential causes, and risk factors of 30-d readmission in included studies were extracted using a standardized EXCEL table. The overall 30-d readmission rate was pooled using a random-effects model. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate potential risk factors for 30-d readmission. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and statistical tests. RESULTS A total of nine studies with 16,581 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled 30-d readmission rate after radical gastrectomy was 8% (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.12). Nutritional difficulty and surgical site infections were the main causes for 30-d readmission. Cardiovascular comorbidity, total gastrectomy, nutritional risk screening 2002 score ≥3, any complications, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 ≥12 were strong predictors for 30-d readmission, whereas combined multiorgan resection was a weaker predictor. No significant publication bias was identified through the funnel plot and statistical tests. CONCLUSIONS The 30-d readmission rate after radical gastrectomy ranges from 4% to 12% and can mainly result from nutritional difficulty and surgical site infections. Nutritional risk screening 2002 score ≥3, cardiovascular comorbidity, total gastrectomy, any complications, and laparoscopic gastrectomy were potential risk factors for 30-d readmission.
-
5.
Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different.
Pucci, A, Batterham, RL
Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2019;(2):117-128
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The worldwide obesity epidemic continues unabated, adversely impacting upon global health and economies. People with severe obesity suffer the greatest adverse health consequences with reduced life expectancy. Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with severe obesity, resulting in marked sustained weight loss, improved obesity-associated comorbidities and reduced mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most common bariatric procedures undertaken globally, engender weight loss and metabolic improvements by mechanisms other than restriction and malabsorption. It is now clear that a plethora of gastrointestinal (GI) tract-derived signals plays a critical role in energy and glucose regulation. SG and RYGB, which alter GI anatomy and nutrient flow, impact upon these GI signals ultimately leading to weight loss and metabolic improvements. However, whilst highly effective overall, at individual level, post-operative outcomes are highly variable, with a proportion of patients experiencing poor long-term weight loss outcome and gaining little health benefit. RYGB and SG are markedly different anatomically and thus differentially impact upon GI signalling and bodyweight regulation. Here, we review the mechanisms proposed to cause weight loss following RYGB and SG. We highlight similarities and differences between these two procedures with a focus on gut hormones, bile acids and gut microbiota. A greater understanding of these procedure-related mechanisms will allow surgical procedure choice to be tailored to the individual to maximise post-surgery health outcomes and will facilitate the discovery of non-surgical treatments for people with obesity.
-
6.
Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Makuuchi, R, Irino, T, Tanizawa, Y, Bando, E, Kawamura, T, Terashima, M
Surgery today. 2019;(3):187-196
Abstract
Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) is a serious complication of total or proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, with a reported incidence of 2.1-14.6% and mortality of up to 50%. EJAL is an independent prognostic factor for the poor survival of gastric cancer patients. Meticulous surgical techniques, experience with anastomotic devices, and a thorough understanding of various risk factors and preventive measures are essential and early diagnosis is critical for preventing EJAL-related death. Patients with suspected EJAL must be evaluated promptly, but contrast swallow is not recommended. There is no standard treatment strategy for EJAL, although conservative treatment with drainage and nutritional support is the most common approach. Effective endoscopic treatments have been reported but need further validation. Surgical treatment is associated with high mortality but should be considered to prevent death from suboptimal EJAL management, for patients with severe sepsis or when conservative treatment has failed.
-
7.
POSTOPERATIVE CHANGES IN INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA AND USE OF PROBIOTICS IN ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS AND SLEEVE VERTICAL GASTRECTOMY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW.
Wagner, NRF, Zaparolli, MR, Cruz, MRR, Schieferdecker, MEM, Campos, ACL
Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery. 2018;(4):e1400
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies suggest that weight loss induced by bariatric surgery and the remission of some comorbidities may be related to changes in the microbiota profile of individuals undergoing this procedure. In addition, there is evidence that manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may prove to be a therapeutic approach against obesity and metabolic diseases. OBJECTIVE To verify the changes that occur in the intestinal microbiota of patients undergoing bariatric surgery, and the impact of the usage of probiotics in this population. METHODS Articles published between 2007 and 2017 were searched in Medline, Lilacs and Pubmed with the headings: bariatric surgery, microbiota, microbiome and probiotics, in Portuguese, English and Spanish. Of the 166 articles found, only those studies in adults subjected to either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve vertical gastrectomy published in original articles were enrolled. In the end, five studies on the change of intestinal microbiota composition, four on the indirect effects of those changes and three on the probiotics administration on this population were enrolled and characterized. CONCLUSION Bariatric surgery provides changes in intestinal microbiota, with a relative increase of the Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria phyla and reduction of Firmicutes. This is possibly due to changes in the gastro-intestinal flux, coupled with a reduction in acidity, in addition to changes in eating habits. The usage of probiotics seems to reduce the gastro-intestinal symptoms in the post-surgery, favor the increase of vitamin B12 synthesis, as well as potentiate weight loss.
-
8.
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of lipid effects at one year postsurgery.
Climent, E, Benaiges, D, Pedro-Botet, J, Goday, A, Solà, I, Ramón, JM, Flores-LE Roux, JA, Checa, MÁ
Minerva endocrinologica. 2018;(1):87-100
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Results of the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels are controversial. Moreover, previous meta-analyses focused on global dyslipidemia remission, but did not include the separate remission rates of the different lipid fractions. Hence, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes (concentration change and remission rates) of GB and SG on diverse lipid disorders one year postbariatric surgery (BS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An exhaustive electronic search carried out on MedLine, Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) until July 2016 yielded 2621 records, of which 17, totaling 4699 obese patients with one-year follow-up after BS were included in the meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS GB was superior to SG in terms of total cholesterol (mean difference= 19.77 mg/dL, 95% CI: 11.84-27.69) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mean difference: 19.29 mg/dL, 95% CI: 11.93-26.64) decreases as well as in hypercholesterolemia remission (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61). No differences were found between GB and SG in terms of HDL cholesterol increase or triglyceride concentration change after surgery, as well as in hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL remission rates. CONCLUSIONS The effect of GB on total and LDL cholesterol concentration decreases and remission was greater than that of SG, whereas no differences were observed with respect to HDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentration evolution. Conclusions cannot be drawn from hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL remission rates based on this meta-analysis.
-
9.
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of different enteral immunonutrition formulas in patients underwent gastrectomy.
Song, GM, Liu, XL, Bian, W, Wu, J, Deng, YH, Zhang, H, Tian, X
Oncotarget. 2017;(14):23376-23388
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Optimal enteral immunonutrition (EIN) regime for gastric cancer (GC) patients underwent gastrectomy remains uncertainty. To assess comparative efficacy of different EIN formulas in GC patients underwent gastrectomy, we performed network meta-analysis. RESULTS We included 11 RCTs enrolling 840 patients. Pairwise meta-analysis indicated that EIN (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.86; MD -0.42, 95% CI -0.74-0.10), Arg+RNA+ω-3-FAs (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.63; MD -0.42, 95% CI -0.75-0.07), Arg+Gln+ω-3-FAs (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.94; MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.22-1.07) reduced ICs and LOS. Network meta-analysis confirmed the potential of Arg+RNA+ω-3-FAs for ICs (OR 0.27, 95% Crl 0.12-0.49) and Arg+Gln+ω-3-FAs for CIs (OR 0.22, 95% Crl 0.02-0.84) and LOS (SMD -0.63, 95% Crl -1.07-0.13), and indicated that Arg+RNA+ω-3-FAs was superior to Arg+RNA and Arg+Gln for ICs as well. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed direct and network meta-analyses for randomized controlled trials comparing EIN formulas with each other or standard enteral nutrition (SEN) in reducing infectious complications (ICs), noninfectious complications (NICs) and length of hospital stay (LOS), through January 2016. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SCURA) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to rank regimes and rate qualities of evidences respectively. CONCLUSIONS As for GC patients underwent gastrectomy, Arg+RNA+ω-3-FAs and Arg+Gln+ω-3-FAs are the optimal regimes of reducing ICs and LOS.
-
10.
Systematic Review of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Gastrectomy for Cancer.
Straatman, J, Wiegel, J, van der Wielen, N, Jansma, EP, Cuesta, MA, van der Peet, DL
Digestive surgery. 2017;(5):364-370
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival rates after a total gastrectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy are improving, leading to a shift in outcomes of interest from survival to postoperative outcomes and symptoms. In this systematic review, we investigate gastrointestinal symptoms that occur after a gastrectomy in relation to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and the effect of pancreatic exocrine enzyme supplementation on these symptoms. METHODS Online databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that researched gastrointestinal symptoms, exocrine pancreatic function, and enzyme supplementation were identified and assessed. RESULTS The search resulted in a total of 1,023 articles after exclusion of duplicates. After performing a thorough assessment, 4 studies were included for systematic review. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was investigated by 2 studies; the results showed a significant decrease of total exocrine pancreatic function of up to 76%. The other 2 studies investigated the effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation and found minor improvement in fecal consistency and a decrease in high-degree steatorrhea. No differences in individual symptom scores were reported. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal symptoms such as steatorrhea, bloating, and dumping syndrome may be related to exocrine pancreatic function, initiated by total gastrectomy. Treatment with pancreatic enzymes had a minor positive effect on patients. It should be noted that these studies were of a small sample size and low quality. New and larger RCTs are necessary to either prove or disprove the benefit of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in the treatment of the gastrointestinal symptoms after total gastrectomy.