-
1.
Evaluation of heparinized syringes for measuring newborn metabolites in neonates with a central arterial line.
Ryckman, KK, Ramesh, A, Cho, H, Oltman, SP, Rogers, EE, Dagle, JM, Jelliffe-Pawlowski, LL
Clinical biochemistry. 2022;:78-81
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Newborn metabolic screening is emerging as a novel method for predicting neonatal morbidity and mortality in neonates born very preterm (<32 weeks gestation). The purpose of our study was to determine if blood collected by an electrolyte-balanced dry lithium heparin syringe, as is routine for blood gas measurements, affects targeted metabolite and biomarker levels. Two blood samples (one collected with a heparinized syringe and the other with a non-heparinized syringe) were obtained at the same time from 20 infants with a central arterial line and tested for 49 metabolites and biomarkers using standard procedures for newborn screening. Overall, the median metabolite levels did not significantly differ by syringe type. However, there was wide variability, particularly for amino acids and immunoreactive trypsinogen, for individual paired samples and therefore, consideration should be given to sample collection when using these metabolites in prediction models of neonatal morbidity and mortality.
-
2.
Design and Rationale of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study Evaluating Dociparstat in Acute Lung Injury Associated with Severe COVID-19.
Lasky, JA, Fuloria, J, Morrison, ME, Lanier, R, Naderer, O, Brundage, T, Melemed, A
Advances in therapy. 2021;(1):782-791
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and the consequent morbidity and mortality attributable to progressive hypoxemia and subsequent respiratory failure threaten to overrun hospital critical care units globally. New agents that address the hyperinflammatory "cytokine storm" and hypercoagulable pathology seen in these patients may be a promising approach to treat patients, minimize hospital stays, and ensure hospital wards and critical care units are able to operate effectively. Dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with robust anti-inflammatory properties, with the potential to address underlying causes of coagulation disorders with substantially reduced risk of bleeding compared to commercially available heparin. METHODS This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial to determine the safety and efficacy of DSTAT added to standard of care in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen. Phase 2 will enroll 12 participants in each of two dose-escalating cohorts to confirm the safety of DSTAT in this population. Following review of the data, an additional 50 participants will be enrolled. Contingent upon positive results, phase 3 will enroll approximately 450 participants randomized to DSTAT or placebo. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who survive and do not require mechanical ventilation through day 28. DISCUSSION Advances in standard of care, recent emergency use authorizations, and positive data with dexamethasone have likely contributed to an increasing proportion of patients who are surviving without the need for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, examining the time to improvement in the NIAID score will be essential to provide a measure of drug effect on recovery. Analysis of additional endpoints, including supportive biomarkers (e.g., IL-6, HMGB1, soluble-RAGE, D-dimer), will be performed to further define the effect of DSTAT in patients with COVID-19 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT04389840, Registered 13 May 2020.
-
3.
Combination of dociparstat sodium (DSTAT), a CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibitor, with azacitidine for the treatment of hypomethylating agent refractory AML and MDS.
Huselton, E, Rettig, MP, Campbell, K, Cashen, AF, DiPersio, JF, Gao, F, Jacoby, MA, Pusic, I, Romee, R, Schroeder, MA, et al
Leukemia research. 2021;:106713
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Leukemia stem cells utilize cell adhesion molecules like CXCR4/CXCL12 to home to bone marrow stromal niches where they are maintained in a dormant, protected state. Dociparstat sodium (DSTAT, CX-01) is a low anticoagulant heparin with multiple mechanisms of action, including inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis, blocking HMGB1, and binding platelet factor 4 (PF-4). We conducted a pilot study adding DSTAT to azacitidine for patients with AML or MDS unresponsive to or relapsed after prior hypomethylating agent therapy, hypothesizing that DSTAT may improve response rates. Twenty patients were enrolled, with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and 6 cycles of prior hypomethylating agents. Among fifteen patients evaluable for response, there was 1 complete remission, and 3 marrow complete remissions, for a response rate of 27 % among evaluable patients (20 % overall). Hematologic improvement was observed in 5 additional patients. The median overall survival for all enrolled patients was 205 days (95 % CI 119-302). While cytopenias and infections were common, these were not out of proportion to what would be expected in this population of patients undergoing treatment with azacitidine alone. In summary, this trial demonstrated the feasibility of combining DSTAT with azacitidine, with several responses observed, suggesting this combination warrants further study.
-
4.
Dosing lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and normal or impaired renal function: a single-center experience with 68 patients.
Tschudi, M, Lämmle, B, Alberio, L
Blood. 2009;(11):2402-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The recommended dose (bolus 0.4 mg/kg followed by 0.15 mg/kg per hour) of lepirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor licensed for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is too high. Starting in 2001, we omitted the bolus and reduced maintenance dose by at least one-third. Analyzing 53 HIT patients treated between January 2001 and February 2007, we observed that therapeutic anticoagulation intensity already 4 hours after lepirudin start had been reached with the following initial lepirudin doses (median): 0.078 mg/kg per hour [creatinine clearance (CrCl) more than 60 mL/min], 0.040 mg/kg per hour (CrCl 30-60 mL/min), and 0.013 mg/kg per hour (CrCl < 30 mL/min). The efficacy of this treatment was documented by increasing platelets and decreasing D-dimers. Based on this experience, we derived a lepirudin dosing regimen, which was prospectively evaluated treating 15 HIT patients between March 2007 and February 2008. We show that omitting the initial lepirudin bolus and administering 0.08 mg/kg per hour in patients with CrCl more than 60 mL/min, 0.04 mg/kg per hour in patients with CrCl 30-60 mL/min, and 0.01 to 0.02 mg/kg per hour in those with CrCl less than 30 mL/min is efficacious and safe, as documented by increasing platelet counts, decreasing D-dimer levels, and rare thrombotic (1 of 46) and major bleeding (4 of 46) complications.
-
5.
Intralipid/heparin infusion suppresses serum leptin in humans.
Garcia-Lorda, P, Nash, W, Roche, A, Pi-Sunyer, FX, Laferrere, B
European journal of endocrinology. 2003;(6):669-76
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Our previous studies showed that administration of dexamethasone plus food increased serum leptin levels 100% more than dexamethasone alone. We hypothesized that this increase in leptin from the meal could result directly from the provision of fuel metabolites rather than from the meal-induced rise in insulin. In the current study, we tested the effect of an i.v. lipid fuel source (Intralipid 20%/heparin) that would incur only a modest increase in insulin. This study was undertaken because the role of lipid in the regulation of human leptin levels has been controversial, with differing effects reported: stimulatory, inhibitory, or no effect at all. METHODS In order to evaluate how lipids affect serum leptin in humans, we administered the following to seven lean, healthy, fasting subjects: (i) Intralipid 20% at 0.83 ml/kg.h plus heparin (800 IE/h) infused i.v. for 7 h (LIPID), (ii) LIPID with one initial pulse of insulin (0.09 U/kg) given s.c. (LIPID+INS), (iii) LIPID with dexamethasone (2 mg i.v. push) given at the start of the infusion (LIPID+DEX), and (iv) LIPID with insulin plus dexamethasone (LIPID+INS+DEX). Control trials in another 14 subjects matched hormonal conditions but lacked the LIPID infusion. Blood levels were collected over 8 h for determination of free fatty acids (FFA), glucose, insulin, and leptin under each experimental condition. RESULTS Over the 420 min of LIPID infusion, FFA levels rose four-fold from 0.28+/-0.05 mmol/l to 0.99+/-0.05 mmol/l. Serum leptin levels were suppressed by 10-20% in the LIPID condition as compared with control (no LIPID) between 90 min (P=0.008) and 360 min (P=0.045). LIPID+DEX did not increase leptin. A pulse of insulin (INS) increased serum insulin levels to 49.9+/-6.1 U/ml at 90 min and increased serum leptin by 21.3+/-6.6% at 480 min (P=0.054). LIPID decreased leptin in the face of this insulin-induced increase (LIPID+INS), between 360 min (P=0.017) and 420 min (P=0.003), with a 23% suppressive effect at 420 min. LIPID+DEX elevated leptin levels by 112.5+/-35.8% at 480 min (P=0.037), however, the Intralipid/heparin infusion did not blunt the rise of leptin under these conditions. CONCLUSIONS These data showed that Intralipid/heparin: (i) are not sufficient to trigger the effect of dexamethasone on leptin, (ii) have an acute inhibitory effect on both fasting and insulin-stimulated leptin levels, and (iii) that this inhibitory effect cannot reverse the strong stimulatory effect of dexamethasone and insulin on serum leptin.
-
6.
[Use of a combination of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin and abciximab during percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized pilot study].
Galeote, G, Hussein, M, Sobrino, N, Calvo, L, Sánchez-Recalde, A, Sobrino, JA
Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2002;(12):1261-6
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The cumulative experience gleaned from the NICE trials suggests that adjunctive enoxaparin therapy for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with or without concomitant abciximab therapy, is both safe and effective. However, no randomized studies have been conducted to compare the two strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of combined enoxaparin-abciximab compared with standard therapy using unfractionated heparin and abciximab. PATIENTS AND METHOD Ninety-nine patients undergoing PTCA were randomly assigned to receive either enoxaparin (enoxaparin group, 50 patients, 0.75 mg/kg) or unfractionated heparin (UH group, 49 patients, 70 U/kg) in an intravenous bolus. Both groups received standard abciximab treatment. The aPTT, creatine kinase (CPK), MB, troponin I, hemoglobin, and platelet count were determined 5 h and 17 h after PTCA. Endpoints were major bleeding and clinical or biochemical in-hospital events. RESULTS There was less major bleeding in the enoxaparin group than in the UH group (1 vs 4) but the difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the frequency of in-hospital clinical events. There was a lower increase in aPTT at 5 h in the enoxaparin vs UH group (p = 0.02). It was impossible to remove the introducer in 7 of the UH group patients due to aPTT > 60 s as opposed to 1 patient in the enoxaparin group. Post-procedural CK elevation occurred in 8.0% of the enoxaparin group and in 6.1% of the UH group (p = NS). No thrombocytopenia was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS Combined enoxaparin-abciximab as an adjuvant therapy during PTCA was safe and associated with a low incidence of major bleeding, major ischemic in-hospital events, and post-procedural CPK elevation.
-
7.
Escin/diethylammonium salicylate/heparin combination gels for the topical treatment of acute impact injuries: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study.
Wetzel, D, Menke, W, Dieter, R, Smasal, V, Giannetti, B, Bulitta, M
British journal of sports medicine. 2002;(3):183-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of escin-containing gels in the topical treatment of blunt impact injuries. METHODS Competitors in soccer, handball, or karate competitions were enrolled within two hours of sustaining a strain, sprain, or contusion and treated three times with the trial gel within a period of eight hours. Patients were randomised to three parallel groups consisting of two active treatment gels, containing escin (1% or 2%), 5% diethylammonium salicylate, and 5000 IU heparin, or placebo gel. Tenderness produced by pressure was measured at 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after enrollment (within two hours of the injury). Tenderness was defined as the amount of pressure (measured by a calibrated caliper at the centre of the injury) that first produced a pain reaction as reported by the patient. RESULTS A total of 158 patients were enrolled; 156 were evaluated in the intention to treat analysis. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for tenderness over a six hour period. The gel preparations containing 1% and 2% escin were significantly more effective (a priori ordered hypotheses testing controlling the multiple alpha = 5% significance level) than placebo (p(1) = 0.0001 and p(2) = 0.0002 respectively). The treatment effects were 5.7 kp h/cm(2) (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 8.5) and 5.9 kilopond (kp) h/cm(2) (95% CI 2.9 to 8.8) between 1% escin and placebo and between 2% escin and placebo respectively. These results were supported by secondary efficacy variables. The time to reach the baseline contralateral tenderness value (resolution of pain) at the injured site was shorter in the treatment groups than in the placebo group (p<0.0001). Both active gel preparations produced more rapid pain relief than the placebo gel. No relevant differences were detected between the two active gels. The safety and tolerability of the escin-containing gels were excellent. CONCLUSIONS Escin/diethylammonium salicylate/heparin combination gel preparations are effective and safe for the treatment of blunt impact injuries.
-
8.
Subcutaneous heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of the canadian colorectal DVT prophylaxis trial: a randomized, double-blind trial.
McLeod, RS, Geerts, WH, Sniderman, KW, Greenwood, C, Gregoire, RC, Taylor, BM, Silverman, RE, Atkinson, KG, Burnstein, M, Marshall, JC, et al
Annals of surgery. 2001;(3):438-44
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of low-dose unfractionated heparin and a low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery. METHODS In a multicenter, double-blind trial, patients undergoing resection of part or all of the colon or rectum were randomized to receive, by subcutaneous injection, either calcium heparin 5,000 units every 8 hours or enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (plus two additional saline injections). Deep vein thrombosis was assessed by routine bilateral contrast venography performed between postoperative day 5 and 9, or earlier if clinically suspected. RESULTS Nine hundred thirty-six randomized patients completed the protocol and had an adequate outcome assessment. The venous thromboembolism rates were the same in both groups. There were no deaths from pulmonary embolism or bleeding complications. Although the proportion of all bleeding events in the enoxaparin group was significantly greater than in the low-dose heparin group, the rates of major bleeding and reoperation for bleeding were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS Both heparin 5,000 units subcutaneously every 8 hours and enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily provide highly effective and safe prophylaxis for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, given the current differences in cost, prophylaxis with low-dose heparin remains the preferred method at present.
-
9.
Increased thromboxane production in women with a history of venous thromboembolic event: effect of heparins.
Kaaja, R, Pettilä, V, Leinonen, P, Ylikorkala, O
British journal of haematology. 2001;(3):655-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We investigated the production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in pregnant women with a previous venous thromboembolic event before, during and after the use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin). Twenty women were studied before starting heparin prophylaxis (before 20 weeks of gestation), during heparin prophylaxis (at 30 weeks of gestation) and after heparin prophylaxis (16 weeks after delivery). Ten pregnant women with no history of thromboembolism were studied as the control group. Urinary output of the stable metabolite of prostacyclin (2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha) and that of thromboxane A2 (2,3-dinor-TxB2), as well as a number of markers of thrombophilia were measured and expressed as mean (+/-SEM). Women with a history of thromboembolism were characterized by normal prostacyclin production but elevated thromboxane production (44.0 +/- 4.1 versus 19.0 +/- 3.6 ng/mmol creatinine, P < 0.001) at 12 weeks of pregnancy. Heparin prophylaxis (regardless of the type) had abolished elevated thromboxane concentrations at 30 weeks of gestation. Four months after delivery, thromboxane dominance had returned (25.2 +/- 3.5 versus 13.6 +/- 2.1 ng/mmol creatinine, P < 0.01). The presence of hereditary thrombophilia (9/20) was not associated with any changes in prostanoid concentrations. Thus, women with a history of venous thromboembolic events have thromboxane dominance during and after pregnancy, but this dominance can be eliminated through the use of heparins.
-
10.
Heparin-coated Wiktor stents in human coronary arteries (MENTOR trial). MENTOR Trial Investigators.
Vrolix, MC, Legrand, VM, Reiber, JH, Grollier, G, Schalij, MJ, Brunel, P, Martinez-Elbal, L, Gomez-Recio, M, Bär, FW, Bertrand, ME, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2000;(4):385-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of elective stenting with heparin-coated Wiktor stents in patients with coronary artery disease. In experimental studies, heparin coating has been shown to prevent subacute thrombosis and restenosis. Recently, a new method of heparin coating was developed, resulting in a more stable and predictable heparin layer on stent devices. This trial constitutes the first in-human use of this coating procedure, applied on the well-known Wiktor stent device. Heparin-coated Wiktor stent implantation was performed in 132 consecutive patients (132 lesions) in a multicenter international trial from September 1996 to February 1997. Forty-three percent of patients had unstable angina, 33% had previous myocardial infarction, and 10% had diabetes mellitus. Patients were followed for 12 months for occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, and 96% of the eligible patients underwent quantitative angiographic control at 6 months. Stent deployment was successful in 95.5% of lesions. Minimal lumen diameter increased by 1.67 +/- 0.48 mm (from 1.02 +/- 0.38 mm before to 2.69 +/- 0.37 mm after the stent implantation). Mean percent diameter stenosis decreased from 67.4 +/- 11.3% before to 18.9 +/- 7.7% after the intervention. A successful intervention (<50% diameter stenosis and no major adverse cardiac events within 30 days) occurred in 97% of the patients. The subacute thrombosis rate was 0.8%, which compares favorably with historical controls of this stent, and a low incidence of postprocedural increase in creatine kinase-MB was noted. At 6 months, event-free survival was 85% and angiographic restenosis rate was 22% with late loss of 0.78 +/- 0.69 mm and a loss index of 0.48 +/- 0.44. Heparin-coated Wiktor stents appeared to be an efficacious device to treat Benestent-like lesions, yielding angiographic and clinical results comparable to a heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent. Despite its use in more complex lesions, the incidence of subacute thrombosis appeared to be lower than historical controls with a similar noncoated stent.