1.
The effect of grape (Vitis vinifera) seed extract supplementation on flow-mediated dilation, blood pressure, and heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with duration- and dose-response analysis.
Foshati, S, Nouripour, F, Sadeghi, E, Amani, R
Pharmacological research. 2022;:105905
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials was to assess the long-term effect of grape seed extract (GSE) supplementation on flow-mediated dilation (FMD), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) in adults. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched up to May 24, 2021. Nineteen trials were included in this study. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. GSE supplementation significantly reduced DBP (WMD: -2.20 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.79 to -0.60, I2 = 88.8%) and HR (WMD: -1.25 bpm, 95% CI: -2.32 to -0.19, I2 = 59.5%) but had no significant effects on FMD (WMD: 1.02%, 95% CI: -0.62 to 2.66, I2 = 92.0%) and SBP (WMD: -3.55 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.59 to 0.49, I2 = 97.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the dose and duration of GSE administration and the characteristics of study participants could be sources of between-study heterogeneity. Significant non-linear relationships were found between DBP and the duration of GSE supplementation (P = 0.044) and its dose (P = 0.007). In conclusion, GSE may be beneficial for individuals with or at risk of cardiovascular disease because it may have hypotensive and HR-lowering properties.
2.
The effect of high Intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on arterial stiffness and 24h blood pressure responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Way, KL, Sultana, RN, Sabag, A, Baker, MK, Johnson, NA
Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2019;(4):385-391
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Greater arterial stiffness and poor 24h blood pressure (BP) are recognized as indicators of poor cardiovascular health. Evidence has shown that high intensity interval training (HIIT) may be a superior alternative to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving cardiovascular disease risk factors such as cardiorespiratory fitness and vascular function. However, there are limited data comparing the effect of HIIT to MICT on central arterial stiffness and/or 24h BP response. The purpose of this study was to compare HIIT versus MICT on central arterial stiffness and 24h BP outcomes by systematic review and meta-analysis. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS Eligible studies were exercise training interventions (≥4weeks) that included both HIIT and MICT and reported central arterial stiffness, as measured by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index and/or 24h BP outcome measures. RESULTS HIIT was found to be superior to MICT for reducing night-time diastolic BP (ES: -0.456, 95% CI: -0.826 to -0.086mmHg; P=0.016). A near-significant greater reduction in daytime systolic (ES: -0.349, 95% CI: -0.740 to 0.041mmHg; p=0.079) and diastolic BP was observed with HIIT compared to MICT (ES: -0.349, 95% CI: -0.717 to 0.020mmHg; p=0.063). No significant difference was found for other BP responses or arterial stiffness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS HIIT leads to a superior reduction in night-time diastolic BP compared to MICT. Furthermore, a near-significant greater reduction in daytime BP was found with HIIT compared to MICT. No significant difference was observed for changes to central arterial stiffness between HIIT and MICT.