-
1.
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative rehabilitation, inflammation, and immunity in gastric carcinoma patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Wang, WK, Tu, CY, Shao, CX, Chen, W, Zhou, QY, Zhu, JD, Xu, HT
Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas. 2019;(5):e8265
Abstract
We determined the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric carcinoma. Sixty patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma in Lishui Hospital between March and October 2016 were randomized to receive either ERAS (30 patients) or conventional care (30 patients, controls). Clinical, economic, and laboratory indices were analyzed. ERAS patients showed faster recovery and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the controls (P<0.05). Some clinical indices (i.e., time to first flatus and defecation, time to removal of drainage tubes, time to resumption of oral feeding, time to postoperative mobilization, and postoperative complications) were significantly better in ERAS patients than in controls. Duration of postoperative infusion was lower in ERAS patients than in controls (P<0.05). In ERAS patients, serum albumin and prealbumin were higher on postoperative day 7, C-reactive protein was lower on postoperative days 3 and 7, and neutrophil count was lower on postoperative day 3 compared to the values in controls (P<0.05 for all). IgM levels were higher in ERAS patients on postoperative days 3 and 7 (P<0.05), while IgG levels were higher on postoperative day 3 (P<0.05). Total T lymphocytes were higher in ERAS patients on postoperative day 3, while helper T cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were higher on postoperative days 3 and 7 (P<0.05 for all). In gastric carcinoma patients, ERAS may reduce perioperative inflammation, improve immunity and postoperative nutrition, shorten hospitalization, and enhance rehabilitation.
-
2.
A Comparative Study of Double-Tract Reconstruction and Roux-en-Y After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
Hong, J, Wang, SY, Hao, HK
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2019;(2):82-89
Abstract
BACKGROUND The meta-analysis was performed to compare surgical and functional results of double-tract (DT) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction, applied in both partial and total gastrectomy. METHODS PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Wiley, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library Central were searched for studies comparing DT and RY after partial or total gastrectomy. Surgical, nutritional, and long-term outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 595 patients from 8 studies were included. Operative time, time to first flatus, length of hospital stays, complications, postoperative nutritional variables, and functional result were similar between 2 groups. Group DT had significantly less blood loss, shorter time to oral intake and less loss of body weight at 2 years after operation. CONCLUSIONS DT reconstruction is comparable with RY after gastrectomy in safety, surgical outcomes including reflux symptom and postoperative recovery and shows better food intake and body weight maintenance.
-
3.
Long-term adverse events after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a 7-year nationwide, observational, population-based, cohort study.
Thereaux, J, Lesuffleur, T, Czernichow, S, Basdevant, A, Msika, S, Nocca, D, Millat, B, Fagot-Campagna, A
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2019;(10):786-795
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns are rising about the late adverse events following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. We aimed to assess, over a 7-year period, the late adverse events after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy compared with matched control groups. METHODS In this nationwide, observational, population-based, cohort study, we used data extracted from the French National Health Insurance (Système National des Données de Santé) database. All patients undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in France in 2009, except those who had undergone bariatric surgery in the previous 4 years before inclusion, were matched with control patients with obesity in terms of age, sex, BMI category, baseline antidiabetic therapy, and baseline insulin therapy. Exclusion criteria for the control group included cancer, pregnancy, chronic infectious disease, serious acute or chronic disease in 2008-09, or previous (2005-09) or forthcoming (2010-11) bariatric surgery. The incidence rate was calculated for each type of adverse event leading to inpatient hospital admission over a 7-year period; incidence rate ratios (with 95% CIs) were computed to compare the rate of complications among the bariatric surgery and control groups. Risks of complications during follow-up were compared using Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat methodology. FINDINGS From Jan 1, 2009, to Dec 31, 2009, 8966 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (7359 [82%] women; mean age 40·4 years [SD 11·3]) and 8966 matched controls (7359 [82%] women; mean age 40·9 years [11·4]) were included in analyses 4955 (55%) off 8966 patients in the bariatric surgery group had a primary gastric bypass and 4011 (45%) patients had sleeve gastrectomy. With a mean follow-up of 6·8 years (SD 0·2), mortality was lower in the gastric bypass group than in its control group (hazard ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·52-0·78]; p<0·0001) and in the sleeve gastrectomy group than in its control group (0·38 [0·29-0·50]; p<0·0001). The gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy groups had higher risk than did their control groups for invasive gastrointestinal surgery or endoscopy (incidence rate ratio 2·4 [95% CI 2·1-2·7], p<0·0001, for gastric bypass vs control and 1·5 [1·3-1·7], p<0·0001, for sleeve gastrectomy vs control); for gastrointestinal disorders not leading to invasive procedures (1·9 [1·7-2·1]), p<0·0001, for gastric bypass vs control and 1·2 [1·1-1·4], p<0·0001, for sleeve gastrectomy vs control); and for nutritional disorders (4·9 [3·8-6·4], p<0·0001, for gastric bypass vs control and 1·8 [1·3-2·5], p<0·0001, for sleeve gastrectomy vs control). For psychiatric disorders, there was no significant association (1·1 [0·9-1·4], p=0·190, for gastric bypass vs control and 1·1 [0·8-1·3], p=0·645, for sleeve gastrectomy vs control), except for gastric bypass and alcohol dependence (1·8 [1·1-2·8], p=0·0124). INTERPRETATION Despite lower 7-year mortality, patients undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy had higher risk of hospital admission at least once for late adverse events, except for psychiatric disorders, than did control patients, with a higher risk observed after gastric bypass than with sleeve gastrectomy. FUNDING None.
-
4.
Initial Experience of Dual-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Arm Study.
Lu, YM, Lin, T, Hu, YF, Liu, H, Mou, TY, Zhu, Y, Yu, J, Li, GX
Advances in therapy. 2019;(9):2342-2350
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dual-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (DPLG) has been widely performed in recent years for treating gastric cancers. The present study reports our initial experience of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (DPLDG). METHODS From November 2016 to August 2018, 38 consecutive patients underwent DPLDG in our center. The observational outcomes included 30-day morbidity and mortality rates, time to first flatus, time to first oral liquid diet, time to first oral semiliquid diet, time to drainage tube removal, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, postoperative 4-day recovery rate, additional analgesic use, hospital stay and cosmetic benefits. RESULTS Mean operative time was 191.6 ± 44.4 min, mean intra-operative blood loss was 39.8 ± 48.7 ml, and the mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 38.3 ± 13.7 nodes. One case was converted to five-port laparoscopic surgery, and no intraoperative complications occurred in any of the cases. The mean time to postoperative first flatus was 45.3 ± 18.0 h. The mean time to intake of an oral liquid diet was 56.7 ± 30.4 h. The mean time to drainage tube removal was 97.9 ± 52.3 h. The mean VAS scores for the 3 days after surgery were 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.0 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.5, respectively. A total of 81.6% of the enrolled patients met the postoperative 4-day recovery standard, and 15.8% of patients received additional analgesics. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.0 ± 2.0 days. No deaths were observed, and the 30-day morbidity rate was 13.2%. CONCLUSION DPLDG is a feasible and safe procedure for experienced surgeons with acceptable short-term outcomes, reduced invasiveness and good cosmetic effects.
-
5.
Early changes in vitamin B12 uptake and biomarker status following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
Kornerup, LS, Hvas, CL, Abild, CB, Richelsen, B, Nexo, E
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2019;(2):906-911
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Bariatric surgery increases the risk of micronutrient deficiencies, including vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency. We analysed early changes in biomarkers of B12 status following bariatric surgery. METHODS We prospectively included adult patients (n = 27) referred for either Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) (n = 19) or Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) (n = 8). Blood samples were drawn before surgery and 2 and 6 months following surgery for measurement of B12, holotranscobalamin (holoTC), and methylmalonic acid (MMA). The B12 absorption capacity was estimated from the increase in plasma holoTC two days after a standardised oral B12 challenge. RESULTS B12 status decreased following both RYBG and SG. While a decrease in plasma B12 was not evident until 6 months postoperatively, we observed a statistically significant decrease in plasma holoTC and increase in MMA already 2 months postoperatively. These changes were more pronounced at 6 months post surgery. Correspondingly, the B12 absorption capacity was decreased following surgery. CONCLUSIONS HoloTC and MMA were superior to B12 to detect early changes in B12 status following bariatric surgery. Our data challenge the current concept that liver B12 stores secure long-term maintenance of B12 status. They indicate that B12 treatment in pharmacological doses may be warranted immediately after surgery.
-
6.
Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Outcomes of Patients after Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.
Li, J, Xu, R, Hu, DM, Zhang, Y, Gong, TP, Wu, XL
Nutrition and cancer. 2019;(4):557-568
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival predication value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with gastric cancer. The second aim was to explore the relationship between preoperative PNI and clinicopathological features. METHODS A systematic search of the electronic databases identified studies that investigated the association of preoperative PNI with short or long-term outcomes among patients after gastrectomy for cancer. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of results was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-five studies with a total of 14,403 patients with gastric cancer met inclusion criteria for this review. Pooled analysis demonstrated that low preoperative PNI was associated with significantly reduced overall survival (HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.56-2.09; P = 0.000), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.24-2.10; P = 0.000), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.20-2.77; P = 0.005). In addition, risk of postoperative complications (POCs) and mortality was significantly higher in patients with lower preoperative PNI (RR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.44-2.17; P = 0.000 and RR 5.14, 95% CI: 2.23-11.79; P = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSION This study suggests that patients with low preoperative PNI may have a high incidence of POCs and poor prognosis following gastrectomy for cancer.
-
7.
Ileal interposition coupled with duodenal diverted sleeve gastrectomy versus standard medical treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus obese patients: long-term results of a case-control study.
Foschi, D, Sorrentino, L, Tubazio, I, Vecchio, C, Vago, T, Bevilacqua, M, Rizzi, A, Corsi, F
Surgical endoscopy. 2019;(5):1553-1563
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that bariatric surgery is effective in obtaining remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in obese patients, yet no data exist in the literature from prospective studies with ileal interposition with duodenal diversion sleeve gastrectomy (II-DD-SG). The aim of this case-control study is to investigate if II-DD-SG is superior to medical treatment in T2DM obese patients. METHODS Thirty obese patients (BMI > 30) affected by T2DM were recruited for surgery (II-DD-SG) between 2008 and 2011 and were matched with an equal control group which received standard medical treatment. Anthropometric measures, glucose metabolism, cardiovascular risk factors were determined baseline and during follow-up. The primary end point was T2DM remission; reduction of body weight, BMI, and cardiovascular risk factors were secondary end-points. RESULTS Shortly after II-DD-SG, normalization of glucose plasma levels and glycated hemoglobin was observed followed by a significant decrease in body weight and BMI. At one-year follow-up, insulin resistance strongly declined as did insulin plasma levels. Complete remission was observed in 26 patients (86%); 2 (6.6%) had partial remission, and two (6.6%) were still diabetic. After 5 years, 17 of 25 patients on follow-up (68%) showed complete remission of T2DM and 56% had remission of cardiovascular risk factors. Only two patients receiving medical treatment showed complete remission of T2DM (p < 0.0001 versus II-DD-SG). No significant changes of anthropometric parameters and lipid metabolism were recorded. CONCLUSIONS II-DD-SG is an effective surgical procedure, able to induce complete and prolonged remission of T2DM in obese patients as opposed to medical treatment.
-
8.
Proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xu, Y, Tan, Y, Wang, Y, Xi, C, Ye, N, Xu, X
Medicine. 2019;(19):e15663
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the incidence of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) has been rising rapidly. Prevalent surgical methods are proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG); however, which method is superior remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of original articles to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of PG with TG for proximal EGC. METHODS Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2018. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was utilized to conduct quality assessments, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger test. STATA version 14.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 2036 patients with proximal EGC in 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that PG was potentially superior to TG regarding operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, and long-term nutritional status. Overall survival between the PG and TG groups was not significantly different. PG was associated with a high incidence of 2 kinds of postoperative complications: anastomotic stenosis and reflux esophagitis. However, the incidence of these complications associated with esophagojejunostomy with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) was comparable with that of TG. CONCLUSIONS PG has several advantages over TG for the treatment of proximal EGC, including surgical outcomes and long-term nutritional status. However, anastomotic stenosis and reflux esophagitis frequently occurred in patients undergoing PG. Esophagojejunostomy with DTR could offer a solution to reducing the incidence of these complications.
-
9.
Thirty-Day Readmission After Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Dan, Z, YiNan, D, ZengXi, Y, XiChen, W, JieBin, P, LanNing, Y
The Journal of surgical research. 2019;:180-188
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission is a commonly accepted parameter to evaluate surgical quality, but previous studies reported inconsistent results in radical gastrectomy. The purpose of our study is to clarify the prevalence, potential causes, and risk factors of 30-d readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS PubMed and Embase were systematically searched from inception to September 2018 for any possible inclusion. Prevalence, potential causes, and risk factors of 30-d readmission in included studies were extracted using a standardized EXCEL table. The overall 30-d readmission rate was pooled using a random-effects model. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate potential risk factors for 30-d readmission. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and statistical tests. RESULTS A total of nine studies with 16,581 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled 30-d readmission rate after radical gastrectomy was 8% (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.12). Nutritional difficulty and surgical site infections were the main causes for 30-d readmission. Cardiovascular comorbidity, total gastrectomy, nutritional risk screening 2002 score ≥3, any complications, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 ≥12 were strong predictors for 30-d readmission, whereas combined multiorgan resection was a weaker predictor. No significant publication bias was identified through the funnel plot and statistical tests. CONCLUSIONS The 30-d readmission rate after radical gastrectomy ranges from 4% to 12% and can mainly result from nutritional difficulty and surgical site infections. Nutritional risk screening 2002 score ≥3, cardiovascular comorbidity, total gastrectomy, any complications, and laparoscopic gastrectomy were potential risk factors for 30-d readmission.
-
10.
Changes in bone metabolism after gastric cancer surgery in male patients: a prospective observational study.
Atsumi, Y, Rino, Y, Wada, H, Kitani, Y, Ozawa, Y, Aoyama, T, Oshima, T, Yukawa, N, Yoshikawa, T, Masuda, M
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2019;(1):237-243
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several retrospective studies have shown that bone disorders occur after gastric cancer surgery. This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the changes in bone metabolism after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 39 men with early gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. We excluded women to avoid the effects of menopause. We employed dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine. DEXA was performed before and 1 and 2 years after surgery. The serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D [1,25(OH)2VD], 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)VD], and estradiol were measured before surgery and every 3 months until 2 years after surgery. RESULTS DEXA revealed that BMD significantly decreased by 0.036 ± 0.033 g/cm2 12 months after gastrectomy (P < 0.001) and by 0.046 ± 0.040 g/cm2 24 months after gastrectomy (P < 0.001). The serum ALP level significantly increased by 38.31 ± 103.8 IU/L 24 months after surgery (P = 0.013). The serum 25(OH)VD level significantly decreased by 4.88 ± 6.42 ng/ml 24 months after surgery (P < 0.001), whereas the serum 1,25(OH)2VD levels were consistently in the normal range. The serum estradiol level significantly increased by 2.94 ± 7.49 pg/ml 12 months after gastrectomy (P = 0.035). A lower preoperative body mass index (BMI) significantly correlated with the reduction in BMD 12 months after surgery; the correlation coefficient was 0.37 (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that a significant decrease in BMD was observed for up to 24 months after gastrectomy, not only 12 months.