-
1.
Design and Rationale of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study Evaluating Dociparstat in Acute Lung Injury Associated with Severe COVID-19.
Lasky, JA, Fuloria, J, Morrison, ME, Lanier, R, Naderer, O, Brundage, T, Melemed, A
Advances in therapy. 2021;(1):782-791
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and the consequent morbidity and mortality attributable to progressive hypoxemia and subsequent respiratory failure threaten to overrun hospital critical care units globally. New agents that address the hyperinflammatory "cytokine storm" and hypercoagulable pathology seen in these patients may be a promising approach to treat patients, minimize hospital stays, and ensure hospital wards and critical care units are able to operate effectively. Dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with robust anti-inflammatory properties, with the potential to address underlying causes of coagulation disorders with substantially reduced risk of bleeding compared to commercially available heparin. METHODS This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial to determine the safety and efficacy of DSTAT added to standard of care in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen. Phase 2 will enroll 12 participants in each of two dose-escalating cohorts to confirm the safety of DSTAT in this population. Following review of the data, an additional 50 participants will be enrolled. Contingent upon positive results, phase 3 will enroll approximately 450 participants randomized to DSTAT or placebo. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who survive and do not require mechanical ventilation through day 28. DISCUSSION Advances in standard of care, recent emergency use authorizations, and positive data with dexamethasone have likely contributed to an increasing proportion of patients who are surviving without the need for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, examining the time to improvement in the NIAID score will be essential to provide a measure of drug effect on recovery. Analysis of additional endpoints, including supportive biomarkers (e.g., IL-6, HMGB1, soluble-RAGE, D-dimer), will be performed to further define the effect of DSTAT in patients with COVID-19 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT04389840, Registered 13 May 2020.
-
2.
Heparinized saline versus normal saline for maintaining peripheral venous catheter patency in China: An open-label, randomized controlled study.
Xu, L, Hu, Y, Huang, X, Fu, J, Zhang, J
The Journal of international medical research. 2017;(2):471-480
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effects of heparin saline versus normal saline as locking solution for maintaining patency in peripheral venous catheters in Chinese patients. Methods This open-label, randomized controlled study was conducted in two hepatobiliary surgery wards, where patients received identical treatments, at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were randomly divided into a normal saline group (NS, 3 ml) or a heparin saline group (HS, 50 IU/ml, 3 ml) for catheter sealing. Results The study enrolled 286 patients and 609 peripheral venous catheters were included in the analysis. The patients in the two groups had no local infections or catheter-related bloodstream infections. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of catheter obstruction, duration time, or the rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and accidental catheter removal. Conclusions No significant differences in the peripheral venous catheter sealing effects were observed between normal saline and heparin saline usage in Chinese patients.
-
3.
A noninferiority trial comparing a heparin-grafted membrane plus citrate-containing dialysate versus regional citrate anticoagulation: results of the CiTED study.
Meijers, B, Metalidis, C, Vanhove, T, Poesen, R, Kuypers, D, Evenepoel, P
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;(4):707-714
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anticoagulation is a prerequisite for successful haemodialysis. Heparin and low-molecular weight heparins are routinely used despite increased bleeding risk. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is efficacious, but is laborious and may induce metabolic disturbances. Heparin-grafted membranes are less efficacious. It is not known whether combining citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid anticoagulation strategy. METHODS We performed a randomized crossover noninferiority trial, with a prespecified noninferiority threshold of 10% in maintenance dialysis patients ( n = 25). We compared the combination of citrate-containing dialysate plus a heparin-grafted membrane [CiTrate and EvoDial (CiTED) protocol] with RCA. The primary endpoint was completion of dialysis without significant clotting. Secondary endpoints included time to clotting, achieved Kt / V urea , loss of total cell volume, venous air chamber clotting score and systemic-ionized calcium concentration. RESULTS In total, 1284 sessions were performed according to study protocol, 636 in the CiTED arm and 648 in the RCA arm. The primary outcome of preterm interruption due to clotting occurred in 36 (5.7%) of sessions in the CiTED arm, and in 40 (6.2%) sessions in the RCA arm, thereby meeting noninferiority criteria (P < 0.0001). Most of the clotting events occurred in the fourth hour of dialysis. Repetitive clotting occurred in four patients in the CiTED arm and one patient in the RCA arm. Time to preterm interruption due to clotting and achieved Kt / V urea was not significantly different. Systemic-ionized calcium levels during treatment were significantly lower in the RCA arm and clinically relevant hypocalcaemia was noted only in the RCA arm. CONCLUSION The combination of citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid alternative to RCA.
-
4.
Taurolidine-citrate-heparin lock reduces catheter-related bloodstream infections in intestinal failure patients dependent on home parenteral support: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Tribler, S, Brandt, CF, Petersen, AH, Petersen, JH, Fuglsang, KA, Staun, M, Broebech, P, Moser, CE, Jeppesen, PB
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;(3):839-848
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Background: In patients with intestinal failure who are receiving home parenteral support (HPS), catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) inflict health impairment and high costs.Objective: This study investigates the efficacy and safety of the antimicrobial catheter lock solution, taurolidine-citrate-heparin, compared with heparin 100 IE/mL on CRBSI occurrence.Design: Forty-one high-risk patients receiving HPS followed in a tertiary HPS unit were randomly assigned in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. External, stratified randomization was performed according to age, sex, and prior CRBSI incidence. The prior CRBSI incidence in the study population was 2.4 episodes/1000 central venous catheter (CVC) days [95% Poisson confidence limits (CLs): 2.12, 2.71 episodes/1000 CVC days]. The maximum treatment period was 2 y or until occurrence of a CRBSI or right-censoring because of CVC removal. The exact permutation tests were used to calculate P values for the log-rank tests.Results: Twenty patients received the taurolidine-citrate-heparin lock and 21 received the heparin lock, with 9622 and 6956 treatment days, respectively. In the taurolidine-citrate-heparin arm, no CRBSIs occurred, whereas 7 CRBSIs occurred in the heparin arm, with an incidence of 1.0/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.4, 2.07/1000 CVC days; P = 0.005). The CVC removal rates were 0.52/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.17, 1.21/1000 CVC days) and 1.72/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.89, 3.0/1000 CVC days) in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin and heparin arm, respectively, tending to prolong CVC survival in the taurolidine arm (P = 0.06). Costs per treatment year were lower in the taurolidine arm (€2348) than in the heparin arm (€6744) owing to fewer admission days related to treating CVC-related complications (P = 0.02).Conclusions: In patients with intestinal failure who are life dependent on HPS, the taurolidine-citrate-heparin catheter lock demonstrates a clinically substantial and cost-beneficial reduction of CRBSI occurrence in a high-risk population compared with heparin. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01948245.
-
5.
Is inhaled prophylactic heparin useful for prevention and Management of Pneumonia in ventilated ICU patients?: The IPHIVAP investigators of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group.
Bandeshe, H, Boots, R, Dulhunty, J, Dunlop, R, Holley, A, Jarrett, P, Gomersall, CD, Lipman, J, Lo, T, O'Donoghue, S, et al
Journal of critical care. 2016;:95-102
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether prophylactic inhaled heparin is effective for the prevention and treatment of pneumonia patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit. METHODS A phase 2, double blind randomized controlled trial stratified for study center and patient type (non-operative, post-operative) was conducted in three university-affiliated intensive care units. Patients aged ≥18years and requiring invasive MV for more than 48hours were randomized to usual care, nebulization of unfractionated sodium heparin (5000 units in 2mL) or placebo nebulization with 0.9% sodium chloride (2mL) four times daily with the main outcome measures of the development of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator associated complication (VAC) and sequential organ failure assessment scores in patients with pneumonia on admission or who developed VAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000038897. RESULTS Two hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled (72 usual care, 71 inhaled sodium heparin, 71 inhaled sodium chloride). There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of the development of VAP, using either Klompas criteria (6-7%, P=1.00) or clinical diagnosis (24-26%, P=0.85). There was no difference in the clinical consistency (P=0.70), number (P=0.28) or the total volume of secretions per day (P=.54). The presence of blood in secretions was significantly less in the usual care group (P=0.005). CONCLUSION Nebulized heparin cannot be recommended for prophylaxis against VAP or to hasten recovery from pneumonia in patients receiving MV.
-
6.
Gender Differences in Associations Between Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adverse Outcomes.
Schoos, MM, Mehran, R, Dangas, GD, Yu, J, Baber, U, Clemmensen, P, Feit, F, Gersh, BJ, Guagliumi, G, Ohman, EM, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2016;(11):1661-1668
Abstract
Women are frequently reported to have increased morbidity after presentation with acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction; however, whether a greater thrombotic tendency contributes to gender differences in clinical outcomes of urgent percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events (IPTEs) are defined as new or increasing thrombus, abrupt vessel closure, no reflow or slow reflow, or distal embolization at any time during percutaneous coronary intervention. IPTEs were evaluated in this pooled analysis of 6,591 patients with stent implantation and blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis, from the ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI trials. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year follow-up and major bleeding at 30 days according to gender and the presence or absence of IPTE. IPTE was identified in 507 patients (7.7%), with 119 of 1,744 (6.8%) occurring in women and 388 of 4,847 (8.0%) in men (p = 0.12). IPTE, but not gender, was independently associated with MACE at in-hospital and 30-day follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard of MACE was higher in women and in patients with IPTE; however, the risk of MACE associated with IPTE was similar among women and men. There was no significant interaction between IPTE and gender for 1-year MACE or 30-day bleeding. IPTE predicted major bleeding only in women. In conclusion, in acute coronary syndromes, women have increased risk of adverse outcome at 1 year. IPTEs are common, occur at similar frequency, and are associated with similar degree of increased MACE in both genders at short- and long-term follow-up. Higher thrombotic propensity does not offer a mechanistic explanation for the worse outcomes noted in women.
-
7.
Apixaban compared with parenteral heparin and/or vitamin K antagonist in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion: Rationale and design of the EMANATE trial.
Ezekowitz, MD, Pollack, CV, Sanders, P, Halperin, JL, Spahr, J, Cater, N, Petkun, W, Breazna, A, Kirchhof, P, Oldgren, J
American heart journal. 2016;:59-68
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke prevention in anticoagulation-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE To determine outcomes in anticoagulation-naïve patients (defined as those receiving an anticoagulant for <48 hours during the index episode of atrial fibrillation) scheduled for cardioversion. METHODS This is a randomized, prospective, open-label, real-world study comparing apixaban to heparin plus warfarin. Early image-guided cardioversion is encouraged. For apixaban, the usual dose is 5 mg BID with a dose reduction to 2.5 mg BID if 2 of the following are present: age >80 years, weight <60 kg, or serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. If cardioversion is immediate, a single starting dose of 10 mg (or 5 mg if the dose is down-titrated) of apixaban is administered. Cardioversion may be attempted up to 90 days after randomization. Patients are followed up for 30 days after cardioversion or 90 days postrandomization if cardioversion is not performed within that timeframe. Outcomes are stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeds, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and death, all adjudication-blinded. STATISTICS The warfarin-naive cohort from the ARISTOTLE study was considered the closest data set to the patients being recruited into this study. The predicted incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding within 30 days after randomization was approximately 0.75%. To adequately power for a noninferiority trial, approximately 48,000 participants would be needed, a number in excess of feasibility. The figure of 1,500 patients was considered clinically meaningful and achievable. CLINICAL CONTEXT This first prospective cardioversion study of a novel anticoagulant in anticoagulation-naïve patients should influence clinical practice.
-
8.
Vitamin E-Coated and Heparin-Coated Dialyzer Membranes for Heparin-Free Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial.
Islam, MS, Hassan, ZA, Chalmin, F, Vido, S, Berrada, M, Verhelst, D, Donnadieu, P, Moranne, O, Esnault, VL
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2016;(5):752-762
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodialysis requires effective anticoagulation to avoid blood circuit clotting. In patients at high risk for bleeding, several alternative methods have been developed. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover study evaluating the noninferiority of vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers in a 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis strategy. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS 32 adult long-term hemodialysis patients from 2 French hemodialysis units with well-functioning fistulas or double-lumen catheters. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to a first period using either vitamin E- or heparin-coated dialyzers. After a washout period of 2 hemodialysis sessions, each patient was switched to the alternative dialyzer for a second period. Each study period started with 2 hemodialysis sessions with reduced heparin dose (50% and 25% of usual heparin dose, respectively, for sessions 1 and 2) followed by 2 heparin-free sessions. OUTCOMES The primary end point was the percentage of successful study periods, defined as no circuit-clotting event leading to premature interruption of any of the 4 dialysis sessions. Secondary end points included total number and cumulative duration of hemodialysis sessions without clotting, number of saline solution flushes, dialysis circuit bubble trap status and dialyzer membrane status by visual inspection, and dialysis adequacy. RESULTS The percentage of success with vitamin E-coated dialyzers (25/32 study periods [78%]) was not inferior to that with heparin-coated dialyzers (26/32 study periods [81%]). Visual inspection showed equal numbers of clean dialysis circuit bubble traps (vitamin E-coated, 34/121; heparin-coated, 32/120), whereas clean fiber bundles were more frequently noted with the vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers (25/121 vs 2/120; P=0.002). LIMITATIONS Results may not extrapolate to critically ill patients. Differences in dialyzer transparency may account for visual inspection scores. CONCLUSIONS The success rate of 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis sessions is lower than that previously claimed in uncontrolled studies. Vitamin E-coated and heparin-coated dialyzers exposed patients to similar and unacceptable high failure rates. Further studies are required to improve heparin-free hemodialysis.
-
9.
Adequate Initial Heparin Dosage for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients Receiving Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.
Yamaji, H, Murakami, T, Hina, K, Higashiya, S, Kawamura, H, Murakami, M, Kamikawa, S, Komtasubara, I, Kusachi, S
Clinical drug investigation. 2016;(10):837-48
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE During atrial fibrillation ablation, heparin is required and is guided by the activated clotting time (ACT). Differences in the ACT before ablation and adequate initial heparin dosing in patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were examined. METHODS Patients who received warfarin (control, N = 90), dabigatran etexilate (N = 90), rivaroxaban (N = 90) and apixaban (N = 90) were studied. A 100 U/kg dose of heparin was administered as a reliable control dose for warfarin, and the remaining patients were randomly administered 110, 120 or 130 U/kg of heparin in each NOAC group, followed by a continuous heparin infusion. RESULTS Periprocedural thromboembolic and major bleeding were not observed. Minor bleeding occurred rarely without significant differences among the groups examined. Baseline ACTs were longer in the warfarin (152 ± 16 s) and dabigatran (153 ± 13 s) groups than in the rivaroxaban (134 ± 13 s) and apixaban (133 ± 20 s) groups. The initial bolus heparin dosages required to produce an ACT 15 min after the initial bolus that was identical to the control (333 ± 32 s) were 120 U/kg (318 ± 29 s) and 130 U/kg (339 ± 43 s) for dabigatran, 130 U/kg (314 ± 31 s) for rivaroxaban and 130 U/kg (317 ± 39 s) for apixaban. The NOAC groups required significantly larger doses of total heparin than the warfarin group. CONCLUSION The baseline ACTs differed among the three NOAC groups. The results of the comparison with warfarin (the control) indicated that dosages of 120 or 130 U/kg for dabigatran, and 130 U/kg for rivaroxaban and apixaban, were adequate initial heparin dosages.
-
10.
Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Stucker, F, Ponte, B, Tataw, J, Martin, PY, Wozniak, H, Pugin, J, Saudan, P
Critical care (London, England). 2015;(1):91
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A systemic anticoagulation is often required to prevent circuit and filter clotting in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). A regional citrate-based anticoagulation (RCA) does not induce a systemic anticoagulation and prolongs the filter lifespan, but metabolic side-effects have been associated with this therapy. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients requiring CRRT to determine whether RCA using a balanced predilution replacement fluid is more effective than heparin in terms of renal replacement delivered dose and safety profile. METHODS One hundred and three patients with AKI requiring CRRT were included. The patients were randomized to either CRRT with RCA or heparin anticoagulation. Primary endpoints were effective daily delivered RRT dose during the first 3 days of CRRT and filter lifespan. Secondary endpoints were 28-day and 90-day survival and severe metabolic complications and bleeding disorders. RESULTS Median CRRT duration was 3.0 (2-6) days. Effective delivered daily RRT doses were 29 ± 3 and 27 ± 5 mL/kg/hr in the RCA and heparin groups, respectively (p = 0.005). Filter lifespans were 49 ± 29 versus 28 ± 23 hrs in the RCA and heparin groups (p = 0.004). Survival rates at 28 and 90 days were 80-74% in the RCA and 74-73% in the heparin group. Electrolytes and acid-base disturbances were uncommon and transient in patients treated with RCA. CONCLUSIONS These results show that RCA is superior to heparin-based anticoagulation in terms of delivered RRT dose and filter life span and is a safe and feasible method. This does not translate into an improvement in short term survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01269112 . Registered 3rd January 2011.